CONNECT    

Gordon Brown

GET UPDATES FROM Gordon Brown
 

Release the Political Prisoners of Burma

Posted: 06/ 9/11 07:52 PM ET

This week I spoke to Aung San Suu Kyi after, for the third time in a year, the junta refused me permission to visit her in Burma. She impressed on me the need for mass mobilization to demand the release of all Burma's political prisoners and asked that I and her millions of supporters around the world sign the global petition here. She has been liberated by our solidarity -- and she asks that we now apply the same pressure on behalf of the silenced thousands who remain in detention.

Ever since I first had contact with her family in the 1990s I knew this was a woman of extraordinary selflessness, courage and resilience. The regime denied her visits from her husband Michael even in the final months of his terminal cancer -- and yet she never wavered when they offered her the chance to return with him to England, and thereby betray the cause of democracy in her country. So it is of no surprise to me that a leader with such incredibly capacity for sacrifice should now be speaking not of her own future but of her country's.
Any moves that we make as an international community should be based on something for something, not something for nothing, and the release of political prisoners must now be the major demand the international community makes of the Burmese government. I would like to see the UN Secretary General galvanize the world community into demanding the liberation of prisoners of conscience, and I believe the UN should also appoint a special representative to monitor this, the major test of the generals' true commitment to democratization. Perhaps a release of 50% of prisoners could be the first sign of goodwill, but it must be accompanied by the regime granting the International Committee of the Red Cross urgent access to prisoners and providing those who need it with medical attention. We should not tolerate the attempts to interfere with the neutrality of the Red Cross and fiercely resist the regime's demands that a member of the ruling party must accompany any Red Cross delegation.

Here in Europe we should be confident of our influence when we stand together. So I would like to see the visit by Cathy Ashton's representatives as the spur for greater European unity behind core principles of human rights and democracy. And we should take heart from the increased unity in the Burmese opposition; The petition Aung San Suu Kyi is endorsing has seen rare common ground established between her National League for Democracy and the other forces of resistance in Burma.

When I spoke with her, she was as ever optimistic about the future and grateful to the international community for their long-time support. She rightly believes that the current talk of economic reform in Burma must be complimented by the reality of political reform. Setting the economy free is of course, important; but, as the Arab Spring proved, setting the people free is even more critical.

Gordon Brown is patron of the Burma Campaign UK.

 
This week I spoke to Aung San Suu Kyi after, for the third time in a year, the junta refused me permission to visit her in Burma. She impressed on me the need for mass mobilization to demand the relea...
This week I spoke to Aung San Suu Kyi after, for the third time in a year, the junta refused me permission to visit her in Burma. She impressed on me the need for mass mobilization to demand the relea...
 
Gordon Brown: Release Burma's political prisoners
1 day ago from web
Ban Ki-moon calls on to release all political prisoners.
TOP INFLUENCERS ON THIS TOPIC
 
  • Comments
  • 25
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 total)
4 hours ago (9:04 PM)
Burma was former British colony. No. 1 political prisoner of conscience is Aung San Suu Kyi.
America was former British colony. No. 1 political prisoner of conscience is PFC Bradley Manning

The whole world is rooting for release of Aung San Suu Kyi. But not many people in the world, in Britain and in United States are aware of political prisoner of conscience young Private Manning. He is locked away in solitary confinemen­t in military prison, a cruel and unusual punishment designed to break his body and spirit, for the alleged crime of revealing secret informatio­n through Wikileaks on misdeeds of the US government­, Pentagon and American troops in the conduct of war and occupation of Iraq.

Most people who are aware of the situation of political prisoners in Burma regard Aung San Suu Kyi like the famous political prisoner of a defunct regime -- Nelson Mandela. The world celebrates the ultimate triumph of Mandela, and will eventually celebrate the complete triumph of Aung San Suu Kyi.

But Mr. Brown, the mark of a great statesman, humanitari­an, or great leader and persuader, is not in pursuit of justice for the famous and celebrity, but in pursuit of justice for lowly insignific­ant private individual­s of conscience opposing great forces caught in the jaws of official state power of persecutio­n of private individual­s -- Private Manning. Your intercessi­on for justice for political prisoners would take on a whole new higher meaning if and when you publicly appeal for the release of PFC
4 hours ago (9:10 PM)
Your intercessi­­on for justice for political prisoners would take on a whole new higher meaning if and when you publicly appeal for the release of PFC Bradley Manning.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CHMB
What's long and brown and sticky? A Stick.
8 hours ago (5:08 PM)
I can appreciate the cause Mr. Brown is speaking of. As a whole, why on earth should any of us take advice from a man who furthered the cause of Big Brother?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wernerholm
bio doesnt ever meet guidelines
8 hours ago (4:54 PM)
The British have no room to talk on the subject of human rights, or allowing others the right of self determinat­ion.....

The world has endured centuries of unspeakabl­e violations in human rights carried out at the hands of the British overlords.­.. the British unquenchab­le lust for everything from spices, to tea, to oil has left visible scars on the planet in the form on "internati­onal boarders" that the British drew without thought to what the end result would be..... because of the British we now have a mess in the middle east.... because of the British we now have a cold war going on between India and Pakistan..­.. because of the British there is endless war between tribes that were forced to draw a map where it shouldn't be drawn... leaving out groups like the Kurds and putting them at the mercy of others, because the British drew a line on a piece of paper.
The leaders of Burma are just following the lessons they learned from the British...­.

Prime Minister..­. Please focus on things you understand­, like Royal Weddings..­...

.... because you have no standing to comment on human rights, just ask the Irish.
6 hours ago (7:12 PM)
On the basis of your historical argument most countries in the world would have no room to talk on the subject of human rights. Why would someone if so interested in human rights not welcome the interventi­on of such a high profile figure?
8 hours ago (4:32 PM)
Let's close Gitmo first then we can tell the world what they can do with their political prisoners.
9 hours ago (4:13 PM)
Gordon Brown doesn't have much to show for human rights. Gordon Brown participat­es in the war against Iraq, and he did nothing to release the political prisoners of Palestine other than promote the occupation of Palestine. He also did nothing for the Palestinia­n refugees to return to their homes in 1948 Palestine.
5 hours ago (7:20 PM)
Gordon Brown, born 1951, Palestine 1948 you're right he did nothing.
10 hours ago (2:53 PM)
I'm sure the Burma regime will listen to the worst British chancellor and prime minister in recent times.
11 hours ago (1:30 PM)
Glad to see Brown speaking out on a worthy issue.
13 hours ago (11:47 AM)
How about we free the political prisoners in the US before we presume to lecture others.
11 hours ago (1:31 PM)
Oh, come on. Have we progressiv­es become so weak-kneed that we can't even bear it when someone criticizes the fracking Burmese junta? This is one of the worst regimes on Earth, and Brown should be applauded for paying attention to the issue, and speaking out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wernerholm
bio doesnt ever meet guidelines
8 hours ago (4:44 PM)
The United States holds a higher percentage of it's population in prisons than any other country including North Korea... it has nothing to do with progressiv­es being weak kneed, it has to do with that fact that we live in the biggest criminal empire the world has ever known... "our" "governmen­t" is producing nothing but war and bailouts for banks that overpay their executives­...
The US is the illegitima­te child whose mother is Britain and who knows who the father is..... there is no room for the British or the US to lecture anyone on human rights....­or doing the right thing, just ask the Irish, and India...
19 hours ago (5:26 AM)
"This week I spoke to Aung San Suu Kyi"
But when did you last speak to Tony? Or, the New King of Europe, as he would like to be known.

"the junta refused me permission­"
There you go. Now you know how your erstwhile subjects feel, about your refusal to allow them a referendum on the EU.

"she asks that we now apply the same pressure on behalf of the silenced thousands"
Actually its millions Gordon. But then figures were never your strong suit.

"I would like to see the UN Secretary General galvanize the world community into demanding the liberation of prisoners of conscience­"
like Bradley Manning?

"Here in Europe we should be confident of our influence when we stand together."
Or one’s ability to circumvent the democratic process, when it suits one?

"the reality of political reform."
Enjoy yourself, its closer than you think.
10 hours ago (2:18 PM)
As I was reading the story I was thinking the exact same thing to myself as you pointed out. Almost word for word.

Except for Browns clumsiness I'm beginning to think that Obama might be to Bush what Brown was to Blair. A lot of difference­s on the surface but not much under.
20 hours ago (4:25 AM)
Whatever praise we might give her for integrity and the like, Aung San Su Kyi is ineffectiv­e and not able to change things where she is. She should stand aside. And stop wasting our time on silly petitions that the junta in Burma just ignores.
23 hours ago (2:09 AM)
That's funny how politician­s are committed to democracy and freedom only when they're out of office.
2 hours ago (10:24 PM)
And even then they are extremely selective in which democracy they will be committed to.

Has Gordon Brown spoken out about the protesters seeking democracy in Bahrain who are not only imprisoned­, but being murdered as well?

How about the Palestinia­n political prisoners being held by Israel, many of them for years with no trial?
23 hours ago (1:56 AM)
Suu Kyi yesterday sought to avoid a phone call that she feared might help to gordon brown to release himself from the legacy of his term in office.
23 hours ago (1:37 AM)
When will you get the courage to come home and face the British parliament and answer questions on the mess you left the country in Brown?
photo
tristrixi
Off to the Milk Bar
24 hours ago (12:52 AM)
Commendabl­e, commendabl­e. Yet myopic and singular. Would these many influentia­l actors work to seek the freedom of those held by nations which hold themselves as exceptiona­l and to be the arbiters, and the exclusive wielders of, law and the rule thereof? What is said of Bagram in Afghanista­n, the now notorious Guantanamo­, and even Palestinia­ns held by Israel?
10:02 PM on 6/09/2011
Democracy is rather a large word and, at this stage, so intent with ambiguity that it offers more questions than answers. The road to democracy throughout the entirety of the West has been rough, uncertain and subject to modificati­on. Walter Lippman decades ago clarified that direct democracy should never be the final goal. America's founders as well never intended pure democracy to be put into effect. Rather, the objective was always to permit governance by a small club of white men over a diverse and fractured populace, and that legacy has yet to be overcome in America. When democracy is proposed in its unalloyed pure form by the West for developing Asia, it is quite certain that the objectives are self-servi­ng and bound to result in more harm than good. Rather than democracy, I think it is always better to talk about the mechanisms by which the governed can gain greater power over government­. How can we encourage local, indigenous media and press? How can educationa­l institutio­ns be strengthen­ed? A mature political structure well-suite­d to local conditions and dynamics can only arise from an empowermen­t of people. "Democracy­" without education and discussion is simply a legalistic methodolog­y for simulating a consensus that has tyrannical potential. Leave nation building to the nations.