CONNECT    

Arne Duncan May Use No Child Left Behind To Give Schools Relief From Mandates

Arne Duncan

By DORIE TURNER   06/12/11 12:25 AM ET   AP

-- Frustrated by what he called a "slow motion train wreck" for U.S. schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he will give schools relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind law if Congress drags its feet on the law's long-awaited overhaul and reauthorization.

That could mean everything from granting waivers on test score requirements to flexibility on how schools spend federal funding, though Duncan offered few details because he said the department is just beginning to work on its plan.

The Obama administration has called for an overhaul of the 9-year-old federal education law by the fall, but lawmakers have indicated that won't be possible. Duncan told reporters Friday that his first goal is for Congress to rewrite the law but he wants to put other plans in place in case that doesn't happen this year.

"This is absolutely plan B," Duncan said. "The prospect of doing nothing is what I'm fighting against."

Duncan has warned that 82 percent of U.S. schools could be labeled failures next year if No Child Left Behind isn't changed. Education experts have questioned that estimate.

Still, no one thinks states will meet the law's goal of having 100 percent of students proficient in math and reading by 2014. A school that fails to meet targets for several consecutive years faces sanctions that can include firing teachers or closing the school entirely.

And Duncan hasn't been shy about granting waivers. In 2009, he granted more than 300, significantly higher than the number given out a year earlier by his predecessor.

Federal lawmakers – even Democrats – aren't thrilled about Duncan's new plan after months of closed-door, bipartisan meetings hashing out changes to the law, which is four years overdue for reauthorization.

"It seems premature at this point to take steps outside the legislative process that would address NCLB's problems in a temporary and piecemeal way," said Senate education committee Chairman Tom Harkin, a Democrat from Iowa.

Story continues below

House education committee Chairman John Kline, a Republican from Minnesota, said he's slowed down the reauthorization process because Democrats on his committee "have really started to engage."

Kline plans to introduce a bill that would give local school districts more flexibility in how they spend federal money. For example, he would like to allow them to move money for teacher training to underfunded special education programs.

Republicans and Democrats agree the law is broken. The Bush-era legislation has led to schools being labeled failures even though they are making improvements, and has discouraged states from adopting higher standards.

Duncan said he's encouraged by talks with federal lawmakers in recent weeks indicating the law might see revisions this year. But he said he wants a backup plan in case that doesn't happen.

"We can't afford to do nothing," he said.

Duncan said the department is talking to state officials, teachers, principals and parents about how to help schools if the law isn't rewritten. He said any actions taken by the department would not prevent Congress from continuing to negotiate reauthorization.

The news comes as relief for governors, who say their schools should not be punished because of an outdated law. In Georgia, for example, the state Department of Education is creating a "performance index" that measures growth in academic achievement rather than just year-to-year test scores and looks at more subjects than just reading and math, the only two required under the federal law.

"I would like the flexibility to use this performance index as it focuses on what makes a school successful and academic growth in each area," said Gov. Nathan Deal.

But some observers say Duncan's plan might backfire with Congress because waivers aren't popular with lawmakers who want more accountability for schools.

"I don't get all the drama. It almost has the feel of a threat to Congress," said Sandy Kress, who served as an education adviser to President George W. Bush in the passage of No Child Left Behind in 2001. "One has to worry that what they're really saying is, `We're going to open up the candy store and let people in and they can have as much as they like.'"

___

Associated Press writer Chris Williams in Minneapolis, Minn., contributed to this report.

___

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

-- Frustrated by what he called a "slow motion train wreck" for U.S. schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he will give schools relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind law...
-- Frustrated by what he called a "slow motion train wreck" for U.S. schools, Education Secretary Arne Duncan said he will give schools relief from federal mandates under the No Child Left Behind law...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 39
  • Pending Comments
  • 2
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FogBelter
Illegitimis non carborundum
5 minutes ago (4:11 AM)
Everything in America is in crisis and requires corporate ... ehem ... expertise to set things right.

This game is so freaking transparen­t, and we will get the same high cost low quality outcomes with education that we get with everything else business gets involved in and inflicts its greed-base­d mediocrity upon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bkerensa
Technology Pundit & Social Media Guru
16 minutes ago (4:00 AM)
We really do need to improve our education.­.. Just the other day I was at a local "meetup" and a few people were dumbfounde­d when I informed them that they could set a wallpaper on their desktop. Later that evening someone asked me what Microsoft Office was.... This was by no means comedy and the group of people were mid-20's
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scandinavian007
29 minutes ago (3:48 AM)
Finland made a change tens of years ago ( in the 70's) to make sure education is number 1 priority in Finnish society. It did not happen waving a magic wand. Now we get rated top education system in the world year after year.

We might not have the most highly developed school rooms or most money used, but we have teachers that are highly respected and people are keen to become teachers because it is highly respected occupation­.

Just pointing out that it did not happen overnight in here. We have truly unbeliable education system but it required alot of hard work.

This might never happen in America where people usually wan't "fix it now" and also it requires people that not want to earn the "American dream : I want millions now"

It might be difficult for American schools that educate future teachers to compete for the best students when university students mainly just want to earn the big bucks.

Hopefully I am wrong.
photo
weebils
I like jalapenos and hot sauce
34 minutes ago (3:43 AM)
No Child Left behind has some good points.It is the only halfway decent thing Bush did. The problem is that local school boards are corrupt to the core. No one in this country wants to admit the level of corruption and political patronage. Giving states more flexibilit­y is not the answer. We need a nationwide standard and curriculum that everyone adheres to if they want federal dollars. The curriculum and standards should be very basic and simple. An ability to read and write, do basic math, understand basic scientific concepts, know basic history, and a physical/h­ealth test.  Schools going above that should be rewarded with additional funds.

This would create competitio­n amongst the schools and allow them to create additional programs that students are interested in. I would rather see an optional shop class where students learn to build things than just advanced geometry classes  where half the students fail and the ones who pass never use it again. In the meantime the law should get serious about coming down on parents who keep their kids out of school or send them to school dirty, hungry, and unprepared­. Nothing will change until you go after the parents and set simple standards nationwide­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heartsmindsvision
48 minutes ago (3:28 AM)
Every time I turn around the present admin. is doing everything that bush has done. Obama has continued the bush aganda and more. I'm sick.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Democratic Sanity Preferred
26 minutes ago (3:51 AM)
Well in this particular instance it is apparently congress holding up the changes that Obama has ordered be made on Bush's Program. So, no, Obama is not adopting Bush's program.
54 minutes ago (3:23 AM)
Eh, dare I point out the on-going success of the Quiet Time program promoted by the David Lynch Foundation­? http://www­.davidlync­hfoundatio­n.org
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fenriswolf26
1 hour ago (3:16 AM)
"The Obama administra­tion has called for an overhaul of the 9-year-old federal education law by the fall, but lawmakers have indicated that won't be possible."

Of course it won't be. Lawmakers are FAR too busy arguing such important business as Anthony Weiner's penis. They can't be bothered to muck around with things like education and the fact that a badly thought-ou­t law is about to fail perfectly acceptable schools.
1 hour ago (3:06 AM)
More parents should try homeschool­ing their children.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fenriswolf26
1 hour ago (3:07 AM)
...You might want to go catch that point. It just sailed clear over your head.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Democratic Sanity Preferred
24 minutes ago (3:53 AM)
I really don't know what to say to that.
1 hour ago (3:00 AM)
You get grades, schools included, to determine where you excel and where you have deficienci­es. A failing school highlights a problem that needs to be fixed. Lowering the bar to eliminate labeling a failing school as failing won't fix anything.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fenriswolf26
1 hour ago (3:06 AM)
The problem is that label of "failing." No matter what you believe, not every child in every school will be at grade level. It just doesn't work that way. Perfectly good schools that can't magically attain this magical, mythical stat are being labelled as "failing." They have students with learning disabiliti­es, with handicaps, kids who can be successful in their own way but of whom will never be academic, but somehow, magically, those kids are supposed to be performing at grade level--bec­ause a law says they should.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
spinotter11
Spinning through life and trying to understand it.
1 hour ago (2:55 AM)
Let me see. If students are performing poorly, let's rewrite the law to say that they are doing great work. Have I understood this article correctly?
1 hour ago (3:01 AM)
Right on! Bravo. This is what happens when you start playing soccer instead of baseball and you quit keeping score.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
fenriswolf26
1 hour ago (3:13 AM)
The law states that 100% of kids should be at grade level at such and such a time. If 100% of students are not, then schools are "failing." This, by the way, is measured on such impeccably accurate scales as standardiz­ed tests which, you know, 100% of students do well on 100% of the time and take 100% seriously. It also includes students whose greatest success in the classroom is being able to read at a 2nd grade level when they're 14 (for some students, this is a great accomplish­ment and represents years of hard work).

If schools do not reach this magical 100% of students being at grade level (kids with learning disabiliti­es and ESL kids included), then they will be "failing." Regardless of how the school is actually doing with the general population­.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Democratic Sanity Preferred
21 minutes ago (3:55 AM)
There is nothing in this article that actually explains the workings of much of anything. Any conclusion­s here are mostly assumption­s.
1 hour ago (2:51 AM)
Whatever happens, our school systems better start embracing critical thinking. While evaluation­s are necessary to weed out poorly performing teachers, a wiser system must be installed in order for every teacher to get a fair and accurate report. When mandates are increased, special ed students are not properly classified­, less time is given to teachers for planning, and a bureaucrat­ic system built on mistrustin­g educators, creativity suffers. Without creativity in the classroom and trusting our teachers..­.we all go down.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
Democratic Sanity Preferred
20 minutes ago (3:56 AM)
Fanned
2 hours ago (2:45 AM)
Maybe the root trouble is waiting -- for someone else to fix it. Volunteer. Anything else is inaction.
2 hours ago (2:45 AM)
Arne Duncan is just horrible. He is an enabler for the dismantlin­g of what was once America's jewel: public education. So what if the country is experienci­ng The Great Unravling; there are a few things you fight for to the end.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hawkseye
we have nothing to fear but fear itself
2 hours ago (2:40 AM)
Discussion­s about letting people into the "candy store" demonstrat­e how little officials know about teaching and how to improve education.
2 hours ago (2:36 AM)
I live in a working class community that has been absolutely inundated with masses of first generation immigrants­. I feel sorry for the remaining native born kids who now must struggle while teachers scramble to meet the needs of the foreign born, slowing down the pace of instructio­n and foregoing individual­ized attention.