advertisement
May 26, 2011 7:44 AM PDT

Security researcher finds 'cookiejacking' risk in IE

A security researcher in Italy has discovered a flaw in Internet Explorer that he says could enable hackers to steal cookies from a PC and then log onto password-protected Web sites.

Referring to the exploit as "cookiejacking," Rosario Valotta claims that a zero-day vulnerability found in every version of Microsoft's IE under any version of Windows allows an attacker to hijack any cookie for any Web site.

Demonstrating his findings at security conferences this month in Switzerland and Amsterdam, Valotta acknowledges that to exploit the hole, the hacker must employ a bit of social engineering because the victim must drag and drop an object across the PC for the cookie to be stolen.

But Valotta said he was able to devise the right type of challenge on a Facebook page that required people to drag and drop an object by undressing an onscreen photo of a woman, noted Reuters, thus allowing him to capture their Facebook credentials via a cookie.

"I published this game online on Facebook and in less than three days, more than 80 cookies were sent to my server," he said, according to Reuters. "And I've only got 150 friends."

From its point of view, Microsoft doesn't see much real-world risk to cookiejacking.

"Given the level of required user interaction, this issue is not one we consider high risk in the way a remote code execution would possibly be to users," Microsoft spokesman Jerry Bryant said in a statement sent to CNET.

"In order to possibly be impacted a user must visit a malicious Web site, be convinced to click and drag items around the page and the attacker would need to target a cookie from the Web site that the user was already logged into," added Microsoft. "We encourage all customers to protect themselves against potential issues by avoiding clicking on suspicious links and e-mails, as well as adjusting Internet settings to higher security levels."

Updated 8:50am PT with Microsoft statement sent to CNET.

E-mail Lance Whitney

If you have a question or comment for Lance Whitney, you can submit it here. However, because our editors and writers receive hundreds of requests, we cannot tell you when you may receive a response.

Submit your question or comment here: 0 of 1500 characters

Lance Whitney wears a few different technology hats--journalist, Web developer, and software trainer. He's a contributing editor for Microsoft TechNet Magazine and writes for other computer publications and Web sites. Lance is a member of the CNET Blog Network, and he is not an employee of CNET.

Recent posts from Security
Anonymous targeting Federal Reserve in next attack
LulzSec targets video game maker ZeniMax Media
EU nations give nod to tougher penalties for cybercrimes
Turkey arrests 32 after Anonymous' Web attacks
Sony's hacking woes mount after PSN breach (roundup)
Anonymous takes down Spanish police site
Reports: International Monetary Fund suffers network break-in
Arrests in Spain don't mean Sony's troubles are over
Add a Comment (Log in or register) (23 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
by Atofose (876 comments ) May 26, 2011 7:58 AM PDT
WHO TOLD YOU YOU COULD STEAL MY COOKIES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111111!!!11111
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by ChSchuldiner (335 comments ) May 26, 2011 9:28 AM PDT
Microsoft did
3 people like this comment
by solitare_pax (5083 comments ) May 26, 2011 10:14 AM PDT
Come over to the dark side - we have cookies.
8 people like this comment
by Super2online (1808 comments ) May 26, 2011 8:01 AM PDT
Not that this issue shouldn't be looked into but how long does he think a page that includes an image of a women that can be undressed going to last on Facebook? My guess is about as long as it takes for Facebook to find out about it, which isn't going to be long with 700 million users on board. Better go back to the drawing board on that one buddy and come up with a more viable scenario that really convinces someone this is a threat that should be taken seriously.
Reply to this comment
by Renegade Knight (7688 comments ) May 26, 2011 9:10 AM PDT
The problem is far simpler than that partcilar facebook app. You just need to find a way to exploit the security hole. Last time I checked I clicked all over the screen on my browser while surfing, reading email and such. It's not a stretch to think it's possible to create a click here to drag there app that would work well enough.
5 people like this comment
by n3td3v (2710 comments ) May 26, 2011 9:05 AM PDT
According to Valdis Kletnieks we shouldn't take people with Google Sites pages seriously. [1]

[1] http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-May/081067.html

Funny, just after he said this on Full-disclosure mailing list, someone post a credible threat on a Google Sites page. [2]

[2] http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2011-May/081066.html

Someone wanted to make you look stupid Valdisk ;)
Reply to this comment 2 people like this comment
by ValdisK (4 comments ) May 26, 2011 10:22 AM PDT
Usually, I don't feed trolls, but n3td3v really needs to work on reading comprehension. What I *said* on the link he quoted was: "Full-disclosure doesn't usually take security groups that only have a Google hosting presence very seriously." That's a fairly important 'only', especially when you look at his second link, which was Valotta's announcement that he had presented it at two security conferences. And keep in mind that n3td3v is mentioning this *in response to a CNET article* about Valotta's research. So it isn't like Valotta has *only* a Google Sites page.

Nice try, but intentionally misquoting me and then using a non-applicable example as evidence doesn't win you many points in the "making me look stupid" category.
by n3td3v (2710 comments ) May 26, 2011 12:30 PM PDT
Anyone reading you on Full-disclosure from day to day would pretty much describe you as a troll.

*Bringing people down all the time.

*Using your .edu when you aren't a professor etc.

*Sitting on the list for years with some delusion you are influential.

I could go on...
1 person likes this comment
by ValdisK (4 comments ) May 26, 2011 1:05 PM PDT
And yet, although you believe me not influential, you felt a need to reference me in regards to Valotta's research. Odd, that...
by Atofose (876 comments ) May 27, 2011 6:52 AM PDT
I could also go on how Net is a delusion nut case that believes in aliens and is paranoid about the CIA Google along with unicorns and is scared of butterflies (yes i can make up $h1T facts up to Net...

Time for your tranq shot.... go back to bed.
by kannuc (40 comments ) May 26, 2011 10:10 AM PDT
the ongoing and constant security problems of IE has passed beyond being an issue. Time to move to another browser and, more than likely, this is my last ms windows computer
Reply to this comment 1 person likes this comment
by andStack (599 comments ) May 26, 2011 10:52 AM PDT
Internet Explorer has been very secure since version 7 (though 8 and 9 is where it's security really shines). Every browser has security vulnerabilities. Internet Explorer 9 + Windows Vista/7 + free AV software (AVG or MSE) + common sense = all the security you will need.
5 people like this comment
by jake3373 (385 comments ) June 1, 2011 2:05 PM PDT
Firefox 4 + Linux + some common sense = a lot more security than you will ever need
by solitare_pax (5083 comments ) May 26, 2011 10:21 AM PDT
Must be UBER-SERIOUS! You have to go through that many steps (or more) to infect a Mac....
Reply to this comment
by QA_Tester (3282 comments ) May 27, 2011 1:15 PM PDT
@solitare_pax

Where is the proof?
1 person likes this comment
by Mullmantwenty11 (1 comment ) May 26, 2011 10:45 PM PDT
so what happens when they do track down the person caught in the cookie jar?
Reply to this comment
by CustomComputers (40 comments ) May 27, 2011 5:00 AM PDT
Another reason to avoid Facebook and Microsoft inter connect abilities like the plague!
Reply to this comment
by Eideard (31 comments ) May 27, 2011 7:32 AM PDT
There still is no patch for stupidity - only this article avoids the level of panic Molly brought to her article on the Mac Trojan.
Reply to this comment
by snth (67 comments ) May 27, 2011 11:29 AM PDT
Fortunately, I use a Mac. Macs are based on UNIX, which is completely immune to any sort of virus, malware, socially engineered exploit, worm.
 
Not only that, but I'm using Safari, which is completely immune to anything remotely wrong this side of alpha Centauri, and...
Reply to this comment
by QA_Tester (3282 comments ) May 27, 2011 1:15 PM PDT
MacDefender
1 person likes this comment
by poyntek (8 comments ) May 27, 2011 12:07 PM PDT
Using Microsoft products makes you a target, simply because so many people use Microsoft products. ID thieves pick the most used platform to attack. I like the move toward cloud based operating systems, there some that are open source and free to use like this...

http://www.tech-adventures.com/2011/02/jolicloud-portable-html5-desktop-web-of.html
Reply to this comment
by QA_Tester (3282 comments ) May 27, 2011 1:18 PM PDT
Sounds like chromium netbook is perfect for what you need.
by tsu_neil (6 comments ) May 30, 2011 9:43 PM PDT
You say that's a product of research? Then what about this?

http://asonsdiary.blogspot.com/2009/08/browser-as-weapon.html
Reply to this comment
(23 Comments)
  • prev
  • next
 
advertisement
Latest News

Anonymous targets Federal Reserve

The hacker group says it's planning an attack on the Federal Reserve tomorrow over monetary policies, most likely with a DDoS attack designed to shut down the agency's Web site.

Military's aeromedical mission heats up

road trip At Ramstein Air Base in Germany, aeromedical crews must care for soldiers coming in from U.S. wars abroad and prepare them for journeys home.
• Photos: Wounded head home

About Security

Online security is threatened by more than hacking and phishing attempts. Check here for the latest updates on software vulnerabilities, data leaks, and rapidly spreading viruses--and learn how to protect your systems.

Add this feed to your online news reader

advertisement

Inside CNET News

Scroll Left Scroll Right