CONNECT    

Hezbollah Rise In Lebanon Gives Syria, Iran Sway

Hezbollah Syria

ZEINA KARAM   06/13/11 07:50 PM ET   AP

BEIRUT — Hezbollah and its allies rose to a position of unprecedented dominance in Lebanon's government Monday, giving its patrons Syria and Iran greater sway in the Middle East.

Lebanon Prime Minister Najib Mikati announced a new Cabinet dominated by the militant group and its allies after the country has operated for five months without a functioning government. The move caps Hezbollah's steady rise over decades from resistance group against Israel to Lebanon's most powerful military and political force.

Opponents of Hezbollah – which the U.S. considers a terrorist organization – say having it in control of Lebanon's government could lead to international isolation. The group's most ardent supporters are Iran and Syria, which dominated Lebanon for 29 years.

The new government opens the door for renewed Syrian influence in Lebanon at a time the Syrian leadership is struggling at home. It's a remarkable turnaround from 2005, when fallout from the assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri led to massive anti-Syrian protests in Lebanon. The protests, dubbed the "Cedar Revolution," drove tens of thousands of Syrian troops out of Lebanon and ended decades of Syrian domination over its smaller neighbor.

The ascendancy of Hezbollah is a setback for the United States, which has provided Lebanon with $720 million in military aid since 2006 and has tried in vain to move the country firmly into a Western sphere and end Iranian and Syrian influence. It also underscores Iran's growing influence in the region at a time when Washington's is falling.

U.S. Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, called for an immediate cutoff of U.S. funds to the new government "as long as any violent extremist group designated by the U.S. as foreign terrorist organizations participates in it."

"For years, members of Congress warned that it was unwise to fund a Lebanese government in which Hezbollah participated. It was clear that Hezbollah's influence was growing, and that the executive branch had no long-term strategy to deal with that reality, and no contingency plan to stop U.S. aid from falling into the wrong hands," the Florida Republican said in a statement.

Fadia Kiwan, a political science professor at Beirut's St. Joseph University, said Hezbollah's dominance in the new government could backfire on the group, which was formed in 1982 with Iranian support to fight Israel's invasion of Lebanon.

"Such a government puts a great political responsibility on Hezbollah's shoulders," Kiwan told The Associated Press. "A moderate, national unity government would have offered more protection for the group."

Story continues below

The Islamic militant group's power has been steadily growing over the years and its newfound clout could add volatility to a region already rocked by anti-government uprisings in a half-dozen countries.

A Hezbollah-led government would obviously raise tensions with Israel, which fought a devastating 34-day war against the Shiite militants in 2006 that left 1,200 Lebanese and 160 Israelis dead. Lebanon, torn apart by decades of civil war and deep sectarian divides, has had several major military conflicts with neighboring Israel.

Hezbollah forced the collapse of Lebanon's previous, pro-Western government in January over fears it would be indicted by a U.N.-backed tribunal investigating the killing of Hariri, a billionaire businessman and political leader who had been trying to limit Syria's domination of Lebanon in the months before his death.

Syria denied any involvement in his killing and called the tribunal a conspiracy by the U.S. and Israel.

Hariri's son, Saad, who was prime minister in January, refused to denounce the tribunal or cut off Lebanon's 49 percent share of the funding for it.

Hezbollah and its allies then walked out of the government, forcing its collapse, and secured enough support in parliament to name Mikati as the new prime minister. But Mikati has struggled to form a Cabinet, insisting he won't do the bidding of any one side.

On Monday, Mikati announced a Cabinet that gives Hezbollah and its allies 16 of the 30 seats. In the previous government, they had 10 seats.

The Cabinet still must be formally presented to Parliament for a vote of confidence.

The makeup of the new government is seen as almost entirely pro-Syrian. President Bashar Assad of Syria, facing a growing uprising against his rule at home, called twice to congratulate Lebanese leaders on the new government's formation.

Lebanon's politics are always fractious, in part because of the sectarian makeup of the country's government. According to Lebanon's power-sharing system, the president must be a Maronite Christian, the prime minister a Sunni Muslim and the parliament speaker a Shiite Muslim.

Each faith makes up about a third of Lebanon's population of 4 million.

Talal Arslan, a politician from the tiny Druse sect, resigned Monday after it was announced he was named to the post of state minister without portfolio. He said Mikati should have given representatives of the Druse community a higher-profile post.

Mikati urged the Lebanese to give the government a chance to prove itself.

"Do not judge intentions and people, but rather actions," he said at a televised news conference.

Mikati was quick to reiterate that his government will respect Lebanon's international commitments – a reference to the tribunal investigating Hariri's killing, suggesting that he won't cut its funding. Many in Lebanon fear Hezbollah will react violently if its members are indicted, as is widely expected.

Saad Hariri, who has described Mikati's nomination as a coup, vowed not to be part of the new government. His Western-backed coalition is now the opposition in Lebanon.

Once seen solely as Iran's militant arm in Lebanon, Hezbollah has reinvented itself as a more conventional political movement. It has joined the government and become involved in domestic politics, but fighting Israel remains the group's priority.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

BEIRUT — Hezbollah and its allies rose to a position of unprecedented dominance in Lebanon's government Monday, giving its patrons Syria and Iran greater sway in the Middle East. Lebanon Prime ...
BEIRUT — Hezbollah and its allies rose to a position of unprecedented dominance in Lebanon's government Monday, giving its patrons Syria and Iran greater sway in the Middle East. Lebanon Prime ...
 
Expert Tabler: Syria's on path to collapse, challenges Obama's efforts to break axis of , ,
17 hours ago from web
Hezbollah's rise gives increasing influence to Syria and Iran
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 295
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »   (4 total)
3 hours ago (10:04 PM)
Open support for the radical religious group Hezbollah-­-----you can find it right here on the Huffington Post. People here love Hamas, Amadenijad­d, and Assad and they virulently hate the U.S., Israel, and the west. If their world were not so absurd, it would be dangerous.
5 hours ago (7:09 PM)
Aside from its caricature in philo-Zion­ist circles in the west as a kind of Shi'ite Al Quaeda, Hezbollah is not an internatio­nal terrorist organizati­on- it is a national resistance movement, founded almost exclusivel­y for the purpose of defending Lebanon against Israeli agression.
To ignore this fact is to ignore nearly nearly thirty years of immediate past history- the invasion of 1981, Grapes of Wrath, and the 2006 war included.
The hasbarists will always counter with "terrorist­, terrorist, terrorist" but this is a very pliable term;
As the old saying goes, "One man's freedom fighter is another man's terrorist.­"
For the US to decry Iran or Syria's "interfere­nce" in Lebanon is akin to Al Capone criticizin­g a shoplifter for criminal activity, or BP taking K-Mart to task for environmen­tal degradatio­n.
3 hours ago (10:06 PM)
they are really good guys, when they are not murdering the democratic­ally elected president of Lebanon
2 hours ago (10:56 PM)
There is absolutely zero hard evidence that they murdered Hariri. Any evidence of USRAELI provenance is immediatel­y suspect and tainted. Just like 9/11. A total, complete farce. The burden of proof is on USRAEL, not them.
6 hours ago (7:01 PM)
If Libya took over its Christian neighbor would NATO do something about it? How about here, the Syrian takeover of Lebanon with the support of the theocratic lunatics in Teheran?
7 hours ago (5:43 PM)
THAT is what our so called war on terror does: empower the radicals.

As long as the we do not stop our government meddling in the politics of the planet - ALWAYS AND WITHOUT FAIL to install and support dictators - that is how long those nations will become more willing to fight us. We are the Great Britain of our time. And we are just telling the world that there is only one freedom to be found: the freedom of the USA to ruin every nation and / or man on the planet for our new god and saviour: PROFIT. We massacred 1 million innocents in Iraq to depose the dictator WE PUT THERE, we assassinat­­ed Bin Laden who the FBI told us had nothing to do with 9/11, we torture innocents and abduct them from their nations, we murder and destroy our way all around the globe while where ever we leave torture becomes national policy and selling the natural resources of the land for chump change to our parasites becomes a way to get rich.

And then we stand agape and cry "WHY DO THEY HATE US?!?!?"

Because we deserve their hatred. We got good money for it but that too is gone to the parasites now. Now all we have left is a thousand billionair­­es and a debt to the planet another 14.5 trillion will not buy us out of.
8 hours ago (4:30 PM)
The Iranians mullahs have successful­ly installed their client Hezbollah in power in Lebanon. We can see how much the Iranian people love rule by mullahs, backed by the ruthless Revolution­ary Guards. Expect an equally repressive regime in Lebanon to the one in Iran. The Sunni and Christian leaders will either be jailed, intimidate­d or dead soon.

As for the Israeli front, I wonder if the Iranians will tell their pet Hezbollah to start something up on the Israeli border. The Lebanese people don't want a fight with Israel, they know that Hezbollah will hide behind them in order to maximize civilian casualties­. But once you put a theocrats in charge, they don't care what the people want and they never leave.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
balamo
9 hours ago (3:24 PM)
fighting israel is not the priority of hezbollah - it has always defined itself as a liberation movement born out of the israeli occupation of southern lebanon...­if war with israel was a central tenet - they would be organizing attacks inside the jewish state - something that has never happened..­.
10 hours ago (2:39 PM)
ANYBODYSEE­NTHEPOPOS.­.great anthology on the terrorist activity of Hezbollah.­.yet some here just love 'em!
9 hours ago (3:26 PM)
Thanks. Give the credit to the Committee for Accuracy in Middle East Reporting in America. In liberal Cambridge Massachuse­tts. It's a great fact-check­er. http://www­.camera.or­g/index.as­p?x_contex­t=2&x_outl­et=118&x_a­rticle=114­8
photo
IrishInsurgent
Marx / Fanon / Sartre / Robespierre / Che
11 hours ago (1:59 PM)
A few of the comments here have mentioned correctly the wording in the article of Hezbollah as a "political organisati­on". Of course even this a fairly narrow definition­. I consider Hezbollah to do something that few organisati­ons have done before which is becoming a full community organisati­on.

For instance I doubt few here know that Hezbollah owns one the largest constructi­on companies in Lebanon known as Al-Bina. During the 2006 war whenever Israel bombed a house members of Hezbollah visited the families and arranged for Al Bina to rebuild the houses free of charge. Al Bina also started rebuilding phone towers and electrical lines right in the middle of the war almost as quickly as they were brought down.

Hezbollah is more than a guerilla organisati­on and more than even a political organisati­on it runs medical clinics for the poor, has its own telecommun­ications network which offers free broadband to poor neighbourh­oods, runs scholarshi­ps for disadvanta­ged children in colleges, obviously runs a network of mosques, and even has a local dating service for its male and female members.

It is because it is so tied into the community that Israel couldn't defeat it. You can defeat a military fairly easily but its harder to defeat a whole community.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galilee
Pro-democracy, pro-west, pro-Zion
10 hours ago (2:21 PM)
This is nonsense, defeating HizbAllah was only a matter of time after Israel cut them off from supplies. The problem was that the US and Europeans didn't allow Israel to have a few more weeks. Hizb didn't have food or water (it was summer - no rains). Hassan Nasrallah begged the Arab dictators on TV to help him save his men, by calling for a ceasefire.
photo
IrishInsurgent
Marx / Fanon / Sartre / Robespierre / Che
10 hours ago (2:38 PM)
Maybe you should read Israels own Winograd Commision report on the war.

You can continue complainin­g about "the US and Europeans didn't allow Israel to have a few more weeks." Fact is that after Bint Jbeil, which Hezbollah held, even the Israeli commanders knew that they wouldn't succeed.

There is a reason Hezbollah took to referring to the Israeli Defense Forces as "a Gucci Army". It was because most of Israels soldiers were 19 year old kids drafted for their mandatory service and more used to wearing designer label clothes (like Gucci) and partying in Tel Aviv nightclubs than actually fighting in a war.

The only Israeli Brigade that I think scored successes in the war was 35th Brigade not surprising­ly made up of career soldiers.
10 hours ago (2:40 PM)
Don't bother the Israel-bas­hers with the facts!
9 hours ago (3:48 PM)
Nasrallah was calling for a ceasefire within days of the Israeli bombings. He wasn't counting on that level of response and rightly guessed that very many Lebanese people resented being dragged into another war with Israel. However, it is naive to think that "a few more weeks" would finish Hezbollah (or indeed Hamas) off, as their roots go farther than military stocks. They have spent 30 years offering social services, building hospitals and social services in a country that is very selective in who receives public aid.
mjc
Represent opinions as honestly as possible.
11 hours ago (1:27 PM)
Perhaps there will come a day in our foreign policy that we won't react as if we were Israelis and Israel our 51st state. Then we could exam our foreign policy and realize that there has been a major upheaval in the way countries react to groups in other countries, always labeled terrorist if Israel looks at them that way. Hamas and Hezbollah need to be considered as important elements in any government and negoitatio­n something we could do with those groups. We didn't mind involving the Taliban in our problems with the Soviet Union and certainly bin Laden was our Frankstein­ian creature in Afghanista­n...and the Middle East.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Galilee
Pro-democracy, pro-west, pro-Zion
11 hours ago (1:57 PM)
You blame the US for OBL and the Taliban as many Muslims do. Now you want the US to be friends with the Hamas and HizbAllah oppressive regimes so the US can be blamed by Muslims for more oppression in the Middle East. That's brilliant.
11 hours ago (2:08 PM)
Here's a helpful hint. Two of them in fact. Numero uno.. GO READ THE HAMAS CHARTER, and then check to see if Hamas said "we are not negotiatin­g, resistance is the ONLY way", and that was just a couple of weeks ago, after they formed a "unity gov." Number two... Hizballah is the proxy army of Syria, it is located in Lebanon, and they have been killing Lebanese and anyone else they disagree whenever it suits them. Hezbollah means "army of god". Zealots with bombs and guns.
READ THIS LINK, it'll shed some light. http://www­.camera.or­g/index.as­p?x_contex­t=2&x_outl­et=118&x_a­rticle=114­8
A history of Hezbollah violence, from kidnapping­s, hijackings­, bombings, to straight up murder.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Connor Alexander
http://agoodsteak.blogspot.com/
11 hours ago (1:19 PM)
Regardless of whether or not I agree with Hezbollah and their ideology, I don't think our government should be calling elected government­s 'terrorist organizati­ons'. Playing label games like that just makes things more murky.
10 hours ago (2:09 PM)
http://www­.camera.or­g/index.as­p?x_contex­t=2&x_outl­et=118&x_a­rticle=114­8 Now see if you'd like to revise your opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Connor Alexander
http://agoodsteak.blogspot.com/
10 hours ago (2:15 PM)
Nope, but interestin­g link, thanks.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Connor Alexander
http://agoodsteak.blogspot.com/
9 hours ago (3:46 PM)
Out of replies, so I've got to respond here - sorry bout that.

Murder and terror *is* a form of democracy - it's the American way. At least, I'm sure a great many people see us that way (as do I). I'm sure from the Hezbollah point of view, they see us that way. I see convenient labels that demonize one side of an argument as counter productive­.

For example - perhaps now that Hezbollah has the responsibi­lities of governing they'll be forced into a position where they can no longer afford or justify their previous actions. While their past cannot be undone, attempting to use labels or politics to push them back into a corner may make them resort to their previous violent tactics.

I would rather use language that encourages them to stop being violent.
12 hours ago (12:45 PM)
Yeah how dreadful..

Maybe if the other national parties did not prefer to take money rather than help the people, maybe then they would not face such a problem. Hezbollah runs a shadow welfare system that helps out the poor and the middle class. The do get elected you know but that's not good enough is it?

Why Americans choose to support those that take money for their own and do nothing to help the poor is understand­able as we so love to be robbed by the rich. however the Oligarchs of the world are seeing one nation after another rebel against their thievery.

would i want to be ruled by the Hezbollah? NO! I am an American I don't want money going to the poor or Medicare..­I want Obama's children to have all my tax dollars and the Banksters too. i am an American and freedom to me is watching my congress give all my money to Oligarchs and bankers!

Hezbollah are just commies..h­elping the poor and educating children..­why that's just pinko trash. God made America for the rich! I hope nothing like that happens here.....s­igh.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Connor Alexander
http://agoodsteak.blogspot.com/
11 hours ago (1:21 PM)
There are two sides to every conflict: The Rich and The Poor.
13 hours ago (11:45 AM)
Iran will fight Israel to the last Lebanese.
10 hours ago (2:10 PM)
LOL! Spot on!!
9 hours ago (3:42 PM)
Well said, Mr. Adamson!
photo
MikeDu
Both salubrious and lugubrious concurrently.
14 hours ago (10:38 AM)
Lebanon wouldn't need Hezbollah if the Lebanese army wasn't a paper tiger. Back in 2006 I didn't read any reports of Lebanese anti-aircr­aft missiles shooting down Israeli jets as they bombed Beirut. No reports of Lebanese army anti-tank teams hallting Israeli incursions­. No Lebanese army artillery pounding Israeli army assembly areas. If your own governemt isn't going to defend you you have to do it yourself. Classic "2nd amendment" rationale for an armed civilian population­.
Gasparilla
18,647th in line to the throne of Denmark
14 hours ago (10:51 AM)
Uh, didn't the whole thing start when Hezbollah crossed the border and killed three Israeli soldiers, along with shelling Israeli villages? Then when Israel struck back, the Lebanese said Israel shouldn't hold them responsibl­e for what Hezbollah did. So now they approve a government that's controlled by Hezbollah and will presumably attack Israel again?
12 hours ago (12:46 PM)
Yawn
10 hours ago (2:13 PM)
Well said. And Fanned! Amazingly the author wrote of the "Israeli Invasion".­.... Why bother with context?
Gasparilla
18,647th in line to the throne of Denmark
14 hours ago (10:34 AM)
The vast majority of deaths of Muslims come at the hands of their fellow Muslims.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
12 hours ago (1:07 PM)
Yes, and most Americans who are murdered are murdered by their fellow Americans.
The vast majority of murdered Israelis are killed by their fellow Israelis.
The vast majority of murdered Germans are killed by their fellow Germans.
Not much of a thinker are you?
Gasparilla
18,647th in line to the throne of Denmark
7 hours ago (5:49 PM)
Nor are you. Because the deaths of Muslims are always blamed on someone else. Everyone's fault but theirs.
14 hours ago (10:30 AM)
The problem in my opinion is the "Shia Muslims". They follow an apocalypse that was essentiall­y borrowed from the book of revelation­. Shia Muslim sources are heavily influenced by Christiani­ty. And therefore they are more susceptibl­e to brain washing (i.e. suicide bombing). Sunnis, and whether like to deny it or not, are also heavily influenced by their apocalypti­c approach. In my opinion this is the core issue.
Shia Muslims are for blind obedience this is why their parties gain such strong grounds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MarcEdward
likes all cats more than most people
11 hours ago (1:12 PM)
Where did you get your informatio­n about Shiia?
I've read rather a lot and nothing you say has any resemblanc­e to what I've read.
11 hours ago (2:07 PM)
Wahhabism is Sunni, not Shia and Shiites are seen by Sunnis as heretics. So, if you want to talk about the most extreme fundamenta­list form of Islam, you should look to Shia Muslim, but more importantl­y, to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

So your "opinion" is not based on any known or studied facts and you don't know what you are talking about.
3 hours ago (9:34 PM)
And who said that Wahhabis are Shia? Not all Sunnis see Shias as heritics.
Also, this is exactly what I said about Shia Islam; it is the most extreme and intolerant­. So please read my post again.
Wahhabism is highly influenced by Ibn Taymeya; a Muslim scholar who lived during the Mongol invasion. His views maybe relevant to his time but with the rise of wahhabism and the strong advertisme­nt supported by Saudi Arabia it gained lots of grounds in the Arab world and provided some breeding ground to terrorism.
Regards