CONNECT    

Haggai Carmon

GET UPDATES FROM Haggai Carmon
 

Iran, Russia and Hezbollah: Strange Bedfellows in Syria

Posted: 06/14/11 02:31 PM ET

Why is the UN Security Council unwilling to condemn Syria? President Bashar al-Assad is butchering his own rebellious citizens and other than public expressions reproaching the massacre in Syria, the world does nothing. Why? Colonel Gaddafi of Libya was bombed by NATO for similar atrocities, then why the preferential treatment accorded Assad who seems to operate with impunity?

A close look at the Syrian arena may offer some clues. The insurrection in Syria is being brutally subdued by President Assad, who is fighting for his life -- existential and political. He is a member of the Islamic Alawite sect, a 7% minority in Syria that has controlled Syria with an iron fist since his father, Hafez Assad, assumed the presidency in 1970. A defeat of President Assad means a defeat for the entire Alawite regime, in a country where such defeat signifies also an expedited delivery to heaven or to hell depending on whom you ask.

Conspiracy theorists speculate that an unwritten understanding was reached between President Obama and Russian President Medvedev during their meeting at the G-8 conference in France at the end of May. The alleged "non paper" called for a tradeoff: Russia would agree to the forceful toppling of Gaddafi, in return for the U.S agreement to allow Assad to suppress the insurrection in his country. The existence of such an agreement -- true or false -- still leaves the question open, why would Russia continue protecting Syria?

The answer may lie in a surreptitious accord between Russia and Syria. Russia offers a military and political umbrella to Syria, and in return, the Russian Navy can use the Syrian ports in the Mediterranean Sea. Intelligence reports indicate also that there are more than 2,000 Russian military advisors in Syria training the Syrian armed forces. The Mediterranean Sea access is extremely valuable for the Russians who helped build a huge modern port in Tartus, 150 miles south of Damascus. The pronounced Russian presence would have probably gone unnoticed, but for an event occurring last August. A decomposing body was found floating in the Mediterranean Sea near the Turkish-Syrian border. The body was of General Yuri Ivanov, deputy chief of the Russian military intelligence (Glavnoye Razvedyvateinoye Upravienie). Official reports claimed he drowned while swimming, but many don't believe that the head of operations for the Russian military intelligence would go swimming without half a dozen bodyguards around him. Was his death connected to the growing Russian involvement in Syria? Just decades ago, Russia had a broad military presence in Mediterranean countries: Egypt, Algeria, Libya, just to name a few, and now just Syria is left on its short -- once long -- list, hence its determination to secure its only remaining stronghold.

Then there are accounts that Iran and Hezbollah sent elite forces to Syria to help President Assad quell the riots. Both Iran and Hezbollah have significant stakes in Syria. Deserting soldiers from the Fourth Syrian Division, under the command of Maher Assad, the president's brother, told reporters that Iranian and Hezbollah officers executed Syrian soldiers who refused to open fire on demonstrating Syrian citizens and deserting soldiers. Syria has traditionally been the route through which Iran was sending military assistance to Hezbollah, its terrorist subsidiary in Lebanon, and a regime change in Syria is likely to cut off that route. Therefore, both Hezbollah and Iran have been assisting Assad. If successful, he'll owe them his allegiance. If Assad falls, Hezbollah would be significantly weakened.

The Syrian population read the event map correctly. There were reports of Syrian demonstrators burning images of Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's leader, and calling President Assad "Iran's puppy" or "the Nuzair butcher." "Nuzair" is a derogatory term used by Sunni Muslims against Alawi Muslims whom they claim are in fact closer to Christianity than to Islam (Nuzair comes from the word Nazareth.) The burning of the Shiite Nasrallah's image is particularly ominous for Hezbollah, as the uprising in Syria resembles more and more strongly Sunnis against Shiites -- to whom the Alawites are considered to be religiously similar. The burning occurred during demonstrations in Hamat to commemorate the massacre of Sunnis there as the Shiites inside and outside of Iran remained indifferent. If the uprising in Syria develops into a Shiite-Sunni war, it could have far reaching regional consequences that would likely envelop Lebanon as well.

Tayyip Erdogan, the recently re-elected prime minister of Turkey, understands the risks to his country from such an all-out war on his southern border, and therefore, condemned in no uncertain terms the conduct of President Assad and opened the Turkish-Syrian border to thousands of Syrian refugees seeking asylum. These surprising steps might indicate that Erdogan has had second thoughts regarding his earlier decision to side with Iran and Syria against the West. Distancing himself from Iran would help him get closer to the leadership of the Muslim world, a position coveted relentlessly also by Iran.

Iran, Hezbollah and Russia on one side? The Russians probably hope that sleeping with dogs won't give them political fleas in the morning.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 35
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »   (2 total)
13 hours ago (10:05 PM)
The author states that the Alawite sect consitutes 7% of the Syrian population­. While precise statistics are not available, I am yet to see a reference that puts the Alawites (Alawis) at < 10% and some go higher than 15% of the total.
23 hours ago (11:30 AM)
The Russian angle makes it all clear
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
24 hours ago (10:51 AM)
"Why is the UN Security Council unwilling to condemn Syria"

and where is council on Bahrain? oh wait the Saudis are un-officia­lly taking care of this right? why are deaths of uprising folks important in Syria but not in Bahrain, guess the author can answer this for us...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGTDBK
We need more drones
23 hours ago (11:50 AM)
Once again this article doesn't mention Bahrain because this isn't a Shia pity party. This article is talking about Russia being involved with Hezbollah and Iran...ple­ase try to read the story past the first paragraph.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
23 hours ago (12:05 PM)
"this isn't a Shia pity party."

if you are repeating lines here then I will repeat mine: this isn't Israel pity party either...
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
12:13 AM on 6/16/2011
When you get right down to it, the actions of any country in another should always be suspect.
photo
tallen
panem et circenses
10:31 PM on 6/15/2011
Good article. Lots of insight and food for thought.
06:52 PM on 6/15/2011
The time has come for us to support the Sunnis
12:21 PM on 6/15/2011
We are asked why the world and the UN does nothing about the Syrian attack on its civilian population­? Yet the writer ignores the attack on civilians in Bharian. WHY? Shiates are being massacred by Sunnis. By Saudi Arabian troops who are now in Bharian. Seems a blatant bias against Iran, here. Concern and tears for Syria but no love for Bharianian civilians.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SGTDBK
We need more drones
04:08 PM on 6/15/2011
The article was about a unique relationsh­ip between Russia, Iran and Hezbollah not a Shia pity party...If you want to see more Shia outrage just go to Al-Jazeera­.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Freenation
24 hours ago (10:54 AM)
"not a Shia pity party"

the article pretty much confirms the indirect Israel pity party as in real word people getting killed in Syria, Libya or Bahrain shouldn't matter...a­s both Libya and Bahrain have nothing to do regarding Israel and with Syria it is located in Israel's faux perpetual victimhood sphere...
12:11 PM on 6/15/2011
My take on this is that the common thread between Russia, Syria, Iran and Hezbollah is that none of them give a fig about human rights or democratic principles­. For a long time people in the Middle East thought mistakenly that Russia is on their side and the USA is on the side of Israel. This view is now changing. It is true that the USA offers economic, military and political support for Israel, but also it supports at least verbally the democratic movements in the Arab World. But recent developmen­ts have exposed Russia, China and Iran as the friends of the dictators and the enemies of the people. The way forward is to amend the UN Security Council procedure to disallow a single veto to torpedo internatio­nal efforts to remove tyrants and to free the people.
10:42 AM on 6/15/2011
There are a lot of assumption­s and innuendos geared toward a certain agenda in this article, which a couple of commenters have already pointed out. I just wanted to correct the author's claim that Recep Tayyip Erdogan is President of Turkey. In fact, he is not and has never been. He is Prime Minister and has been since 2003 and was just reelected to another term. The President of Turkey is Abdullah Gul.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Haggai Carmon
06:37 AM on 6/15/2011
The author was accurately describing Syrian rage against Iran. See a few samples of different demonstrat­ions where Iranian flags are burned.
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=_BqswBF9H­nQ
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=7IYbpnVDY­Ng
http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=M5kSy3RRx­tE
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sal Glen
01:19 AM on 6/15/2011
Why is the UN Security Council unwilling to condemn Syria?

Its not Israel.
09:16 AM on 6/15/2011
That is the thing, the UN "Human Rights Council" hasn't touched any of these slaughters resulting from the "Arab Spring" but will denounce Israel when a Palestinia­n stubs his toe. This organizati­on was disbanded once for it's anti-Israe­l stance, but it's re-brandin­g didn't do anything to transform it into a group which actually cares about Human Rights.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
12:05 AM on 6/15/2011
Here's how the author can state that Iran has sent its Quds forces into Syria:
1. he quotes the Jerusalem Post
2, the Jerusalem Post quotes the Washington Post
3. The Washington Post quotes " two U.S. officials and a diplomat from an allied nation, all of whom spoke on the condition of anonymity"

No doubt the "allied nation" is Israel and the two US officials are carrying water for it also.
photo
Wozzeck
Pearl Bay, Australia
11:50 AM on 6/15/2011
Why would US Officials and the diplomat need anonymity unless their "secret informatio­n" would immediatel­y be dismissed as propaganda if their identities and ideologica­l affiliatio­ns were known? Why have there been no confirmati­ons of this allegation­?
07:00 PM on 6/14/2011
Hezbollah is far more than a "terrorist subsidiary of Iran". Is Israel a terrorist subsidiary of the US?
06:57 PM on 6/14/2011
Is the writer not aware that the Shia community in Lebanon depend virtually entirely on Hezbollah for provision of social services, roads, water lines, sewer lines, bridges, etc etc?
11:22 AM on 6/15/2011
The article is about Hezbollah'­s dependence on the brutal murderous Assad regime so why does that matter? Besides, isn't the Lebanese government responsibl­e for the welfare of its citizens and for providing those basic services? Just because an organizati­on steps in to fill that void does not mean that everything it does is altruistic and that it doesn't also have blood on its hands.
12:48 PM on 6/15/2011
adam - - The Lebanese government for strutural reasons is unable to deliver services to much of southern Lebanon.

What source of support do you think is open to Hezbollah, that is not pursued by that entity?
06:55 PM on 6/14/2011
Didn't "the west" seek the UN resolution regarding Libya, on basis it would not be approval of military effort aimed at regime change? And what happened, after the UNSC resolution was passed?
09:19 AM on 6/15/2011
If i recall there wouldn't be military action if it weren't for the Arab League who gave the green light.
06:33 PM on 6/15/2011
yon - Yes. Good point.