CONNECT    

Osama Bin Laden Raid A Watershed Moment For Pakistan, Says Clinton

Hillary Clinton

By ANNE GEARAN and NAHAL TOOSI   05/27/11 06:46 PM ET   AP

ISLAMABAD -- The killing of Osama bin Laden is a watershed moment for Pakistan's confrontation with homegrown terrorism, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday. She sought to patch relations rocked by knowledge that the terror mastermind lived for years in a country receiving billions in U.S. counter-terror aid and that the U.S. didn't trust its ally enough to alert Pakistani leaders that the raid was coming.

"We have reached a turning point" following the long hunt for bin Laden, Clinton said after intensive meetings in the Pakistani capital under tight security.

"It is up to the Pakistani people to choose what kind of country they wish to live in," Clinton said, "and it is up to the leaders of Pakistan to deliver results."

Clinton and Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, praised Pakistan's stand against some militants and challenged its leaders to take decisive steps to jointly take on al-Qaida. Both the senior leadership of al-Qaida and the Taliban are thought to live in Pakistan, and affiliated militants use safe havens in Pakistan to attacks U.S. forces fighting next door in Afghanistan.

U.S. officials said the U.S. and Pakistan have agreed to take some specific measures together, and Clinton referred to joint operations coming soon.

There were no details on targets or plans. But in one sign of a slight warming trend, CIA and Pakistani intelligence officials completed a joint search of the bin Laden compound in Abbottabad Friday, a Pakistani official said.

The joint search was part of a number of confidence building measures agreed to by CIA deputy Mike Morell and Pakistani intelligence chief Gen. Ahmed Shuja Pasha in a meeting in Islamabad last week, U.S. and Pakistani officials said, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive negotiations.

Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari's office released a statement after the meeting saying that the two sides agreed to "work together in any future actions against high-value targets in Pakistan," and to cooperate on promoting peace in Afghanistan.

The U.S. pair repeated a warning that lower-ranking U.S. officials have been making to Pakistan since the bin Laden raid: The billions of dollars a year in military and development aid to Pakistan will dwindle if Pakistan is seen to play both sides.

Story continues below

Mullen and Clinton met jointly with Zardari, Pakistan's prime minister, the interior minister and the powerful army and spy chiefs. A brief portion of the meetings witnessed by reporters was stiff and awkward, with no smiles among the U.S. delegation. U.S. officials later said the overall mood was serious but productive.

The delicate attempt to manage Pakistani anger following the bin Laden raid underscores the stakes for the U.S. in dealing with Pakistan, a nuclear-armed nexus for extremism and terrorism in a strategically vital region. The U.S. also relies on Pakistan for transit and supply routes for the war in Afghanistan and will need its help if Afghanistan is to broker a peace deal with Taliban militants that can end the war.

Clinton warned against the reflex to blame America or mistrust its motives.

"Conspiracy theories will not make problems disappear," she said.

Clinton and Mullen are the highest-ranking U.S. officials to meet with Pakistani leaders since the May 2 raid by Navy SEALs.

The raid damaged the reputations of the Pakistani government and military, with many Pakistanis asking how bin Laden could have hidden in an army town, and how the Americans managed to enter the country, carry out the raid and leave Pakistani airspace without being detected.

"I think we all realize the challenges under which this relationship now labors," Mullen said.

The commando raid raised a stark question about U.S. faith in its own decade-long strategy to coax greater cooperation from a historically ambivalent counterterrorism ally. Either Pakistani officials harbored the world's most wanted terrorist or were so inept that he lived for years right under their noses.

Shamefaced Pakistani authorities say it is the latter, and Clinton said repeatedly on Friday that there is no evidence that any senior leaders knew about the hide-out.

U.S. officials said the raid has forced a crisis of conscience among Pakistan's government and military elite over the country's political complexion and goals. The Obama administration wants the raw shame and anger many Pakistanis feel about the raid to yield a new, fuller commitment to fighting all brands of terrorism.

Despite optimism on that point from Clinton and Mullen on Friday there is scant evidence now that the Zardari government has the pull or the resolve to roust militants along the border. Nor has it taken on powerful naysayers who want to keep ties to the Taliban as a hedge against a possible power shift in Afghanistan when international forces leave.

Successive Pakistani governments, both civilian and military-led, have promised to confront al-Qaida and other terror agents. Pakistan has waged a two-year campaign against militants targeting the weak, U.S.-backed Zardari government but has done little to expunge safe havens for militants who attack U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

The U.S. visit comes a day after a Pakistani Taliban suicide bomber detonated a pickup truck loaded with explosives near several government offices in northwest Pakistan, killing at least 32 people.

Thursday's blast was the latest in a series of attacks to hit the country since the bin Laden raid, including an 18-hour siege of a naval base in Pakistan's south. Some commentators and elements in the media have tried to blame the siege on "foreign hands" such as archrival India, with some suggesting that it was part of a grand Western conspiracy to destabilize Pakistan and take away its nuclear weapons.

Clinton's visit was not announced in advance for fear of an assassination attempt or terror strike. She was in the Pakistani capital only a few hours.

___

AP Intelligence Writer Kimberly Dozier in Washington contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

ISLAMABAD -- The killing of Osama bin Laden is a watershed moment for Pakistan's confrontation with homegrown terrorism, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday. She sought to patch...
ISLAMABAD -- The killing of Osama bin Laden is a watershed moment for Pakistan's confrontation with homegrown terrorism, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said Friday. She sought to patch...
Filed by Adam Goldberg  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 264
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (7 total)
19 hours ago (2:06 PM)
The ones who control the NARRATIVES controll the facts.

Whether or not this Bin Laden ENTITY has been eradicated long time ago (even before the 911 act) or since after 911, or just now is completely irrelevant­. Or for that matter, THE WHERE of this Bin Laden ENTITY has been eradicated­. WHAT REALLY REALLY MATTERS is that the NARRATIVE has been establiseh­d to put Pakistan at the center of next Empire's Adventure, be it physically­, politicall­y or financiall­y.

The NARRATIVE has implicitly link Pakistan with this Bin Laden SYMBOLIC ENTITY. And thus it is natural for the Empire to put its foot onto this new theatre.
23 hours ago (10:49 AM)
Why do you want to give money to someone who hates your guts and wants to kill you?
11 hours ago (10:02 PM)
Because we need the Pakistans. And they know that too. And thus it is just supply and demand, not coopperati­on or friendship­.

And more critically­, they know that the US Empire wants to take control of their country's destiny and are very watchful of such actions.
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
10:57 PM on 5/29/2011
As usual, Hillary's appearance is for the media! In the real world, Pakistan would LOVE it if the US would get out!

The money we give them is to buy our military stuff and use it as we direct so they would not miss it!

Don't you people remember hwen Bush told Musharef you either help us or we will destroy you?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Iron100
01:28 AM on 5/30/2011
Bush did the right thing. Where was Osama hiding? Where did the Khalid sheikh mohammad come from? They could have handed over ladenif they acted under the US directions­.
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
14 hours ago (7:22 PM)
Eh, except that a lot of people believe Bush put Osama Bin Ladin in Pakistan in that safe house because at the time, Bush could not go to war with Iraq if he had Bin Ladin!
10:23 PM on 5/29/2011
If Pakistan knows where Bin Laden was for a whole decade. How many of you would believe C.I*A does not know where Bin Laden was for the whole decade?

Seriously ... what is the chance that C**IA was just an innocent guy who got betrayed by his Pakistan friends?

The truth is more likley to be that Bin Laden was a set up and has been under C**IA "house arrest" for most of the decade. The mere existence of Bin Laden gives the "legitimac­y" for US to invade and stay in the region.

And when the time comes to "wrap up the Empire's adventure" in Centural Asia and Middle East, US simply sends out a special ops to tie up the loose end.

Now Obama can call it "Mission Completed" and being to pull out the troops. It is all part of the act. And you and I are just bystanders cheering and feeling proud to be Americans.

Keep up the good act, as long as the resource keeps coming into our shores for us to consume. Long Live the Empire!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Iron100
01:33 AM on 5/30/2011
Bin laden wasn't an immediate threat. He was an ideologica­l leader of the jihadis. It wasn't worth going after him when pakistan's help was needed against afghan taliban. Now that the US is going to start leaving afghanista­n, it makes sense to take out laden even if it means violating pakistan sovereignt­y. Laden was a long term threat not an immediate one.
10:06 PM on 5/29/2011
Secretary Clinton is a great representa­tive of the USA at State. She has clearly mastered the diplomat speak and used it beautifull­y on the Pakistanis­. Translated­, she said since Pakistan can't take care of business, we helped them out. And if Pakistan wants to do the right thing, now is the time to decide to do so. Or, the SEALS will be back whenever we feel it necessary but, of course, in a nice way.
08:10 PM on 5/29/2011
Why isn't she just a silver-ton­gued, diplomatic Sec. of State.

Praise and flattery should win the world over to our way of living. Goodness knows we didn't do so well with winning hearts and minds, but then guns never solved problems. They just create more. We just haven't caught on yet.

But there's a lot of money to be made in war profiteeri­ng.

The more I research and learn about US foreign policy and war profiteeri­ng in Washington­, the more I have come to detest what our rotting Government has made of America.

We're a sham. We're warmongers­.

Little honor or integrity comes out of Washington­, regardless of what we are led to believe with hopes and dreams and the rest of the pie in the sky garbage.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cleverboots
09:31 PM on 5/29/2011
Great Post! I think you've hit on some very valid problems.I­f we are ever to get out of Afghanista­n, Iraq etc. Obama MUST say no, enough is enough. He must stand up to the military, not be obsequious to them as he has been.
07:40 PM on 5/29/2011
Hillarys problems :
Her job, she is in over her head
Still thinks about being President
Profession­al Knowledge
Last but not least . Pakistan is not nor will it be a friend to the USA, other than money they have no use for us.
9 hours ago (12:18 AM)
SHAME ON YOU!!! Both Clinton contribute­d to our country greatly and honorably, and both of them earned such global respect and recombinat­ion; jealous all you locals want, their honorable good works have profound impact and influence, as a great inspiratio­n contribute­d so much to the true meaning of humanity, freedom and democracy nationally and internatio­nally. and yet, as a S.S., she works so respectful­ly with excellence as she never forgets to mention that she represents the president and people, always get 'mansion in impossible­' jobs done with excellence for the U.S. and strives for world peace. Honor her non-person­al-ambitio­n, don't hatefully jealous for nothing, you locals.
27 minutes ago (9:04 AM)
Go for it groupie/sh­eep, I love it when bash locals, isn't locals another word for American .

I would rather have Condi back as Secretary of State, no personal agenda.
02:01 PM on 5/29/2011
How does this relate to to this Christian Science Monitor report, "Umar Patek. Arrested March 29, 2011, in Abottabad. The Indonesian militant is accused of playing a key role in the 2002
Bali bombings. Pakistani authoritie­s were reportedly tipped off by the CIA." (?) Patek and bin Laden at the same city?
01:29 PM on 5/29/2011
"It is up to the Pakistani people to choose what kind of country they wish to live in," Clinton said, "and it is up to the leaders of Pakistan to deliver results."

The pot calling the kettle black!
12:12 PM on 5/29/2011
I Think it is shameful that Osama was shot while unarmed. He should have been taken alive and taken to trial. I'm very glad he was caught. I think that the leaders of Pakistan knew where he was the whole time.Anywa­y he's gone and there are plenty left over just like him.
11:48 AM on 5/29/2011
Yeah, Hillary, it's a watershed moment all right. We just made more enemies in Pakistan, and we haven't begun to feel it yet.
12:16 PM on 5/29/2011
Pakistan and where else?
12:43 PM on 5/29/2011
But, but, but she said the people of Pakistan get to choose what kind of country they want. Didn't that sincerity make you warm inside?
01:30 PM on 5/29/2011
With friends like Pakistan..­.who needs enemies??
10:57 AM on 5/29/2011
If Pakistan continues to believe that their primary enemy is India then their country will be eventually be destroyed from within
11:55 AM on 5/29/2011
Pakistan is on the right track. I wish them to be on this wonderful Journey,
10:55 AM on 5/29/2011
If they did know he was there why would they tell. They knew the cash register would stop ringing if we took him out. what they didn't count on was us not "sharing" that we found him and were going to take him down.
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
10:58 PM on 5/29/2011
"If they did know he was there why would they tell. They knew the cash register would stop ringing if we took him out. what they didn't count on was us not "sharing" that we found him and were going to take him down."

Except the cash register has not stopped ringing because we are still there! The money we give "them" is fro us! Sheesh.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
juna
09:44 AM on 5/29/2011
Pakistan is certainly a very slippery "friend."
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
10:59 PM on 5/29/2011
Pakistan is like an abused wife and we are the husband abuser! What else do you expect?
08:50 AM on 5/29/2011
If Bin Laden were to be captured today would he be entitled to Miranda
rights????­??????? GOOD QUESTION,,­,,,,,BUT,,­,,,,, WHO captures
him?,,,WHE­RE is he captured?,­,,,,WHAT was he doing when
captured?,­,,,,,,,,,,­,If the Military captures him on the battlefiel­d
while firing a A K 47,,,, NO he needs no Miranda
rights,,,,­,,,,,,,,,,­,,,,,,,IF he is caught by the police in a motel
while he is sleeping,,­,,, YES ,,, he is entitled to Miranda rights like any other police arrest....­..........­....UPDATE­….. Third possible senario,,,­Bin Laden is inside a FORTIFIED building that gets raided and gets blown away in the attack,,,, NO MIRANDA NEEDED
11:17 AM on 5/29/2011
No need to respect the laws of the country you invade?

You have no idea how terrorists are created.
01:33 PM on 5/29/2011
Why should you respect the laws of other countries when you barely respect your own?
Our DOJ enforces the laws that they deem necessary to stay politicall­y safe,
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sophie M
ANTI WAR.
12:44 PM on 5/29/2011
(wow.i finally found someone on HP........­that writes like me....
style wise ..(do u by chance write poetry too?)
Pauline Jaing
Artist, worker, mother
11:00 PM on 5/29/2011
You all have it so many ways: it is a war, and everywhere is the battlefied­, but it is a PERMANENT war, which maes if FASCISM, because real wars only last for a short length of time, thus the measures are extraordin­ary.

Your logic is that you can do what you like because the war is a global war of a new type,b ut that is FASCISM.