CONNECT    

Edward Flattau

Edward Flattau

GET UPDATES FROM Edward Flattau

The Vatican's Unsupportable Logic

Posted: 06/ 6/11 01:00 PM ET

There is strained logic, to put it mildly, in the statement that condom use will increase rather than reduce the spread of AIDS. Doesn't the premise suggest that no protection against sexually transmitted disease is better than some?

In this day and age, when ever more ubiquitous AIDS can be lurking in unsuspected places, rejecting condom use in principle is outright convoluted thinking. Yet, that is the official position to which the Catholic Church still clings.

Ignoring condoms may have no adverse consequences for a healthy monogamous couple. But the reality is that in many if not most societies, a behavioral pattern involving multiple sexual contacts is commonplace, abetted by culturally sanctioned custom or just general permissiveness. In such environments, condoms have an important role to play in curbing AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.

This is the reality that the Vatican denies when it preaches that condom use creates a false sense of security that leads to more AIDS cases than would otherwise occur. (It was a claim most recently voiced in the official Vatican newspaper during a Church-sponsored AIDS conference held in Rome during the May 27-28th weekend.)

One of the attacks that the Church levels against condoms is that they are not very effective. It cites statistics in which an African region where contraceptive use was prevalent had a higher AIDS rate than a region where contraceptive use was not.

This discrepancy can most likely be traced to a factor that the Vatican ignores. According to the U.S. Center for Disease Control (CDC), the preponderance of epidemiological studies and extensive monitoring have found that condoms do work well, provided they are made of latex and used consistently and correctly. Even the cheapest made condoms, the CDC says, reduce exposure risk to AIDS 10,000 fold, and when manufactured of good quality and properly used are 98 percent effective. Hence, in disease-plagued areas where condoms have not had dramatic impact in reducing AIDS incidence, educational programs are likely to be deficient or poorly attended.

The Church's formula for AIDS prevention is based on the moral principle of marital fidelity: celibacy until wedded and avoidance of any extra-marital sex thereafter. Where sexual activity outside of wedlock is prevalent, behavioral patterns must be changed -- a suppression of powerful human libido that is a formidable challenge at the very least.

What if one of the spouses has AIDS? The Vatican remains adamant against condom use. Instead, it advocates that the couple abstain from sex for the rest of their lives, an easy thing for a priest to say.

The bottom line is that neither abstinence outside of marriage nor artificial contraception is a zero sum game in the battle against AIDS. Both have a role in complex societies, with the latter coming into play when the former, for whatever reason, cannot be maintained.

Edward Flattau's fourth book, 'Green Morality,' is now available.

 
 
 

Follow Edward Flattau on Twitter: www.twitter.com/greenmorality

 
  • Comments
  • 15
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
11 hours ago (7:10 AM)
The problem is with your logic! The Vatican’s point is not that you should not use a condom when you are screwing around. What they are saying is: Stop screwing around!

Let me ask you a question: Imagine, your daughter has a new boyfriend who turns out to be HIV positive and/or has AIDS. What will your advice be to her? Will you tell her that she should carry on having sex with him as if he was healthy, just make sure he wares a condom, or will you tell her to stop having sexual intercours­e, with him and that there are many other ways to express ones love than actual sexual intercours­e?

Also, independen­t research shows (Edward Gree et al) that it is change in lifestyle and not condom use that is effective in AIDS prevention­.
07:07 AM on 6/07/2011
Thing is, the sexual moral of the Church is rather problemati­c. It was dreamed up by Jesus
but others later on. It is, when closer looked at, rather nasty, even Godless.
http://soc­ratesbooks­.blogspot.­com/2008/1­1/decent-c­ritic-of-c­hurch-reli­gion-and.h­tml
12:54 AM on 6/07/2011
I do not see Jesus siding with the unrealisti­c dream world. I do not see God being nearly as sex-crazed as humans, and I think the Vatican's obsession with an activity they eschew is unhealthy at best.
But I really do not see why anyone would take advice from those who speak from ignorance! If the priests are celibate, they know nothing of the nuances of marriage or sex.
11:16 AM on 6/07/2011
But they will claim that god has given then some mystical insight, and they speak with his authority.
05:00 PM on 6/06/2011
"What if one of the spouses has AIDS? The Vatican remains adamant against condom use. Instead, it advocates that the couple abstain from sex for the rest of their lives, an easy thing for a priest to say."

Not in Africa. Apparently priests there don't just force themselves on children, even the nuns aren't safe.
http://www­.independe­nt.co.uk/n­ews/world/­europe/vat­ican-confi­rms-report­-of-sexual­-abuse-and­-rape-of-n­uns-by-pri­ests-in-23­-countries­-688261.ht­ml
whirlpool
Save the unicorns!
03:55 PM on 6/06/2011
The Vatican and logic--now there is an oxymoron for you.
03:23 PM on 6/06/2011
Hey I am God on earth if I say it so it is so!
:(
03:02 PM on 6/06/2011
"What if one of the spouses has AIDS? The Vatican remains adamant against condom use. Instead, it advocates that the couple abstain from sex for the rest of their lives, an easy thing for a priest to say."

Why does the church hierarchy - who have vowed to remain celibate and who are not particular­ly scientific - have any credibilit­y when talking about condom use? In reality, most American Catholics have used contracept­ion in order to plan their families. But the church is condemning condom use in Africa?

By condemning the use of condoms, the church is putting men's and women's lives in danger. There's no other way to spin it. There is nothing logical or loving about it.
02:44 PM on 6/06/2011
The fact that the church, as well as the pope, want people to believe something counterint­uitive to what just about every medical institutio­n has stated as fact, really blows my mind. What blows my mind further is the people who will rush to the aid of the church and the pope, stating that the pope somehow makes a "valid point" is supremely absurd.

To take the absurdity to even new heights, when people suggest that in order to not contract a disease, one simply should just stop having sex, despite the fact this goes against our biological nature, is absolutely mind boggling to me.
04:12 PM on 6/06/2011
********..­....one simply should just stop having sex, despite the fact this goes against our biological nature,...­.....*****­****

And just how would that NOT be a "sin against nature"? I agree with whirlpool above. During the past millenia of lesser communicat­ions, the RCC could get away with it's lies and fallacies and hypocrisie­s, but it will not survive the internet.
04:31 PM on 6/06/2011
I agree. Celibacy would be a perfect solution if we WERE NOT programmed to be sexual beings.
08:47 AM on 6/07/2011
I'm programmed to have sex! Just remember that the next time your husband/wi­fe cheats on you. Materialis­tic morality at its best!
11:08 AM on 6/07/2011
Being programmed to have sex is not in any way the same thing as cheating on a spouse, so your argument doesn't make sense. The morality high horse of Jesus attempts to strike again!