CONNECT    

Rev. Jennifer Butler

Rev. Jennifer Butler

GET UPDATES FROM Rev. Jennifer Butler
 

Paul Ryan and Ayn Rand: An Unholy Alliance

Posted: 05/20/11 05:14 PM ET

In an op-ed this week, Rep. Paul Ryan claims the GOP budget he authored would help poor and vulnerable Americans. In reality, this budget violates the principles laid out by major faith groups including the Catholic Bishops and would shred our safety net while preserving tax giveaways for the rich.

In a recent letter to Catholic Archbishop Timothy Dolan, Rep. Ryan said that the Republican budget is consistent with Catholic social teaching and is "aimed at strengthening economic security for seniors, workers, families, and the poor." But his plan, which the House of Representatives passed and the Senate will vote on soon, reflects the philosophy of Ayn Rand more than Ryan's religious rhetoric.

Ayn Rand, of course, is the extreme right-wing philosopher who advocates self-advancement over the common good, and who Ryan credits with articulating the (im)morality underlying his economic philosophy: "Ayn Rand more than anyone else did a fantastic job of explaining the morality of capitalism, the morality of individualism..."

Ryan is using his position of great power to enact policies that would inflict concrete hardship on the most vulnerable Americans. And in the GOP budget authored by Ryan, low-income families face certain harm; millionaires are given massive tax breaks. Ayn Rand would be proud of this fact.

The budget makes two-thirds of its immediate cuts to programs that protect low-income people -- programs like SNAP, which provides nutritional assistance to struggling families. Ryan's transformation of Medicare shifts staggering out-of-pocket medical costs to seniors while ending the guarantee of full coverage. And his proposed conversion of Medicaid into a state block grant will lead to massive health care cuts for children, poor families and seniors in nursing homes.

Ryan is either under the mistaken impression that the best way to help poor people is to give rich people more money with no strings attached, or he believes -- as Ayn Rand would -- that it is morally right to use his office to reward the powerful even at the cost of harming the powerless.

Ryan's Randian sympathies further shine through in his letter to Archbishop Dolan. He claims:

"...We believe human dignity is undermined when citizens become passive clients living on redistributions from government bureaucracies. ... Sustaining national moral character and human dignity have been our paramount goal in developing this Budget."

Ryan's clear implication here is that both poverty and use of the safety net are marks of moral defect. At a time of 9 percent unemployment, when job seekers outnumber job openings 4-to-1 and tens of millions are trapped in poverty, that's a purely Randian position.

Does Ryan conceive of the millions of Americans who can't find work amid the slowest economic recovery since World War II as "passive clients living on redistributions"? Does he believe that making it harder for seniors and struggling families to get the health care they need and put food on the table is good for their moral character? If the answer is yes, as Ryan's letter to Dolan suggests, he needs to stop, reflect and choose between God or Rand. He can't serve both.

 
 
  • Comments
  • 18
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
54 minutes ago (11:33 PM)
These Ayn Randian ideas have been tried before. She didn't invent greed and selfishnes­s, she just tried to make them "Moral." In the 1920's you had no safety net or government programs, no health care, no social security, no food stamps-- and fully a third of the country lived in abject misery. Malnourish­ment and disease was common, and actual hunger was not uncommon. Rand would not only have opposed government aid in Charles Dickens England, she would have mocked the men of wealth who tried to get a donation from Mr. Scrooge for the poor as the problem, too. In her warped view, "Empathy" was the enemy of progress.
07:47 AM on 5/25/2011
Politician­s are neither good or evil. They reflect the priorities of those who pay to get them in office. The rest is posturing. Our government is a reflection of the electoral system. If only American citizens could contribute to candidates­, then politician­s might more accurately reflect the priorities of American citizens. I can choose one bought corpo-cand­idate or the other.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
arkymorgan
09:46 PM on 5/24/2011
Jesus said unto him, If thou wilt be perfect, go [and] sell that thou hast, and give to the poor, and thou shalt have treasure in heaven: and come [and] follow me.

King James version
photo
NVEd
I like mountains.
10:25 AM on 5/25/2011
Jesus did not speak in Shakespear­ian English.
08:21 PM on 5/24/2011
It's nice for someone who is healthy and young to announce that caring for unhealthy and old isn't necessary. Ageism is one prejudice we all eventually grow out of. The problem is, of course, that he has a point; we are facing tough financial times, and we need to take some austerity measures. But perhaps giving up on the natural empathy that makes us human isn't the best way to accomplish this.
06:34 PM on 5/24/2011
When a person proudly embraces both Ayn Rand and the Catholic Church, I have to wonder if that individual understand­s either one - or if they are turning cherry picking into an extreme sport...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grammasher
01:29 PM on 5/24/2011
"Ryan's clear implicatio­n here is that both poverty and use of the safety net are marks of moral defect."

This is the crux of Republican ideology. To them, poverty is a moral failing, therefore, those who are impoverish­ed are not worth our sympathies or help.
05:32 PM on 5/24/2011
Calvinism.
07:54 AM on 5/25/2011
Not true. Geneva, with Calvin as its chief minister, set up hospitals and other welfare systems to feed and care for the empoverish­ed of the city. It was about 400 years before that model was reinstitut­ed by western society.
Maybe if you were to refer to the Borgia popes of about the same period, one of whom stated that "God has given us the papacy we will enjoy it!" you could equate Rand and RCC as Ryan does.
10:55 AM on 5/24/2011
What powerful hubris - that Ryan thinks he is the one to decide that his GOP budget is consistent with Roman Catholic social teachings. Maybe he could show a little humility and allow the RC church to decide for itself. As a theologian­, I know that I would be incensed if a politician tried to tell me. That isn't how it works. I get to tell him that the plan is not consistent with my denominati­on's social teachings.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
grammasher
01:31 PM on 5/24/2011
Just in case you didn't know, these Republican­s know everything and are the sole authority on everything­.
05:35 PM on 5/24/2011
When you are an acolyte of an philosophy that denies the reality of community, and insists that Ego and self-aggra­ndizement is the Ultimate Good....

...what did you expect other than such hubris.

What is sad, is that neither Ryan nor Rand seemed to realize that NO mainstream religion or any spiritual tradition worthy of being called that teaches anything like that. In fact, such relentless pursuit of self-at-th­e-expense-­of-others is the root of sin (at best) and the root of evil (at worst).
photo
kimbanyc
LIBERAL NY DEMOCRAT
08:35 PM on 5/23/2011
Thank you for this exceptiona­l post
03:09 PM on 5/23/2011
Paul Ryan is a guy who grew up poor and was/is embarrasse­d by that fact. His family lived on social security after his father died and he drew SSI while attending college.

He has no business being in Congress, he needs to be on a therapist'­s couch to help him let go of the self-hatre­d.
05:38 PM on 5/24/2011
Ahhhhhhhhh­......

It's all so much clearer now. A Reaction Formation is a terrible thing to waste.

A classic example of the notion that one of the best things you can do to make for a healthier planet is to give it a healthier you, emotionall­y. That way you deal with your inner demons, rather than acting them out for all the world to have to deal with.
11:51 PM on 5/24/2011
Practicing psychiatry without a license, I see. Typical.

Those who begin life poor and make something of themselves are not ashamed of their beginnings­, they are proud of what they have achieved. And they, better than anyone, know the struggle to pull yourself up and also the faults that keep so many others down.
photo
quorthon
High priest, temple of apathetic agnosticism
12:19 PM on 5/25/2011
The whole "pull yourself up" trope is a myth, and is ruining this country. Nobody--an­d I mean nobody--su­cceeds without some social support, be it family, friends, or yes, gubmint.