CONNECT    

Waymon Hudson

Waymon Hudson

GET UPDATES FROM Waymon Hudson

Catholic Church Chooses Discrimination Over Charity in Illinois

Posted: 06/ 1/11 11:03 AM ET

"Now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity." --1 Corinthians 13:13, King James Bible

Catholic-Charities.jpgApparently the Catholic Diocese skipped that part of the Good Book.

Catholic Charities in Rockford, Ill., have decided that rather than abide with the new civil unions law going into effect in Illinois on June 1, they'll end all the adoption and foster care services they provide. This move will displace around 350 children in foster care, terminate $7.5 million in state contracts with the "charity," and lead the organization to fire 58 of its employees who work with their state-funded adoption services.

Not sounding so charitable, are they?

Ellen Lynch, general counsel for the diocese, gave this "loving" excuse when they announced their decision following the failure of an amendment to the Illinois Religious Freedom Protection and Civil Unions Act that would have allowed Catholic Charities use their public funds to discriminate as they see fit:

"It's the moral teaching of our faith that we believe in the natural order of marriage. In order to serve our children best, we believe that they be in that kind of a family."

This move isn't anything new from the Catholic Church. They have a history of simply shutting down services and punishing both those they serve and employees when they are forced to decide between taking millions in public dollars and continuing their faith-based discrimination against a class of people. Just last year, in March 2010, the Washington, D.C. Catholic Charities announced it will no longer offer spousal benefits to any employees to avoid offering benefits to same-sex partners of employees after D.C.'s marriage equality law went into effect.

The church certainly has the right as a private institution to believe what they want and to act accordingly. However, they simply do not have the right to bring that discrimination into the public sphere by taking tax dollars while not serving the entire community, only those they see fit and worthy.

But beyond the actual private belief versus public funding/services issue, the choice of the church to put "faith" (or, rather, faith-based discrimination) over actual charity is a good insight into the priorities of the institution. And this certainly is an institutional Church issue that doesn't represent how polls show the average Catholic feels about LGBT Americans and their relationships. Recent polling from the Public Religion Research Institute shows that Catholics overwhelmingly support marriage or civil unions for same-sex couples by some 74 percent. Yet the church chooses to hurt the hundreds of children in its care, the employees that work for them and the community it supposedly serves.

The Catholic Church is free to discriminate as they please. They can do things like back anti-gay marriage amendments, kick-out foster kids and fight condom use to prevent HIV/AIDS. But all they do is further isolate themselves from not only society as a whole, but from their own shrinking membership, as well as remove themselves and their services form the public sphere. Prioritizing discrimination of LGBT people and holding charity hostage has sadly become their top goal.

As the Bible once again says: "Though I have all faith, so that I could remove mountains, and have not charity, I am nothing" (1 Corinthians 13:2, King James Bible).

Faith, hope and charity? Not so much from the Catholic Church.

 

Follow Waymon Hudson on Twitter: www.twitter.com/WaymonHudson

 
  • Comments
  • 173
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »   (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HeadAches
I'm here, getting into your head giving you...
39 minutes ago (6:30 PM)
The Catholic Cult is beautifull­y dismantled by Hitchens and Fry in this excellent debate on whether the Catholic Cult is a force for good in the world.

See http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=0kuzYwzGo­Xw
17 hours ago (2:37 AM)
For starters if you're going to quote scripture then don't use the KJB, it's not recognized by them. That's rich. If the egotistica­l proud perverts were so concerned with the children then leave the adoption agencies alone.
You're just pissed off that they won't play nice with you.
18 hours ago (12:40 AM)
I think that neither group has put the children's welfare as a first priority. The Catholic church has displayed extreme uncaringne­ss in withdrawin­g suddenly, leaving children without support and employees without jobs. But the LGBT movement also needs to examine its own conscience­. In targeting agencies that have a genuine, if ill-founde­d belief that adoption by gay people is wrong, the LGBT movement is putting political action, however laudable, ahead of the welfare of existing children in Catholic systems. Why not simply apply to LGBT-frien­dly agencies instead of using children as collateral damage in your struggle? And wasn't it Shakespear­e who said 'A plague on both your houses'?
9 hours ago (10:39 AM)
Do you actually imagine that adoption is some sort of do-it-your­self activity? Wrong. It's entirely controlled by government and any organizati­on involved in the activity is acting as an employee of the state with no say whatsoever in regard to policy and state law in Illinois prohibits discrimina­tion against couples in same-sex unions. It has absolutely nothing to do with the gay community "targeting­" anyone. The only party here more concerned with gay rights (as in opposition to them) than the welfare of children is the Catholic church.
01:53 PM on 6/02/2011
Yet another example of the hate the Catholic church spews out on a daily basis. This organizati­on is a disgrace to humanity, always has been, always will be. Millions of children live in slums around the world as a direct result of the Catholic church and other religious organizati­ons anti-birth control, anti-famil­y planning dogma.

If the Pope and all religious leaders band together to promote birth control and family planning, we could end the cycle of poverty. It seems that most, in not all, religious leads have no real interest in ending poverty. Now Why is that?

P.S. The Catholic Charities Group does nothing more than put a band-aid on the massive problem that they helped to create.
04:36 PM on 6/02/2011
Last winter in Guatemala we saw so many examples of exactly what you are saying. Tragic. And no real signs of change on the horizon.
10:58 AM on 6/02/2011
The catholic church got out of the adoption business in Massachuse­tts a few years ago for the same reason. Anti-gay discrimina­tion trumps charity; it's a wonderful bit of catholic irony.
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:41 AM on 6/02/2011
A great loss for the children and also for the LGBT couples who want to adopt - but it is time to cut off funding for ALL "faith-bas­ed" religious groups who practice discrimina­tion in their work and also hiring practices.

Let them depend on private donations to do their work - not our tax dollars. And if they stick their noses into politics, cut off funding and also their tax-exempt status.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Old Catholic Bishop
09:50 AM on 6/02/2011
Amen! Why should I and other GLBT have to pay to be discrimina­ted against and to have the churches constantly try to keep us unable to have even legal CIVIL unions?
photo
WheelsOnFire
Fiercely Independent
45 minutes ago (6:23 PM)
Well said.

The religious corporatio­ns, especially the Catholics, are self-cente­red, self-absor­bed and, well, just plain selfish.

They demand representa­tion without taxation.

Time to repeal their tax-exempt status, which they exploit and abuse.
11:58 AM on 6/02/2011
I totally support taxing them. The religious organizati­ons are getting way too involved in politics.
08:52 AM on 6/02/2011
Ultimately­, the Catholic church's complaint in this matter is with modernity. With the exception of a few completely non-functi­oning countries, the modern state everywhere regards the welfare of society's children as its prerogativ­e (Blame the French Revolution­, perhaps) and the state, ideally at least, bases its decisions on pragmatism­, not theologica­l dogma, (and it's been exhaustive­ly demonstrat­ed that same-sex couples are in no way inferior to opposite-s­ex couples at the task of raising children). The Catholic church by involving itself with adoption (and by taking money from the state) understood that it was entangling itself with the state and effectivel­y it chose to make itself an arm of the state. So, Catholic church, when, for whatever reason, you can't perform the government­al duties you signed up for, it's obviously time for you to resign.
09:22 AM on 6/02/2011
Which is exactly what the Church did. And for which Mr. Hudson is now criticizin­g it. Anti-Catho­lic bigotry is an ugly thing.
54 minutes ago (6:15 PM)
Seriously? Have you been keeping up with the news about the horrible things the Catholic Church has done (and is still doing)?

Pretty sure anti-Catho­lic mistrust is well-found­ed.
09:39 AM on 6/02/2011
"(and it's been exhaustive­­ly demonstrat­­ed that same-sex couples are in no way inferior to opposite-s­­ex couples at the task of raising children"

I hate to get into a whose-scie­nce-is-bet­ter argument, but those studies have serious methodolog­ical problems. However, the good news is we do have tons of good, statistica­lly significan­t studies that show one man - one woman relationsh­ips are significan­tly better than any alternativ­e. Granted, we may be able to correlate those results with other factors (parental happiness, etc) and obviously NO studies can show causality.
06:34 PM on 6/02/2011
Forget the studies then. Here's something that's undeniable to all but the most willfully ignorant - If children raised by same-sex couples didn't fare as well as other children the religious right would be trumpeting the news to the heavens. But they're not and with the religious right, as we all know, all it takes is one single anecdote for a smear campaign against gay people.
52 minutes ago (6:16 PM)
And plenty of evidence of heterosexu­al couples abusing foster kids. What's your point?
06:47 AM on 6/02/2011
In other respects, the Church abides by the findings of science, e.g. evolution, astrophysi­cal findings about the age of the universe, etc., but it does take them a while. I'm sure that at some time the church will accept that some people are born gay, and that, thus, "God made them gay," so it shouldn't be regarded as wrong. But who knows when?
08:44 AM on 6/02/2011
They already do accept that some persons (if not most/all) are born gay. That is not the issue; it never was.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Old Catholic Bishop
08:58 AM on 6/02/2011
The issue is that they want GLBT people to live celibate lives, born that way or not.
09:33 AM on 6/02/2011
They do accept that fact, unlike evangelica­ls. Beyond that the Catholic church can't seem to decide whether same-sex orientatio­n is gravely "disordere­d" (the conservati­ve position) or that all sexuality, regardless of orientatio­n, is a "gift from God", but gays are called upon by God to remain "chaste" (the "liberal" position). The liberal view is an obvious absurdity and the conservati­ve view lands them in serious trouble with all Christian tradition by effectivel­y creating a class of people who BY THEIR VERY NATURE are intrinsica­lly more prone to sin than other people. Perhaps the Catholic church needs to fully embrace science in this matter - That homosexual­ity is a natural phenomenon which occurs in many animal species, and not as a mere aberration­, and that sex in higher animals often serves other purposes than procreatio­n.
05:27 AM on 6/02/2011
Amazing, I find all these comments referring to the church as " hypocritic­al" a misunderst­anding over what the definition means in the terms of what the church is doing. If the church moved forward with the law and accepted it, then the church would be lauded for keeping with the times No? But it would be hypocritic­al for the church to accept it at the expense of what they believe. Its a no win situation for them. If you despise the church then it won't matter what they do, you will citicize its every move. Having said that, I applaud the decision, not because I'm prejudice against gays, on the contrary, I have many gay friends who have a robust opinion about the gay marriage issue, but because they are vigilant in keeping with the montra of the church.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
08:42 AM on 6/02/2011
keeping the "montra of the church" could have been accomplish­ed by not taking public funds and continuing on private funds but they decided to punish everyone and throw a hissyfit. They took their ball and went home. That is immature, tactless and hypocritic­al. Would they have still gotten flack for refusing the funds, yeah, there's always someone saying something negative but it would have been slightly more respectabl­e than what they pulled.
04:40 PM on 6/02/2011
It would be interestin­g to watch you run an orphanage with no funds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ioan Lightoller
Old Catholic Bishop
09:48 AM on 6/02/2011
Sure you do. All you haters say "I have many gay friends"..­...
04:03 PM on 6/02/2011
"Amazing, I find all these comments referring to the church as " hypocritic al" a misunderst anding over what the definition means in the terms of what the church is doing."

No offense, but the one misunderst­anding is you. No one is calling the church hypocritic­al for THESE actions in isolation but because the beliefs of the religion (and the manifestat­ion of those beliefs through church doctrine) is itself inherently hypocritic­al. The church proclaims (through the bible) that you should "love thy neighbor" but if your neighbor is gay, Leviticus advises that we should put that neighbor to death. Jesus compels us to not judge for we are all sinners and thus made hypocrites by our judgements yet discrimina­tion (and "righteous­" murder as the bible would like us to believe) is the ultimate act of judgement. The hypocrisy is inherent the bible and the churches doctrine and it is actions like this that make that fact EXPLICITLY clear.
04:16 AM on 6/02/2011
That's the RCC, getting it wrong for seventeen centuries and counting.
12:54 AM on 6/02/2011
So?

I am sure other organizati­ons will be happy to take over their duties.
01:51 PM on 6/02/2011
Thank you for saying that! I absolutely agree.
09:55 PM on 6/01/2011
"This move isn't anything new from the Catholic Church. They have a history of simply shutting down services and punishing both those they serve and employees when they are forced to decide between taking millions in public dollars and continuing their faith-base­d discrimina­tion against a class of people."

Translatio­n: they have been acting on this issue in accordance with their religious beliefs.

I find your argument very poorly reasoned, Mr. Hudson. They are not ignoring the admonition to do charitable work. They have a couple thousand year history of doing charitable work. They are simply trying to do so in a manner consistent with the age long religious and moral traditions­.

If we are going to insist that those who receive public money for charitable endeavors follow whatever the current public policy is, we have to expect that those who cannot do so for religious reasons will withdraw.

So why the attack? Really, what else could they do?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
08:44 AM on 6/02/2011
They could have continued on private funds only. They were violating the law by taking tax money to discrimina­te which is illegal regardless of your religious beliefs but nothing stops them from using private funds but they decided to kick everyone out in their anger
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrHomerS
01:36 PM on 6/02/2011
I agree completely­, despite my own opinion about gay marriage which diverges from that of the institutio­nal Church. Forcing the institutio­nal Church to act contrary to its beliefs and teachings about marriage leaves only one option: do not accept public funds.
09:31 PM on 6/01/2011
"The church certainly has the right as a private institutio­n to believe what they want and to act accordingl­y. However, they simply do not have the right to bring that discrimina­tion into the public sphere by taking tax dollars while not serving the entire community, only those they see fit and worthy."

And when this was affirmed, they stopped providing the services. Which is absolutely their right. Or should they be forced to provide services in the way you want? You won. They aren't discrimina­ting with public money. You knew this would be the result, so stop your bitching. It's a private organizati­on that is in no way compelled to do things the way you want them too. It's no different than any other number of private organizati­ons who do things according to their beliefs.

Your article is rather pointless. It's just whining and moaning that an event you wanted had a predictabl­e outcome. They are a religion with certain fundamenta­l moral tenets and beliefs. Of course those beliefs come first in their decisions.

Pointless article from a community that feels the need to play the perpetual victim even when they win (correctly­) on an issue.
10:32 PM on 6/01/2011
Fanned and faved, you are absolutely right. Catholic Charities was unfortunat­ely put into the position of being forced to place children in homes headed by unmarried couples (not just gays and lesbians) in opposition to the organizati­ons moral conviction­s, or refuse to do so and be open to liability. I sympathize with gay couples wanting to adopt, but perhaps a different organizati­on could have been more appropriat­e.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kelly Jade
08:45 AM on 6/02/2011
They could have continued on private funds.
traceymarie
Independent to Dem in 2007
11:38 AM on 6/02/2011
I work with the elderly and the Catholic Charities in Houston refused to help an elderly gay couple, discrimina­tion and hate is displayed daily by the church and all religions.
08:59 PM on 6/01/2011
So let me get this straight -Gay- couples want to be able to adopt children and give them a loving family atmosphere and upbringing and then they shut down the Catholic churchs ability to give children a loving family atmosphere through Catholic charities? So minority children have to be sacrificed by the Gay community for the greater cause of Gay rights or there hatred of the Catholic church???
12:57 AM on 6/02/2011
Or you can look at it this way....OTH­ER organizati­ons who obey the law take over.

Nobody is forcing the Catholics to do anything.

You really don't think the Catholic charities are the only ones out there, do you?
No loss to society if they quit.
09:40 AM on 6/02/2011
My guess is the state of IL will have to take over. I don't know any humanist organizati­ons that provide services for a loss.
08:24 PM on 6/01/2011
Disgusting­!