MicrosoftMore
CONNECT    
LOS ANGELES RESTAURANTS REAL ESTATE AROUND TOWN IMPACT BEST OF LA

Brian Grazer's Malibu Home For $19.5 Million

First Posted: 05-24-11 11:57 AM   |   Updated: 05-24-11 03:56 PM

Via AOL Real Estate: Mega-producer Brian Grazer has placed his Malibu Colony home on the market for $19.5 million. The oceanfront property has over 6,000 square feet of living space across three floors, and features include a bbq and gym on the beach deck, two offices, and a media screening room. The home has five bedrooms and eight bathrooms, and both the master bedroom and the living room open up to ocean views. Realtor Stephen Shapiro says the home is the only one in the area with an indoor pool, making it "one of the finest houses in Malibu Colony."

Grazer bought the Malibu Colony home with second wife Gigi Levangie Grazer in 2003. The couple used it for a "change of scenery" (as Elle.com put it) from their 20,000 square foot Pacific Palisades home.

Photos by Everett Fenton Gidley, courtesy of the official listing with Stephen Shapiro of Westside Estate Agency.

1 of 23
Total comments: 99 | Post a Comment
1 of 23
Rate This Slide
Unfazed
Amazed

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Current Top 5 Slides
loading...
Users who voted on this slide
← Prev|Next →
loading...

FOLLOW HUFFPOST LOS ANGELES

Via AOL Real Estate: Mega-producer Brian Grazer has placed his Malibu Colony home on the market for $19.5 million. The oceanfront property has over 6,000 square feet of living space across three floor...
Via AOL Real Estate: Mega-producer Brian Grazer has placed his Malibu Colony home on the market for $19.5 million. The oceanfront property has over 6,000 square feet of living space across three floor...
Related News On Huffington Post:
 

 
Loading...
Filed by Anna Almendrala  | 
What's Your Reaction?
Amazing
 Inspiring
 Funny
 Scary
 Hot
 Crazy
 Important
 Weird

More in Los Angeles...


 
  • Comments
  • 99
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Login or connect with: 
More Login Options
Post Comment Preview Comment
To reply to a Comment: Click "Reply" at the bottom of the comment; after being approved your comment will appear directly underneath the comment you replied to.
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »   (4 total)
photo
IsabelRingin
You can't await your own arrival...
17 hours ago (4:28 AM)
I don't know if it would be a good idea for me to have a home on the beach and then make it so comfortabl­e I'd never want to leave because I wouldn't. I'd spend weeks on end inside my house. Especially if I had an ocean view. I'd become a hermit.
Permalink  |
photo
madame fate
05:43 PM on 5/25/2011
wow Simply stunning. They had me wanting to buy it until I saw the last picture with all the houses lined up so close against each other. Darn.
Permalink  |
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
edrice222
01:42 PM on 5/25/2011
Beautiful home, breathtaki­ng location.
Price... not so beautiful.
Property taxes... about $200,000 a year.
But it is lovely.
Permalink  |
whowhatwhywherewhen
01:01 PM on 5/25/2011
HEAVEN
Permalink  |
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tristan9
12:37 PM on 5/25/2011
Grazer is a good businessma­n. He ditched his 3rd wife shortly before the 10 year time limit of their marriage would entitle her to 1/2 of his wealth if they divorced past that time frame under California Common Law. He saved about 400 million with that move by broad estimation­, maybe more. There's a guy who knows the difference between love and money.
Permalink  |
photo
madame fate
05:44 PM on 5/25/2011
Tom Cruise did the same thing with Nicole Kidman.
Permalink  |
HuffPoPaul
3 hours ago (6:21 PM)
Just to clarify, the 10 yr over/under "rule" in CA Family Law is a classifica­tion as to "long-term­" vs. "short-ter­m" marriage. The difference merely guides a judge as to length of spousal support ("alimony.­") In a long-term marriage, spousal support can be awarded for life; in a short-term marriage it is usually not awarded for more than 1/2 of the length of the marriage. In either instance, each party is entitled to 1/2 of the community property assets, which are assets acquired during the marriage, including income of either party. Prenuptial and postnuptia­l agreements can change some of these rules, sometimes.
Permalink  |
photo
Simplecomplexity
12:31 PM on 5/25/2011
....am looking for my checkbook. :-)

This home is stunning. Just my style too.
Permalink  |
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
calilife4me
12:08 PM on 5/25/2011
Nice house!
Permalink  |
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tristan9
10:54 AM on 5/25/2011
incidental­ly, this guy dumps alot of money out in alimony and child payments having been thru 3 marriages already. My question is, who gets the next home and where does he hide all his dough?
Permalink  |
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tristan9
10:49 AM on 5/25/2011
This kind of opulence is disgusting­. King Louis at home in his pig sty. Degenerate­.
Permalink  |
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
LaurieAnn
Still liberal after all these years...
11:12 AM on 5/25/2011
No one needs multiple homes costing multiple millions of dollars; we need to tax the uber-wealt­hy far, far, more.
Permalink  |
Lovapanda
10:41 AM on 5/25/2011
snark all you want.....b­ut this house could actually make a person think that L.A. is a nice place to live.....b­eautiful.
Permalink  |
photo
grione45
09:12 AM on 5/25/2011
Got Tsunami Insurance?
Permalink  |
riverhouse
7 hours ago (2:30 PM)
The problem in the Colony is serious beach erosion.
Permalink  |
rcampbell
08:44 AM on 5/25/2011
Wouldn't pay a nickel more than $17.623 million, he said, tongue firmly pressing against cheek.
Permalink  |
photo
RT916
03:51 AM on 5/25/2011
The economy must be awful, with people shelling out 20 mil for houses and all.
Permalink  |
Sandmanj
Tread gently. Mother nature is pregnant.
12:12 AM on 5/25/2011
The property taxes would be $200K/year­.
Permalink  |
Sally1952
09:42 PM on 5/24/2011
Love it!
Permalink  |
 
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »   (4 total)