Opinion Contributor
Time to ax federal jobs programs
With the nation’s unemployment rate still above 9 percent and a steady stream of worrisome labor news (the latest statistic: 429,000 new unemployment claims last week), federal policymakers are facing pressure to do something about joblessness. The giant 2009 stimulus bill was supposed to cut unemployment to less than 7 percent by now — but that clearly hasn’t worked as planned.
Some policymakers are now looking at expanding job training and other federal employment programs. Even conservative House Budget Committee ChairmanPaul Ryan (R-Wis.) proposed to “strengthen” these programs in his recent fiscal plan. Alas, the history of waste and failure in these programs argues for termination, not expansion.
Continue Reading
Federal programs for unemployed and disadvantaged workers now cost $18 billion a year, yet the Government Accountability Office recently concluded that “little is known about the effectiveness of employment and training programs we identified.” Indeed, many studies over the decades have found that these programs — though well intentioned — don’t help the economy much, if at all.
Worse, federal jobs programs have long been notorious for wastefulness. The word “boondoggle” was coined in the 1930s, to describe the inefficiencies of New Deal jobs programs. Laborers on Works Progress Administration projects were generally viewed as slackers, and a popular song of the era went, “WPA, WPA, lean on your shovel to pass the time away.”
The modern era of jobs programs began in the 1960s, under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, who created an array of employment services. Indeed, so many overlapping programs were created that, in 1969, Labor Secretary George Shultz called the organization chart for jobs programs a “wiring diagram for a perpetual motion machine.”
In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon created — and President Jimmy Carter then expanded — the Public Service Employment Program, which used federal dollars to create hundreds of thousands of jobs in local governments and community groups. The program was “scandal-ridden,” according to Congressional Quarterly, and led to many “newspaper exposés of local instances of nepotism, favoritism and other kinds of fraud.”
Luckily, President Ronald Reagan killed the entire program. Unfortunately, he then backed a wasteful “conservative” solution to high unemployment — expanded job training. Reagan said the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 would not be “another make-work, dead-end bureaucratic boondoggle.”
But in his book, “The Job Training Charade,” University of Oregon labor professor Gordon Lafer found that “from its start, JTPA was plagued by widespread abuse and mismanagement.” A 1994 official study on JTPA found that job-training programs created no significant benefits for most participants.
Get reporter alerts
-
Chris Edwards
-
Daniel Murphy
Readers' Comments (18)
'.” Indeed, many studies over the decades have found that these programs — though well intentioned — don’t help the economy much, if at all.''
Read more: http://www.politico.com/news/s...
What about the people they were designed to help? The seniors re-training program for one!
Seniors are really hard hit in this jobless recession recovery , do you want to throw them under the bus?
There are many places to cut waste in the government -- people programs are not waste..
If you cut that program and ones like it in a recession such as this , there is no other places they can go ...
The taxpayers have spent over $100 Billion dollars on their numerous agencies that overlap each other.
Do people know that there are over 50 agencies?......All with our taxes.
Taxes used for offices and staff doing the same thing.
They have names such as CETA, JTPA, AYES, MDTA, YACC, HIRE and on and on and on.
None of them work......NONE.
They make promises and can't keep them.....The only thing they keep is THEIR job.
Almost sounds like the GOP. When will they start with the WASTE the GAO has shown us months ago?
We can't afford the waste. We're broke, remember ?
yes the made up jobs need to go
First notice that the report was funded by the Koch Bros.-established conservative Cato Institute. Koch Industries, who got sweetheart deals behind the scenes with the Cheney national energy plan written by the energy and chemical companies, is one of the nation's largest polluters of oil and chemicals like benezine. Under Cheney, huge EPA fines imposed under the Clinton Administration, were greatly reduced.
Also the article refers to the Republican Hoover Great Depression where the Republican response to the corrupt Wall St. meltdown was to DO NOTHING resulting in 25% (conservatively) unemployment, business and bank failures, and home and farm foreclosures. People starved, committed suicide, and died from neglect and lack of access to healthcare (but not the rich).
Thanks to FDR, the government intervention and jobs programs like the WPA, CCC, TVA, etc. that the GOP scoffed at, railed against screeching communism, marxism, socialism, etc. (sound familiar), resulted in reducing the unemployment to 9% in just his first of three terms. In short, despite the GOP howls, millions of Americans were helped which, in turn, helped the country. Another current parallel: the GOP wailed about government spending and a balanced budget, so when FDR and the Democrats cut spending to balance the budget, the recovery stalled. It took WWII, which the GOP opposed until we were attacked by the Japanese, to stimulate the economy with war material production.
We know that the GOP "cut and grow" plan is a joke just like their bogus Reagan-era to present "trickle down economy" that made the filthy rich filthy richer. The latest plague of baggies and "born-again deficit hawks" wanted to cut $68 billion from mostly social programs that Wall St. indicated would have cost 700,000 jobs. Bush created the fewest jobs, 1.1 million over eight years, while losing five million manufacturing jobs. Thanks to the Bush Great Recession, over eight million jobs were lost at a rate of 600,000 monthly during the last half of 2008 into the first three months of 2009 or before the Obama ARRA went into effect creating more jobs that Bush. The GOP also opposed the bail out of the auto industry on partisan grounds which would have cost over 1.5 million innovative manufacturing jobs plus an addition seven-to-one jobs in automaker-dependent jobs in the private sector.
To the Republicans, unemployment benefits are welfare while the $4 trillion, 10-12-year, non-jobs-creating tax breaks for the rich were called "job creators" though the GOP cannot point to a single job created, not for the working class anyway. Under Bush, there were 1931 top secret companies with 854,000 government workers and 265,000 contractors costing 30% more. Their 435-plus, GOP-approved war-profiteers in Iraq and Afghanistan failed in their nation-building while posting over $8 billion in waste, fraud, and abuse and $6.6 billion of Iraqi funds were also stolen. All being protected from oversight and accountability by the GOP (Greed On Parade) in Congress.
Rather than money going to help the poor and working class, they have already successfully fought to keep the subsidies for the oil companies posting record profits and agri-business and their military-industrial-congressional and "bridge to nowhere" pork projects. For the poorly-educated, Republicans have historically NEVER represented the working class whom they confuse, manipulate and exploit while picking their pockets. They scoff at job centers claiming that people can go on the Internet to find jobs. Well, as a five-year, employment specialist, I can say that most jobs though posted on the Internet do not always result in employment, not above entry-level. Also, poor people, older workers, including the elderly, may not have computers or the Internet or do not have the tech skills that many take for granted. Dealing with poor people, inner-city, welfare mothers and high school dropouts, job applicants often do not have reading, writing, computer skills, a resume, or job-search skills or even a way to get around.
Affluent Republicans, who do not work with the poor or needy or have isolated themselves from the hardships of everyday Americans, have shown consistently that they do not care. Their thoughtless willingness to cut funding for programs for the poor and working class while giving massive amounts of taxpayer money to the rich and coprporations shows how morally bankrupt they are. Judgment Day cannot come soon enough for these selfish, greedy people, but it is coming. No amount of GOP spin or burdening wealth will save them.
Heard of any jobs programs from Republicans other than more tax breaks for the rich and corporations who are making out great as the working class suffer? Name one law passed that benefitted specifically the working class under the previous neo-con-artists Bush-Cheney. In comparison, Clinton created more jobs, had a better economy and prosperty for Americans and less debt than Reagan, Bush I and Bush, the lesser combined.
Yes, anything that creates JOBS is clearly wasteful. That's why the GOP HASN'T SHOWN US **ONE** JOBS BILL SINCE THEY TOOK OVER IN JANUARY.
I'm sure to each person that gets a job this way it wasn't "wasteful." What snobs.
And many, many do not. I've been working for 35 years and never ONCE got a job or been able to help provide one to someone else through the myth they call "personal networking."
Many income-strapped families can't AFFORD a computer or an Internet connection. (And the Internet connection is one of those things that goes when it comes to keeping the lights on.) Using the library usually means signing up for a time, waiting for that time to come, sending out everything in that one span of usually an hour, and then having to wait hours or even another day before repeating the cycle to see the responses. And then losing out to someone who responds faster because they can surf from home.
Monster isn't the private-sector, end-all, be-all. It sucks for specialty areas like tech jobs, can get you TONS of emails from pyramid schemers wanting you to 'sell insurance', and is difficult to browse if you want to expand your skill set into other areas or change careers altogether.
These trust fund babies who got their jobs through Daddy or Daddy's Rich Friends need to stop giving job-seeking advice to people who live in The Real World.
I think anyone looking at the WPA will agree that it was successful in its aims. Although many of its members were not intensely productive, the program built large amounts of infrastructure, reduced unemployment (through direct hiring, arguably the best gvt approach during recessions), and was not that expensive since it did not pay people that well. But jobs programs have had mixed records, and the Nixon/Ford/Carter push to expand local governance was clearly too much of a "success." Temporary, federal, "recession" jobs programs make sense.
How do articles like this ever see the light of day? Stick it where the sun don't shine! This is the same mentality that couldn't comprehend why the people of the 9th Ward didn't fill up their SUV's with gas and go to the Hilton when Katrina hit.... not everybody has a rich daddy! And the GOP is trying to keep it that way! I attended a government training program and met hundreds of young people just like myself from underprivileged families who really needed a hand, not a hand out! That's what these fools forget! If you don't train people and help them get a job they'll just go on welfare!!! How stupid are you people!
If that's the case, how is it you can post your gibberish? Did you build the internet? Did you come up with the technology for all the wonders of the 21st century? How much have you contributed to our society? You obviously don't work because you post here every day all day.
As is the case in the majority of exposed instances of fraud and waste in government programs, these are the work of the oh, so righteous and efficient private sector who act in conjunction with the corrupt politicians which they conveniently own! By the way, why is the Gov. of Fla. not in jail, as should be the case with how many others passing thru the revolving door? It isn't the programs that fail; it's the agents of official and corporate greed and corruption that are the cause. Next time you consider voting for a "conservative" who blames gov. for all of our woes, think about why they want a job working for such an odious institution in the first place! Could be that they want to really perpetuate the problem because it's just so profitable for them to do so. It isn't the civil servant at the core of corruption and waste; it's the "elected" overseer and his/her appointed lackey that are in accordence with the directives of their true employers- the corporatocracy!
Not sure what news footage YOU were watching, but I saw plenty of vehicles parked(floating) in the streets of the 9th Ward that I sure couldn't afford. The reason they stayed is the same reason the jobs programs don't work. They are lazy and don't want to help themselves, they know the Govt. will come save them. Before you throw the race card, I am aware that the majority of people on welfare are caucasian and they are lazy as well. It is not a race thing, it is a culture thing. They have been raised for generations to expect the Govt. handout. The real reason entitlement spending is so high is that they are somewhat reliable liberal voters, when you can sufficiently bribe them with cigs and beer to go cast a ballot.
IT IS VERY SHOCKING AT HOW HIGH THE UNEMPLOYMENT RATE IS. It is amazing that the dems blame Bush for this situation, when the the rate was so much lower before Obama became president. the dems only blame others for their silly ideas. Also I am tired of the MSM telling me how smart Obama is. He is constantly making boo boos. Today he was giving an award to someone who had died fighting for his country. Obama said he was alive. He only knows how to read the prompter, and doesn't pay any attention to what he is saying. Remember when he said "corpse" rather than corp? Had that been Bush the MSM would have broadcast it all over every day, in every way. No wonder I get so disgusted when people start telling me how brilliant Obama is. NOT!
There is already a jobs program in place. It is called the free market. In Georgia, for example there is a farm labor shortage. It is estimated that 11000 to 15000 farm workers are needed to fill the void left by the illegal Aliens who fled the State. There is one catch, and that is that work, hard work is required and the pay is the Federal minimum wage. Let's see how many of these suffering "poor" line up to earn a day's work for a day's pay. I'll bet none.
Let them starve if they won't work. If you do work and are not making enough money to support your family, by all means you should receive assistance in the form of food, but if you refuse to work, you and your family should starve. You asked for it. No, you demanded it.
They are lazy and don't want to help themselves,
You forgot to accuse them of drug use too!
It WASN'T that much lower under Bush. When Bush left office, the unemployment rate was 7.8%. It's now 9.1%. 1.3% diffeerence is not THAT much lower!!!
Why should I? You did it for me.
free printable Rental Lease Agreement
Free state Tax Forms
Dow Jones Today
You must be logged in to comment
Not yet a member?
Register Now