Opinion Contributor

Time to ax federal jobs programs

Close

Send to a friendTime to ax federal jobs programs

  • Please enter your e-mail
    Invalid e-mail
  • Please enter a valid e-mail
    Invalid e-mail
Cancel
  • 18 Comments
Job listings are seen on a board at the Verdugo Jobs Center in California. | AP Photo
Job training programs would be good areas to cut spending, the authors write. | AP Photo Close

With the nation’s unemployment rate still above 9 percent and a steady stream of worrisome labor news (the latest statistic: 429,000 new unemployment claims last week), federal policymakers are facing pressure to do something about joblessness. The giant 2009 stimulus bill was supposed to cut unemployment to less than 7 percent by now — but that clearly hasn’t worked as planned.

Some policymakers are now looking at expanding job training and other federal employment programs. Even conservative House Budget Committee ChairmanPaul Ryan (R-Wis.) proposed to “strengthen” these programs in his recent fiscal plan. Alas, the history of waste and failure in these programs argues for termination, not expansion.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset

Get Adobe Flash player

Federal programs for unemployed and disadvantaged workers now cost $18 billion a year, yet the Government Accountability Office recently concluded that “little is known about the effectiveness of employment and training programs we identified.” Indeed, many studies over the decades have found that these programs — though well intentioned — don’t help the economy much, if at all.

Worse, federal jobs programs have long been notorious for wastefulness. The word “boondoggle” was coined in the 1930s, to describe the inefficiencies of New Deal jobs programs. Laborers on Works Progress Administration projects were generally viewed as slackers, and a popular song of the era went, “WPA, WPA, lean on your shovel to pass the time away.”

The modern era of jobs programs began in the 1960s, under Presidents John F. Kennedy and Lyndon B. Johnson, who created an array of employment services. Indeed, so many overlapping programs were created that, in 1969, Labor Secretary George Shultz called the organization chart for jobs programs a “wiring diagram for a perpetual motion machine.”

In the 1970s, President Richard Nixon created — and President Jimmy Carter then expanded — the Public Service Employment Program, which used federal dollars to create hundreds of thousands of jobs in local governments and community groups. The program was “scandal-ridden,” according to Congressional Quarterly, and led to many “newspaper exposés of local instances of nepotism, favoritism and other kinds of fraud.”

Luckily, President Ronald Reagan killed the entire program. Unfortunately, he then backed a wasteful “conservative” solution to high unemployment — expanded job training. Reagan said the Job Training Partnership Act of 1982 would not be “another make-work, dead-end bureaucratic boondoggle.”

But in his book, “The Job Training Charade,” University of Oregon labor professor Gordon Lafer found that “from its start, JTPA was plagued by widespread abuse and mismanagement.” A 1994 official study on JTPA found that job-training programs created no significant benefits for most participants.

  • 18 Comments

Read more about:

Get reporter alerts
  • Chris Edwards
  • Daniel Murphy

Readers' Comments (18)

  1. default avatar for user LIL John
    LIL John
    Party: Republican
    Reply #1
    Jun. 23, 2011 - 11:41 PM EST
  2. default avatar for user skint
    skint
    Party: Independent
    Reply #2
    Jun. 23, 2011 - 11:46 PM EST
  3. avatar for user Marine3
    Marine3
    Party: N/A
    Reply #3
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 2:26 AM EST
  4. default avatar for user Willie12345
    Willie12345
    Party: NA
    Reply #4
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 7:56 AM EST
  5. default avatar for user Larry B
    Larry B
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #5
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 10:39 AM EST
  6. default avatar for user hallaquila
    hallaquila
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #6
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 11:04 AM EST
  7. default avatar for user itsallsogoofy
    itsallsogoofy
    Party: NA
    Reply #7
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 11:23 AM EST
  8. default avatar for user mj3652
    mj3652
    Party: NA
    Reply #8
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 12:12 PM EST
  9. default avatar for user Once Bitten
    Once Bitten
    Party: Independent
    Reply #9
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 12:20 PM EST
  10. default avatar for user Once Bitten
    Once Bitten
    Party: Independent
    Reply #10
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 12:24 PM EST
  11. default avatar for user berniem
    berniem
    Party: Independent
    Reply #11
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 12:54 PM EST
  12. avatar for user ZoomieMSgt
    ZoomieMSgt
    Party: Conservative
    Reply #12
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 1:31 PM EST
  13. default avatar for user Rocky1
    Rocky1
    Party: Conservative
    Reply #13
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 2:23 PM EST
  14. default avatar for user rowdy1
    rowdy1
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #14
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 4:51 PM EST
  15. avatar for user Captain Crunch II
    Captain Crunch II
    Party: Independent
    Reply #15
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 5:16 PM EST
  16. avatar for user Captain Crunch II
    Captain Crunch II
    Party: Independent
    Reply #16
    Jun. 24, 2011 - 5:17 PM EST
  17. avatar for user ZoomieMSgt
    ZoomieMSgt
    Party: Conservative
    Reply #17
    Jun. 25, 2011 - 12:59 PM EST
  18. avatar for user jelet54
    jelet54
    Party: N/A
    Reply #18
    Jun. 27, 2011 - 5:50 AM EST
Read all 18 comments in our forum

You must be logged in to comment

  • Email is Required
  • Password is Required

Not yet a member?

Register Now

Comment on this article

  1. Message is Required
    (9000 characters max)
  2. (200 characters max)
Get Adobe Flash player

Pollitico

Breadwinner
Does Mitt Romney's money advantage make him unbeatable in the GOP primaries?

Wuerking Drawings

Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
Wuerker Cartoon
See all