Manufacturing

This house believes that an economy cannot succeed without a big manufacturing base.

JOIN THIS LIVE DEBATE

View Siemens's perspective

About sponsorship
ABOUT SPONSORSHIP

Our sponsors provide financial support for this website. In the spirit of open debate, we invite them to offer their own perspective on the matter at hand. If they accept, they must declare any relationship or conflict of interest they have with the subject under discussion. They may not contact The Economist Group editorial staff once the debate begins, and they may not attempt to influence the moderation of the debate in any way. At all times, The Economist's editorial staff maintain full control of the debate's moderation.

OverviewOpening (95 comments)Rebuttal (82 comments)Closing (53 comments)Post-debate
 28Tuesday
June
1Friday
July
6Wednesday
July
8Friday
July
Latest updatesStatements
Statements
Guest
Statements
Decision
How an Economist debate works
HOW OXFORD STYLE DEBATES WORK

Economist Debates adapt the Oxford style of debating to an online forum. The format was made famous by the 186-year-old Oxford Union and has been practised by heads of state, prominent intellectuals and galvanising figures from across the cultural spectrum. It revolves around an assertion that is defended on one side (the "proposer") and assailed on another (the "opposition") in a contest hosted and overseen by a moderator. Each side has three chances to persuade readers: opening, rebuttal and closing.

In Economist Debates, proposer and opposition each consist of a single speaker, experts in the issue at hand. We also invite featured guests to comment on the debate—not to take sides, but to provide context and informed perspective on the subject.

Those attending an Oxford-style debate participate in two ways: by voting to determine the debate’s winner and by addressing comments to the moderator. The same holds here. As a reader, you are encouraged to vote. As long as the debate is open, you may change your vote as many times as you change your mind. And you are encouraged to air your own views by sending comments to the moderator. These should be relevant to the motion, the speakers’ statements or the observations of featured guests. And they must be addressed directly to the moderator, who will single out the most compelling for discussion by the speakers.

 

Do you agree with the motion?

76%
voted yes
24%
voted no
This debate has finished. Voting is now closed.

Voting at a glance

50%
 
 
 
 
DAY
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14

Representing the sides

Ha-Joon  Chang
Defending the motion
Ha-Joon Chang  
HA-JOON CHANG
Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge

Ha-Joon Chang teaches at the Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge. In addition to numerous articles in journals and edited volumes, he has written 13 books and edited 10. His books include "The Political Economy of Industrial Policy", "Kicking Away the Ladder", "Bad Samaritans" and "23 Things That They Don't Tell You About Capitalism". By the end of 2011, his writings will have been translated into 24 languages. He has worked as a consultant for numerous international organisations, national governments, private-sector firms and NGOs. He is the winner of the 2003 Gunnar Myrdal Prize and the 2005 Wassily Leontief Prize.

Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge
READ MORE
Jagdish Bhagwati
Against the motion
Jagdish Bhagwati  
JAGDISH BHAGWATI
Professor of Economics and Law, Columbia University

Jagdish Bhagwati is Professor of Economics and Law at Columbia University, Senior Fellow in International Economics at the Council on Foreign Relations and co-chair of the High-Level Experts Group on Trade appointed by the governments of Britain, Germany, Indonesia and Turkey. He has made seminal contributions to the post-war theory of commercial policy, strengthening the case for free trade, with several books, including "In Defense of Globalization", and articles on current policy issues. He has been an adviser to the UN on globalisation and a member of the Advisory Committee to the UN Secretary General on the NEPAD process in Africa. He was a member of expert groups on the future of the WTO and of UNCTAD, and is widely regarded as the intellectual father of the post-1991 reforms that have transformed India. He has also worked with Human Rights Watch and other NGOs such as SA8000, a pioneering social labelling agency.

Professor of Economics and Law, Columbia University
READ MORE

Today

The moderator will announce the winner.
READ MORE

Background reading

Economics focus: The service elevator

Latin America's unproductive economies: Service break

A survey of manufacturing: Post-industrial manufacturing

Manufacturing in Asia: The problem with Made in China

A survey of the near future: The manufacturing paradox

Economics focus: Cash machines

A survey of technology in India and China: Leapfrogging or piggybacking?

More on manufacturing

Comments from the floor

Post-debate phase

ADD YOUR VIEW Most recommended  |  View all (0)
No one has commented on this phase yet.

Current debates

Manufacturing
"

This house believes that an economy cannot succeed without a big manufacturing base.

"

Upcoming debates

The news industry
"

This house believes that the internet is making journalism better, not worse.

"
VIEW NOW
Remind you when a debate begins?
Sign up for email alerts

Sign up for e-mail alerts. We will remind you when a new debate is about to start and when each phase of a debate begins.




Recent debates

Tech bubble
"

This house believes that we are in a new tech bubble.

"
Banking
"

This house believes that more competition makes banking more dangerous.

"
VIEW ALL PAST DEBATES