12 Feb 2012 - 22 Sep 2015
Issue #19, Winter 2011
First Principles: The Role of Government
Eric Liu and Nick Hanauer
Issue #18, Fall 2010
History shows that dissent within the progressive ranks has been vital to advancing the liberal agenda. A response to Michael Tomasky.
David Dayen
Issue #17, Summer 2010
When will all the benefits of e-commerce come to e-government? A response to the previous issue’s symposium on liberalism.
James P. Pinkerton
Issue #16, Spring 2010
Joe Klein
Issue #16, Spring 2010
Brad Carson
Issue #16, Spring 2010
William Galston
Issue #16, Spring 2010
Michael Walzer
Issue #16, Spring 2010
Instead of moving to the center, liberalism should try embracing people who are actually liberals—starting with women.
Katha Pollitt
Issue #16, Spring 2010
Michael Sandel
Issue #15, Winter 2010
A new liberalism must reflect not only on our permanent beliefs, but also on many Americans’ reservations about them. A response to E.J. Dionne, Jr.
William Galston
Issue #14, Fall 2009
Claiming the future means embracing the full complications of the past.
E.J. Dionne, Jr.
Issue #13, Summer 2009
The twentieth anniversary of the fall of communism serves as a reminder that liberalism makes the right kind of “regime change” possible.
Michael Tomasky
Issue #11, Winter 2009
Bernard Henri-Levy may criticize the Left, but it is worth saving. A response to Nick Cohen.
Todd Gitlin
Issue #10, Fall 2008
What the downfall of the European Left can teach American liberals.
Nick Cohen
Issue #7, Winter 2008
Thirty-five years later, what the 1972 campaign can—and can’t—teach liberals today.
Rick Perlstein
Issue #6, Fall 2007
Why red scare attacks on liberalism are red herrings. A response to Fred Siegel.
Paul Starr
Issue #5, Summer 2007
Liberals are at their best when they recognize the difference between themselves and radicalism. Too often in American history, they haven’t.
Fred Siegel
Issue #2, Fall 2006
Why liberal internationalists are not neoconservatives. A response to Michael Lind’s review of “The Good Fight.”
Peter Beinart