October 18, 2011 9:21 AM

Israelis 'shocked' at Egypt TV Schalit interview

(AP)  JERUSALEM — Israeli officials harshly criticized an Egyptian television interview with soldier Gilad Schalit minutes after Hamas militants freed him in a prisoner swap Tuesday, saying the questioning was inappropriate and insensitive.

A gaunt, pale and uncomfortable looking Schalit appeared to struggle to speak at points during the appearance on Egyptian state TV, and his breathing was noticeably labored as he awkwardly answered questions. The footage, along with earlier video showing Schalit being transferred to Egypt, were the first images seen of the soldier after more than five years in Hamas captivity.

Hamas militants were in the area as the interview was being set up. One of them stood behind Schalit's chair, wearing a black face mask, a green headband of the Qassam brigades — Hamas' military wing — and filming with a video camera in his hand.

"You have known what it is like to be in captivity," interviewer Shahira Amin said to Schalit. "There are more than 4,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails. Will you help campaign for their release?" she asked in English.

Schalit took a long pause before answering, then said he would be happy if all those prisoners were freed so that they can go back to their families and loved ones.

"What has the experience brought you? Has it made you stronger?" she asked at another point.

And, brushing aside the fact Hamas had barred anyone from visiting Schalit, she asked why he only gave one interview while held captive. Schalit gasped for air, the handler suggested halting the interview because Schalit wasn't feeling well, and he didn't answer the question.

Amin insisted Schalit had not been coerced to give the interview.

An Israeli official questioned the ethics of the journalists involved.

"We are all shocked that a so-called interview was forced on (Schalit) before he could even talk to his family or set foot on Israeli soil," the official said. He spoke on condition of anonymity because he was discussing a sensitive diplomatic matter, but said the sentiment was widely shared in official Israeli ranks.

Israeli security officials told Israeli YNet News the interview was a violation of the deal for Schalit's release.

However, an Egyptian security official said the interview and all the details of Schalit's handover went according to agreements between Israel, Egypt and Hamas. The official said Israel knew about the interview in advance.

"The Egyptians didn't force him to give the interview. If he refused or if the Israelis refused, he wouldn't have given the interview," said the official, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak to the media.

With Schalit's interview on state television, the Egyptians appeared to be trying to show the success of their mediation efforts at winning freedom for so many Palestinians at a time when the ruling military council, which took power after the ouster of President Hosni Mubarak in an uprising, has come under heavy criticism for mismanagement of the transitional period.

The presenter even tried to get Schalit to credit the Egyptians, asking: "It was the Egyptian national security that mediated your release. There were previous failed mediation efforts including one by the Germans. Why do you think that this time the round of mediation was a success?"

Egyptian reporter Salah Gomaa, who attended the interview, said that the room was packed, small and hot. Schalit stopped several times to catch his breath or to drink water. Gomaa said that the presenter insisted on asking questions in English and getting answers in English.

"Schalit told her that he has not practiced his English for five years and it is better to speak Hebrew," Gomaa said.

However, another Egyptian security official said the Egyptian information minister asked the intelligence chief for an exclusive interview with Schalit. It was not a condition in the deal but a request from Egypt.

An ashen-faced Schalit answered a range of questions on his captivity and what he thought of the 1,027 Palestinian prisoners released for his freedom.

He was then handed over to Israeli officials and only then given a medical examination, where doctors determined he showed signs of malnutrition and lack of exposure to sunlight.

He called his family shortly afterward.

Israeli media discussed the interview at length, with commentators calling it insensitive.

Channel 10 commentator and presenter Raviv Drucker said her questions would "likely win the title of the stupidest questions of the past 100 years."

"It wasn't the most sensitive thing to do. An interview forced on a prisoner just released is a low thing to do," Drucker said.

Israeli TV anchor Yonit Levy called the interview "borderline torture"

Amin is a respected journalist within Egypt. During the Jan. 25-Feb. 11 Egyptian uprising she resigned from her job at Egyptian state television Nile TV, saying she did not want to be part of the "state propaganda regime."

She told Israel's Channel 10 TV that she would not have forced Schalit to speak if he didn't want to, and he seemed willing to do so.

Nonetheless, "he seemed extremely tired, thin and pale, voice very faint, very difficult to concentrate. I had to repeat the questions several times," Amin told The Associated Press. She acknowledged that he was accompanied by Hamas gunmen when he arrived for the interview.

Earlier this week, major Israeli media outlets agreed not to disseminate new video or photos of the Schalits for 10 days following the release.

____

AP writer Maggie Michael contributed to this report from Cairo.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 12 Comments
by euge005 October 20, 2011 6:49 AM EDT
I suspect the Israeli gov is more upset that the interview was before they were able to give him programed responses to the questions they would have asked. They are a democracy in name only and need to maintain a united front to justify the occupation of the West Bank.
Reply to this comment
by thegreywolfe October 20, 2011 8:39 AM EDT
This is a pretty ridiculous statement. Gilad Shalit was not examined by any medical personnel before the interview. Even just watching it, one could see that Gilad wasn't well. Pale, gaunt, struggling for breath at times, just the fact of continuing the interview was, at they very least, insensitive on the part of the interviewer. Perhaps the idea of being the first with a "scoop" that would be broadcast internationally clouded her judgement.

Gilad supposedly agreed to the interview--but what was he to do with his jailors right behind him? He might very well have thought that refusing the interview would spoil the exchange deal and leave him captive for who knows how much longer.

There is no need to "justify the occupation of the West Bank", because UNSCR 242 justifies it. UNSCR 242 specifically states that the Security Council: "Affirms that the fulfillment of Charter principles requires the establishment of a just and lasting peace in the Middle East which should include the application of both the following principles:

Withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from territories occupied in the recent conflict;

Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgement of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force;"

In plain language, Israel is under no obligation to withdraw from any territory until there is a negotiated solution to the conflict, agreed upon by all parties. If that's not justification, then what is?

I agree that our democracy is flawed and I have my own issues with it, but it is still a democracy--and what democracy doesn't have flaws?
by kuching88 October 19, 2011 11:47 AM EDT
What is worse? We are allowing religion to do to America what it has done to The Middle East.

We are allowing the religious superstitions of tribal primitives to drag us into their tribal warfare.

Religion poisons everything, especially government.
Reply to this comment
by karek40 October 19, 2011 1:49 PM EDT
All religion except christanity is mans attempt to please God, whether it is by blowing your self up (Islam) or by living a moral life (Mormons). They are attempting by their ownefforts to earn eternal life. With Jesus it is a gift and a subsequent relationship.
by kuching88 October 19, 2011 11:46 AM EDT
What is worse? We are allowing religion to do to America what it has done to The Middle East.

We are allowing the religious superstitions of tribal primitives to drag us into their tribal warfare.

Religion poisons everything, especially government.
Reply to this comment
by kuching88 October 19, 2011 11:45 AM EDT
What is worse? We are allowing religion to do to America what it has done to The Middle East.

We are allowing the religious superstitions of tribal primitives to drag us into their tribal warfare.

Religion poisons everything, especially government.
Reply to this comment
by kuching88 October 19, 2011 11:45 AM EDT
What is worse? We are allowing religion to do to America what it has done to The Middle East.

We are allowing the religious superstitions of tribal primitives to drag us into their tribal warfare.

Religion poisons everything, especially government.
Reply to this comment
by m1ldbrew October 18, 2011 4:59 PM EDT
I agree, this is a tragedy for both sides, I feel as bad for Gilad as I feel for all the nameless Palestinians wasting away in Israeli prisons.

Sadly, Obama has turned out to be a good old Uncle Tom, a house slave, more loyal to his master than his master himself. I dont expect Obama to do anything fair or positive, he tried to help but the Israel first lobby quickly slapped him down, now he;s like a timid little pup.
Reply to this comment
by haroldamaio October 18, 2011 1:59 PM EDT
"You have known what it is like to be in captivity," the interviewer Shahira Amin said to Schalit. "There are more than 5,000 Palestinians in Israeli jails. Will you help campaign for their release?" she asked.


It is an excellent question.
Reply to this comment
by shnovitz October 19, 2011 10:51 AM EDT
This is not an "excellent question." Gilad Shalit is not a murderer; he had committed no crime. He was minding his own business, doing his job, when he was abducted from his tank in Israeli territory by terrorists. The prisoners in Israeli jails are there for a reason: They are Arabs who committed countless murders. You have been so persuaded by evil Arab propaganda that you can no longer see straight.
by euge005 October 20, 2011 6:51 AM EDT
A better way to deal with the terrorists is to tell them you grabbed one of ours. We will hang a 100 of yours daily until he is returned.
by speakthetrut October 18, 2011 1:51 PM EDT
Israeli TV anchor Yonit Levy called the interview "borderline torture".

I wonder what Dick Cheney has to say about this. He doesn't think water boarding is torture. Now you are saying TV interview is borderline torture!
Reply to this comment
See all 12 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook