Scroll Left Scroll Right
October 3, 2011 12:16 PM

Denmark's "fat tax" targets butter, burgers

By
Ryan Jaslow
Topics
News ,
Food and Drink ,
Research

(Credit: istockphoto)

(CBS/AP) A fatty cheeseburger may take a toll on your health, but if you live in Denmark, it's also about to take a toll on your wallet.

Pictures: Fat tax? 15 states with biggest obesity bills

Denmark has imposed a "fat tax" on fatty foods in an effort to convince Danes to eat healthier. The tax is a complex one, in which rates will correspond with the percentage of fat in a product. The value of the tax is about $3.00 for every 2.2 pounds of saturated fat.

For example, a burger will increase in price by about $0.15, and a small package of butter could cost around $0.40 more under the new plan.

The tax was approved by large majority in a parliament in March as a move to help increase the average life expectancy of Danes - which has fallen below the international average of 79 years - by three years over the next 10 years.

Other European countries, including Denmark, have higher fees on sugar and soft drinks, but Linnet Juul, food director at Denmark's Confederation of Industries said he believes Denmark is the first country in the world to tax fatty foods.

"Higher fees on sugar, fat and tobacco is an important step on the way toward a higher average life expectancy in Denmark," health minister Jakob Axel Nielsen said when he first introduced the idea in 2009, because "saturated fats can cause cardiovascular disease and cancer."

Some Danes are skeptical the tax will succeed. Mathias Buch Jensen, of Copenhagen, told The Guardian that "Danes are big fans of butter."

"Knowing the Danes, it could have the opposite effect," Buch Jensen said. "Like naughty children, when they are told not to do something, they do it even more."

But would a "fat tax" work in the U.S.? Dr. Marion Nestle, professor of nutrition, food studies, and public health at New York University, told CBS News in an email that a tax like this would be "impossible" to pass in the States.

"We can't even get a tax passed on sugary beverages, which ought to be an easy target," she told CBS News.

Nestle also questions the importance of saturated fat for lowering heart disease risk, which "remains to be proven." But she thinks if the tax's goal were to prevent skyrocketing obesity rates, then taxes should be imposed on other major sources of calories - like grain-based or dairy desserts, alcoholic beverages, pizza and pasta dishes, sodas.

Said Nestle, "I'm for imposing the highest possible taxes on companies that market sugary drinks in general and junk foods to kids in particular."

Would a fat tax force you to eat healthier? Or have the health police run amok in Denmark?

Fat tax? 15 states with biggest obesity bills

1-2 of 16
Scroll Left Scroll Right


Add a Comment See all 26 Comments
by magnumdr October 7, 2011 12:00 PM EDT
People have to start minding their own buisness and leave others alone here in USA. We could also have a perfume tax because some of it stinks. Why not tax people who don't fit into society as some people think that everyone should.
Reply to this comment
by AttentionDeficit October 7, 2011 12:23 PM EDT
"People have to start minding their own buisness and leave others alone here in USA"

Like your angry diatribes against pot smokers, magnum?
by bmgeo416 October 4, 2011 1:42 AM EDT
Health experts have done their job and most people know the guidelines for a healthy lifestyle, but they do not follow the day-to-day approach to healthy eating. Why? Because it is very difficult—if not impossible—to follow these guidelines unless you have a personal dietitian or you eliminate most of the favorite foods from your diet.

The primary objective in developing the BetterFat™ line was to focus on consumer needs and create all-natural products that are healthy and delicious. BetterFat™ products have all the functional benefits of palm oil and partially hydrogenated oil, yet with excellent nutritional profiles. Our products are extremely stable to oxidation and possess a uniquely pleasing flavor not found in other frying oils or bakery fats. BetterFat™ is the premier choice for manufacturers looking to improve their nutritional profile without compromising flavor or function.

- http://www.betterfat.com
Reply to this comment
by foo8259 October 3, 2011 4:21 PM EDT
1st lets be perfectly clear on this: if you are going to "sin tax" something make darn sure it's truly unhealthful like sugar or grain. Saturated fats, animal fats are healthful -- that's supported by the latest research. Man evolved eating meats and fat. There are no essential carbohydrates humans need to eat. It's not the burger that gives you heart disease -- it's the bun! The liver can make all of the small amounts of sugar we need daily from protein, and ketones from fats provide plentiful energy. Show me the research that shows sugar, starch and even margarine are healthy?
Reply to this comment
by AttentionDeficit October 6, 2011 1:15 PM EDT
I don't necessarily disagree with you, mankind did evolve eating meat, but not from the local market. And they likely at less of it.
by ucs0208 October 3, 2011 3:44 PM EDT
In the US there's no need for such taxes. All the government would have to do is to stop subsidize corn production with billions of dollars every year. That would make corn a lot more expensive, which in turn would lead to a dramatic increase of cost for pretty much all unhealthy food choices.
Almost all processed food contains at least one corn based ingredient, most contain several. Soda is cheap because corn syrup is cheap. Tripple the price on corn syrup and soda will cost at least twice -> people will drink water instead.
Meat will be more expensive - a lot more expensive. People would then start eating much cheaper veggies instead of the over 200lbs of meat the average american eats a year.

Get rid of government subsidies for unhealthy ingredients and you'll curb the obesity epidemic.
Reply to this comment
by Kawliga7 October 3, 2011 3:40 PM EDT
Tax the food to make sure we eat right, tax books and TV programs to make sure we read & watch the correct material and programs, tax everything that isn't what the government & scientists want you to do, see, or eat. Put a ring thru your nose so you can be lead around to do what you're told.
Reply to this comment
by SuperSageUSA October 3, 2011 3:40 PM EDT
Oh no another tax...

The Democrats are drooling.

Which is another reason we find ourselves in the OBAMA DEPRESSION...
Reply to this comment
by displeased2 October 3, 2011 3:43 PM EDT
I thought it was because we cut our tax revenue while funding two wars. So it's acceptable to borrow money from China so we can destroy and rebuild other nations?
by SuperSageUSA October 3, 2011 4:06 PM EDT
by displeased2 October 3, 2011 3:43 PM EDT
I thought it was because we cut our tax revenue

Gee did I miss the Democratic control house and senate since 2007... Since they really control spending and then guess what we get a Democrat President and you know what...

We're in the OBAMA DEPRESSION....
by EmpireGeorge-_ October 3, 2011 3:27 PM EDT
This is insanely stupid liberalism gone wild.....what about oils....why only butter....is a bison burger fatty ? no it isn't.

How about a tax on hypocracy of Michelle telling us to eat healthy and then see the Obamunist every time with a big ice cream cone, while vacationing on my dime.
Reply to this comment
by displeased2 October 3, 2011 3:30 PM EDT
The rates correspond with the percentage of fat in a product. So you're bison burger would be cheaper than a regular burger (I guess that's how it works).

As far as your obsession with what people do on vacations, I can't help you there.
by AttentionDeficit October 3, 2011 3:31 PM EDT
If there were a tax on hypocrisy, both sides of the aisle would have to pony up
See all 4 Replies
by boehhher October 3, 2011 3:26 PM EDT
No, but a grain tax would. Leave the healthy animal fats alone, unless of course you're TRYING to give everyone heart disease and diabetes. Oh wait, of course we are otherwise big Pharma would get nothing.
Reply to this comment
by AttentionDeficit October 3, 2011 3:32 PM EDT
If not a grain tax, stop subsidizing them
by dagrandma October 3, 2011 2:51 PM EDT
We'd be better off with an adzehole tax. There are more of them than fat people.
Reply to this comment
by tsigili October 3, 2011 2:48 PM EDT
It won't succeed in Denmark.......much less the US.
Reply to this comment
See all 26 Comments
.

Follow HealthPop

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
Better Information. Better Health.
CBS News on Facebook