December 3, 2010 6:05 PM

The Cost of Dying

By
CBSNews
(CBS)  Every medical study ever conducted has concluded that 100 percent of all Americans will eventually die. This comes as no great surprise, but the amount of money being spent at the very end of people's lives probably will.

Last year, Medicare paid $50 billion just for doctor and hospital bills during the last two months of patients' lives - that's more than the budget of the Department of Homeland Security or the Department of Education.

And it has been estimated that 20 to 30 percent of these medical expenditures may have had no meaningful impact. Most of the bills are paid for by the federal government with few or no questions asked.

You might think this would be an obvious thing for Congress and the president to address as they try to reform health care. But what used to be a bipartisan issue has become a politically explosive one - a perfect example of the costs that threaten to bankrupt the country and how hard it's going to be to rein them in.

Caring Connections
National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization
Web Extra: Comfort and Costs
Web Extra: At Home, At Peace

Marcia Klish is either being saved by medical technology or being prevented from dying a natural death.

She is 71 years old and suffering from the complications of colon surgery and a hospital-acquired infection. She has been unconscious in the intensive care unit at Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center in Lebanon, N.H., for the better part of a week.

One of her doctors, Ira Byock, told 60 Minutes correspondent Steve Kroft it costs up to $10,000 a day to maintain someone in the intensive care unit. Some patients remain here for weeks or even months; one has been in the ICU since May.

"This is the way so many Americans die. Something like 18 to 20 percent of Americans spend their last days in an ICU," Byock told Kroft. "And, you know, it's extremely expensive. It's uncomfortable. Many times they have to be sedated so that they don't reflexively pull out a tube, or sometimes their hands are restrained. This is not the way most people would want to spend their last days of life. And yet this has become almost the medical last rites for people as they die."

Dr. Byock leads a team that treats and counsels patients with advanced illnesses.

He says modern medicine has become so good at keeping the terminally ill alive by treating the complications of underlying disease that the inevitable process of dying has become much harder and is often prolonged unnecessarily.

"Families cannot imagine there could be anything worse than their loved one dying. But in fact, there are things worse. Most generally, it's having someone you love die badly," Byock said.

Asked what he means by "die badly," Byock told Kroft, "Dying suffering. Dying connected to machines. I mean, denial of death at some point becomes a delusion, and we start acting in ways that make no sense whatsoever. And I think that's collectively what we're doing."

A vast majority of Americans say they want to die at home, but 75 percent die in a hospital or a nursing home.

"How do so many people end up in the hospital?" Kroft asked Dr. Elliott Fisher, a researcher at the Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy.

"It's the path of least resistance," Fisher said.

The institute did a detailed analysis of Medicare records for patients in the last two years of their lives. Fisher says it is more efficient for doctors to manage patients who are seriously ill in a hospital situation, and there are other incentives that affect the cost and the care patients receive. Among them: the fact that most doctors get paid based on the number of patients that they see, and most hospitals get paid for the patients they admit.

"The way we set up the system right now, primary care physicians don't have time to spend an hour with you, see how you respond, if they wanted to adjust your medication," Fisher said. "So, the easiest thing for everybody up the stream is to admit you to the hospital. I think 30 percent of hospital stays in the United States are probably unnecessary given what our research looks like."



Copyright 2010 CBS. All rights reserved.
Add a Comment See all 379 Comments
by SherryLoo December 7, 2009 2:41 AM EST
People are tend to accept something gives them for free without further consideration. People might say "Anyway I would not get any money back if I choose not to receive all kinds of tests and treatments which may extend my life."
I think if government or hospitals can offer the opportunities for them to choose to donate their end-of-life medicare cost to some charity groups such as Children's Foundation or Red Cross Group, it will be more probable that some dying ones choose their path differently. That would be like re-igniting their lives.
If I were old and dying, but then I can choose to give up my treatment and donate the money for children in Africa who suffer in starvation or other treatable disease, I am sure I will die with joy and peace. It does seem to me that my life has not ended, but extend longer than any treatment could do.
Reply to this comment
by AnneOrchard November 30, 2009 8:58 AM EST
Although the cost issue is important, it is the human aspects that seem to matter most to me. Support for the person who is dying is essential - and that means giving them time to explore the situation and their hopes and fears, not simply a short conversation about whether they wish to be resuscitated. Family members must be supported and gently supported in facing their loss. It seems so cruel to artificially prolong life because this support is not widely available.
I have explored this issue further in my blog at http://cancerfalloutzone.wordpress.com/2009/11/30/end-of-life-care/
Reply to this comment
by cjhous November 28, 2009 9:58 AM EST
My mother passed away on November 10, 2009. After watching your segment on the Cost of Dying, I could not agree more. As a society, we have forgotten what the term 'quality of life' really means. Now, it is all about the money and the legalities. My mother probably should have passed away five or more years ago. But, due to our medical society's concerns about 'dollars' and its total lack of common sense, she was kept alive much longer. She suffered greatly in the hospitals and emergency rooms, over and over. Finally, her primary care physician (who by the way was never the one treating her in her hospital stays, due to hospital 'rules and regulations' governing emergency room admissions), recommended hospice. Nine days later my mother passed away in what was probably the most peaceful last days of her life. Hind sight is 20-20, but, I know that my family will never again put its loved ones through this type of ordeal again. Those who are dying and those who must stay and grieve, will be better informed and suffer much less pain. I only wish I had been able to do the same for my mother.
Reply to this comment
by sarahla2408 March 1, 2011 9:30 PM EST
I completely agree with you! My grandmother went into the hospital with cancer and her health went down hill very fast. She was in a lot of pain and did not like being at the hospital. It scared her. They finally decided she was ready for "hospice." So we moved her into a more comfortable room and later that night she passed away. At least she wasn't hooked up to everything and was out of pain, but I feel she suffered quite a lot the last few weeks of her life and it makes me feel awful. It's true, pro-longing an inevitable death is more of a selfish want and deed. Some people are scared of death and some people don't want their loved ones to be gone, **but them being alive but not "living" their life isn't any better. They would probably be happier and better off NOT extending a suffering state of living for a few weeks than they would be dying in a hospital, scared and without things of comfort. I don't want any of my loved-ones to leave, but it's true, no good really comes out of extending their suffering..... in those situations, of course.
by milo55 November 26, 2009 3:17 AM EST
current practices such as putting brain dead fetuses on respirators and giving illegals 'free' hip replacements are among the things to be nixed.. no 75 year old needs a heart lung transplant or cholesterol drugs...etc etc.. we have to decide as a society when life is used up.. 'expired'.. what ever you want to call it..its a hot button discussion for sure.. but one that IS going to take place.. only large cash deposits will sway the medical community to make you an exception..
Reply to this comment
by Damoneki November 25, 2009 9:53 PM EST
I am disabled.
Why aren't we talking about the criminal cost of prescription drugs. You mentioned that the cost of the drug Avastin is $55,000, in my opinion, this is why medical cost are out of control. If not for Medicare, I would have to pay close to $100,000 a year on drugs, and most of that is for the pain medication called Actiq, a lollypop made from Fentanyl, a drug that has been around for over 40 years, but the drug company added sugar to it, and thus calls it a new drug to scam the American people.
Shameful.
Reply to this comment
by RonPanzer November 25, 2009 8:47 PM EST
What Dr. Byock and others are not telling you is that many patients are hastened to their death, i.e., death is imposed when they are not agitated, not even in the intensive care unit. Patients who have a terminal illness do not ask to be killed the moment they enter hospice and they do not wish to be sedated when they are not agitated. But physicians like Byock and Quill are pushing terminal sedation, the permanent sedation of patients until they die. They die because they are not getting fluids, even though they could be walking, talking, eating and drinking. People all over this country are having death imposed upon them by physicians and/or nurses who take it upon themselves to hasten death. Sometimes patients are outright overdosed with morphine and their breathing stops due to opioid overdose, suppression of the respiratory effort.

60 Minutes II did a story about such killings in hospice in their 1998 article, "A Question Of Homicide?" which detailed where 19 hospice deaths were ruled officially as homicides by the coroners and referred for prosecution to the DA, but which was covered up by a special panel of hospice doctors with ulterior motives that ruled all the 19 homicides as "natural deaths."

We at Hospice Patients Alliance hear about such imposed deaths regularly. How would you like it if your loved one was snuffed out in a hospice. Good hospice would never do this, but it is now widespread in the hospice industry. This is the reality Byock is not telling you about. He knows.
Reply to this comment
by Aaron_B_Butcher November 25, 2009 4:38 PM EST
I smoke. I have emphysema. I am going to die. I'm NOT going to go to a hospital to do it. I am going to get up, go for a walk, look death straight in the face and say "what took you so long?" I will be high as a kite on as many pain killers as I can get, legally or otherwise. If it appears that I may lose control of my faculties and be taken to a hospital against my wishes, I will take a bottle of pain killers and hide until I AM DEAD. It is the fear of death that is the major problem here. Everyone is afraid to die or to let someone die. God forbid anyone should HELP someone die. Until we, as a species, figure out that death is not the enemy, this will continue to be a problem. Poor quality of life should be the enemy. When my quality of life degrades to the point that I am a liability to the wonderful family I have built and the great country in which I live, I WILL TAKE MY OWN LIFE, if neccesary. What are they gonna do to me? Put my dead body in jail? Fine my wife and kids? I don't think so. So to all you people hanging on by a thread because you are afraid, I say this. Bravery is not the lack of fear. Bravery is being afraid and doing the right thing anyway.
Reply to this comment
by sddesai November 25, 2009 4:24 PM EST
I am a primary care provider in Northwest Iowa. I entirely agree that death is inevitable and no one wants his or her loved ones to "die badly" in the ICU. WE need to deliver this message across the entire nation.The way to do it is to have HOSPICE conferences/lectures throughout the country to explain to the American people how to deal with the terminal illness and " to die with dignity and quality" instead of prolonging the dying process with pains and misery for everybody.

We had a HOSPICE conference in this region 2 months ago. About 400 people attended it.As a physician, I am already noticing some positive changes in how people think about the terminal illness and the process of dying.
Reply to this comment
by milo55 November 25, 2009 12:59 PM EST
and the religious nutcases who think life is worth any cost no matter how extreme the medical care are going to have to learn to 'butt out'...

that alone would be a real improvement...
Reply to this comment
by milo55 November 25, 2009 12:54 PM EST
It will be a bitter pill for some but some practices will have to be abandoned.. vegetative people with feeding tubes attached that have rung up millions in charges or an aging person who checks into a hospital and then finds they have been 'visited' by numerous specialists who come in just to 'touch' the patient so they can add a charge to the bill.. all while some relatively healthy people can't get a fractured bone set.. its gotten so out of whack it may collapse.. then everybody loses..
Reply to this comment
See all 379 Comments
.
60 Minutes for iPad. Updated for the 2011-2012 Season! Download Now »
60 Minutes on Facebook