October 19, 2011 7:45 PM

U.S. to renew N. Korea nuclear talks

Glyn Davies in early 2011

Glyn Davies in early 2011 (AP Photo)

(AP) 

WASHINGTON - The Obama administration said Wednesday it would sit down with the reclusive North Korean government for a fresh round of atomic weapons talks and appoint a full-time envoy with the task of persuading Pyongyang to abandon its nuclear program.

Disarmament efforts are saddled with a history of deceit and mistrust, but the meetings on Monday and Tuesday in Geneva represent another step forward after last year's military attacks on South Korea that led to threats of war. The coming talks will be the second set of nuclear discussions between the United States and North Korea since July, after a three-year freeze in diplomacy.

"We're looking for more progress," State Department spokesman Mark Toner said in Washington. "We're not seeking to reward North Korea in any way by holding these talks, and we certainly don't want to have talks just for the sake of talking. We want to see a seriousness of purpose and a commitment to moving this process forward to taking the steps that they've already committed to take."

As Washington intensifies its engagement of Pyongyang, it is turning to seasoned diplomat Glyn Davies to lead the efforts. Davies, the U.S. ambassador to the International Atomic Energy Agency, will replace Stephen Bosworth, though both will be meeting next week with the North Korean delegation led by Vice Foreign Minister Kim Kye Gwan.

The U.S. and its ally South Korea are pressing familiar demands. Toner said the U.S. wants North Korea to adhere to a 2005 agreement it later reneged on, which required the North's verifiable denuclearization in exchange for better relations with its Asian neighbors, energy assistance and a pledge from Washington that it would not attack the isolated country. The U.S. and North Korea still are formally at war, having signed only an armistice to end their 1950-1953 conflict.

To demonstrate its seriousness, American officials want Pyongyang to take concrete action such as freezing its uranium and plutonium programs and allowing IAEA inspectors back into the country. They also are looking for the North to show that it will not launch any new military actions against South Korea, or further nuclear or missile tests.

In its latest nuclear-related infraction, North Korea disclosed a uranium enrichment program in 2010 in defiance of U.N. Security Council resolutions. Tensions also spiked last year after South Korea was attacked twice militarily, including the sinking of a submarine, blamed on the North, that killed 46 sailors.

In a separate engagement effort, the U.S. also has reopened talks with North Korea on cooperative searches for the remains of U.S. troops killed in the Korean War. This is a topic that Pyongyang sees as a humanitarian gesture and that Washington has periodically embraced as a means of improving relations.

A U.S. delegation led by the Pentagon's top POW/MIA official began talks Tuesday with the North Koreans about how and when to resume searches for what the Pentagon estimates are 5,500 U.S. servicemen unaccounted for on North Korean soil. Also at issue is how much North Korea would be paid for helping in the searches; prior to a suspension of the effort in 2005 the U.S. paid about $1 million per mission.

North Korea's economy is in shambles and even those small sums would have meaning as Kim Jong Il's government prepares for a leadership succession and the centennial next year of the birth of his father and the nation's founder, Kim Il Sung.

The Pentagon's talks in Bangkok were expected to conclude Thursday. The remains recovery program began in 1996 and previously was suspended by the U.S. from October 2002 to June 2003 after the North Koreans disclosed to a State Department envoy that they had been running secretly an active nuclear weapons program.

The U.S. and North Korea have no formal diplomatic ties, and relations have forever been rocky. During a state visit to Washington last week by South Korean President Lee Myung-bak, President Barack Obama stated bluntly that "if Pyongyang continues to ignore its international obligations it will invite even more pressure and isolation."

The bilateral nuclear talks are an attempt to restart broader, six-nation disarmament-for-aid negotiations that Pyongyang pulled out of in April 2009 after being censured for launching a long-range missile. The North then conducted its second-ever nuclear test and, late last year, revealed a uranium enrichment program that could give it another means of generating fissile material for nuclear bombs.

This year, the United States and South Korea have offered the North another chance. But they are insisting that six-nation talks — which also include North Korean ally China as well as Russia and Japan — cannot resume unless the communist-led government shows it is ready to abandon its nuclear weapons arsenal.

In Geneva, Bosworth will introduce Davies to the North Korean delegation, and Toner said the U.S. would ensure a "seamless transition" in guiding the U.S. policy toward North Korea. This is a change in personnel, not in policy," he said.

Bosworth, who has long experience in diplomacy with North Korea, served as special representative since February 2009, but always retained his academic post as dean of The Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy at Tufts University.

A respected career diplomat, Davies will commit to the job full-time. Prior to serving at the IAEA, he held a senior position in the State Department's bureau of East Asian and Pacific affairs and was the agency's deputy spokesman under President Bill Clinton.

Toner said he did not expect the U.S. and North Korean delegations to discuss food aid in Geneva, which the administration has been reluctant to offer for fear that any assistance would be hoarded or directed toward the military instead of delivered to those in need.

It appears unlikely the regime would agree to give up its nuclear weapons, despite its perilous economic situation and need for aid. But engaging the North may serve to forestall another military provocation or a nuclear test, the kind of security crisis Obama would likely want to avoid as he enters an election year.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment
by oldman67 October 20, 2011 12:31 PM EDT
North Korea doesn't have the right to protect themselves from the only country to use nuclear weapons over and over. the former PNAC stated in 2003 that the US would never start a war they couldn't win after the embarrassment of Vietnam.the same government that wants all on its enemy list unarmed wants its citizens unarmed also.America is full of sheepe and this is good for the Zionist, the neo-conservatives and coporate America.
Reply to this comment
by juwboy October 20, 2011 6:09 AM EDT
At the beginning of the negotiations to end the Korean War, the North Koreans caused months of delay by refusing to sit at a round table.

Talks did not begin until all parties agreed the table should be square!
Reply to this comment
by Anotheryahoo October 19, 2011 9:18 PM EDT
They have lied so many many times and broken their word , the only thing they would understand is waking up one day to rubble that was where their nuclear factory. 100% waste of time. They cant be trusted at all in any way and their form of govt that worships a idiot man as a god sums it up.
Reply to this comment
by TellitTrue October 19, 2011 8:41 PM EDT
How many times does North Korea LIE about their intentions before we stop "negotiating" with them? How much will it cost us THIS time? Our negotiation should be really clear - if we find any evidence whatsoever that a facility is being used to develop or manufacture any portion of a nuclear weapon, we send missiles to reduce it to rubble. Any questions? Good. Thanks for negotiating...
Reply to this comment
by xyz323 October 19, 2011 8:21 PM EDT
this is a very good story. very well written. personally I hope that they do get them to give up their nuclear weapons.
Reply to this comment
by tweaver1945 October 20, 2011 12:42 AM EDT
The only way they will give up their nuclear weapons is for them to receive a hot tomahawk to their supply of weapons.
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook