August 18, 2011 12:13 AM

Report: Feds probing S&P; over mortgage ratings

(AP) 

WASHINGTON - The Justice Department is investigating whether the Standard & Poor's credit ratings agency improperly rated dozens of mortgage securities in the years leading up to the financial crisis, The New York Times reported Wednesday.

The investigation began before Standard & Poor's cut the United States' AAA credit rating this month, but it's likely to add to the political firestorm created by the downgrade, the newspaper said. Some government officials have since questioned the agency's secretive process, its credibility and the competence of its analysts, claiming to have found an error in its debt calculations.

The Times cites two people interviewed by the government and another briefed on such interviews as its sources. According to people with knowledge of the interviews, the Justice Department has been asking about instances in which the company's analysts wanted to award lower ratings on mortgage bonds but may have been overruled by other S&P; business managers.

Fitch doesn't follow S&P;, maintains U.S. at AAA
Report: SEC asks S&P; for info on downgrade
France too? Paris may lose AAA credit rating

If the government finds enough evidence to support a case, it could undercut S&P;'s longstanding claim that its analysts act independently from business concerns. The newspaper said it was unclear whether the Justice Department investigation involves the other two major ratings agencies, Moody's and Fitch, or only S&P.;

S&P; and other ratings agencies reaped record profits as they bestowed their highest ratings on bundles of troubled mortgage loans, which made the mortgages appear less risky and thus more valuable. They failed to anticipate the deterioration that would come in the housing market and devastate the financial system.

Companies and some countries — but not the United States — pay the credit ratings agencies to receive a rating, the financial market's version of a seal of approval. Before the financial crisis, banks shopped around to make sure rating agencies would award favorable ratings before agreeing to work with them. These banks paid as much as $100,000 for ratings on mortgage bond deals, according to the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, the Times said.

Critics say this business model is riddled with conflicts of interest since ratings agencies might make their grades more positive to please their customers.

The Times said the Securities and Exchange Commission also has been investigating possible wrongdoing at S&P;, citing a person interviewed on that matter.

Ed Sweeney, a spokesman for S&P;, said in an email to the Times: "S&P; has received several requests from different government agencies over the last few years. We continue to cooperate with these requests. We do not prevent such agencies from speaking with current or former employees."

Representatives of the Justice Department and the SEC declined to comment on whether they are investigating the ratings agencies, the newspaper said.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by freedom8246 September 1, 2011 5:55 PM EDT
I want tell a lie. IT WAS not any attorney at law it was no one in any political party That turned all Those in THe Morgage Markets and in the foreclosure Markets into those in Washington Dc.

It was The Book I wrote called What They DONT WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT Foreclosures. On the Front Picture Cover it read

This HOUSE IS UNDER FEDERAL INVESTIGATION FOR FORECLOSURE FRAUD.

This Book was summitted in a pdf file to Millons of Americans and to the Senate in 2009. IT was also published on a blog run by Farmer Jim Bonham in NC. He runs a free food farm for the needy.

NO I HAVE NOT MADE ONE PENNY FROM THIS. But I will asure you this law was passed to protect the American people from losing thier Homes. The President in fact put The Attorney General Pam Bondy in charge of cleaning this mess up. I already see she herself is in way over her head.

Best Regards DAle Bennington VIET NAM VET
Spring Hill Fl.34608
1 352 340 5852

GOD BLESS AMERICA AND ALL OF HER PEOPLE
Reply to this comment
by -LiftingSkirts- August 18, 2011 7:37 AM EDT
Better late than never, but I'm not optimistic that any crooks will pay for their crimes. Too much collusion by, too many people, who are too high up the food chain, and too bloody powerful for any justice.

The peasants will continue to be taxed by the rich and powerful... just the way loaded lefty libs like it.
Reply to this comment
by RobAla August 18, 2011 6:05 AM EDT
The Fed need to probe itself regarding the horrible state of the US economy, rather that probe S&P. The bottom line is that S&P said it would downgrade the US if we did not cut $4 billion in overspending. We did not cut $4 billion in overspending and - what, the S&P downgraded the US????

Our problem is the horrible irresponsible deficit spending - not the fact that S&P points this out by a downgrade. Washington has been irresponsibly overspending for decades -- by both political parties. Granted, President Obama and recent Democrats have accelerated the deficit spending like crazy - but this only caused the downgrade to come sooner than later. Both parties are responsible for irresponsible behavior, when it comes to the mismanagement of the public's money.

For decades, we Americans voted into office those who would "bring home the bacon". We selfishly didn't seem to care that they were bringing home the bacon that belonged to future generations, as well. We just wanted stuff today - it didn't matter that we were robbing our children and grandchildren of their stuff - like spoiled brats, we demanded more stuff. We are to blame, as well. We Americans and the thieving politicians we put in office are to blame - not S&P.

The CBO, the GAO, and President Obama's Deficit Commission all have warned that what we have been doing is not SUSTAINABLE - this can not go on. However, we have both politicians and citizens who are addicted to goodies - regardless of the price or the consequences. We have to change our mindset, and we have to remove those politicians from Washington who are thieves. We have to reverse course, we have to live within our means, we have to manage this nation on balanced budgets, and then we need to begin to pay back this outrageous national debt. It will not be fun, it will be tough - but it will be the mark of responsible adults. We can be looked on in history as not just the generation that wrecked the nation - but as the generation that took the job of fixing the nation for future generations. It will be a worthwhile challenge, and we have to do it.
Reply to this comment
by RedDeath50 August 18, 2011 7:10 AM EDT
Typical teabagger. The S&P report also specifically calls out the lack of increased revenues (taxes, for you mentally lame righties) as one of their key reasons for the downgrade.

Of course, you prefer to cherry pick rather than face the facts!
by -LiftingSkirts- August 18, 2011 7:32 AM EDT
hey RedDeath,

Why do you want to be taxed more? Did you know that every single tax payer would have to fork over $101,000.00 to pay off the debt incurred by our "leaders"?

I can't afford it!

So... how about the gov't learn to live within it's means? Taxed Enough Already (TEA)!

I can't understand how you libs can afford to fork over a hundred thousand dollars to cover your share of the debt. Y'all must be made of money...
by Rick03466 August 18, 2011 5:41 AM EDT
This smacks of of Obama using the Department of Justice as political Muscle. First with setting up a international Gun Smuggling Operation and once in became apparent that the S&P was going to downgrade the Credit Rating (a possibility everyone has been aware of for a more than 2 years) Attacking Standard & Poors.
Not since Richard Nixon have we seen such a Perversion of the Department of Justice!
Reply to this comment
by Excalibrationist August 18, 2011 5:37 AM EDT
So, "Obama~Blames" doesn't like S&P's dumping of "his" credit rating to double A
so he sics the Justice Department on them (and probably the IRS too)!

Henry W. Christioni! Obama~Blames is abusing his power! (...this is new???)
Reply to this comment
by macintrance August 18, 2011 5:30 AM EDT
What took them so long
Reply to this comment
by Social_Adjudicator August 18, 2011 5:00 AM EDT
The leadership of this country should most certainly understand that "you get what you pay for". Isn't that the rules of their game?
Up until now, if you were to investigate the Feds; you would probably find that over the past years, there was "backdoor payola" (in one form or another) going on in the direction of these credit rating agencies to maintain the AAA credit status.
Reply to this comment
by Tedsliver August 18, 2011 4:38 AM EDT
SP, never tell emperor Obama he has no clothes..
Reply to this comment
by Imthaid2 August 18, 2011 3:55 AM EDT
The ONLY reason the feds want to investigate S&P is because they did not cave in like Fitch and raise america's rating back to AAA after it was dropped to AA+. S&P has kept the rating at AA+, and the government is applying strong arm tactics in order to get them to raise it.
Reply to this comment
by tmittelstaed August 18, 2011 4:27 AM EDT
that's why the feds started the investigation BEFORE S&P downgraded the US to AA+ because they were psychic. Read the article, doofus.
by venusvegasvada August 18, 2011 3:37 AM EDT
That's cute.

NOW the Feds wake up and want to figure out what happened?

To the FED and the Govt:

YOUR A JOKE. Somebody stands up like the S&P and calls it like it is and it pissed you off. Only problem is this time, it had some teeth and you didn't like it and NOW your sending over the DOJ? PATHETIC.

ON THE DOWNGRADE: TAKE YOUR MEDICINE AND GET YOUR SPENDING UNDER CONTROL.
Reply to this comment
See all 30 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook