October 18, 2011 12:03 AM

IRS: Cut our budget, feds lose billions

(AP) 

WASHINGTON - Legislation that would trim hundreds of millions of dollars from the Internal Revenue Service budget would force significant cuts in the services it provides taxpayers and cost the government $4 billion annually in lost revenue, the agency warned Congress on Monday.

In a letter to lawmakers, IRS Commissioner Douglas Shulman said the budget cuts "would lead to noticeable degradation of both service and enforcement and would have a serious detrimental impact on voluntary compliance for years to come."

The House Appropriations Committee has approved a bill that would provide $11.5 billion for the IRS in fiscal 2012, which began Oct. 1. That is $600 million less than it received last year and $1.8 billion less than President Barack Obama requested.

The Senate Appropriations Committee version of the bill would provide $11.7 billion. The cuts are part of an effort by lawmakers to curb spending at a time when annual federal budget deficits have reached $1.3 trillion.

With cuts of that magnitude, IRS answers to taxpayers' letters would be delayed by up to five months and about half of those telephoning the agency would not get through, Shulman wrote. As examples, he said that would mean problems for individuals and small businesses that have fallen behind paying their taxes and want to reach the IRS to work out payment plans before they are penalized.

Shulman said the budget cuts would hurt revenue collections because it would force the agency to shrink its staffing levels, and thus to reduce its collection activities. The $4 billion in yearly lost revenue would far outweigh the cuts in agency spending, he said.

"In other words, these budget cuts will result in a direct increase to the nation's deficit," Shulman wrote.

Shulman said the proposed cuts are already forcing his agency to reduce spending, because it would not have enough time to implement them if it waited until the congressional budget process is completed.

Lawmakers will try to help the IRS ease the cuts' impact, but with the government's debt problem, "making do with less will be the rule, not the exception," said Max Gleischman, spokesman for Sen. Richard Durbin, D-Ill., who chairs the Senate Appropriations Committee panel that wrote the spending bill.

Rep. Jo Ann Emerson, R-Mo., who leads the House Appropriations subcommittee that authored that chamber's legislation, said the cuts were designed to avoid hurting collections and services but added, "Like families across the country, the IRS will have to do more with less."

Michelle Dimarob, a senior Republican adviser to the tax-writing House Ways and Means Committee, said IRS enforcement actions resulted in 17 percent more revenue in 2007 than in 2006, even though the IRS budget did not increase.

Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a member of the Ways and Means panel, said the reduction "makes no sense." And Colleen M. Kelley, who heads the National Treasury Employees Union, called on Congress to act to prevent the cutbacks.

© 2011 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Add a Comment See all 28 Comments
by jcgaunet October 20, 2011 9:31 AM EDT
This article leaves out one significant piece of information: How much revenue does the IRS account for? If they have to cut expenses by $600 million (about a 5% reduction from last year), how much in lost revenue does this equate? At any rate, a 5% reduction seems pretty small to me given the current climate.
Reply to this comment
by DrJJJ October 18, 2011 6:06 PM EDT
Another big fat reason (loosing billions if we cut the budget) we must simplify the tax code and do it, like yesterday! 65,000 pages is unbelievable favortism for the rich folks, light years from being understandable and 10s of thousands making 6 figures working for the IRS that nobody likes or should need! What's wrong with this picture?
Reply to this comment
by MsIndigoBlue October 18, 2011 1:47 PM EDT
Fight Organized Crime!!!
Abolish the IRS
Reply to this comment
by GOPeconomicterror October 18, 2011 2:05 PM EDT
Abolish the anti American GOP economic terrorists who took the Clinton surplus and cut taxes for the rich while running up Trillions in deficits.
by credibility2 October 18, 2011 11:55 AM EDT
Whaa, whaa, whaa! Why don't we just start by making all government employees pay into the same systems as do private sector employees. That would level the playing field and maybe add some solvency to the financial problems. We can begin by forcing them to pay into Social Security instead of their own funding, which gives them a hefty retirement guarantee.
Reply to this comment
by jmailbox October 18, 2011 10:30 AM EDT
Please the IRS is a joke, they don't go after the big tax cheaters so they scr*w the little guys who are extorted into paying more money they don't owe and probaly don't have either.

The IRS is a total waste of money and is as corrupt as other federal organizations
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 October 18, 2011 9:42 AM EDT
by GOPeconomicterror October 18, 2011 9:26 AM EDT
So let's get this straight: under 9-9-9, average and poor Americans would pay more, while the rich would have their taxes cut. Andrew Fieldhouse, a budget policy analyst at the Economic Policy Institute, boiled it down this way: the 9-9-9 plan "only makes sense if you believe that the problem with the current tax code is that low- and middle-income households have it way too good, and they should give more of their income to those poor Americans making more than half a million dollars a year."







Lost in Cain's 9-9-9 tax plan, is the fact that the Social Security administration would no longer be funded by payroll taxes.

Does that mean that the funding for the program stops altogether?
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 October 18, 2011 9:35 AM EDT
by Jhihmoac October 18, 2011 9:19 AM EDT
Congress cutting the IRS budget? Isn't that like "biting the hand that feeds them"?







No.

When the republicans had full control of Washington from 2001 - 2007, EVERY SINGLE PIECE of legislation that they passed, was "deficit funded". They NEVER planned or budgeted for anything.

So it's not really a surprise that they would abolish the IRS, and then pass EVEN MORE legislation with ZERO CONSIDERATION of how to pay for it.
Reply to this comment
by GOPeconomicterror October 18, 2011 9:22 AM EDT
When Dumya and the anti American GOP economic terrorists cut taxes for the rich, while running Trillions in deficits, they needed the IRS to go after the middle class that did pay taxes to support the doubling of the Federal government and tripling of illegal immigration.
Now, the morons want to defund the IRS, operate with even deeper deficits and lower revenues. Welcome to Somalia.
Reply to this comment
by Jhihmoac October 18, 2011 9:19 AM EDT
Congress cutting the IRS budget? Isn't that like "biting the hand that feeds them"?
Reply to this comment
by sdemaggie October 18, 2011 9:08 AM EDT
You've gotta be kidding. This agency is running amok. When you do get through the personel are not helpful, not competent. Taxes are so automated it's nearly impossible to fix a mistake by the IRS. I recently received a $12k bill from the IRS. The notice stated the IRS is filing for a judgement against me in a court in DC (I live in Denver). Charles Schwab over stated my income by over $30k. It was a nightmare getting the IRS or Schwab to admit it was their mistake. I for one am in favor of abolishing the IRS. It's run like a mafia enforcement agency.
Reply to this comment
by GOPeconomicterror October 18, 2011 9:29 AM EDT
So, you hate the IRS because Charles Schwab made an error that you were too stooopid to catch before you signed your return????
Are you a Bagger, Birther, Buffoon, or all three???????????
See all 28 Comments
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook