BW Mall - Sponsored Links

Buy a link now!

text size: T T Companies & Industries October 19, 2011, 11:24 PM EDT

Can Netflix Regain Lost Ground?

CEO Reed Hastings’ poorly explained pricing and service changes have alienated customers and handed rivals an opening

By and

Comic by Nitrozac & Snaggy; © 2011 Geek Culture, joyoftech.com

At Netflix, new hires are drilled in Chief Executive Officer Reed Hastings’ guiding principles. Avoid “barnacles” that can slow down a fast-growing business, Hastings advises newcomers. Make tough decisions without agonizing and focus on great results rather than process, go his dictums, which are posted on the video service’s corporate site.

Now Hastings, who founded Netflix in 1997, is learning the limits of his shoot-first credo. His attempt to navigate away from DVDs-by-mail and toward online movies and television shows resulted in a series of poorly explained pricing and service changes, announced by Hastings on the Netflix blog, that alienated customers and Wall Street.

Besides becoming the butt of late-night TV hosts’ jokes, the company may have lost as many as 600,000 of its 24.6 million U.S. customers since July, estimates Darren Aftahi, an analyst with Northland Capital Markets. The extent of the damage should be revealed on Oct. 24, when the company announces earnings and subscriber numbers that will show how many customers have fled. “Moving forward step by step, despite the foot with the bullet hole,” Hastings wrote on his Facebook page in late September after striking a deal to add streaming titles from DreamWorks Animation, maker of the Shrek movies. He declined to comment.

Hastings might have dodged the bullets had he paid more attention to process and reacted more speedily to his customers’ frustrations, expressed in the thousands of negative comments on the Netflix blog. The miscalculations began in April, when Hastings moved to end a debate within the company over how much of Netflix’s resources should be devoted to the DVD business, as opposed to streaming movies over the Web. Netflix executives expect the DVD business to decline over the next five years. Hastings’ plan, announced at an April staff meeting, was to separate and rename the DVD business Qwikster, according to a former employee. Customers were told in July that they would be charged $7.99 for each, instead of $9.99 for both.

For years Netflix had carefully tested its products in focus groups assembled in the Lord of the Rings conference room in Building A at its Los Gatos (Calif.) headquarters campus or at rented space around the country. Focus groups have been asked about everything from the red color of DVD envelopes to the quality of video streams. This time Hastings skipped the focus group step, missing an opportunity to gauge customers’ potential reactions to separate websites and billing, according to the former employee. (Netflix spokesman Steve Swasey declined comment.) Instead, Hastings and his team relied on data showing that 75 percent of new signups before the price hike preferred streaming.

After the April discussions, there was hardly any internal talk about the plans to split the businesses. At a July meeting, the company’s chief marketing officer said that she was monitoring reaction to the price hike announced in a blog posting on July 12, but made no mention of how the plan to spin off the DVD business into Qwikster would be communicated to subscribers, according to someone in attendance. Soon after, Netflix began moving workers at the DVD business into office space in San Jose and hiring Qwikster staffers, including a chief marketing officer.

Netflix executives expected a spike in cancellations after the price increase, but thought it would be short-lived, Chief Financial Officer David Wells said at a conference on Sept. 21. Some of the company’s analysis proved correct: Even amid the backlash, the majority of new customers are opting for the $7.99-a-month streaming-only plan, skipping the add-on for DVDs, says Swasey. He points out that for the millions of customers who took the streaming-only plans, the price change was a “non-event.”

READER DISCUSSION