October 19, 2011 2:38 PM

Perry calls for flat tax to replace income tax

By
Rebecca Kaplan
Topics
Economy ,
Campaign 2012

Republican presidential candidate, Texas Gov. Rick Perry delivers a keynote address during the Western Republican Leadership Conference, Wednesday, Oct. 19, 2011, in Las Vegas.

(Credit: Isaac Brekken)

Texas Gov. Rick Perry is calling for replacing the federal income tax with a flat tax, a conservative idea condemned by liberals as a regressive burden on lower- and middle-income taxpayers.

The Republican presidential hopeful previewed his economic plan for the country at the Western Republican Leadership Conference in Las Vegas, but offered few details.

He said he would unveil a proposal next week calling for creation of a flat tax, which would replace the present system of graduated tax rates based on income with a single rate for all taxpayers regardless of income.

Perry told an audience of about 150 Republicans that his plan would also include a ban on congressional earmarks, passage of a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution, spending cuts and entitlement reform. He plans to unveil details in a speech Tuesday in South Carolina.

"A change election requires a new direction, and not more of the same," Perry said. "And I come by my conservatism very authentically, not by convenience. I offer the American people a new direction. My economic plan is rooted in what has worked in my home state."

He said he would scrap "the current 3 million words of the American tax code" and replace it with "something simple: a flat tax."

"I want to make the tax code so simple that even (Treasury Secretary) Timothy Geithner can file his taxes on time," Perry said.

One of Perry's main rivals for the Republican nomination, pizza executive Herman Cain, has also called for a flat income tax, which he has said would be a rate of 9 percent. Perry did not stipulate a rate in his speech on Wednesday.

Perry said he will also work to pass a balanced budget amendment, another long-standing conservative idea that has lacked sufficient support to pass in Congress. "I will barnstorm this country from Day One, going to all 50 states if that's required, to generate the support for a balanced budget amendment, that will demand (that) the necessary changes will be placed in our Constitution," he said.

Earmarks, the special provisions for certain districts and states tucked into appropriations bills, have been greatly reduced in recent years after they became the object of public scorn as wasteful spending. Perry said, "My plan is to end earmarks for good. It's time to bring some tough medicine to Washington."


  • Rebecca Kaplan

    Rebecca Kaplan is covering the Rick Perry campaign for CBS News and National Journal.

Add a Comment See all 268 Comments
by ACRScout October 21, 2011 12:54 PM EDT
As a certified "poor person" living on $16,000 per year, I don't mind a flat tax, even if it is a higher rate than I pay now. And they can implement it as soon as they stop all the BS bickering and.... CREATE A JOB FOR ME TO BE TAXED ON.
Reply to this comment
by nadelio October 21, 2011 6:35 AM EDT
I don't care what Perry wants. I just hope he dissapears alltogether.
Occupy Texas.
Reply to this comment
by ge556 October 20, 2011 9:05 PM EDT
This insistence on raising taxes on the poor is hateful, and wrong, and certainly not what Jesus would do.
Also, if you raise taxes on poor people, then you are raising taxes on poor students like my son, so you are effectively raising taxes on middle class families like ours.
Reply to this comment
by sgbarnes1 October 21, 2011 6:16 AM EDT
Yes. Don't you think everyone should pay his/her fair share?
by ge556 October 21, 2011 5:24 PM EDT
Yes, I believe in paying one's fair share. Unfortunately, conservatives want the rich to pay less, and the poor to pay more. The rich already pay much lower rates than they did under Reagan.
by Lindag10 October 20, 2011 4:50 PM EDT
Wonder who's going to attack Perry on this one. Watching these clowns go at it reminds me of that TV show "Robot Wars" where the nerd types built robots and put them in an arena where they fought each other and the "house robots". The last one standing won. Some of the robots self-destructed, others worked intermittentally, others did pretty well and eventually one of them survived to be the "winnter".
Reply to this comment
by steeepe October 20, 2011 2:24 PM EDT
Perry dramatically demonstrates that there is no shortage of fools in the tea party GOP.
Reply to this comment
by starving1968-3 October 20, 2011 2:06 PM EDT
by antiglobal5 October 20, 2011 12:39 PM EDT
where do you get that they are skimming about 35%?

They may be middlemen but as I understand it when a person needs medical care that costs for example 500k but has only paid the insurance company 300k over their lifetime, the so called middleman has to pony up the additional 200k they never collected from the insured. Am I missing something?







When that happens, the insurance company claims that it was a "pre-existing condition", and refuses to pay the claim at all.

The victim, er um, I mean insured then has to hire a team of lawyers, and play it out in court over the course of 5 - 10 years or more.

The insurance company waits it out, hoping that the patient dies before a verdict is rendered, and the patient dies - penniless - after exhausting their life savings on lawyers and paying for the health care out of their own pockets.
Reply to this comment
by antiglobal5 October 20, 2011 2:40 PM EDT
Really that's funny because my father and law died of cancer one year ago last week.
We got him into the U of Penn hospital and had him started on the most aggressive treatment available in the Eastern US. Unfortunately his prior Dr. was misdiagnosing his type of cancer so it was to late and we lost him.

My point is when all was said and done the insurance company ended up paying almost 680+k and never gave us a hard time about anything.

I am not doubting insurance companies screw people over but I don't know of any cases first hand so who knows what is true and what is rumor when there is no proof.
by daffy64 October 20, 2011 1:48 PM EDT
Just make the tax rate 25% for everyone. That way, the poor won't have any food money and will die. Then there won't be any poor any more and the rich people won't have to support them.

But then again, who's going to clean the toilets?

Hmmm. Let me re-think this...
Reply to this comment
by ffrecster October 20, 2011 11:48 AM EDT
Consumption tax not income tax. Fair Tax vs. Flat Tax. Abolish the IRS and everyone pays as they go, businesses and individuals. No loopholes, no exemptions, no exceptions. The productivity and money WASTED on bookkeepers, accountants and tax lawyers can go back into real economic development. Sellers collect the tax and pay to the state, the states enforce the collection and pay to the Fed less their cut - just like state sales tax is collected now. It is in the best interest of the states to ensure the taxes are collected. It can shrink the federal government drastically.
Reply to this comment
by Riverjump October 20, 2011 11:22 AM EDT
What makes the politicos from all sides, think we want to pay any more taxes than what needs to be covered in the constitution? Anybody in their right minds think we should be financially helping yet another "transitional government"? We are worse than broke now folks. Our treasure would be better spent shoring up the good 'ol U S of A. How dare they think our, repeat OUR treasury, is their own pesonal piggy bank?
Reply to this comment
by Lawyers-Guns-n-Money06 October 20, 2011 11:22 AM EDT
I wonder if Perry can do better math than Cain's goons. Seriously this 22% bit REALLY threw them for a tizzy. Apparently, according to them, you subtract $2.20 from $10.00 to figure out an embedded tax percentage of 22%.
Reply to this comment
by Lawyers-Guns-n-Money06 October 20, 2011 11:30 AM EDT
Fuzzy wuzzy math?
by Progress4USA October 20, 2011 11:49 AM EDT
Yep...they got that from Wall Street Banks. They may have record profits, sure...but that doesn't take into account all the "embedded taxes" they pay to the mythical "them"... Actually, if you ask Wall Street big wigs...their rich on paper but really broke!!! See...they can't afford to have their taxes raised because they're already paying HUGE embedded taxes.
See all 268 Comments
.

Follow Political Hotsheet

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook