web.archive.org

NOVDECJAN
03
201020112016
12 captures
01 Dec 2011 - 01 Aug 2018
About this capture
Opinion
A shift from the Middle East to the Pacific
The US should balance the need for responsible military drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan, says the author.
Christopher R Hill Last Modified: 01 Dec 2011 09:42
Tweet
Print
Polling data finds that Iraqis appreciate US forces and what they have done, but nonetheless want them to leave [GALLO/GETTY] 
Denver, Colorado - For two years, President Barack Obama's administration has tried to convey a narrative in which it is winding up wars in Southwest Asia and turning the US attention to its longer-term - and arguably more important - relationships in East Asia and the Pacific. In recent months, that narrative has gained the virtue of actually being true.
Now, the task will be to balance the need for responsible military drawdowns in Iraq and Afghanistan with a responsible buildup of activities in East Asia. And that means putting to rest fears that the United States is gearing up for confrontation with China.
Obama's decision to break off talks with Iraq's government for a new agreement on the status of US forces there means that, after eight years, those troops are finally coming home (perhaps in time for Christmas). Since US politics no longer stops at the water's edge, Obama's decision was greeted with howls of derision by those who argued that he was "uncommitted" to the Iraq venture and somehow did not make his best effort to keep troops there. Never mind that Vice President Joe Biden, the chief negotiator, travelled to Iraq more times than any senior US leader has travelled to any previous war zone.
Nonetheless, critics claimed that Obama's administration had offered up Iraq to the Iranians. The "proof" was that Iraq's Shia prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki - a leader who may be called many things, but certainly not pliable or pliant - did not deliver the rest of the country's political class to an agreement.
Early in the process, Maliki signalled two points to his American guests: He would like to see a continuing US troop presence in Iraq, but was unwilling to bear the entire political burden. He expected support from other Iraqi politicians; none came.
Sunni leaders, who tend to be grouped under the banner of the Iraqi National Party, Iraqiya, made clear that they would not support the continuation of US troops on Iraqi soil, denying Maliki the backing that he needed to forge a broad-based coalition. Sunni leaders have often expressed support for US forces' presence in their country, but also believe that Iraq should no longer be a host to foreign troops. Polling data in Iraq, such as they are, reveal strong sentiments of the same kind: Iraqis appreciate US forces and what they have done, but nonetheless want them to leave.
The American writer Mark Twain once said: "Do the right thing. It will gratify some people and astonish the rest." Indeed, Iraq's implacable anti-American radicals are now both astonished and confused. Iraq's Sunni and Shia extremists agree on little, but one point of unison had been that the Americans would never leave their country voluntarily. Yet that is what is happening today.
Whether Americans will ever return to Iraq for exercises and training missions that exceed the scope of embassy-sponsored security-assistance initiatives remains to be determined. Iraq needs continued training programmes to manage its airspace, and its land forces must still overcome the Soviet model of massed artillery and armoured formations. But potential future missions, if they materialise, would be understood as emanating from a sovereign Iraqi decision, not as making a virtue out of a fact on the ground.
And so, with the US withdrawal from Iraq paving the way for the administration's tectonic policy shift on Asia, Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton headed west, confident that they would have a smooth journey. They did not.
To the extent that Americans regard any foreign-policy speech as having relevance to their lives, Obama's economic message at the Asia-Pacific Economic Co-operation meeting in Hawaii was on message and on target: jobs, jobs, jobs.
But, soon after, when Obama arrived in Australia and Clinton landed in the Philippines, what looked like a clean narrative about the economy abruptly unravelled: Obama promised his Australian hosts that the US would station fewer than a brigade of US Marines in far-off Darwin to train and exercise. No one could possibly believe that this step would be sufficient to allay whatever concerns the Obama administration and the US' Asian allies have about China's growing military power, but that is how the US press played it.
When combined with Hillary's crowd-pleasing appearance on a warship in Manila Bay, and her use of the term "West Philippine Sea", the economic narrative stood little chance. The new storyline was that the US had started pulling out of Southwest Asia for the purpose of confronting China. Even the administration's deft and courageous move to send Hillary to Myanmar, following Burmese opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi's release from detention and decision to rejoin the political system, was portrayed as another effort to poke China in the eye.
The US' re-engagement in the Asia-Pacific region is welcome and overdue. Some of the US' partners in that part of the world ask very little, except for the US to pay attention now and again, attend meetings and respect their consensual approach to problem solving. Just showing up, as the old aphorism goes, is half of life. In the Asia-Pacific region, it is sometimes even more than that.
But re-engagement will come at too high a cost if it is widely seen as a path to confrontation with China, rather than overdue attention to everyone else. The US and the Asia-Pacific countries need to maintain productive relationships with China, which is becoming more complicated for everyone as China plunges into a period of internal introspection about its future.
How China emerges from this process and how it behaves in its neighbourhood - and globally - will determine much about what the world will look like in the medium and long term. We need to avoid creating self-fulfilling prophecies that stem from our deepest fears.
Christopher R. Hill, a former US Assistant Secretary of State for East Asia, was US Ambassador to Iraq, South Korea, Macedonia and Poland, US special envoy for Kosovo, a negotiator of the Dayton Peace Accords, and chief US negotiator with North Korea from 2005-2009. He is now Dean of the Korbel School of International Studies, University of Denver.
A version of this article was first published by Project Syndicate.
The views expressed in this article are the author's own and do not necessarily represent Al Jazeera's editorial policy.
Source:
Project Syndicate
Print
Send Feedback
Tweet
Topics in this article
City
Featured on Al Jazeera
Americans are being lied to about the deficit
Republicans want to gut social safety nets, not cut the US deficit.
Pepper spray nation
With most of the UC board of regents being in the 1%, student demonstrators should expect more police brutality.
The battle of Cairo's Muhammad Mahmoud Street
The street battles taking place in Cairo are emblematic of its Second Revolution: tear gas, hair gel and tramadol.
Bahrain: Shouting in the dark
The story of the Arab revolution that was abandoned by the Arabs, forsaken by the West and forgotten by the world.
Content on this website is for general information purposes only. Your comments are provided by your own free will and you take sole responsibility for any direct or indirect liability. You hereby provide us with an irrevocable, unlimited, and global license for no consideration to use, reuse, delete or publish comments, in accordance with Community Rules & Guidelines and Terms and Conditions.
Top News
Turnout reaches 62 per cent in Egypt poll
Merkel calls for tighter euro fiscal union
UN rights body condemns Syria violations
Sharp drop in US unemployment rate
Panetta: Israel must mend fences in region
Opinion
Egypt's revolution will not be militarised
Who are you going to believe? The media?
How to be in opposition in Russia
Neutralising Myanmar's ethnic rebellions
Everybody hates Newt Romney
What's Hot
ViewedEmailed7 Days
Targeting Iran
Chavez lauds new South American alliance
Muslims of France
Turnout reaches 62 per cent in Egypt poll
Ghana Gold
Lebanon's intelligence war
Global rebellion: The coming chaos?
Sharp drop in US unemployment rate
Afghan woman jailed for being raped pardoned
Everybody hates Newt Romney
More Opinion
Egypt's revolution will not be militarised
Abdullah Al-Arian
Who are you going to believe? The media?
Daniel Hind
Everybody hates Newt Romney
Cliff Schecter
Another Asian wake-up call
Stephen S Roach
Hope or hype for personalised medicine?
Henry I. Miller
Japan's 10 years since 9/11
Fumi Inoue
New India, old Europe
Shashi Tharoor
Egypt's 12,001 missing votes
Mark LeVine
Iran: domestic power plays
Nima Khorrami Assl
How one Tanzanian village is fighting AIDS
Belinda Otas
Neutralising Myanmar's ethnic rebellions
Maung Zarni
A democratic Myanmar?
Yuriko Koike
Famine as a crime against humanity
Abdi Ismail Samatar
A shift from the Middle East to the Pacific
Christopher R Hill
DR Congo Elections
Follow our in-depth coverage as Africa's second-largest nation goes to the polls.
  
Join Our Mailing List
Email Address

Enter Zip Code
Go

links from aljazeera.com
Pakistan tells NATO to leave air base
354 points | 182 comments
Locking up profits - Private prison companies strive to keep millions behind bars to keep their profits up
338 points | 34 comments
Global Rebellion: "the immense structural inequalities of the global political economy can no longer be contained through consensual mechanisms of social control. The ruling classes have lost legitimacy; we are witnessing a breakdown of ruling-class hegemony on a world scale."
247 points | 63 comments
Global Rebellion: "the immense structural inequalities of the global political economy can no longer be contained through consensual mechanisms of social control. The ruling classes have lost legitimacy; we are witnessing a breakdown of ruling-class hegemony on a world scale."
181 points | 16 comments
LA mayor sites "trampled grass" as reason to evict occupyLA
116 points | 20 comments
NewsIn DepthProgrammesVideoBlogsBusinessWeatherSportWatch Live
FocusOpinionFeaturesIn PicturesInteractiveSpotlightBriefingsYour Views