• Site Search
  • Search Local Business Listings

Gov. Rick Snyder signs Michigan business/income tax overhaul into law

Published: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 2:37 PM     Updated: Wednesday, May 25, 2011, 5:11 PM
Peter Luke
rick snyder sign.jpgSenate Majority Leader Randy Richardville, R-Monroe, (back, center) and (from his left) Sens. Mark Jansen, R-Gaines Twp.; Darwin Booher, R-Evart; Arlan Meekhof, R-West Olive Twp.; and Mike Kowall, R-White Lake, joined Gov. Rick Snyder as he signs into law eight-bill tax package.

Day 143: This is one in a series of posts assessing key developments during Gov. Rick Snyder's self-imposed 182 days to chart a new course for Michigan by July 1. For earlier posts go to mlive.com/stateofchange.

Gov. Rick Snyder signed the biggest tax overhaul in Michigan in 17 years that finances the elimination of the Michigan business tax with a bundle of changes to the personal income tax.

Overall, it amounts to a $220 million net cut in tax revenues to state coffers, but for Michigan businesses, including some 100,000 that no longer will have to pay the repealed Michigan Business Tax, it’s a $1.65 billion cut.

The difference is being made up with $1.42 billion in additional income taxes, which includes applying the tax to pensions and other retirement income.

“Something fundamentally had to happen to make us a great state again,” Snyder said before signing House Bill 4361 into law as Republican lawmakers looked on.

Snyder made eliminating the MBT the central plank of last year’s campaign and he accomplished the feat just three months after he unveiled details of the plan back in February. He said the four-year-old MBT “simply had to go away. It killed jobs in our state.”

It’s being replaced with a 6-percent tax on the profits of some 40,000 companies doing business in Michigan that file a federal corporate income tax form.

stateofchange_mlive.jpg

But making up for the revenue loss is more controversial.

Currently, private pension income up to $90,240 for joint filers is exempt from income tax. All public pension income is exempt. For those born before 1946, those exemptions will remain under a law that first affects the tax year beginning Jan. 1, 2012.

Tax filers born 1946-1952 would receive a smaller pension tax exemption of $40,000 for joint filers, $20,000 for single filers. Those born after 1952 would pay tax on all pension income. As under current law, Social Security and military pensions would be exempt. The pension tax changes raise $343 million.

Snyder said the plan defuses what he called the “time bomb” of an aging demographic in Michigan that threatened to push more and more of the state tax burden onto younger wage earners.

The second biggest income tax change wipes out the Homestead Property Tax Credit, which has a $1,200 maximum, for households making more than $50,000 or those with homes with a taxable value of more than $135,000. The current income threshold is $82,650. The change affects some 268,500 tax filers.

The Michigan Earned Income Tax Credit for low-income wager earners would be reduced from 20 percent of the federal credit to 6 percent. That takes the average $430 state credit received by nearly 800,000 claimants down to $143.

As to Democratic assertions that there is no guarantee the tax changes will create jobs, Snyder acknowledged it was a challenge to argue it would generate a set amount of new hires. 

But Lt. Gov. Brian Calley said the plan allows small and medium-sized firms to once again view Michigan as good place to grow. “This plan recognizes them for the job creators they are.”

Contact Peter Luke at (517) 487-8888 ext. 235 or e-mail him at pluke@boothmichigan.com


Sponsored Links




Comments Feed

View: Oldest first | Newest first
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next comments »
virgogirl May 25, 2011 at 3:26PM

Let the jobs begin!!

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
getittogether May 25, 2011 at 3:47PM

How is demand going to go up when everyone else is still struggling? In order for businesses to hire more workers they need to see an increase in demand. This bill does not create that demand. It just funnels more money to the wealthy.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Know the Facts May 25, 2011 at 8:45PM

Party today and fill your pockets, Granny taxers. Republicans will feel the repercussions next election day.

The good people of this state have seen what republicans will do to them if given a chance.
They will not forget that you choose to take away from retirees and school kids to sweeten the pot for cigar chomping CEO's.

They will remember that republicans are the ones who choose to gift businesses over $1.7 BILLION each year in exchange for less than 24,000 new jobs annually.

Bask in your glory while it lasts. Your actions WILL have consequences.

KTF B4U BUY

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
retired teacher May 26, 2011 at 10:10PM

once again, not one of these republicans will lose their jobs, unless they are term limited. these people in michigan, especially west michigan, vote straight republican no matter who is running. they are one bunch of dumb folks. i have to admit though, i voted two times for snyder. guess that makes me dumb too. he sure fooled me. never again though. where is that recall petition??

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
mushmorton May 27, 2011 at 12:08PM

Were you stupid enough to think that Snyder was going to keep on doing what Granholm did for 8 years? Are you one of those MEA Iris Salter's brainwashed idiots who think tax increases are always good if they never increase taxes on your LIBERAL public pension posterior?

Wake up tax evading Retired Teacher, you and all your liberal Democratic PArty tax evading buddies are going to pay your fair share of state taxes on your public pensions just like the rest of us private sector retirees without a defined benefit union pension.

All men are created equal and must pay the same taxes as ALL other taxpayers.....remember that !

PAY UP SUCKA ........the free ride is over for tax scofflaws like you and all your liberal friends.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
rzdfwl May 29, 2011 at 8:47AM

I’m okay with business paying the same income tax as I do…as long as I get the same breaks they do. I want to write my car off, depreciate my home , write off my furniture, I shouldn’t pay taxes on the money I spend to have someone work for me whether it’s mowing the lawn, washing the windows or doing my laundry. These are all things that I have to support me while I work…I need a place to sleep, eat, and protect me so I can get up and go to work every day. You get my drift? The Governor asked if it was fair to have people taxed twice (once for business and another as an individual) and I say yes it is… otherwise - if we are going to treat everyone/thing equal then it has to be equal across the board. If I can’t write off the things I need to support income production – then neither should you.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
CuriousOneMi2 May 25, 2011 at 3:48PM

Virgo:

And they did.

Michigan's payroll employment expanded by 1.7% in Jan-April of 2011 versus the prior year. By contrast, Michigan's payroll employment declined for 8 straight years in 2002-2010.

C1

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
virgogirl May 25, 2011 at 4:06PM

hmmm only a real naive person would think that had to do with snyder. He just got in office! That had to do with Granholm and our Prez and democratic party bailing out the auto industry. How can you possibly think it is Snyder???????????????????????????????????????

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
CuriousOneMi2 May 25, 2011 at 4:25PM

Virgo:

Snyder was elected in Nov 2010 on a promise to cut corporate taxes and enhance the business climate. The Nov 2010 elections also resulted in Repubs gaining control of the State House and the State Senate as voters expressed disappointment with 8 straight years of declining payroll employment in Michigan.

Jobs in Michigan are up now versus the early 2010 experience. However, the Granholm/Obama effect from 2009 and 2010 will still leave calendar year 2011 employment below the 2008 level.

MI's Payroll Employment Gov
2008 4162 Granholm
2009 3876 Granholm
2010 3842 Granholm
2011(est) 3900 Snyder
Source: BLS; thousands

C1

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Know the Facts May 25, 2011 at 4:43PM

From C1's textbook, "Laws of Expert Macroeconomics":

ALL constructive statistics shall be attributed to republicans.
ALL detrimental statistics shall be attributed to democrats.

I have to wonder, did C1 learn these universal rules at a Limbaugh lecture or a Beckonomics class?

KTF B4U BUY C1's ES

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Know the Facts May 25, 2011 at 4:45PM

From C1's textbook, "Laws of Expert Macroeconomics":

ALL constructive statistics shall be attributed to republicans.
ALL detrimental statistics shall be attributed to democrats.

I have to wonder, did C1 learn these universal rules at a Limbaugh lecture or a Beckonomics class?

KTF B4U BUY C1's ES

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Russ Thomas May 25, 2011 at 4:58PM

You could make that case for just about any State. How is it that a Democratic Gov can get lambasted for job losses, when a Republican President and Congress gets no criticism? Hell I will say the same thing if a Republican Gov was in office and was replaced by a Democrat. So these jobs being created hasn't been done by a Democrat President or Congress? You can't have it both ways.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
venom May 25, 2011 at 5:12PM

Russ, excellent point.

Lets see if "Curious" can explain their way out of that one.

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
CuriousOneMi2 May 25, 2011 at 6:19PM

Venom:

Michigan experienced a one-state recession under Granholm during 2002-2010. I accept $100,000 offers on whether this statistic is correct or not. Belly up!!!

C1

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
Know the Facts May 25, 2011 at 9:03PM

@ Crazy1;
You continuously rant about "Michigan's one state recession 2002-2010". Repeatedly making this statement proves that you:
1. Do NOT have an understanding of what constitutes a recession. (We have been through this before)
2. You completely ignore the fact that the entire country experienced actual recession from Dec. 2008-Jun. 2009 and therefore disproves your theory of a one state recession during that period.

How stupid do you think people are?

KTF B4U BUY C1's LIES

Inappropriate? Alert us.
Reply Post new
  1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 Next comments »

Most Active Users

What's this?
Users with the most MLive.com comments in the last 7 days
silver_rush silver rush
Barking Bear Barking Bear
CitizenXGen CitizenXGen
landingteam2 landingteam2
Harry-Hopkins Harry-Hopkins

Popular Tags

What's this?