National Defense Authorization Act sent to W.H.

  • 41
Carl Levin is pictured on Capitol Hill. | AP Photo

Carl Levin denied the charge that the bill establishes new authority to detain U.S. citizens. | AP Photo

The Senate on Thursday sent a defense policy bill to President Barack Obama, who has said he would reluctantly sign it after months of fighting over the handling of suspected terrorists, especially those who are U.S. citizens.

The vote was 86-13.

Text Size

  • -
  • +
  • reset

The House passed the bill 283-136 on Wednesday after weeks of negotiation on provisions governing the detention of suspected terrorists under a White House veto threat. The White House lifted the veto threat just hours before the House vote as it became clear that the compromise package in the final bill had broad bipartisan support.

Likewise, House Republicans, who had sought tougher measures, did not carry out their threat to block the legislation when it became clear that a majority of senators would not accept them.

“Those who say that we have written into law a new authority to detain American citizens until the end of hostilities are wrong. Neither the Senate bill nor the conference report establishes new authority to detain American citizens – or anybody else,” said Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin (D-Mich), one of the key negotiators on the issue, who at times expressed frustration with the administration and opponents of the provisions over what he called “misstatements” about what they contained.

The bill would create a legal basis for the detention of suspected Al Qaeda terrorists and their allies and require military custody for foreign terrorists who attack the United States. It also favors military trials for suspected terrorists, subject to a presidential waiver, and extends for one year the ban on moving detainees from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the United States.

In order to satisfy the administration and other opponents’ concerns, the final legislation states that nothing in it may be “construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.” The Supreme Court has said U.S. citizens can be held by the military as enemy combatants, but the law is unclear on whether that includes those captured inside the United States and the issue is hotly disputed.

  • 41
Get reporter alerts
  • Charles Hoskinson

Readers' Comments (41)

  1. avatar for user M1sf1ts
    M1sf1ts
    Party: N/A
    Reply #1
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 6:08 PM EST
  2. avatar for user M1sf1ts
    M1sf1ts
    Party: N/A
    Reply #2
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 6:09 PM EST
  3. default avatar for user dregstudios
    dregstudios
    Party: NA
    Reply #3
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 6:31 PM EST
  4. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #4
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 6:32 PM EST
  5. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #5
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 6:34 PM EST
  6. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #6
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 6:39 PM EST
  7. default avatar for user Longhorn
    Longhorn
    Party: N/A
    Reply #7
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 7:19 PM EST
  8. default avatar for user ThomasMc
    ThomasMc
    Party: NA
    Reply #8
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 7:50 PM EST
  9. default avatar for user TheOtherDrG
    TheOtherDrG
    Party: NA
    Reply #9
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 8:04 PM EST
  10. avatar for user GoDems2012
    GoDems2012
    Party: Democrat
    Reply #10
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 8:33 PM EST
  11. avatar for user A Vietnam Veteran
    A Vietnam Veteran
    Party: Republican
    Reply #11
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 8:57 PM EST
  12. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #12
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 8:57 PM EST
  13. avatar for user A Vietnam Veteran
    A Vietnam Veteran
    Party: Republican
    Reply #13
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 9:01 PM EST
  14. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #14
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 9:04 PM EST
  15. avatar for user A Vietnam Veteran
    A Vietnam Veteran
    Party: Republican
    Reply #15
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 9:30 PM EST
  16. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #16
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 9:41 PM EST
  17. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #17
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 9:42 PM EST
  18. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #18
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 9:43 PM EST
  19. avatar for user Bleddyn Capricornius
    Bleddyn Capricornius
    Party: Libertarian
    Reply #19
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 10:18 PM EST
  20. avatar for user Moderatelyneutral
    Moderatelyneutral
    Party: Independent
    Reply #20
    Dec. 15, 2011 - 10:33 PM EST
Read all 41 comments in our forum

You must be logged in to comment

  • Email is Required
  • Password is Required

Not yet a member?

Register Now

Comment on this article

  1. Message is Required
    (9000 characters max)
  2. (200 characters max)
Close

Send to a friendNational Defense Authorization Act sent to W.H.

  • Please enter your e-mail
    Invalid e-mail
  • Please enter a valid e-mail
    Invalid e-mail
Cancel

Recommended on Facebook