Asia

Banyan

Japan's immigration control

Gulag for gaijin

Jan 18th 2012, 12:29 by K.N.C. | TOKYO

AN EXTRAORDINARY story is making the rounds among the hacks and other expats in Japan. A Canadian freelance journalist who has lived in Japan for years fell into the ugly whirlpool of Japan’s immigration-and-detention system. For years human-rights monitors have cited Japan’s responsible agencies for awful abuses; in their reports the system looks like something dark, chaotic and utterly incongruous with the country’s image of friendly lawfulness.

Still the case of Christopher Johnson beggars belief. Returning to Tokyo after a short trip on December 23rd he was ushered into an examination room, where his nightmare began. Over the next 24 hours he was imprisoned and harassed. Most of his requests to call a lawyer, the embassy or friends were denied, he says.

Officials falsified statements that he gave them and then insisted that he sign the erroneous testimony, he says. Guards tried to extort money from him and at one point even threatened to shoot him, he says—unless he purchased a wildly expensive ticket for his own deportation, including an overt kick-back for his tormentors. Once he was separated from his belongings, money was stolen from his wallet and other items removed from his baggage (as he has reported to the Tokyo police).

The problems to do with Japan’s immigration bureau have been known for years. Detainees regularly protest the poor conditions. They have staged hunger strikes and a few have committed suicide. A Ghanaian who overstayed his visa died in the custody of guards during a rough deportation in 2010. (In that case, the prosecutor has delayed deciding whether to press charges against the guards or to drop the case. A spokesperson refuses even to discuss the matter with media outlets that are not part of the prosecutor’s own “press club”.)

Mr Johnson’s ordeal closely matches the abuses exposed in a 22-page report by Amnesty International in 2002, “Welcome to Japan?”, suggesting that even the known problems have not been fixed. One reason why the practices may be tolerated is that the Japanese government apparently outsources its airport-detention operations to a private security firm.

It is a mystery to Mr Johnson why he was called aside for examination, but he suspects it is because of his critical coverage of Japan. (Mr Johnson’s visa status is unclear: in an interview, he said his lawyer advised him not to discuss it.)

Reached by The Economist, Japan’s immigration bureau said it cannot discuss individual cases, but that its detentions and deportations follow the law, records of hearings are archived and the cost of deportation is determined by the airline. The justice ministry declined to discuss the matter and referred all questions to the immigration bureau. Canada’s department of foreign affairs confirmed to The Economist that a citizen was detained and that it provided “consular assistance” and “liaised with local authorities”.

Mr Johnson’s own rambling account of his saga appeared on his blog, “Globalite Magazine”. It must be considered as unverified, despite The Economist’s attempts to check relevant facts with the Japanese and Canadian governments. As a result, we cannot endorse its accuracy. We present edited excerpts, below, because they are deeply troubling if true.

On my way home to Tokyo after a three-day trip to Seoul, I was planning to spend Christmas with my partner, our two dogs, and her Japanese family. I had flight and hotel reservations for ski trips to Hokkaido and Tohoku, and I was planning—with the help of regional government tourism agencies—to do feature stories to promote foreign tourism to Japan. 

While taking my fingerprints, an immigration officer saw my name on a computer watch list. Without even looking through my passport, where he might find proper stamps for my travels, he marked a paper and gave it to another immigration officer. ”Come with me,” he said, and I did. 

He led me to an open room. Tired after three hours’ sleep overnight in Seoul, I nodded off. Officers woke me up and insisted we do an “interview” in a private room, “for your privacy.” Sensing something amiss, I asked for a witness and a translator, to make sure they couldn’t confuse me with legal jargon in Japanese. An employee of Asiana Airlines came to witness the “interview.”

The immigration officers provided a translator—hired by immigration. She turned out to be the interpreter from hell. ”Hi, what’s your name?” I asked, introducing myself to her. “I don’t have to tell you anything,” she snapped at me. She was backed up by four uniformed immigration officials.

Q: “What are the names of the hotels where you stayed in April in the disaster zone? What are the names of people you met in Fukushima?”

A: “Well, I stayed at many places, I met hundreds of people.”

Q: “What are their names?”

A: “Well, there are so many.”

Q: “You are refusing to answer the question! You must say exactly, in detail.”

(Before I could answer, next question.)

Q: “What were you doing in May 2010? Who did you meet then?”

A: “That was a long time ago. Let me think for a moment.”

The interpreter butted in: “See, you are refusing to answer. You are lying.” 

The “interpreter”, biased toward her colleagues in the immigration department, intentionally mistranslated my answers, and repeatedly accused me of making unclear statements. I understood enough of their conversation in Japanese to realise she totally got my story wrong. 

Without hesitation, he wrote on a document: “No proof. Entry denied.” 

“But I do have proof,” I said.

But he refused to acknowledge it. “You must sign here. You cannot refuse.” 

For about four hours, I sat in limbo, unable to properly communicate with the outside world. Starving and tired, I couldn’t think clearly. Various people in various uniforms aggressively shoved various documents in my face for me to sign. I simply said “wait” to everything and zoned out into a world of denial that this nightmare wasn’t happening. 

At about 4 pm, the security guards came to take me away. Two haggard old men probably in their 60s or 70s, were like dogs barking at my heels. They were constantly shaking me down for money. They demanded 28,000 yen as a “service fee” for taking me to buy rice balls and cold noodles at the convenience store.

What is going on here, I wondered. I started to get worried when they took me deep into a cold tunnel below the airport. Away from [ordinary travellers in the airport], they got more aggressive with demands of now 30,000 yen for a “hotel” fee. I was feeling threatened. (I would later find Amnesty International accounts of rogue guards working for the airlines beating up airline customers in the tunnel until they paid up.)

Well, at least I’m going to a hotel, I thought. I’ll make some phone calls there, go online, and get higher-ranking officials to help me out of this big misunderstanding. 

*      *      *

The “hotel” was in fact a jail. A prison, a detention facility, a dungeon. ”The police just told me I could make a call from here,” I said in Japanese. A guard told me flat out in Japanese: “You have no rights here.”

A sign, in English, Japanese, and other languages, lists phone numbers for United Nations organisations dedicated to helping victims of state brutality. 

“It says right here that I can call these numbers.”

“No you can’t.”

They led me into a locked off area with at least two sleeping cells. The room was cold, with no windows. Lying under thin blankets, using my parka (down jacket) as a pillow, I stared at the ceiling and walls.

Later that night, I was ordered into the common room. A man, probably in his 50s, was waiting to see me. His tie said “immigration.” He was warm and compassionate. He tried his best in English and Japanese to explain what was happening. He said, to my surprise, that the other officers were “idiots”. He said they had no business putting foreigners—tourists or expats—in jail like this. “It is a shame for Japan,” he said. “Embarrassing.”

After talking to me, he went out for a few minutes and came back to give me more documents to sign. One was titled “Waiving the Right to Appeal”, meaning, “We are kicking you out of the country.” The other was an “appeal form”. It said I had three days to appeal to “the Minister of Justice.” This at least gave me hope that someone would recognise their mistake, and let me go home

After he left, the guards granted me a privilege—the right to take a shower. My show of respect, and polite language toward them, was reciprocated. They let me make a phone call. They gave me a form to fill out—this is Japan, after all—listing the nationality, name, phone number and relation of that person. 

I tried to milk it. While pretending to check my phone messages (technically not a phone call), I sent messages on Facebook. I wrote short, and sent quickly, in case they caught me: (In jail now … Narita … No rights … Innocent … Help me.) 

I went back to my cell dejected. I lay under blankets in my winter clothes, tormented. I chased away dark thoughts—suicide, protest, escape—from my mind. I cried for myself, and for the tortured souls of the previous tenants.

*      *      *

I was so exhausted from the ordeal that I did fall asleep, shortly after they turned off the lights at 11pm. When I woke up at 10 am on Saturday morning, December 24, my cell was unlocked. [From] the jail’s common room, I was allowed to call my partner. “Don’t worry,” I said, “They’re going to let me go home soon. It’s all been a big mistake.”

The guards now let me make a second call, to my embassy representative. Though helpful and genuinely concerned, she said, “only Japan has authority. There’s nothing we can do.” She said my worried family and friends, who saw my messages on Facebook, had been calling her to offer assistance. She also had faxed a list of lawyers and legal assistance agencies in Japan to the immigration officers.

It was a smart move, because it showed them that powerful people in Canada—the department of foreign affairs, the Canadian embassy, media people—were indeed watching what they were doing with me, a human, with a name, family and supportive friends. It was a way to humanise me. [But] the papers were useless. How could I contact a legal website, if I wasn’t allowed internet? How could I call a lawyer, if I wasn’t allowed phone calls?

There was another call for me. This time from someone at Asiana Airlines. ”How are you doing this morning?” she asked, cheerfully. She said they had been calling my partner at home, asking her to pay 170,000 yen for my one-way ticket to Canada. I wasn’t pleased to hear that. “I’m not going home to Canada,” I scolded her. “My home is in Tokyo. I live here, in Japan.”

“This is a good offer, you should take it,” the airline employee insisted. “If you don’t, the price will go up. The normal price is 400,000 yen. If you wait, you will pay 400,000 yen.”

“That’s crazy,” I said. “I paid 25,000 yen for a round trip ticket to Seoul on your airline. And now you want me to pay 170,000 yen, or 400,000 yen? That’s $5,000, for a one-way ticket. That’s more than five times the normal rate, because I’m in jail.” The airline employee hung up. 

I was worried. “This is a scam,” I thought. The airline guards are shaking us down for money, and now the airline is price gouging me, and even harassing my partner to pay. 

But I was cheered about an hour later, when the guards told me, “Pack up your bags. Don’t leave anything behind.” It was good news. They were going to let me out of here. My appeal worked, I thought. They’re going to release me and let me go home. 

A Special Inquiry Officer sat me down in his office, across from the Special Examination Room where everything had gone wrong a day earlier. He showed me a document from the Ministry of Justice. It was an “Exclusion Order”, with my name on it, next to the details of a flight leaving for Canada. 

I was crestfallen. “No, that’s not right,” I said, confused.

“There is a plane leaving for Canada at 7pm. You must take that plane.”

“But I live in Tokyo. I have a life here.”

“If you do not take that plane, you could end up in jail for months, years. And you’ll never be allowed back into Japan.”

Next, the airline employees came around to hit me up for money. They now wanted 200,000 yen for a one-way ticket on Air Canada. I told them it was a rip-off. I knew that a round trip ticket at HIS travel agency in Tokyo was 50,000 yen plus tax. “OK. 170,000 yen, plus 30,000 for the hotel fee and the security guards,” they said. “This is outrageous,” I said. 

I grabbed my phone from them, since they still had my passport and bags. I called a friend. “Quick, call the police. Tell them I’m in the immigration office, Narita terminal one.” The immigration officers derided me. “Police do not have jurisdiction to come in here,” they laughed. “Narita is a special legal area.”

*      *      *

The airline employee and the [private security guards] were alone with me in a room. ”You must hurry up and buy this ticket,” the Asiana employee said. “Can you pay 150,000 yen?” He went out to negotiate with another airline.  When he came back, he said, “The best I can do is 130,000 yen, plus 30,000 yen for the [guards].”

“No,” I said. “This is wrong. This is a scam. You are just trying to profit off someone in a weak position, a victim of human rights abuses.”

Again, he went out, and came back with a new offer. ”I have asked for special prices. I can do it for 100,000 yen. Anything lower is absolutely impossible. I’m really trying to help you. Please get on this flight.”

It was already after 5 o’clock. People were checking in for the 7 pm flight. I was really sweating now. 

This time, he came back with a young, stocky guy. He was wearing a blue uniform. “Do you see this gun?” he said in Japanese, turning around to show me a weapon in its holster. “I have the legal authority to use this if you refuse to get on that flight. Now are you going to buy that ticket?”

I was angry now. They are forcing me at gunpoint to buy an overpriced ticket.

The [guards] ushered me out of the room and through the airport. They still had my bag, my passport, my wallet, credit cards, everything. I had no choice. They whisked me through the airport like a criminal. I didn’t have to line-up for x-ray machines or immigration. [They] pushed me through VIP lines, ahead of pilots and flight attendants. 

As we walked to the departure gate, they continued to badger me for money. I told them flat out, “This is wrong. Have some pride. I am a working man just like you.” 

The older guys backed off. They sensed I wasn’t going to give in to their pressure. But a hideous older bulldog of a woman was much more relentless. Even the Asiana officers were taken aback by her uncultured onslaught. She raised the demand in increments—30,000 yen, 35,000 yen, 38,900 yen—the tactic of a third world market haggler, trying to pressure you to buy before the price goes higher. 

Still holding my passport, she dogged me all the way to the gate. “I’m going to fly with him all the way to Canada,” she said to another [guard], in Japanese so that I could hear it. 

At the departure gate, I sat down amongst ordinary people happy to be going home for Christmas or on a ski holiday to Canada. I made several last phone calls to loved ones in Japan. My partner cried so heavily, she made me cry. I told her to hug our dogs for me. At that point, I realised I might never see our 15-year-old dog ever again.

My heart burst open like a seawall against a tsunami. Flowing with tears, I ran to the bathroom—to hell with asking the guards. I returned to my seat near the gate. I didn’t even look at anyone. I just covered my face in my hands and cried. 

Finally, the [female guard] gave up. The two male [guards] escorted me onto the plane, and finally gave me back my passport. 

As the Pacific coastline came into view, I gazed perhaps one last time at the street lights and dark rice fields below. It was a feeling I had never considered before: what it would be like to leave Japan, and not return.  

I could only notice that the vast majority of space below was filled with a deep and utter darkness. Somewhere out there, in the gulag of detention centres dotting the land like black holes in the heart of Japan, were the cries of innocent people who would not be heard.

Readers' comments

The Economist welcomes your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful of other readers. Review our comments policy.

Bob2012

This is Japan all over , deeply racist and hateful , and they wonder why Karma came to take them out with a massive Tsunami... please make this article viral and expose these Racists.

sebastian4cisf

Karma little japanese, keep asking why the tsunami??? there you have the answer...

PL123 in reply to sebastian4cisf

Karma little japanese, keep asking why the tsunami??? there you have the answer...
---------------

Such a stupid comment!! The whole world are full of Karma then.

Katrina Hurricane, Bushfire every year in Australia, earthquake everywhere, Thailand tsunami etc etc...

PW-Imlwoei

It really is unbelievable that The Economist would publish this without checking his visa status. My guess is that you are defending other journalists regardless of the facts (or without knowing them). His account of the whole ordeal is sensational and melodramatic, and far from believable. Not to say that it didn't happen, but it clearly is one side of the story and could very well be clouded with vengeance.

guest-iisijia in reply to PW-Imlwoei

TE prefaces this story with a disclaimer.

"We present edited excerpts, below, because they are deeply troubling IF true."

I thought journalistic integrity relied on getting the facts straight then publishing a story. Heresay is not fact.

What's more, the blog this story was originally presented on states at the top, "News, Photos, and FICTION From Around the World"

A liability disclaimer if I ever hear one.

Tai Chi

I'm surprised you would give so much attention to an unverified account.

My guess is he is lying. The narrative has an outlandish feel to it.

Far_Far_Away

After spending some time studying the US immigration system in law school, I can't honestly say we're much better. Immigration generally seems to be a legal black hole, in which governments are allowed to grant detainees minimal and inadequate rights.

Tommaso47

I've never visited Japan. After reading this, I never will.

VSMumbai

bloody japs, they are a disgrace to asia. hey they dont consider themselves asian anyway?
havent apologized for ww II and until they do wont be accepted as a friend by any asian country they invaded and raped.

Mahamaharaja in reply to VSMumbai

"they are a disgrace to asia"

Right, compared to who? India? Seriously? India, the third-world state sponsor of terror, clinging to primitive dynastic politics, worshipping a foreign woman because she has the name "Gandhi", and with more starving, illiterate, and unemployed people than all of Africa? India, where the "untouchable" caste are pretty much 21st century slaves who are treated worse than criminals? That India?

And why is it that tens of thousands of Indians willingly, voluntarily and happily choose to live in Japan, and why do so many other Asians also do the same? Heck, why do Westerners go there?

Can the opposite be said? No. Frankly, the only people willing to go to India are either businessmen looking for child labour to exploit, or those forced to serve as diplomats.

"wont be accepted as friend by any asian country they invaded and raped"

Perhaps not, but then why are all of India's neighbouring countries practically begging the Chinese to set up bases in their countries? Don't you think that's because all those countries surrounding the Raj fear -- based on India and Nehru's imperialistic ambitions, pronoucements and hegemonic actions -- that if given the chance, India would be no better than imperial Japan?

I'm all for criticism where criticism is due: Japan's immigration policies and upholding of human rights are deficient, and needs improving. Visa violators should be treated humanely and not beaten, killed or extorted.

But to come out with racist drivel starting with the phrase "bloody japs" is out and out ridiculous chauvinism. It is ridiculous especially in light of the fact that India is the epitome of human rights abuse (Kashmir, anyone?), not to mention corruption and economic mismanagement -- which is why its economy is about to come to a screeching halt soon.

irljp

imcanjpn,

I'm reminded of a paranoid little Yorkshire terrier biting at the heels of all approaching its space. The danger, of course, is that in its excitement the poor little dog pees on its owner's shoes.

sensevisual

The preconceptions about Japan are so strong that if you challenge simple blanket statements as "japanese are this, Japan is that" you get painted as an "defensive apologist"...

guest-iisowma in reply to sensevisual

The preconceptions about Japan are usually something silly and crude. But this is a serious story concerning massive human rights violations that could very well be factual. It would be downright cruel and heartless to outright dismiss it just because it does not confirm your view of Japan, whatever that it may be.

guest-iisijia in reply to guest-iisowma

It's more about the facts not lining up. He flew into Narita from a 3 day bump to Korea and won't devulge his visa status. If he was not in the wrong, he would have had nothing to hide. He also has changed the story on his blog a number of times since first posting it. There are plenty of problems with racism in Japan, and those stories deserve proper attention. But this story has a lot of holes in it.

You should read the original blog post before he sanitizes it completely. (what is posted here on the Economist is already heavily excerpted)

His abusive rant about the woman official shows a lot about his character (and attitude towards women). He sounds emotionally immature at best, and a bit unstable at worst.

The fact anyone is giving him attention is sad. There are real injustices that deserve to be covered. Not some whiney guy who was shacking up with a rocker in Tokyo, got caught coming in on a tourist visa too many times, and now is trying to stir the pot.

sensevisual

White privilege, much?

The persons mentioned in the the 2002 Amnesty report are mostly from poor asian countries (Afghanistan, China, Kurds, etc..).

Well, go read it yourself and see if it applies to WHITE CANADIANS.

Also, the fact that this rant got picked so fast, without criticism, by a otherwise responsible news org like The Economist, confirms my suspicions about the untrustworthiness of most western reporting about Japan.

imcanjapn

Where are the facts supporting the claims that The Internet consensus is to doubt the credibility of Johnson and The Economist on this story? Says on this page that more than 1000 people like this story, more than 500 tweets. How many doubters? 10, 20, 50?

ryusoma in reply to imcanjapn

Because most people reading news articles and regurgitating them in the Twitscape (thank you Jon Stewart) are typically completely IGNORANT of the subject they are spuriously propagating.

Meanwhile, on sites full of people (ostensibly) with direct experience living and working in Japan, dealing with air travel, immigration issues, etc.. the consensus is that his facts don't add up, his story is overly melodramatic, and he deliberately leaves out key details on the possible CAUSE of this entire issue.

So to sum up, the tweets are twits and the tubes are tied.

Andrei R

This is a comment, purportedly from Mr Johnson, that was recently posted on Debito.org:

“I knew about the issue of mistreatment of foreigners a long time ago. I learned to speak Thai before Japanese, so I knew about Thais smuggled into Japan in cargo holds and sleeping in a box under bridges. I wrote about these issues in my book Siamese Dreams … In the past year, most of my work has been from the tsunami zone and Fukushima.

About the accusation of dishonesty: If the New York Times (one of my strings the past 10 years) are working on an investigative piece blowing the lid off some heavy issue, are they dishonest for not revealing all their sources and info on chat sites before going to publication with the story? Of course not. That is my present situation. I’m a working journalist, and I’m working with editors on this, and lawyers. Do you really expect me to give my story away to everybody for free? I’m not an “NHK stooge” getting paid for one job while doing another or commenting on chat sites.”

imcanjapn in reply to Andrei R

What's wrong with this? Sounds like what any freelance journalist would do. Would you work for free, if you had a hot story like his? And what does this have to do with reports by Amnesty International about Japanese imprisoning foreigners in Japan? Seems like another lame excuse to attack someone you don't know by abusing your freedom on the internet.

Anjin-San in reply to imcanjapn

Problem with professional journalists trying to report on a story his(her) own experience is, there is always a constant temptation for Yarase, which is a Japanese term for 'staging' reality that suits the reporter's scenario.
It's like Tony Blair asking the reports on Iraqi WMD to be 'sexed up', only instead of simply writing false words, going all the way and planting false evidences...

Andrei R in reply to imcanjapn

The fact that Mr Johnson's article has been edited so many times since publication has smashed its credibility for me, and I can't be the only one who finds it odd that this whole immigration saga began with "It was the government wot chucked me out!" to "I'm working on a biiig story here, guys. Strictly on the QT".

As another poster commented, Mr Johnson would have been better off spending some time reflecting on events and writing a clearly-worded article, rather than hasitly typing out a sensationalist diatribe and hitting the "Post" button. Perhaps then readers wouldn't be questioning the validity of his story.

Critique

He's not a journalist or at least not an objective one. His story seems so biased, exactly like someone who got beat-up by some guy but would not tell the whole story and particularly not the part where he provoked and caused his own misfortunes...

irljp in reply to Critique

Critique, he IS a journalist. On (tennis pro) Li Na, he tweets:

"Li is tough but her mood spats with her husband/coach tend to carry over onto the court. If only she knew of my secret admiration for her"

The words of a true professional, passionate about his subject.

imcanjapn in reply to irljp

Thus all humour should be banned online. How dare a "true professional" do that. It therefore proves that Hiroko Tabuchi, Justin McCurry, Chico Harlan, Jake Adelstein are also not credible sources. They write fun tweets too.

PL123 in reply to irljp

Critique, he IS a journalist. On (tennis pro) Li Na, he tweets:

"Li is tough but her mood spats with her husband/coach tend to carry over onto the court. If only she knew of my secret admiration for her"

The words of a true professional, passionate about his subject.
---------------------

That proved he is NOT professional, only a blogger!!

Christine USA in reply to Critique

Objective journalism is a thing of the past. NOW journalism is a script handed down to the journalist by his superiors on what he may and may not report. GE and its subsidiaries own much of the media. The 1% control the media, thereby deciding what part of reality the 99% will be told. Impartial journalism has not existed for some time now...did you not notice?

avaiki

...

Claim and counter-claim. Three facts stand out for me. One, that he was a long term resident. Two, that he reported on Fukushima. Three, he was suddenly deported.

Wonder how many other journalists, local and foreign, have been hassled after reporting on Fukushima?

...

VKay in reply to avaiki

avaiki, given that all the major news networks and newspapers report on Fukushima on a regular basis and have been ripping shreds out of TEPCO, why don't you give them a call in your best Japanese and ask them?

Or you could look at this, from Reporters without Borders, which in 2010 ranked Japan 11th in the world for Press Freedom. That's worse than the Nordic countries, but better than the UK, the US, Australia and Canada.

http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2010,1034.html

It's theoretically possible that the 2011 report will see Japan's ranking plummet, but JSF don't appear to have made any noises about problems over Fukushima reporting. In general, there's been excessive pallyness between journalists and bureaucrats (the press club system has not helped), and in general we really need more decent investigative journalism, but it's not as if there's been silence over the problems at Fukushima after the tsunami. If anything, it's possibly been a bit of a shot in the arm to journalism.

Some people commenting here seem convinced that Japan is a police state of some kind. It isn't. It has its problems, but they're not much different to most other stable democracies.

sensevisual in reply to avaiki

Many journalists reporting on the Fukushima disaster don't even live in Japan, like VOA's Steve Herman, who travelled from Seoul to Japan regularly, and was one of the first western journalists to visit the Fukushima plant, for example.
He never mentioned any problem with customs.
If this had happened on march or april 2011, maybe we could go on conspiracy mode, but now?

Anjin-San in reply to avaiki

”One, that he was a long term resident. ”
A claim not yet substantiated by facts. He may have been a frequent visitor, but his legal residency status in Japan is "withheld at Lawyer's advice" at this moment...

Ishikawa

What a tragedy. I hope Mr. Johnson can get this sorted out and back to Japan.

Children in Japan also without effective protections. Please see this article describing the struggles children face in Japan.

http://www.economist.com/node/21543193

One of the best written and most informative articles in a good while.

Level3Osaka

Wow, his story just keeps on changing.

He has dropped the parts about having "had a few beers" on the 9AM flight from Seoul, which takes 90 minutes. Gee, I wonder why...

He dropped his claims that he was suffering "delirium" from "lack of sleep" to help explain the fuzziness of detail.

The first versions of his story had the initial demand at a ticket price of 400,000 or 500,000 yen. That part has been dropped to 200,000 yen.

His sob story about not having appropriate winter clothing for being shipped off to the "-40 degrees" in Alberta (even though in the same story he later wrote that he slept on his parka, plus the fact that the temperature in Alberta that day, 4C, was in fact slightly warmer than both his departure point, Seoul -2C and the same as the place of the incident, Tokyo, 4C) has been dropped.

Of course, he still hasn't exactly explained what his visa status was. The crux of the whole incident.

It's very sad that this guy is putting his own fame ahead of honest reporting. And it's very sad that he seems to be using his connections to spread this story just as fast as he redacts it. But I think most people can smell the bullshit (including editors here at The Economist, who probably regret taking this guys' word), and this guy has just ended any hopes for a career in legitimate journalism.

But there's always blogs and conspiracy sites...

He seems determined to blame everyone but himself for not properly renewing his visa like 99.9% of the responsible adults in Japan. So much easier to say it's all a giant conspiracy. A giant government and corporate conspiracy to shake down a few totally innocent (and hungover) people for SEVERAL HUNDRED DOLLARS??!! :P Wow, it's so obvious!

Hint for CJ (The airlines would make far more than a few hundred bucks from him if he could have kept his paperwork in order and continue buying tickets to and from Japan for the rest of his life. The Japanese government would make far more than a few hundred bucks if he stayed in Japan working and paying taxes.)

imcanjapn in reply to Level3Osaka

Clearly Level3 is not trying to make a name for himself off attacking Johnson and anybody else who challenges his narrow mindset about Japan. HIs commitment to truth comes through in his ongoing investigations into claims by Amnesty, the Tokyo District Court others about widespread mistreatment of Non-Japanese (NJs).

HealthySkepticism

It isn't clear to what extent this event was staged as a provocation. In any case, its clear that this story is a platform for the real issue here, Japan's immigration policies. I'm not Japanese but I support Japan's self determination. Japan's government should be focused on the welfare of the Japanese people. I think that it would be harmful for a Japan to become a multicultural society.

guest-iismsmo in reply to imcanjapn

You tell us, Chris. You're the one bragging about having been the "Japan correspondent" for the Washington Times, "on assignment for them, taking down details, remembering every little bit, trying to gather as much knowledge as I could about a murky world."

http://www.debito.org/?p=9868#comment-307431

So, if you're on assignment for them to write about Japan's deportation centers from the inside, that kind of requires you to be stopped as an illegal, now doesn't it? Otherwise the assignment falls through!

So, tell us, Chris, were you trying to get caught and thrown out (not "deported", you weren't in Japan yet), or just caught and you figured you'd be "talked to" and let go since they wouldn't dare refuse entry to an "educated white male"?

Which was it, Chris?

therightside.com.au

The story runs contrary to my expectation of the Japanese. Is there some truth in this story?

havill in reply to imcanjapn

No, because there are police at the airport. And real uniformed police officers do have guns. There is no U.S. second amendment in Japan, and firearm use is heavily regulated. Even having knives greater than certain lengths is illegal.

Sometimes farmers in rural areas are given special limited licenses to use non-concealable hunting-use rifles and shotguns for the purpose of repelling bears or monkeys that have run amok, but other than that, the real police and the military (self-defense force) are the only two classes of people in Japan that possess firearms.

Security guards? No way. Even the guards that move large amounts of cash from ATMs and armored cars have no firearms in Japan.

About Banyan

In this blog, our Asia correspondents and our Banyan columnist provide comment and analysis on Asia's political and cultural landscape. The blog takes its name from the Banyan tree, under which Buddha attained enlightenment and Gujarati merchants used to conduct business

Advertisement

Trending topics

Read comments on the site's most popular topics

Advertisement

Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
The worst yet
From Baobab - 26 mins ago
Neighbourly advice
From Babbage - 1 hrs 49 mins ago
Shades of grey
From Prospero - 1 hrs 47 mins ago
The battle to keep the FAA running
From Gulliver - 1 hrs 36 mins ago
Hail to the dragon!
From Cassandra - 1 hrs 24 mins ago
Bring on the lawyers
From Baobab - 2 hrs 27 mins ago
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day

Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.


Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter


See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.