EDITION: U.S.
 
CONNECT    

George Mitchell Plans To Resign: AP Sources

George Mitchell Resigning

JIM KUHNHENN   05/13/11 08:52 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — His two-year mission unfulfilled, former Sen. George Mitchell announced his resignation Friday as the Obama administration's special envoy to the Mideast at a time of turmoil in the region and after fruitless attempts at rekindling Israeli-Palestinian peace talks.

President Barack Obama, accepting the resignation, called Mitchell "a tireless advocate for peace."

In a two-paragraph letter to Obama, Mitchell said that he took the diplomatic job intending to only serve two years. "I strongly support your vision of comprehensive peace in the Middle East and thank you for giving me the opportunity to be part of your administration," Mitchell wrote.

Mitchell's resignation comes at a critical time for the Middle East, which is embroiled in uprisings, and the Israeli-Palestinian peace process, which has been moribund since last September and is now further complicated by an agreement between Palestinian factions to share power.

Mitchell's resignation appears to have been timed to match Obama's increased public focus on the region. The president will deliver a speech next Thursday at the State Department about his administration's views of developments in the region, ahead of a visit to Washington by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Obama also will play host to Jordan's King Abdullah II on Tuesday. Mitchell's last day will be effective May 20 – the same day Netanyahu visits the White House.

The White House was also looking to schedule a speech by Obama to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee before he leaves for Europe May 22, officials said.

David Hale, Mitchell's deputy, will serve as acting envoy, Obama said in a statement.

White House spokesman Jay Carney said the administration remains focused on reviving Middle East peace negotiations.

"The president's commitment remains as firm as it was when he took office," Carney said. "This is a hard issue, an extraordinarily hard issue."

On his second full day in office in January 2009, Obama appointed Mitchell to the special envoy's post amid much fanfare. The former Democratic senator from Maine, who rose to be Senate majority leader, had established his credentials as an international mediator by helping broker peace in Northern Ireland. As such, he brought an outsize profile to one of the most intractable diplomatic undertakings.

Since his appointment, Mitchell, 77, has spent much of his time shuttling between the Israelis, Palestinians and friendly Arab states in a bid to restart long-stalled peace talks that would create an independent Palestinian state. But in recent months, particularly after the upheaval in Arab countries that ousted longtime U.S. ally and key peace partner Hosni Mubarak from power in Egypt, his activity had slowed markedly.

What's more Mitchell never established a firm presence, preferring to jet in for short visits lasting several days, or even several hours.

More critically, Mitchell never established a rapport with either side.

With Israelis suspicious of Obama even before he assumed office, Mitchell further unnerved them by taking a tough line against West Bank settlements, saying that any construction was unacceptable. The Palestinians, initially encouraged, became disillusioned when the U.S. was unable to persuade Israel to freeze settlement construction, and Mitchell lost credibility with the Palestinians.

Partisans also blamed each other for Mitchell's inability to bring the sides together.

Nimer Hamad, a senior adviser to Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas, said Mitchell's job had been made more difficult by Israeli intransigence.

"Mitchell hasn't been in the region in three months," Hamad said. "Whether he resigns or not, it's clear that Mitchell wasn't in the region because he didn't see the possibility of being a mediator between two sides where one of them is not responsive."

Israel's ambassador to the U.S., Michael Oren, praised Mitchell's efforts. "Unfortunately, the Palestinians rejected his repeated invitations to resume direct negotiations and instead decided to achieve statehood unilaterally, without direct talks and without peace," Oren said.

Jon Alterman, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said Mitchell's task held greater hope at the time of his appointment.

"But the way the politics worked out, you have an Israeli government that is very skeptical about the ability of negotiating with the Palestinian Authority," Alterman said. "And you have a Palestinian Authority where the internal politics are increasingly fraught.

"So it's hard to find a political consensus either among the Israelis or the Palestinians to move forward on the kinds of negotiations that George Mitchell was appointed to facilitate."

Mitchell believed his patience would serve him well in the Arab-Israeli conflict and its constant forward and backward steps. Speaking of the Northern Ireland conflict, he once said: "I formed the conviction that there is no such thing as a conflict that can't be ended. Conflicts are created, conducted and sustained by human beings. They can be ended by human beings."

Israeli analyst Yossi Alpher, former director of the Jaffee Center for Strategic Studies at Tel Aviv University, said Mitchell's departure could signal a different approach by the Obama administration.

"His methods just didn't work here," Alpher said. "The Northern Ireland method of listen, listen and listen doesn't work here."

Nabil Shaath, a leading Palestinian negotiator, suggested the resignation was not so much a blow to the peace effort as a reflection of its failure – and that should conditions change, the identity of the mediator was not key.

"Mitchell hadn't received enough support from the U.S. administration to make a breakthrough in the peace process. He is a positive man, he is a great man and he is my friend," Shaath said. "But Mitchell can be replaced when the U.S. administration is ready. There is no possibility for a mediator to work without the needed support and pressure from the administration on Israel."

Mitchell served in the Senate as a Democrat from Maine from 1980 to 1995, the final six years as majority leader. In 2000-01, he headed a fact-finding committee on Mideast violence that called for commitments by Israel and the Palestinian Authority to immediately and unconditionally end their fighting. The panel urged a cooling-off period and other steps toward peace, but it did not lead to lasting results.

Mitchell also led the 2007 investigation into the use of performance-enhancing drugs in major league baseball. Before that, he was chairman of The Walt Disney Co. from 2004-2006.

___

Associated Press writers Matthew Lee and Erica Werner in Washington, Dan Perry and Ian Deitch in Jerusalem and Dalia Nammari in Ramallah, West Bank, contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
  • Comments
  • 944
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »   (15 total)
10:23 AM on 5/16/2011
George just needed to turn off the USA 3+ Buillion a year and all problems wouyld be solved!! The ZIonist control the USA and now George knows it too!!
06:32 AM on 5/16/2011
The Palestinia­n-Israeli Clash seems insolvable­. This may be the 21st century version of the 100 year war. Except this may be a 1,000 year war. I am pro-Israel but I can understand the bitterness of the Palestinia­ns having their homes and land confiscate­d and taken over by the Israelis. I don't see peace in the cards. And this issue is driving the radicaliza­tion of Islam across the world and it is the key to "peace" between East and West. Why haven't the rich Arab states done more to help the impoverish­ed Palestinia­ns? What is it about them that makes them reluctant to help each other except to provide weapons of war? Places like Saudi Arabia may eventually be a victim of their neglect as the flames of revolution come closer and closer to their doorstep. While I don't believe Trump's "let's take over their oil fields" approach is either sane or workable, I think we have to get tougher with that side of the world and demand more of them.
01:29 AM on 5/16/2011
And I thought my last two years at work were difficult.­..
08:37 PM on 5/15/2011
The whole strategy of piling up pro-Israel­i operatives in the state department as a balance against the perceived pro-Palest­inian Obama and white house, ended up to be a one sided piling up of pro-Israel­i operative everywhere who only knew how to pressure the Palestinia­ns while Israel moved the goal post. They basically destroyed any chance of negotiated settlement­.
08:33 PM on 5/15/2011
Israel never wanted Peace ,its just another dog and pony show for the American public.
06:21 PM on 5/15/2011
AlPAC / and the israelis control the US government and US congress. That is why Mitchell could never do his job.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Erewhon7
Join atheists, our non-prophet organization
10:19 PM on 5/15/2011
A fanatic is a person will not change her mind and will not change the subject.—C­hurchill
10:25 AM on 5/16/2011
Well said, time for Americans to wake up and take control of America
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vincent Van Der Hyde
The truth will set you free.
03:06 PM on 5/15/2011
Mitchell failed because:
1. the US policy toward Israel isn't governed by US best interests but by Israel's demands.
2. Israel's policy of repression and intimidati­on naturally produces resistance­, which is then used to justifiy more repression and intimidati­on. Invade someones homeland and you can hardly expect them to love you.
02:55 PM on 5/15/2011
If his boss (Obama) cannot even hold or stop (even if temporary) the Israelis from building settlement­s, how can Mitchell proceed to do his job?

He just confirmed how a foreign country is directing our ME foreign policies -- all because of moneyed-lo­bbyists controllin­g our elections (e.g. Congressio­nal elections.­..). SHAME!!!

(Obama and Hillary are lap d ogs...) As Bibi said, "it's easy to push US around" -- he sabotaged Oslo negotiatio­n: http://www­.youtube.c­om/watch?v­=z6KLFrye9­Xk
FreeAmerican7
It's hard to soar like an Eagle around Turkeys!
03:35 PM on 5/15/2011
His boss is President Obama
and the BOSS of President Obama
is the PM of Israel.... Currently Bibi
01:46 PM on 5/15/2011
Israels AIPAC will be in Washington on the 23 of May to straighten out our leaders.
08:21 PM on 5/15/2011
Wolf Blitzer of CNN will likely be confused as to
whether report on it or be one of their main speakers..­.
and of course distort the truth...
freddyflotilla
Gone fishin'
10:44 AM on 5/15/2011
Happy Nakba Day!
11:29 AM on 5/15/2011
Wow ... when you thought a person can go low.. they lower the limbo bar and ...there you go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Standley
opinionated jerk
12:28 AM on 5/15/2011
Don't send another envoy until both parties show up here with a rough framework of an agreement. Enough already-60 years-!
12:28 AM on 5/15/2011
I guess "listen, listen and listen" work about as well as our daministra­tion's "talk, talk and talk", eh?
11:57 PM on 5/14/2011
Mitchell's been a pretty good guy and fair.
Too bad to see him go.
But he likely see's that Israel, which
holds most of the cards, is still not
willing to bend. The Likud party in
some ways is just as extreme as
Hamas can be.

Both sides need to give up their
history, their hurts and insults,
and make it work for their kids.
01:05 AM on 5/15/2011
They are each as bad as the other. They care about themeselve­s not their kids.
photo
Lady In Silhouette
It's my cats lives. I'm here to open their cans.
06:50 PM on 5/14/2011
Truth be told he sees the futility in staying there. Just a nice way of saying, "I'm outta' here!"
06:41 PM on 5/14/2011
If you want peace in the middle east,stop bombing them,IDIOT­S...
freddyflotilla
Gone fishin'
08:01 PM on 5/14/2011
Yeah..you Hamas idiots...w­hat she said!
01:05 AM on 5/15/2011
Uhm.......­...yes. what they said