MARAPRNOV
09
201120122013
162 captures
24 Jun 2011 - 19 Mar 2021
About this capture
Monday April 9th 2012
The economics of the Arab spring
Open for business?
Economic reform in the Middle East could prove harder than in eastern Europe. The West needs to help it along
Jun 23rd 2011 | from the print edition
IS THE Arab spring a 1989 moment? The collapse of communism remade eastern Europe both politically and economically, as vibrant market economies emerged from the rubble of central planning. Optimists argue that democratic transitions in the Middle East and north Africa could transform the region’s lousy economies (see chart). Countries such as Egypt and Tunisia don’t have to build a capitalist system from scratch. But their state-dominated economies need an overhaul, similar in nature—if not in scale—to that in eastern Europe. Unfortunately, though the task is smaller, there are several reasons why it could be a lot harder.
Unlike eastern Europe, all Arab countries (those with oil wealth and those without) have capitalist economies, in which prices and private enterprise play a big role. Yet it is a distorted, patriarchal capitalism, characterised by a dominant state, kleptocratic monopolies, heavy regulation and massive subsidies. This has fuelled corruption, stunted growth and left millions without jobs. High oil prices give petro-economies the wherewithal to counter discontent by dispensing largesse. Those without such wealth face a growing fiscal mess.
Take Egypt. Outside agriculture, over 40% of the economy is in state hands, with a hefty chunk controlled by the army. Private firms are strangled with red tape. Subsidies for food and fuel, worth some 10% of GDP, are busting the budget. The result is that Egypt faces a fiscal crunch as well as an urgent need to overhaul its economic model (see article).
In this section
If Greece goes…
Rising power, anxious state
A gamble that may not pay off
»Open for business?
A good idea in danger of going bad
Reprints
Related items
Thailand's general election: Lucky Yingluck
Jun 23rd 2011
Egypt's economy: Light, dark and muddle
Jun 23rd 2011
Related topics
European Union
Middle East
Europe
Africa
Egypt
Top of the to-do list is reform of subsidies, so that government handouts are confined to the needy. Next comes a set of measures needed to foster private enterprise: breaking up monopolies, reducing the size of the state and rewriting regulations so that they support rather than suffocate competition. That sounds like a slimmed-down version of the post-communist transition agenda, where privatisation and the creation of competitive markets were also priorities. Unfortunately, the Middle East faces two big problems that eastern Europe didn’t.
First, eastern Europe’s transition had a clear aim: membership of the European Union. For all the EU’s current difficulties, it provided both a powerful political motivator and a detailed reform blueprint. The economies of the Middle East and north Africa have no such lodestar. Joining the EU is not an option. And although European politicians talk of deeper partnerships with the awakened countries, they still refuse to cut the trade barriers that matter, such as those on farm exports.

Use the interactive "carousel" to browse our key coverage of Middle East unrest through graphics
Second, the appetite for reform is far feebler. East Europeans wanted economic freedom along with democracy. In the Middle East popular anger at corruption and high joblessness have not translated into demands for wholesale economic reform. Quite the contrary. In Egypt the transitional government has expanded subsidies and increased employment in state firms. Economic liberalisation has a poor reputation, thanks to reforms earlier this decade whose fruits flowed largely to the well-connected. Indeed, a desire for vengeance against fat cats helped to bring the crowds onto Tahrir Square.
Fortune and favours for the bold
So the Middle East’s economic transition could be a lot bumpier than that of eastern Europe (which was itself a pretty rough ride at times). The West’s strategy for assistance must change accordingly. Up to now the focus has been on financial help: America has offered debt relief to Egypt, the IMF has lent cash with few strings attached. That buys time but does not promote reform. In future, aid should become more conditional, aimed at helping private enterprise. And far more important than cash will be the West’s willingness to offer freer trade and real integration to the successful reformers and democratisers. Maybe not EU membership, but something close.
from the print edition | Leaders
Recommend
108
Submit to reddit
View all comments (28)
Related items
TOPIC: European Union »TOPIC: Middle East »
TOPIC: Europe »
Germany and Greece: Wolfgang's woes
The week ahead: February 17th 2012: Santorum surges (again)
Carmakers in Europe: Hands off the wheel
TOPIC: Africa »
Africa's oceans: Saving the briny deeps
Healthcare in Africa: Home schooling
Africa’s oceans: A sea of riches
More related topics:
Egypt
Want more? Subscribe to The Economist and get the week's most relevant news and analysis.
Comment (28)
Print
E-mail
Reprints & permissions
Advertisement
Most commented
Most recommended
Asia's balance of power: China’s military rise
Trade policy in the EU: Germany's blast at Barroso
Charlemagne: Currency disunion
The Republican nomination: Say cheese!
China’s military rise: The dragon’s new teeth
Campaign strategy: The reverse dog whistle
Climate change: Climate scepticism is not just American
Uncertain politics: Reimposing order
American Indians: Gambling on nation-building
Happiness: No longer the dismal science?
Over the past five days
Advertisement
Latest blog posts - All times are GMT
Weekend link exchange
From Free exchange - April 9th, 00:19
JAS's cartoon
From Newsbook - April 8th, 20:23
Flying the friendlier skies
From Gulliver - April 8th, 18:41
A hold-up at the Bank of Japan
From Banyan - April 8th, 08:49
Out, but far from over
From Babbage - April 7th, 18:15
When ignorance is lethal
From Eastern approaches - April 7th, 14:58
Our friends in the South
From Democracy in America - April 7th, 14:52
More from our blogs »
Products & events
Stay informed today and every day
Subscribe to The Economist's free e-mail newsletters and alerts.
Get e-mail newsletters
Subscribe to The Economist's latest article postings on Twitter
Follow The Economist on Twitter
See a selection of The Economist's articles, events, topical videos and debates on Facebook.
Follow The Economist on Facebook
Classified ads
About The Economist
Media directory
Advertising info
Staff books
Career opportunities
Subscribe
Contact us
Site index
[+] Site Feedback
Copyright © The Economist Newspaper Limited 2012. All rights reserved.
Legal disclaimer
Accessibility
Privacy policy
Terms of use
Help
Log inRegisterSubscribe
Digital & mobileEventsTopics A-ZNewslettersJobsRSS feedFacebookTwitter
World politicsUnited StatesUS Elections 2012BritainEuropeFrance's presidential electionChinaAsiaAmericasMiddle East & AfricaBusiness & financeAll Business & financeWhich MBA?Business Books QuarterlyEconomicsAll EconomicsEconomics by invitationMarkets & dataEconomics A-ZScience & technologyAll Science & technologyTechnology QuarterlyCultureAll CultureMore Intelligent LifeStyle guideThe Economist QuizThe World in 2012BlogsLatest blog postsEastern approachesAnalectsElyséeAmericas viewFree exchangeBabbageGame theoryBagehot's notebookGraphic detailBanyanGulliverBaobabJohnsonBlightyLeviathanButtonwood's notebookLexington's notebookCharlemagne's notebookNewsbookClausewitzProsperoDemocracy in AmericaSchumpeterDebateEconomist debatesWhat the world thinksEconomics by invitationLetters to the editorIdeas arena: Women & workMultimediaWorldBusiness & economicsScience & technologyCultureEventsThe Economist in audioPrint editionCurrent issuePrevious issuesSpecial reportsPolitics this weekBusiness this weekLeadersKAL's cartoon