Consumer Spending Slows in March

The Bureau of Economic Analysis observed that personal spending rose 0.3 percent in March, its slowest pace so far in 2012. Personal consumption expenditures had increased 0.5 percent and 0.9 percent in January and February.

In constant 2005 dollars, consumers spent just 0.1 percent more for the month. Much of the growth was attributable to higher nondurable goods purchases, with durable goods spending lower. Even with this month’s slowdown, consumer spending is 4 percent higher today than last year.

While spending lagged somewhat in March, personal income continued to grow moderately, up 0.4 percent. This was above the 0.3 percent growth rate of February.  Disposable income also grew by that rate, with real personal disposable income up 0.2 percent.  Manufacturing wages increased from $730.5 billion to $730.6 billion, a small jump for the month but a continuation of a larger upward trend over the past couple years.

With income growth outpacing spending, the savings rate increased from 3.7 percent to 3.8 percent. Still, it remains low, especially since the savings rate stood at 4.7 percent in December.

Inflation continues to be modest. Prices for consumer items are rising by 2.1 percent at the annual rate, with core inflation, which omits food and energy, up 2 percent. Energy goods and services have moderated since the past report, as they are up 1 percent in March versus being 3.5 percent higher in February. This is obviously welcome relief.

Chad Moutray is chief economist, National Association of Manufacturers

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Monday Economic Report – April 30

Below is the commentary from my Monday Economic Report:

The economy is growing modestly, up 2.2 percent in the first quarter of 2012, according to the Bureau of Economic Analysis. Consumers were one of the main drivers of activity, as personal spending accounted for nearly all first-quarter growth. This is a testament to the durability of consumers, who—despite economic uncertainty and higher prices—have continued to spend. As such, manufacturers continued to have an outsized role with durable and nondurable goods purchases, adding nearly 1.5 percentage points to growth. Exports were higher, but they were offset by increases in imports.

Still, real GDP rose less in the first quarter than in the previous one, which was up 3 percent. Business investment was lower, and this was largely a function of slower inventory growth. This was expected for the most part given that manufacturers ramped up strongly in the fourth quarter after a slower mid-2011, and inventory replenishment contributed largely to that story. Nonresidential construction was lower in the first quarter, and government spending continued to provide a drag on growth at the local, state and federal levels.

Many other economic indicators released last week showed slower growth in March and April in manufacturing and elsewhere. The Census Bureau reported a 4.2 percent decline in durable goods orders in March, and the Kansas City Federal Reserve observed slower manufacturing activity in its region. The Richmond Fed’s survey showed an uptick in production so far this spring. For that reason, the Chicago Fed has said that the U.S. economy is operating below its historical trend, with sluggish manufacturing growth being a key reason.

Moving forward, real GDP should increase around 2.5 percent this year, with industrial production up 4 percent. Manufacturers remain mostly positive about future activity, but as recent weaknesses in the data illustrate, such optimism is tenuous at best. A number of headwinds will continue to confront both manufacturers and the public at large. The global economy—in Europe and elsewhere—has slowed, and despite progress in labor and housing markets, both remain weak. Policymakers would be wise to adopt pro-growth strategies that will help to ensure growth for the rest of this year and beyond and, where possible, to alleviate marketplace anxiety.

This week, we will learn more about the current state of manufacturing. Today’s Chicago and Dallas regional releases will preview the Institute for Supply Management’s (ISM) purchasing managers’ index, which will come out tomorrow. Last month, ISM data moved higher, so it will be interesting to see if slowness seen in other indicators continues. The other main headlines this week will stem from new employment data out on Friday. Job creation appears to have eased from the faster pace of December and January, and April employment numbers are likely to repeat March’s. Manufacturers, though, have been a bright spot overall on the jobs front, adding nearly 150,000 jobs between December and March.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Real GDP Grew 2.2 Percent in the First Quarter

The Bureau of Economic Analysis announced that real gross domestic product (GDP) rose 2.2 percent in the first quarter. This is below the 3 percent growth rate experienced in the fourth quarter of 2011, but much of this was expected due to lower inventory replenishment needs in the first quarter. Inventories accounted for 1.81 percent of the 3 percentage points of growth in the fourth quarter as the economy started picking up steam. This was unlikely to be repeated moving into 2012.

Consumers accounted for the bulk of the growth in the first quarter, bucking lower sentiment amid worries about higher gasoline prices. In fact, personal consumption accounted for 2.04 percent of the 2.2 percent in growth for the quarter, or nearly all of it. This also shows the strength of the manufacturing sector continuing into the new year. Durable and nondurable goods consumption added 1.13 percent and 0.35 percent, respectively, (or nearly 1.5 percent) to real output in the quarter.

Other positives in today’s release include business investment and exports. Both of these were somewhat tempered from the previous quarter, however. Gross private fixed investment added 0.77 percent to growth (down from 2.59 percent, largely on slower inventory growth and reduced nonresidential spending). Meanwhile, goods exports were up modestly over the fourth quarter, but these were counterbalanced by higher imports. Overall net exports essentially added nothing to real GDP in the quarter.

Government continues to provide a drag on growth, something that is expected to continue. With defense and state and local government spending cuts, government reduced real GDP by 0.6 percentage points. This was, however, an improvement from the previous quarter’s 0.84 percent negative contribution.

Overall, these numbers are consistent with modest economic growth in 2012. I continue to predict that real GDP will increase around 2.5 percent this year, with industrial production up 4 percent. Moreover, these figures confirm the importance of manufacturing in our current economic environment, with durable and nondurable goods spending contributing nearly two-thirds of the net growth in the quarter. This is also a testament to the durability of the consumer, who – despite uncertainties in the economy and higher prices – has continued to spend.

Moving forward, a number of headwinds will continue to confront both manufacturers and the public at large. The global economy – in both Europe and elsewhere – has slowed, and despite progress in labor and housing markets, both remain weak. Manufacturers remain mostly positive about future activity, but as recent weaknesses in the data illustrate, such optimism is tenuous at best. Policymakers would be wise to adopt pro-growth strategies that will help to ensure growth for the rest of this year and beyond, and where possible, to alleviate anxieties in the marketplace.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)


Taxwriters Agree That “On Again, Off Again” Extenders Leave Taxpayers Up in the Air

“Uncertainty” was the buzz word at today’s House Ways and Means Select Revenue Measures Subcommittee hearing on tax extenders. At the hearing, which focused both on provisions that that expired at the end of 2011 and those set to expire at the end of 2012, Democrats and Republicans alike said that repeated expirations of temporary tax provisions breed “uncertainty” for both individual and corporate taxpayers that needs to be addressed. Subcommittee Chairman Pat Tiberi (R-OH) summed it up well in his opening statement: “[W]ith a few exceptions, temporary tax provisions that are worthy should be made permanent.” Manufacturers agree that worthy extenders should be made permanent and we put several provisions in that category including the R&D tax credit, deferral for active financing income and  the look-through rules for controlled foreign corporations (CFCs). 

There is real world cost to letting these tax provisions lapse. For example, the on-again, off-again U.S. R&D credit encourages companies to look into relocating U.S. R&D projects to countries offering more generous and permanent research incentives. Foreign direct investment in the U.S. takes a hit, too, as the U.S. is less attractive to R&D-intensive foreign-owned companies evaluating where to perform their research activity. 

We commend the many members of Congress who are interested in reform our nation’s out-dated tax code. This effort is going to take time and, until it’s done, these proven pro-growth, pro-manufacturing, pro-job tax incentives should be renewed sooner rather than later. We hope taxwriters can build on the bipartisanship evident at today’s hearing and act to restore these sound tax provisions to provided badly needed tax certainty for business taxpayers as soon as possible.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)


EPA Official Backtracks from “Crucify” Remarks, But Agency Continues Aggressive Agenda

It’s an uneasy feeling when your worst suspicisions are confirmed. That’s exactly what happen when a video of EPA Administrator Al Armendariz in the Region 6 Dallas office surfaced. Alarmingly, EPA’s Armendariz uses a rather crude analogy of how his staff should approach enforcement on energy producers by comparing it to Romans crucifying Turkish villagers.

“It was kind of like how the Romans used to, you know, conquer villages in the Mediterranean,” he said. “They’d go in to a little Turkish town somewhere, they’d find the first five guys they saw, and they’d crucify them.” 

Manufacturers and energy producers are already facing a litany of overreaching regulations from the EPA which are making it tougher to create jobs and grow. It’s concerning that an EPA official in charge of enforcement would make such a comment about the treatment of job creators. An adversarial approach to enforcement is not going to help our energy security. The aggressive targeting to specific energy producers does not get us closer to a true “all of the above” approach to energy.

Sen. Inhofe has already stated that he is going to begin an investigation into the EPA. Armendariz issued a statement apologizing for his poor choice of words. However, the EPA continues to move forward with harmful regulations which will increase energy prices for manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)


Corporate Taxes: Now’s the Time to Act

When it comes to tax policy, we couldn’t agree more that This Is No Time For The U.S. To Hesitate On Corporate Tax Reform, an editorial by Walt Galvin, vice chairman of Emerson that appeared in today’s Investors’ Business Daily.  Earlier this month, the United States earned the dubious distinction of having the no.1 corporate tax rate among developed countries, a fact that did not go unnoticed by the Japanese, who previously held the top spot.  As Mr. Galvin notes, Mieko Nakabayashi, a member of Japan’s House of Representatives recently commented on the failure of the United States to address our high corporate tax rate and archaic worldwide tax system and said that the United States “will suffer from that hesitancy while we and others outside the U.S. will benefit.”

While our numero uno tax rate generally grabs the headlines, both Mr. Nakabayashi and Mr. Galvin point out another major problem with our current tax code—a worldwide tax system that subjects income earned by U.S. companies and taxpayers to U.S. tax no matter where the income is earned.  In contrast, our major trading partners, including Japan, have adopted territorial tax systems that only taxes income earned in the home country.

Tax policy plays a critical role in the ability of companies to prosper, compete and create jobs.  In recent years, our trading partners have gotten the message and slashed tax rates and moved to tax systems that encourage global competitiveness. We can’t afford to drag our feet any longer—now’s the time to reform our tax laws, not only for corporations but for businesses of all sizes.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 5.0/5 (1 vote cast)


Manufacturing Activity Eases in Kansas City in April

The Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank noted continued easing of manufacturing activity in April. The composite index has fallen from 13 in February to 9 in March to 3 in April. This suggests that the region is continuing to expand, but at a much slower pace. (Since the beginning of 2010, the region has only contracted in one month – December 2011.)

The various sub-components of the data were mixed. Employment growth remained decent, unchanged at 12. Elsewhere, though, indicators were mostly lower across-the-board. Production was flat (falling from 13 to 0), and the growth of new orders turned negative (declining from 17 to -8). Other measures of activity followed suit, with a declining average workweek and weaker shipments data. On the positive side, pricing pressures have eased from their highs in January but remain elevated.

Looking forward six months, manufacturers in the Kansas City region continue to be positive, but with less vigor than in February. New orders, shipments, and employment are expected to grow somewhat strongly, with capital expenditures and exports also expanding.

Seasonal issues might be at play with some of the data. A warmer winter allowed for increased activity earlier in the year than normal, for instance. In addition, the release adds the following: “The majority of producers reported some negative effects from elevated gasoline prices, and nearly half of all respondents noted difficulty in finding workers.” This is consistent with other findings, as well.

 

 

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Manufacturers Experience 1st Quarter Success In Spite of Washington’s Policies

Today’s Wall Street Journal painted a pretty picture about manufacturing’s success in the first quarter of 2012. Companies like 3M Co., Cummins Inc., and Eaton have reported increased earnings and improved forecasts for the rest of the year. This is good news and a testament to the strength of manufacturing in the U.S.

The lion’s share of the credit is given to domestic successes with the caveat that future growth is largely dependent on growth in Europe and China.

However, the article doesn’t paint the full picture. Manufacturers in the U.S. are succeeding in spite of the current environment of regulation and the ongoing threat of tax hikes. Yet, as the article explains, “Despite rising profits, manufacturers remain cautious about hiring in the U.S., generally relying on their current workforces to churn out more products.”

Getting down to brass tacks here – manufacturers in the U.S. are leading our economic recovery, but they are doing so in a hostile environment for business. To maintain domestic success and lessen our dependence on fluctuations in markets overseas, Washington needs to put forth policies that place certainty back in the tax system and make sure that regulations don’t stand in the way of growth and job creation.

We’ve had enough of the class warfare rhetoric and choking regulations – it’s past time to implement policies that will eliminate the 20% cost disadvantage manufacturers face and work together to foster our own economic recovery.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Chicago Fed Notes Sluggish Economic Growth in March

The National Activity Index from the Chicago Federal Reserve Bank dropped from +0.07 in February to -0.29 in March. Positive numbers suggest that the U.S. economy is growing above its historical trend, with negative values implying the opposite. The fact that this indicator has turned negative after three consecutive months of above-trend growth is a sign that U.S. growth has become sluggish.

The three-month moving average still remains positive at +0.05. Values under -0.70 suggest that the economy might be in a recession, signifying that recessionary risks still remain low.

Manufacturing production and capacity utilization both fell slightly in March, and as such, they were one of the main contributors to the index’s decline. Other factors included a weaker contribution from the job market and continued drags from housing.

Stepping back a second, it is important to note that many of the indicators used in this index have shown considerable improvement since last year, with a longer-term trend positive. The outlook for 2012 calls for modest economic growth, for instance, and most manufacturers continue to have a cautiously optimistic outlook. Still, the National Activity Index reflects what other data have shown of late; economic growth is tenuous with a number of persistent headwinds continuing to cause anxieties.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


Keep Politics out of the Federal Contracting Process

Today the National Association of Manufacturers joined 153 other organizations in a letter supporting H.R. 2008, the “Keeping Politics Out of Federal Contracting Act of 2011.”  The legislation would preclude the White House from forcing federal agencies to require entities to disclose their political spending – as well as that of their officers and directors – as a condition of participating in the federal procurement process.

The letter was sent to Chairman Darrell Issa (R-CA) and Ranking Member Elijah Cummings (D-MD) of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which is scheduled to consider H.R. 2008 tomorrow.

The bill is in response to an April 2011 draft Executive Order that would require disclosures of political contributions by select parties as a condition for bidding on federal contracts. The draft order is an attack on the First Amendment and suffers from severe legal and policy defects that would, if signed, immediately damage the federal contracting process.

From the letter:

The legislation reaffirms the principle, currently embodied in federal procurement laws, that the Executive Branch has an obligation to procure goods and services based on the best value for the American taxpayer, and not on political considerations. It also reaffirms the principle that the Administration cannot enact through executive fiat legislation that Congress has considered and explicitly rejected.

The NAM thanks Rep. Issa for his leadership on this issue and urges members of the Committee on Oversight and Government to approve H.R. 2008.

Erik Glavich is director of legal and regulatory policy, National Association of Manufacturers.

VN:F [1.9.7_1111]
Rating: 0.0/5 (0 votes cast)


A Manufacturing Blog

  • Categories

  • Connect With Manufacturers

            
  • Blogroll

  • -->