The New York Times


Posts tagged with

POVERTY

March 22, 2012, 2:11 pm

Seeking a Sustainable Path for Coffee, and Coffee Farmers, in Haiti

Todd Carmichael, a founder of La Colombe Torrefaction, in Haiti.La Colombe TorrefactionTodd Carmichael, a founder of La Colombe Torrefaction, in Haiti.

Todd Carmichael, a founder of the coffee roaster La Colombe Torrefaction, is an interesting mix of entrepreneur, adventurer (Antarctic speed trekker), showman (a reality TV show on coffee hunting is coming) and philanthropist. His latest venture combining all of these traits is a line of coffee, called Lyon, sales of which will generate money for environmental initiatives supported by the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation. The coffee blend includes beans that Carmichael is obtaining from Haitian sources that, he says, sidestep predatory loan sharks and middlemen who have hampered the climb out of poverty by Haitian coffee growers. I recently had an e-mail exchange with Carmichael about his experience building relationships with coffee growers in rural Haiti.

Here’s are some video highlights from Carmichael’s trip, followed by our e-conversation: Read more…


March 8, 2012, 1:46 pm

Closer Look: Deep Poverty in Retreat, Even Through the Great Recession

This is as close to a palindrome as a truism can get:

No news is good news <-> Good news is no news.

The good news that (happily) violated that norm and rippled in headlines this week came in a World Bank report showing a broad reduction in deep poverty and concluding that the great global recession did not increase poverty in the developing world. Annie Lowrey’s article in The Times has this nut:

[F]or the first time the proportion of people living in extreme poverty — on less than $1.25 a day — fell in every developing region from 2005 to 2008. And the biggest recession since the Great Depression seems not to have thrown that trend off course, preliminary data from 2010 indicate.

The progress is so drastic that the world has met the United Nations’ Millennium Development Goals to cut extreme poverty in half five years before its 2015 deadline.

Charles KennyMary F. Calvert for The New York Times The economist Charles Kenny.

The article quotes Charles Kenny, the author of “Getting Better: Why Global Development is Succeeding — And How We Can Improve the World Even More,” which I find an invaluable counterweight to the professional doomsaying that often dominates development discourse. The book happily caught the attention of David Leonhardt and, more recently, Mark Bittman, in his column on “The Glass-Half-Full Department.” (There was also a great discussion of the book hosted by Foreign Policy.)

After reading the story on the World Bank report, I sought more input from Kenny, who among other things is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development, and here’s his “Your Dot” contribution:
Read more…


December 15, 2011, 12:48 pm

Nepal and Others Mull Monsanto’s Role in Advancing Agriculture

farming in NepalKashish Das Shrestha Farmland in Nepal’s Makwanpur district.

Here’s a quick update on efforts to expand access to higher-yielding hybrid seed in Nepal. Even though the country already has lots of different varieties beyond their own traditional supplies, a recent plan to expand access to higher-yielding seed, facilitated by the United States Agency for International Development and involving Monsanto, hit a big roadblock, as was explored here not long ago (“In Nepal, Farmers Struggle as City Dwellers Fight Monsanto“).

Below you can read reactions to this situation from Pamela C. Ronald, a professor of plant pathology at the University of California, San Diego, and her husband Raoul W. Adamchak, an organic vegetable farmer. Together they are authors of the eye-opening book “Tomorrow’s Table: Organic Farming, Genetics, and the Future of Food” (which was praised by Bill Gates).

But first, here’s an update on the situation in Nepal, where a Ministry of Agriculture hearing was held last Sunday and covered by Kashish Das Shrestha, a Nepal-born photographer and writer now based in New York City. (Have a look at his photos of farming and protests over Monsanto on the Asia Society blog.) His report, posted on MyRepublica, is worth a full read. Particularly notable is this long statement by Hari Dahal, the ministry spokesman: Read more…


December 1, 2011, 12:22 pm

The Human Race (Between Potency and Self Awareness)

Jeannine Cahill, a student at the Pace University Law School, caught me on campus recently for a short discussion of some of the core issues explored on Dot Earth:

In the video, I explain the significance of the blazing growth in human numbers and appetites over the last eight generations or so, and note how we are essentially in a race between potency and self awareness.

We explore the issues raised by having 2.6 billion people without a sanitary place to excrete and the deep divides that have produced what are, in essence, scattered exploding population cluster bombs (in place of the flawed 20th-century notion of a global unraveling from a population explosion).

I describe great opportunities for making a difference using communication technologies, new and old, including radio. (On that front, I mention the innovative efforts of the nonprofit group Developing Radio Partners.)

Cahill asks me about the best opportunities for action. Here’s my reply: Read more…


November 14, 2011, 1:01 pm

Can Extreme Climate Confusion be Avoided?

This post is a tale of two climate conferences, and a forecast for a substantial risk of climate confusion later this week.

A meeting of the world’s “climate vulnerable” nations, aiming to nail down longstanding, but largely unfulfilled pledges of aid from the world’s industrial powers, is wrapping up in Dhaka, Bangladesh (here’s the latest draft of the planned statement). As this meeting ends, another is getting into high gear in Kampala, Uganda. There, climate scientists and government officials from around the world are tweaking the summary of a forthcoming report, “Managing the Risks of Extreme Events and Disasters to Advance Climate Change Adaptation.”

It would’ve been better if the timing had been reversed, given the signs that many of the science findings of the extremes report, from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, are largely not reflected in the statements from the leaders in Dhaka.

Richard Black, the indispensable climate and environment reporter for the BBC (I urge you to follow him on Twitter @BBCrblack), has nicely summarized the disconnect in a piece describing the draft summary of the report on extreme meteorological events and relating it to claims of greenhouse-driven damages in poor places.

As has been the case for years, climate science points to measurably rising impacts from human-driven global warming later this century. And those impacts will be divided unevenly between the world’s poor, vulnerable countries and rich ones that are shielded from big impacts by wealth and are most responsible for building the global greenhouse blanket so far. (That “climate divide” was explored in two pieces in The Times in 2007.)

But the same research concludes that it’s difficult to link human-driven warming to losses in recent mega-disasters. Deeply confounding factors get in the way — particularly the huge growth in exposure to climate threats through population growth and settlement patterns in vulnerable places and the substantial natural variability in the frequency and intensity of rare extreme events.

Black starts by describing the three categories of climate and coastal impacts projected to intensify as greenhouse gases accumulate in the atmosphere: Read more…


November 2, 2011, 3:49 pm

The World’s Condom, Electricity and Climate Divides

A chart showing glaring differences in access to electricity in rich and poor parts of the world.United Nations Development ProgramA chart showing glaring differences in access to electricity in rich and poor parts of the world.

Our fine Economix blog has a post up on the new Human Development Report from the United Nations (Twitter feed). The trends are mainly good in the word’s most struggling places — reprising findings from a year ago. But the report’s authors stress that human-driven climate change could easily derail progress in the world’s least developed places.

The findings build on the picture of a glaring climate divide on the planet that we described in a Times series in 2007. But they also point to divides on condom use and access to electricity, as well.

The table at right shows the glaring energy gap on this planet.

Another widespread unmet need is for family planning. At the bottom of this post I’ve appended another table from the report, showing that there are wide gaps not only between countries but within countries (the poorest of the poor having the least access to contraceptives).

Here’s the nut of the Economix post, by Rachel Nuwer: Read more…


July 28, 2011, 3:04 pm

Innovation from the Bottom Up

The Rockefeller Foundation, in deciding how to dispense tens of millions of dollars in grants each year, typically sends scouting teams around the world to search out problems impeding human well-being and organizations or individuals working to address them.

New Delhi slumAdam Ellick for The New York Times Open sewers, like this one in New Delhi, create enormous health risks in many poor communities.

This year, the foundation tried something new, convening a hundred or so people from a variety of fields and positions at an “innovation forum” in Manhattan on Wednesday. The task of half dozen small groups was to explore ways to foster innovations aimed at sustaining access to water and food and sustaining cities — a particular focus of Rockefeller — as human appetites and numbers crest in coming decades. (I was a participant.)

Innovations can be technological, as in the design of cheap water filters or cleaner, more efficient cook stoves. This is the world of Paul Polak, the author of “Out of Poverty” and guru of a movement to “design for the other 90 percent” – meaning the vast majority of global citizens, for whom an iPad or Netflix or Nissan Leaf are not innovations with any meaning but who comprise an enormous market.

The innovations can be financial – the realm of microfinance — which has been a transformative force, although one suffering deep growing pains in India — and its less well-known cousin, microfranchising (a model best illustrated by VisionSpring’s network of homegrown entrepreneurs providing cheap eyeglasses in poor places).

They can also be conceptual, in taking an approach to problem-solving that isn’t focused on symptoms, but root causes. That was what the foundation’s leadership seemed to be looking for at the forum. (In my group, focused on sustaining cities, my prime point was the important role of colleges and universities, and particularly students — through learning-by-doing projects — in making a difference in communities, whether just outside the ivy-covered walls or spread across the globe.)

Judith Rodin, the president of the foundation and former president of the University of Pennsylvania, where she led an effort to take the university “out of the ivory tower and into the streets,” explained the foundation’s innovation focus in a speech at the meeting.

It’s worth excerpting at some length here because it centers on the power of innovation not only to create wealth and well-being for the top billion, but to directly address the profound challenges impeding the lives of the world’s poorest, most vulnerable populations.

Here are portions of her remarks, starting with the case study of an unconventional approach to wiping out hookworm in the United States nearly a century ago: Read more…


June 27, 2011, 8:59 pm

A Reality-Based Cooking Show with a Difference

rocket stove A Paradigm Project stove in use.

June 28, 11:15 a.m. | Updated
There’s no shortage of reality-inspired cooking shows in which participants struggle against long odds.

Now there’s a new offering, with a difference. It’s Stoveman, a four-part video series documenting the efforts of two young men who are part of a “low profit” business aimed at providing efficient rocket stoves to poor households in struggling places.

Stoveman Trailer from The Paradigm Project on Vimeo.

[The full first episode is now watchable here.]

This is all part of the Paradigm Project, which has a business model depending in part on revenue earned from the sale of carbon credits (generated because the stoves get more cooking power with less combustion and heat-trapping pollution). Read more…


May 18, 2011, 11:34 am

In ‘Earth v. Humanity,’ Nobelists Issue Verdict

12:40 p.m. | Updated
Now here’s a new way to get the public to heed a warning: Hold a trial in Stockholm in which planet Earth is the plaintiff, humanity the defendant and a panel of Nobel Prize winners the jury, then issue a verdict centered on a to-do list including fundamentally unachievable goals (stabilizing global emissions of carbon dioxide by 2015, for starters).

I guess it doesn’t hurt to try, but I sure wish the list of Nobelists had included more social scientists, perhaps Elinor Ostrom of Indiana University or Daniel Kahneman of Princeton, for starters. [12:40 p.m. | Update | I sent Ostrom a query about the meeting and she has weighed in below on the limits of top-down approaches.] (Keep in mind, too, that Nobelists are almost as variegated as the rest of us, and my strong impression is that this jury did not fully reflect that range.)

Then perhaps the jury, in conferring, would realize the futility in pointing a chiding hand at Homo sapiens, kind of like the futility in the parents facing their tormented teenager in “Rebel Without a Cause” (click for the “you’re tearing me apart” scene):

Below you can read the verdict that emerged today at the Third Nobel Laureate Symposium on Global Sustainability. I agree with many conclusions and recommendations but disagree with others. I’m on deadline on unrelated work so you have to start the process of moving from manifestos to concrete steps on the ground that could smooth the human journey in this century. Here’s the Stockholm Memorandum: Read more…


March 30, 2011, 10:26 am

Ethical Engineering- No Oxymoron

There’s something afoot in the bolts and circuits world of engineering — a focus on designing and building devices and systems that can improve the lot of struggling societies.

You can see hints of this in the title of Braden Allenby, a professor of engineering ethics at Arizona State University (with whom I recently had an onstage conversation about the path toward and beyond 9 billion people). You can see it in the basement of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology at the International Development Design Summit each summer (watch my narrated slideshow here).

And you can definitely see it at Southern Methodist University, which has created the Hunter & Stephanie Hunt Institute for Engineering & Humanity. Early in April, the institute will host “Engineering and Humanity Week,” in part to honor the work of Dean Kamen, who has turned much of his entrepreneurial and inventive talent to projects aimed at aiding the “bottom billion.

The details on the award are in the agenda for the week of events. Congratulations to both Southern Methodist and Kamen.

There are other engineers, architects and designers hard at work at the interface of ethics and design, including Darcey Donovan (straw houses resistant to earthquakes) and Santiago Pujol (simple, economical designs for safer schools in quake zones).

I’d love to gather other examples of “ethical engineering” here, so please weigh in with links or your own observations.