304 captures
22 Dec 2007 - 20 Jan 2022
SEPOCTNOV
11
201120122013
About this capture
About
|
Activities
|
Publications
|
Contact
| Support | Blog
U.S. Military Deploys Task Force to Jordan
Photo Credit: Associated Press
The New York Times, citing unnamed American officials, reported the U.S. military secretly dispatched a task force of more than 150 “planners and other specialists” to a Jordanian military training center near Amman. The task force will help the Jordanian military “handle a flood of Syrian refugees, prepare for the possibility that Syria will lose control of its chemical weapons and be positioned should the turmoil in Syria expand into a wider conflict.” The news came on the heels of Sen. Bob Corker‘s (R-TN) visit to Jordan, where he met with ministers, businessmen and senators, and “hailed steps taken by the Kingdom to achieve reforms that fulfill aspirations of the Jordanian people.” Corker also traveled to the Syrian border to evaluate the situation there and expressed concerns that al-Qaeda remains a “serious threat” to the United States.
King Abdullah II established a constitutional court by royal decree on October 7, which will be the only court authorized to verify that laws comply with the constitution. The committee is comprised of nine members sworn in before the King and chaired by Taher Hekmat, a legal expert and head of the board of directors of the National Center for Human Rights. In a letter to members of the court, Abdullah stressed the institution “offers an important guarantee of the separation of powers and respect for the rights and freedoms of citizens.”
Over the weekend, protesters gathered in downtown Amman in the largest demonstration since the Jordanian Arab Spring began. The government dissolved the parliament on Thursday and promised more political reform in response to the protests, a common tactic that has led to 11 prime ministers since 1999. ”It is now clear that the King is in no mood for compromise,” wrote Osama Al Sharif in Gulf News. “The Islamists and their allies have shown that they too are determined to challenge the regime.” However, “Jordan deserves some credit,” said an op-ed in ammonnews.net. “Unlike in some Arab states, protests have been met with a peaceful response. It is now crucial that the government gets ahead of events and own the process.”
By Rachel October 10, 2012 Category: Diplomacy, Featured, Islam and Democracy, Jordan, Political transition, Protests, Reform, US foreign policy
State Dept. Working to Unblock Egypt Aid
Photo Credit: Foreign Press Centers
The State Department has announced that is continuing to work with Congress to remove a block  on $450 million of aid to Egypt. Spokeswoman Victoria Nuland said, “We are continuing our regular consultations. We had a number of folks from this building, including [Special Coordinator for Middle East Transitions William Taylor] up talking to Hill staff about the request, [and] about how it fits into our overall strategy of supporting the democratic transition in Egypt.” She added, “We feel very strongly that now is not the time to pull back from supporting these fragile democracies in North Africa and the Middle East. It’s time to support those who are trying to take their countries in a democratic direction.”
Meanwhile, Thomas Friedman writes, “The worst message we can send right now to Middle Easterners is that their future is all bound up in what we do. It is not. The Arab-Muslim world has rarely been more complicated and more in need of radical new approaches by us — and them.”  He suggests the U.S. “start by making clear that the new Arab governments are free to choose any path they desire,” but U.S. support is predicated on a country’s action to “1) educate [its] people up to the most modern standards; 2) empower [its] women; 3) embrace religious pluralism; 4) have multiple parties, regular elections and a free press; 5) maintain [its] treaty commitments; and 6) control violent extremists with security forces governed by the rule of law.”
Finally, Daniel Levy offers a critique of Mitt Romney’s recent foreign policy speech, saying “the speech did tell us quite a bit about the tensions inherent in doing Republican foreign policy in the post-Bush era.” Among other arguments, Levy suggests Romney’s promise to “deepen our critical cooperation with our partners in the Gulf”  will be difficult to reconcile with his desire to support ”the dignity that comes with freedom, and opportunity, and the right to live under laws of our own making.” He also labels Romney’s articulated policy as “Weaponized Keynesianism.”
By Todd October 10, 2012 Category: Egypt, Featured, Foreign Aid, Freedom, US foreign policy
Analyst Examines Differences among Arab Uprisings
Photo Credit: AFP/Getty Images
In an op-ed, professor Mark LeVine describes why democratic transitions have been so drastically different across the Middle East. He argued that the initial movement in Syria was not as successful as Egypt or Tunisia due in part to a lack of a “well developed and organized public sphere.”LeVine posits that the current level of violence in Syria is a product of non-intervention and external protection of the Assad regime. Now that the conflict has threatened neighboring countries, intervention is justified on the grounds of humanitarian law, he said. Likewise, fear of punishment for crimes against humanity ensure the regime will not reconcile with the opposition. LeVine points out that the Syrian regime benefits from the U.N. Security Council membership of China and Russia, and likewise Bahrain has the liberty of violently cracking down on protesters due to its strategic importance to the U.S. and Gulf monarchies.
In an update from Bahrain, imprisoned rights activist Nabeel Rajab recently ended a hunger strike that protested his poor treatment. In Libya, authorities faced off with the International Criminal Court over who would best provide Saif al-Islam Qadhafi, son of Muammar Qadhafi, a fair trial regarding accusations of war crimes.
By Chris October 10, 2012 Category: Bahrain, Civil Society, Egypt, Featured, Gulf, Human Rights, Libya, NGOs, Political transition, Protests, Reform, Syria, Tunisia, UN Security Council
Kuwait Dissolves Parliament, UAE Slams Brotherhood
Photo Credit: Arab Times Online
Kuwait’s Emir Sheikh Sabeh al-Ahmad al-Sabah has “called upon all people to work together to maintain stability, security and national unity,” after he issued a decree dissolving parliament.  In response, opposition groups warned “the current intentions of the political authorities … could severely undermine political stability and the historical relations binding the people with the al-Sabah ruling family.” Fourteen detainees were also released in Kuwait today after being arrested in relation to demonstrations organized by stateless people, or Bedouns, pressing for more rights. The release came after some Bedouns accused of inciting public revolt admitted to calling for protests through Twitter.
Meanwhile, the UAE’s foreign minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed al-Nahayan urged collaboration between the gulf countries to stop the Muslim Brotherhood from plotting to undermine governments in the regime. Al-Nahayan denounced the Muslim Brotherhood as “an organization which encroaches upon sovereignty and integrity of nations.” Roughly 60 local Islamists have been arrested this year for accusations of belonging to the Muslim Brotherhood, which is banned in the UAE, and conspiring to overthrow the government.
By Rachel October 10, 2012 Category: Featured, Gulf, Gulf Cooperation Council, Kuwait, Muslim Brotherhood, Protests, UAE
POMED Notes: Death from Above
On Thursday, the Center for National Policy hosted a panel discussion entitled, “Death from Above: Drones and Targeted Killings.” The panel featured Peter Bergen, Director of the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation, and Christopher Swift, Adjunct Professor of National Security Studies at Georgetown University. Gregory Aftandilian moderated the event.
For full notes continue reading, or click here for the PDF.
 
Read more…
By Rachel October 10, 2012 Category: Event Notes, Featured, US foreign policy, Yemen
The Brookings Institution: Americans on the Middle East
The Brookings Institution published a study of American opinions on the Middle East, conducted by the University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes and Anwar Sadat Chair Shibley Telhami. The study sought to gauge American first impressions and public opinion of the attacks on U.S. embassies in the Middle East, and whether attitudes on other issues have changed since the attacks.
A poll conducted as part of the study found that a majority of Americans do not believe that a majority of Libyans or Egyptians supported the attacks. However, a majority of those polled felt that the respective governments did not do enough to protect the missions or respond to the attacks. The number of Americans who wish to reduce aid to Egypt has substantially increased, though only a small number of respondents advocate for cutting aid completely. Egypt is mostly seen as “somewhat unfavorable,” while Libya is seen as “largely unfavorable.”
According to the study, most Americans value a U.S. role in the Middle East, while a minority think that the the U.S. ought to disengage. A nearly equal number of respondents either favored or were opposed to continued support for democracy, even if it lead to a less pro-western government. In addition, “the perceptions of the popular uprisings in the Arab world have changed. They have shifted away somewhat from a view that the uprisings are about ordinary people seeking freedom and democracy to a perception that they are more about Islamist groups seeking power.” In general, “views of Arabs and Muslims are divided and have not changed significantly” in light of  recent events.
Regarding Iran’s nuclear program, most Americans think that a preemptive Israeli strike would do little or nothing to slow progress, and that Israeli engagement could hurt U.S. strategy in the region. However, “a slight majority favored taking a neutral stance toward the possibility of Israel carrying out such a strike, though more favor discouraging Israel than encouraging from doing so.” On Syria, a majority of Americans support a joint effort to ratchet up sanctions and implement a no-fly zone, although there is still broad opposition to arming anti-regime groups in the country, as well as undertaking a full-scale ground invasion.
By Brett October 9, 2012 Category: Egypt, Foreign Aid, Iran, Islam and Democracy, Islamist movements, Israel, Libya, Political transition, Syria, US foreign policy
Thousands March on Maspero as Morsi Pardons Protesters
Photo Credit: Ahram Online
On his 100th day as president of Egypt, Mohamed Morsi issued a general amnesty for all protesters and political prisoners arrested between January 25, 2011 and June 30, 2012 in connection to the revolution, excluding those charged with murder. Morsi had promised to take this step before he became president and the announcement was met with overwhelmingly positive press in Egypt. Egyptian journalist Hamdi Kandil said, “Revolutionaries have not waited for any decision as much as they have waited for today’s decision by Morsi to pardon all political prisoners.” Morsi has been criticized for failing to deliver on many of his other 100-day promises, but Morsi generally gave himself high marks on his initial work.
On the one-year anniversary of a march that ended in the deaths of scores of protesters, hundreds of Egyptians gathered to commemorate the lives lost and call for military accountability. The October 9, 2011 demonstration was a response to the torching of a church in Upper Egypt, but YouTube videos and firsthand accounts from the march captured the violent response by soldiers in armored vehicles.
Egypt and Turkey began a week-long war games exercise in the Mediterranean on October 8, emblematic of the close economic and military ties between the two countries. An anonymous source in the Egyptian military said that a similar U.S.-Egypt exercise is slated for next year.
By David October 9, 2012 Category: Egypt, Featured, Freedom, Human Rights, Political transition, Protests, Turkey
Analysts React to Romney’s Middle East Policy Speech
Photo Credit: OC Family
The Obama campaign responded to Mitt Romney’s Virginia Military Institute speech, citing it as lacking “meaningful specifics or outline” and “full of platitudes.” The website quoted James Lindsay of the Council on Foreign Relations, who argued that the speech failed to answer two key questions: what Romney would do differently than Obama and why his plan should be expected to work. A New York Times op-ed labeled Romney’s policies as “wrong and dangerous,” accusing Romney of making false accusations and failing to provide alternatives to Obama’s strategy. A Washington Post op-ed generally agreed with Romney’s views that Obama has been “too cautious” in supporting reform and stabilization, but echoed Lindsay’s assessment in that both candidates have failed to offer a “robust Mideast policy,” appearing vague and fearful that they might offend voters.
Christian Whiton of the DC International Advisory vindicated Romney’s critique of Obama’s record in Libya, Syria and Iran, writing that “Obama…has been asleep at the wheel as revolutions have swept the Middle East.” Shadi Hamid of the Brookings Doha Center and Michael E. O’Hanlon of the Brookings Institution also commented on the speech. Though Hamid has disagreed with Romney on Middle East issues in the past, he defended Romney’s argument that there has been failure by the U.S. to lead in Syria and to “tie any existing or new aid to explicit benchmarks on political reform and democratization” in the region. Hamid also pointed out, however, that Romney’s pledge to stand by allies in the Gulf creates a conflict of interest as they have “become more repressive in the wake of the…Arab Spring” and that neither candidate has even begun to speak on Jordan. O’Hanlon also disagreed with Romney on some issues but felt the overall balance of the speech was effective in promoting continued American engagement in the Middle East and contributed to a type of foreign policy debate which was good for the country. Bruce Reidel of the Saban Center for Middle East Policy said, “The VMI speech is a good start to what needs to be a far more vigorous and detailed debate in the next month.”
By Chris October 9, 2012 Category: Democracy Promotion, Diplomacy, Elections 2012, Featured, Foreign Aid, Gulf, Iran, Jordan, Libya, Political transition, Presidential Candidates, Reform, Syria, Uncategorized, US foreign policy, US politics
Weekly Wire – October 9th
POMED’s Weekly Wire for October 9th is now available. This week we highlight these and other top stories:
Romney Talks Middle East Policy, Foreign Aid in Speech
Demonstrations, Election Boycott Calls Shake Streets of Amman
Reps. Ros-Lehtinen, Jordan Question Aid to Egypt
Libyan Prime Minister Receives Vote of No Confidence
To continue reading the full Weekly Wire, click here.
By Nada October 9, 2012 Category: Egypt, Elections 2012, Foreign Aid, Jordan, Libya, POMED, Weekly Wire
POMED Notes: U.S.-Egyptian Relations: Where is the Bilateral Relationship Headed?
The Center for National Policy hosted an event on Thursday (10/4) entitled “U.S.-Egyptian Relations: Where is the Bilateral Relationship Headed?” The discussion centered around the slow and initial tepid response of the new Egyptian leadership to the attack on the U.S. embassy in Cairo. The response caused some members of Congress to advocate for a cut in U.S. assistance. On the other hand, both Egyptian and U.S. officials have indicated that they want the bilateral relationship to be maintained. Gregory Aftandilian, CNP Senior Fellow for the Middle East; Perry Cammack, Staff Member for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee; Stephen McInerney, Executive Director of the Project on Middle East Democracy; and Shibley Telhami, Anwar Sadat Professor for Peace and Development at the University of Maryland analyzed the situation and gave their assessments on where the bilateral relationship is headed.
Continue reading for a full summary, or click here for the PDF version. Read more…
By Brett October 8, 2012 Category: Congress, Egypt, Foreign Aid, Islam and Democracy, Israel, Muslim Brotherhood, Political transition, Reform, US foreign policy
Romney Tackles Middle East Policy in Latest Speech
Photo Credit: AP
Republican Presidential candidate Mitt Romney addressed his foreign policy positions in a speech at the Virginia Military Institute. Romney suggested that “it’s time to change course in the Middle East.” ”I know the President hopes for a safer, freer, and a more prosperous Middle East allied with the United States. I share this hope,” Romney said. “But hope is not a strategy.”
He called on the U.S. to work with other countries to arm the Syrian rebels to help them defeat Bashar Assad. Vis-a-vis Iran’s link to Syria, Romney said that with the help of allies the U.S. should “support the many Syrians who would deliver that defeat to Iran rather than sitting on the sidelines.”
On foreign aid, Romney said: “I will make further reforms to our foreign assistance to create incentives for good governance, free enterprise, and greater trade, in the Middle East and beyond. I will organize all assistance efforts in the greater Middle East under one official with responsibility and accountability to prioritize efforts and produce results. I will rally our friends and allies to match our generosity with theirs. And I will make it clear to the recipients of our aid that, in return for our material support, they must meet the responsibilities of every decent modern government—to respect the rights of all of their citizens, including women and minorities… to ensure space for civil society, a free media, political parties, and an independent judiciary… and to abide by their international commitments to protect our diplomats and our property.”
Romney also pledged to “deepen our critical cooperation with our partners in the Gulf” and “reaffirm our historic ties to Israel and our abiding commitment to its security.”
By Todd October 8, 2012 Category: Featured, Foreign Aid, Reform, US foreign policy
Kuwait Parliament Dissolved, Elections to Follow
Photo Credit: BBC
Kuwaiti Emir Sheikh Sabah al-Ahmad Al-Sabah dissolved the 2009 parliament, just over three months after it was reinstated by the constitutional court. According to Kuwaiti law, new elections must be held within 60 days. Former opposition parliamentarians welcomed the move, but they also pressed for another decree to set the date for the election and warned against amending the controversial electoral constituency law to influence the outcome of polls. This latest dissolution is the third in a year that has pitted opposition members staunchly against supporters of the ruling family on a number of issues. ”The 2009 assembly has gone without regret,” former opposition lawmaker Mubarak al-Waalansaid via Twitter.
Since 2006, the parliament has been dissolved five times, and BBC reports that Kuwait’s parliament “has the most powers of any elected body in the Gulf,”  due partially to opposition MPs ability to “openly criticize the ruling Sabah family.”
By Todd October 8, 2012 Category: Elections, Featured, Kuwait
American Middle East Network for Dialogue at Stanford Seeking Applicants
The American Middle East Network for Dialogue at Stanford (AMENDS) is seeking applicants to be a part of its 2013 program. AMENDS is a student initiative at Stanford University that enables the most promising youth change agents from across the Middle East, North Africa, and United States to learn from each other, advance their work, and share, through TED style talks, their ideas and experiences with the world. Delegates for the program should be between 18-28 will ideally have the following qualifications:
Please click here for the 2012-2013 Application, and email the completed application and all supplementary materials to amends-info@stanford.edu. The Application Deadline is Oct. 26, 2012. Visit the AMENDS website for more information.
By Todd October 8, 2012 Category: Civil Society, POMED
Libyan Prime Minister Receives Vote of No-Confidence
Photo Credit: EFE
The Libyan General National Congress rejected Prime Minister-elect Mustafa Abu Shagur‘s proposal for an emergency government on October 7. The plan, composed of 10 governing ministries, failed to pass by a vote of 125 to 44. Seventeen members of parliament chose to abstain, while the vote effectively removed Shagur from his position. The decision marks Shagur’s second failure to form a government. His first attempt proposed a unity government composed of 29 ministries, however he withdrew the list before it went to a vote. The original submission drew intense criticism from legislative members as well as protesters who stormed the parliament headquarters in Tripoli.  Shagur had aimed to form a coalition government based on merit saying, “I will not abandon my principles and my convictions. I did not return to Libya [from years in exile] to become head of government, I came back to serve the country and its children.” The GNC now has three to four weeks to elect a new prime minister.
Meanwhile, U.S. investigators left the embassy compound in Benghazi after thoroughly combing the site for information on the attack which took the life of Ambassador Chris Stevens. It is unclear what evidence the FBI team was able to gather. Local Libyans noted that the FBI did not conduct interviews during the investigation. U.S. officials have declined to say whether the team would be able to return to Benghazi in order to do so.
By Brett October 7, 2012 Category: Featured, Libya, Parliament, Political transition, Protests, US foreign policy
Jordanians Call for Boycott of Upcoming Elections
Photo Credit: AP
Thousands of protesters took to the streets of downtown Amman on October 5 to call for a boycott of the upcoming parliamentary elections. The demonstration was the largest since weekly protests began in early 2011. Jordanian opposition groups sought to show that change can be implemented through the street rather than through the king’s legislature. In a speech to fellow demonstrators, Hammam Saeed of the Muslim Brotherhood shouted “We will not reverse our boycott of the elections,” while protesters chanted, “Abdullah, listen well: We want freedom, not your royal favors.”
On the eve of the demonstrations, King Abdullah II made the decision to dissolve the current parliament, a move he said would pave the way for a the coming elections. He has repeatedly criticized the Islamists in the last few months for their decision to boycott. ”As constitutional monarch, my mandate is to be the umbrella for all political groupings and all segments of our society, and as part of that responsibility, I am telling the Muslim Brotherhood that they are making a tremendous miscalculation. So I am telling the Muslim Brotherhood, you have a choice: to stay in the street or to help build the new democratic Jordan,” he said.The Brotherhood has called for changes that would remove the king’s power to select the prime minister as well as the members of the upper house of parliament, and that members of both houses of parliament be popularly elected. Those parliamentarians would then choose the prime minister, who in turn would create his own cabinet.
Corruption has played a big role in nearly all of Jordan’s protests. “It’s not that the king has to open up the political system entirely to the Islamists,” said David Schenker. “Modest reforms would help ease public fears, but at the same time [Abdullah] has to do something about the corruption in the kingdom. There is a great disparity between the rich and the poor in the kingdom. This is an issue that resonates throughout the kingdom, whether they are Palestinians, East Bankers or Jordanians,” he added.
By Brett October 6, 2012 Category: Elections, Featured, Islamist movements, Jordan, Muslim Brotherhood, Parliament, Political Islam, Political transition, Protests, Reform
Amid Protests, Bahrain’s Nabeel Rajab Begins Hunger Strike
Bahraini riot police have reportedly used water cannons and tear gas to disperse hundreds of anti-government protesters trying to reach the former site of the Pearl Roundabout. Meanwhile, the Gulf Centre for Human Rights (GCHR) and Bahrain Center for Human Rights (BCHR) expressed concern over imprisoned human rights defender Nabeel Rajab choice to participate in a hunger strike Friday. Rajab will abstain from taking food, water and medication in protest of what he calls unjust treatment. Rajab was briefly released from prison yesterday to attend his mother’s funeral but was quickly returned to jail.
By Rachel October 5, 2012 Category: Bahrain, Civil Society, Featured, Freedom, Human Rights
Debate over U.S. Aid to Egypt Continues
Photo Credit: Veterans Today
In a letter to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (R-FL), Chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH), Chairman of the House Republican Study Committee, expressed concerns and raised a number of questions regarding the Administration’s intent to provide $450 million Egyptian government. “In the wake of the breach of the U.S. Embassy in Cairo and the nature of the Egyptian response,” the letter states, “we are very concerned with respect to the overall direction of the transition on Egypt.”  Chairman Ros-Lehtinen’s letter also asks the Administration numerous questions about its current policy on Egypt with regard to democracy assistance, protection of minority communities, and human rights.
A day before the release of the letter, the American Egyptian Strategic Alliance (AESA), an organization aimed at shaping U.S. policies towards Egypt, launched an advocacy campaign urging the hold on aid to Egypt to be lifted. In a press release, AESA said it “believes it is important that the U.S. stands firm in protecting our national security interests by fully supporting the democratic aspirations of the Egyptian people,” concluding “the $450 million USD is desperately needed by Egypt to help its people.”
In an op-ed for the Washington Post, Jennifer Rubin wonders if it’s time to withhold aid to Egypt. “Not only do we not have a firm handle on what sort of regime Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi is setting up, but once we release the $450 million in aid, what influence do we have? At the very least, it seems a large portion of the aid should be deferred until such time as we spell out to Morsi what behavior we expect from a top aid recipient and what will chill the relationship and cut the purse strings,” Rubin writes. However, an op-ed written in the Dallas Morning News defended aid to Egypt, stating “However challenged the U.S.-Egypt relationship might be today, it only grows worse if the U.S. loses its primary leverage point with the Morsi government. It does American interests no good to push Morsi into the arms of other nations willing to offer cash for influence.”
By Rachel October 5, 2012 Category: Committee Meetings, Congress, Egypt, Featured, Foreign Aid, Islamist movements, Muslim Brotherhood, Political transition, US foreign policy
POMED Notes: Meeting of the Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy
The U.S. Department of State’s Advisory Committee on International Economic Policy to the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs held a quarterly meeting on Wednesday (10/3), hosted by Assistant Secretary for Economic and Business Affairs Jose W. Fernandez. The meeting focused on U.S. Government economic related assistance for supporting Egypt’s democratic transition and how the U.S. Government can assist U.S. businesses seeking to operate in Egypt. The meeting was conducted under the Chatham House Rule.
Continue reading for a full summary, or click here for the PDF version. Read more…
By Todd October 5, 2012 Category: Economics, Egypt, Libya, US foreign policy
International Community Responds to Syrian Attack on Turkey
Photo Credit: Reuters
After the Syrian military shelled the Turkish border town of Ackakale, killing five Turkish citizens, Turkish Prime Minister Recept Tayyip Erdogan responded by proclaiming, “Under the rules of engagement and international law, Turkey will never let the Syrian regime’s provocations targeting our national security…go unanswered.” Syrian ambassador to the U.N., Bashar Ja’afari, addressed the attack by sending a letter to the U.N. Security Council expressing “Syria’s deepest condolences” and clarifying that Syria is not “seeking any escalation of violence with Turkey,” although he did not issue an official apology.
Tensions mounted when the Turkish parliament’s authorization of military action against Syria resulted in counterattacks on a Syrian military base. Turkey also sent armed warships and submarines into the Mediterranean. The U.N. Security council officially condemned the Syrian attack and demanded “such violations of international law stop immediately and are not repeated.” Russia rejected the original text of the condemnation, and despite Western council member objections, the text was revised to accommodate Russian concerns. N.A.T.O. also denounced the attacks and Israel’s Deputy Prime Minister Dan Meridor defined the incident as an attack on N.A.T.O. itself, per existing N.A.T.O. treaties.
The U.S. Department of State responded by sending “its deepest condolences to the Turkish victims,” condemning the Syrian attack and pledging U.S. support for Turkey. The Turkish counterattack on Syria was deemed “appropriate” and “proportional” by U.S. officials. The Washington Institute’s Jeffrey White, Soner Cagaptay, and Andrew J. Tabler weighed in on the matter, arguing the incident provides a prime opportunity for the U.S. to lend their support in an effort to achieve regional stability and emboldened the Syrian opposition.
By Chris October 5, 2012 Category: Diplomacy, Featured, Freedom, Israel, NATO, Parliament, Political transition, Reform, Syria, Turkey, UN Security Council, Uncategorized, United Nations, US foreign policy
POMED Notes – Syria After Assad: Managing the Challenges of Transition
The U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP) brought Syrian opposition members together on Thursday (10/4) to discuss the Day After Project, an eight-month effort to plan for a post-Assad Syria, coordinated by USIP and created by a group of 50 academics and opposition members. Although the report was released in August, this was the first presentation the report to the U.S. public. The project was divided into working groups, and each panelist focused their remarks on their respective sections. Amr al-Azm introduced the report and briefly discussed the Economic and Social Reconstruction working group, Afra Jalabi spoke on the Transitional Justice working group, Murhaf Jouejati focused on security sector reform, Rafif Jouejati represented the Economic and Social Reconstruction group, and Rami Nakhla of USIP discussed the Executive Committee. Steven Heydemann, Senior Adviser for Middle East Initiatives at USIP, introduced the panelists and served as moderator.
For full event notes, continue reading or click here for a PDF.
 
Read more…
By Rachel October 5, 2012 Category: Civil Liberties, Civil Society, Event Notes, Freedom, Islam and Democracy, Islamist movements, Political transition, Reform, Syria
Next Page »
About the POMED Wire
Recent Posts
U.S. Military Deploys Task Force to Jordan
State Dept. Working to Unblock Egypt Aid
Analyst Examines Differences among Arab Uprisings
Kuwait Dissolves Parliament, UAE Slams Brotherhood
POMED Notes: Death from Above
From POMED's Executive Director
More than Rhetorical Support Needed for Democracy
Must-see Documentary on Bahrain
GCC to Include Monarchs Beyond Gulf?
Keeping up with Syria
Sectarian Violence in Egypt
Blogs
Abu Aardvark
Abu Muqawama
Across the Aisle
Across the Bay
Al-Bab
Arab Media and Society
Arabist
Babylon and Beyond
Belgravia Dispatch
The Cairo Review of Global Affairs
CIPE Development
The Corner (National Review)
Daily Dish (Andrew Sullivan)
Daily Kos
Democracy Arsenal
Democracy Digest
Democracy in Development
Dipnote (State Department)
Foundation for the Defense of Democracies
From the Potomac to the Euphrates
Frontline Tehran Bureau
FP Passport
Huffington Post
IC Global Affairs
Informed Comment
Inside Iran
Iran Primer
Iraq and Gulf Analysis
Istanbul Calling
Kamil Pasha
Matthew Yglesias
MEI Editor’s Blog
Middle East Matters
Middle East Progress (Center for American Progress)
Middle East Strategy at Harvard
Nile View
Pita Policy
Plank (New Republic)
Post Global
Pressure Points
Prospects for Peace
Qifa Nabki
Race for Iran
Real Clear World
RedState
Sandbox
Save Darfur
SyriaComment
Talking Points Memo
TAPPED (American Prospect)
Waq al-Waq
War and Piece
Washington Monthly
Washington Note
Washington Realist
Young Professionals in Foreign Policy
Journals
American Interest
Foreign Affairs
Journal of Democracy
National Interest
Washington Quarterly
Arab Reform Bulletin
Magazines
American Conservative
American Spectator
Atlantic
Commentary
Dissent
Democracy Digest
Democracy Journal
Economist
Foreign Policy
Mother Jones
The Nation
National Review
New Republic
Newsweek
New York Review of Books
New Yorker
Reason
Slate
Time
US News and World Report
Weekly Standard
Newspaper Opinions
C S Monitor
Daily Star
Forward
The Hill
International Herald Tribune
Los Angeles Times
New York Times
USA Today
Wall Street Journal
Washington Diplomat
Washington Post
Washington Times
Financial Times
Al Masry Al Youm
Organizations
American Enterprise Institute
Americans for Informed Democracy
Brookings Institution
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
Cato Institute
Center for American Progress
Center for Contemporary Arab Studies
Center for Global Development
Center for Democracy and Civil Society
Center for Liberty in the Middle East (CLIME)
Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS)
Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy (CSID)
Coalition for a Realistic Foreign Policy
Council on Foreign Relations
Foundation for Defense of Democracies
Freedom House
Future of Freedom Foundation
Heritage Foundation
Hudson Institute
International Crisis Group
International Republican Institute (IRI)
Middle East Institute
Middle East Research and Information Project (MERIP)
National Democratic Institute for International Affairs (NDI)
National Endowment for Democracy
New America Foundation
Open Society Institute
RAND Center for Middle East Public Policy
Stimson Center
United States Institute of Peace
Washington Institute for Near East Policy
Wilson Center, Middle East Program
World Affairs Council
Bitter Lemons International
World Bank
Arab Reform Initiative
Persia House
Pressure Points
U.S. Government-Related Resources
C-Span
Congressional Quarterly
House Appropriations Committee
House Foreign Affairs Committee
Library of Congress THOMAS
Senate Appropriations Committee
Senate Foreign Relations Committee
State Department Daily Press Briefings
White House Daily Press Briefings
Archives
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
Categories
al-Qaeda
Arab League
Civil Liberties
Civil Society
Committee Meetings
Congress
Congressional Hearing Notes (House)
Congressional Hearing Notes (Senate)
Countries
Afghanistan
Algeria
Bahrain
Egypt
Gulf
Iran
Iraq
Kurdish Region
Israel
Jordan
Kuwait
Lebanon
Libya
Mauritania
Morocco
Oman
Palestine
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Sudan
South Sudan
Syria
Tunisia
Turkey
UAE
Western Sahara
Yemen
Country Pages
Note
Policymakers
Presidential Candidates
Democracy Promotion
Diplomacy
Economics
Elections
Elections 2012
EU
Featured
Foreign Aid
Freedom
From POMED's Executive Director
Gulf Cooperation Council
Hezbollah
Human Rights
Islam and Democracy
Islamist movements
Journalism
Legislation
Muslim Brotherhood
NATO
NGOs
Parliament
Policy Briefs
Development Assistance
Egypt
Syria
Tunisia
UNHRC
Political Islam
Political transition
POMED
Articles
Event Notes
Events
Reports
Weekly Wire
Protests
Publications
Reform
Sectarianism
Secularism
Uncategorized
United Nations
UN Human Rights Council
UN Security Council
US foreign policy
US politics
Women
Youth
Project on Middle East Democracy 1611 Connecticut Ave NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20009 (202) 828-9660
All Rights Reserved, POMED 2011
Switch to our mobile site
Extension Factory Builder