Spectators watch the men's cycling individual time trial at the London 2012 Olympic Games August 1, 2012.          REUTERS/Mark Blinch

Reuters Photojournalism

Our day's top images, in-depth photo essays and offbeat slices of life. See the best of Reuters photography.  See more | Photo caption 

A municipal agent (L) argues with a woman, who agents say is a suspected crack user, during an operation by Rio de Janeiro's Social Action Secretariat to bring crack addicts to shelters for rehabilitation, near Parque Uniao slum October 17, 2012. Municipal agents approached people showing signs of crack abuse during the operation to offer to send them to the shelters as part of efforts by authorities to end crack use in Rio's slums, including 11 areas known as Cracolandias or cracklands in the city. The exercise is mainly voluntary except for suspects that broke the law.  REUTERS/Ricardo Moraes (BRAZIL - Tags: DRUGS SOCIETY CRIME LAW)

Helping crack addicts

Brazilian agents offer help to crack addicts in Rio's slums.  Slideshow 

Photo

Bombing in Beirut

The death toll rises as a huge car bomb explodes in central Beirut during rush hour.  Slideshow 

Editor's Choice

Sponsored Links

Girls may not have riskier sex after HPV vaccination

Related Topics

NEW YORK | Mon Oct 15, 2012 12:07am EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters Health) - Girls who had been vaccinated against human papillomavirus (HPV) weren't more likely to get other sexually transmitted infections or to become pregnant, in a new study from Georgia.

That goes against worries on the part of some that getting the vaccine - which is supposed to ultimately help prevent cervical cancer - would encourage girls to become sexually active or engage in riskier sex than they otherwise would.

"Some parents have expressed it as a concern," said Saad Omer, an infectious diseases and vaccine researcher from Emory University in Atlanta who worked on the study.

"Parents can be reassured at least based on the evidence that young girls who receive HPV vaccines did not show increased signs (of) clinical outcomes of sexual activity," he told Reuters Health.

The vaccine, which has been recommended for 11- and 12-year-old girls in the U.S. since 2006, is still controversial, and only about half of girls start the series of shots.

One of the arguments against it has been that vaccination will make pre-teens feel a false sense of security when it comes to sex.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention now calls for boys to get vaccinated as well.

For the new study, Omer and his colleagues analyzed databases from Kaiser Permanente Georgia, a managed care organization covering the Atlanta area. Out of 1,398 girls who were 11 or 12 when they saw their doctors in 2006 and 2007, 493 got at least one dose of the HPV vaccine.

Based on records of their primary care visits, 107 of the girls included in the study were given a pregnancy test through 2010, and 55 were tested for Chlamydia.

Girls who did or didn't get the HPV vaccine were equally likely to be tested for both.

Two girls in each group got pregnant during the study. One girl who'd been vaccinated was diagnosed with Chlamydia, compared to three unvaccinated girls, according to findings published Monday in the journal Pediatrics.

Omer's team didn't have any data on how many of the girls were sexually active during the study period. The researchers also couldn't tell if the STI and pregnancy tests were part of standard clinical procedures or if girls were tested because they were sexually active or had symptoms.

Divya Patel, an ob-gyn researcher from the University of Michigan in Ann Arbor, called the study a "really good first stab" at looking at the behavioral effects of HPV vaccination.

"But I felt that it didn't convey the full picture," she added.

For example, it's possible girls as young as 11 and 12 aren't even told what the vaccine is for, or only hear about it in the context of cervical cancer.

"I'd be really surprised if kids this age are knowing that, ‘I got a vaccine for HPV and it's a sexually transmitted disease,'" Patel, who wasn't involved in the new study, told Reuters Health.

Looking at pregnancy tests from primary care doctors' offices is also limiting, she said, because girls might be more likely to go to school health clinics, or buy a test off the shelves, in those situations.

She said future studies like this one, but in different locations and in older girls, will be needed to help piece together what's going on.

The researchers agreed that there are other issues limiting the popularity of the HPV vaccine besides concerns about a spike in sexual risk-taking.

"I think that perception of risk (with HPV) is not quite there. People don't really consider themselves at risk, or they're not concerned," maybe because it's so common, Patel said.

"We need to be aware of how to prevent it, and vaccination is the best way to do that."

SOURCE: bit.ly/jsoh2P Pediatrics, online October 15, 2012.

We welcome comments that advance the story through relevant opinion, anecdotes, links and data. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters. For more information on our comment policy, see http://blogs.reuters.com/fulldisclosure/2010/09/27/toward-a-more-thoughtful-conversation-on-stories/
Comments (4)
featherknife wrote:
Of course they didn’t. Just another ridiculous pile of………….information………..from the religious right. How can an intelligent person be against preventative treatment for a problem as serious as h.p.v.? If you are going to be against abortion, how can you be against birth control? A vaccine against H.P.V. can keep a woman from contracting a potentially life threatening problem for life. Access to reliable birth control is the best method of reducing the need for abortions. So many refuse to see the logic in these and so many other things because of invalid and poorly thought out arguments driven by religion. Sad and foolish.

Oct 15, 2012 1:17am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MikeHughJass wrote:
Never allow science get in the way of your ideology. If science contradicts your belief system, then obviously the science is wrong and/or it’s a conspiracy perpetrated by the Left.

Oct 15, 2012 2:59am EDT  --  Report as abuse
MikeHughJass, excellent POE attempt except that you spelled everything correctly which gave you away. You can leave out entire words, but you must misspell at least 25% of what you type in order to make it legit.

Oct 15, 2012 7:35am EDT  --  Report as abuse
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.