We publish this here because we
couldn't stand the constant garbage statistics quoted on web sites and
newspapers. The following list is based on written papers we have. on file.
We have so many stats backing the following
article up, but we decided to just keep it a simple as possible. We
don't have an axe to grind, it just started from our investigators
constantly reading these "STATS" used as shark attack page fillers. The
sad thing is, even government agencies use these same
stats!,....".Journalists.....Do your own research, don't just throw us
the same lines every time" For example, the stat of 150 cocnut deaths a year, was
derived from a probability of death if the whole world lived in close
proximity to palm trees, and assumed we all claimed the trees for a
living. (Injurys included falling out of the trees, trees falling over etc)
Coconut deaths
For years scientists and journalists have been
saying you have a better chance of getting killed by a coconut falling on your head than a shark. (It's actually reverse) For
example... "Falling coconuts kill 150 people worldwide each year, 15
times the number of fatalities attributable to sharks." In all
fairness, most of these figures can be traced back to a report that
came out from a U.K. travel insurance company, who, In turn quoted
their figures from an Australian web, based on trees being uprooted.,
etc, etc, etc It was used so the insurance company would cover you for
coconut damage, if you travelled with then to PNG. Sounds fair enough, and would be useful coverage.
In actuality, here is the basis of all coconut death stats
1) Article by Dr. Peter Barss in the Journal
of Trauma entitled "Injuries Due to Falling Coconuts." (The
article received an Ig Nobel Prize, given annually at Harvard by the
editors of the Annals of Improbable Research in
recognition of research that "cannot or should not be replicated." The
award was presented in 2001, notwithstanding that the paper had been
published in 1984. ( nine injuries in Papua New Guinea due to falling
coconuts, none fatal. Barss notes that a coconut palm tree commonly
reaches 25 meters in height, that a coconut can weigh two kilograms or
more, and that a two-kilogram coconut falling 25 meters would have a
velocity of 80 kilometers per hour on impact and a force of as much as
1,000 kilograms. Several victims suffered fractured skulls, were
rendered comatose, etc. When we read the article, it said 9, not a 150!
He provides an anecdotal account of one such death
and in a separate paper estimates that over a four-year period five
deaths in his hospital's service area were related to coconut palm
trees (including climbers falling out of them). A recent report
(Mulford et al, "Coconut Palm-Related Injuries in the Pacific Islands,"
ANZ Journal of Surgery, January 2001),
which describes itself as "the largest review of coconut-palm related
injuries," also reports no deaths and on the question of mortality
merely cites Barss. Given that Barss' hospital in Papua New Guinea
served a population of 130,000, one conceivably could project 150
deaths over that portion of the world population living in proximity to
coconut palm trees, but I'm not aware of any systematic attempt to do
so. Noting that death reports in tropical countries are limited, Barss
tells me, "I am surprised that someone has come up with an actual
number for such injuries. It must be a crude estimate, and you would
have to ask them what methodology they used to verify whether it has
any validity." Conclusion: Somebody pulled the figure about 150 deaths
due to coconuts out of thin air.
Lightning deaths:
Again, we have many stats on this one. --
Statistically, lightning poses a greater threat to individuals than
most other natural hazards. On average, it causes 5 to 10
deaths and over 100 injuries in Australia each year. These
deaths include industrial, indirect hits, boats hit by thunderstorm
squalls, tree limbs falling on people, buildings damaged, debris hurled
about in high winds etc.
The above stat, allbeit an Australian one, still
includes all lightning or lightning related deaths and not actual
ldirect lightning strikes on an individual. One of our
investigators is actually one of these stats. He was having coffee
outside when lightning struck 20 feet away. He jumped back, struck his
head and became an official lightning stat. (On file)
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AUSTRALIA,
Australian Government - Attorney-General's
Department
Wet suit colours:
we have many E-mails asking "Is it true that you have more chance of
being attacked by a shark if you have a black wetsuit on".." the stats
say, there is"
We say, most attacks do ocur to those in black wetsuits. We also
say, 99.9% of all wetsuits sold are mostly black. So this figure really
doesnt mean anything at all. Saying you have a 99.9% less chance if you
wear an orange wetsuit would be true based on stats....it would
also be a stupid statistic, but makes the seller of orange wetsuits
happy.
The real number of shark attacks around the world are so under quoted.
Even our own files are lacking. I am aware of attacks in my home
town, from when I was a child. I have never seen the attack recorded. I
can't record it myself on our files, because there is no proof that we
can find, other than the fact I was surfing in the area and saw
the bite marks on the surfboard. I have no names etc.
Send us an E-mail if you want info
on other misquoted stats.
|