Disability, USA
October 6, 2013 4:48 PM
Steve Kroft reports on the alarming state of the federal disability program, which has exploded in size in the last six years and could become the first federal benefits program to run out of money.
Disability, USA
Web Extras
Scroll Left Scroll Right
When a man is injured on the job he should sue the automobile industry for every penny they own, to guarantee no one is ever injured on the job again, that's what Justice says.
But you can't sue the automobile company, all you can get is a cheesy thousand dollar month disability check.
It's not those who are injured on the job who are cheating the system.
It's the people who drive automobiles, that cost less than $1 million a piece, because they don't want to pay the people who were injured manufacturing those automobiles.
Over 70,000 people a year are injured building automobiles. How can the automobile companies even make a profit when one person is injured? How can they even be making a profit when one person is killed by their product?
Because the news channels like 60 minutes, are so good at brainwashing people into believing everybody's faking an injury, to get the automobile companies money. It's not about getting another job after job injury. It's about making sure no one else is injured by putting that company out of business. No one in their right mind can go back to work at another job knowing people are still being injured at the automobile plant.
Over 1000 workers were killed in Bangladesh manufacturing clothing, and all you people care about is that the people who survived the building collapse go out and get another job so you can wear cheap clothing made by slaves. You don't get it, because you're evil and brainwashed.
Eye for an eye tooth for tooth. When a person loses an eye while building an automobile, if the people who drive automobiles don't want to that injured worker sue the automobile manufacturer for every penny they own, because that person wants to drive an automobile cheep, then every person who drives a car, should have an eye chiseled out of their head. That's God's law. If you don't like it move off of God's earth.
Wake up 60 minutes and do the story of the man who was injured on the job and suffered $450 billion worth of pain and all he got was a cheesy disability check, because people still want to drive cars and they don't care how much people suffer.
Why should your back pain cut into automobile industry profits? You think those 70,000 people who are injured at the automobile factories every year are faking injuries? If any 60 minutes viewers think industry should still be making a profit after one man is injured on the job, they should receive that injury. That's what Justice says.
Everyone who watches 60 minutes is possessed by the devil. I don't know how your viewers are going to handle judgment day when they actually have to pay the price for the suffering they cause.
When a man is injured on the job he should sue the automobile industry for every penny they own, to guarantee no one is ever injured on the job again, that's what Justice says.
But you can't sue the automobile company, all you can get is a cheesy thousand dollar month disability check.
It's not those who are injured on the job who are cheating the system.
It's the people who drive automobiles, that cost less than $1 million a piece, because they don't want to pay the people who were injured manufacturing those automobiles.
Over 70,000 people a year are injured building automobiles. How can the automobile companies even make a profit when one person is injured? How can they even be making a profit when one person is killed by their product?
Because the news channels like 60 minutes, are so good at brainwashing people into believing everybody's faking an injury, to get the automobile companies money. It's not about getting another job after job injury. It's about making sure no one else is injured by putting that company out of business. No one in their right mind can go back to work at another job knowing people are still being injured at the automobile plant.
Over 1000 workers were killed in Bangladesh manufacturing clothing, and all you people care about is that the people who survived the building collapse go out and get another job so you can wear cheap clothing made by slaves. You don't get it, because you're evil and brainwashed.
Eye for an eye tooth for tooth. When a person loses an eye while building an automobile, if the people who drive automobiles don't want to that injured worker sue the automobile manufacturer for every penny they own, because that person wants to drive an automobile cheep, then every person who drives a car, should have an eye chiseled out of their head. That's God's law. If you don't like it move off of God's earth.
Wake up 60 minutes and do the story of the man who was injured on the job and suffered $450 billion worth of pain and all he got was a cheesy disability check, because people still want to drive cars and they don't care how much people suffer.
Why should your back pain cut into automobile industry profits? You think those 70,000 people who are injured at the automobile factories every year are faking injuries? If any 60 minutes viewers think industry should still be making a profit after one man is injured on the job, they should receive that injury. That's what Justice says.
Everyone who watches 60 minutes is possessed by the devil. I don't know how your viewers are going to handle judgment day when they actually have to pay the price for the suffering they cause.
When a man is injured on the job he should sue the automobile industry for every penny they own, to guarantee no one is ever injured on the job again, that's what Justice says.
But you can't sue the automobile company, all you can get is a cheesy thousand dollar month disability check.
It's not those who are injured on the job who are cheating the system.
It's the people who drive automobiles, that cost less than $1 million a piece, because they don't want to pay the people who were injured manufacturing those automobiles.
Over 70,000 people a year are injured building automobiles. How can the automobile companies even make a profit when one person is injured? How can they even be making a profit when one person is killed by their product?
Because the news channels like 60 minutes, are so good at brainwashing people into believing everybody's faking an injury, to get the automobile companies money. It's not about getting another job after job injury. It's about making sure no one else is injured by putting that company out of business. No one in their right mind can go back to work at another job knowing people are still being injured at the automobile plant.
Over 1000 workers were killed in Bangladesh manufacturing clothing, and all you people care about is that the people who survived the building collapse go out and get another job so you can wear cheap clothing made by slaves. You don't get it, because you're evil and brainwashed.
Eye for an eye tooth for tooth. When a person loses an eye while building an automobile, if the people who drive automobiles don't want to that injured worker sue the automobile manufacturer for every penny they own, because that person wants to drive an automobile cheep, then every person who drives a car, should have an eye chiseled out of their head. That's God's law. If you don't like it move off of God's earth.
Wake up 60 minutes and do the story of the man who was injured on the job and suffered $450 billion worth of pain and all he got was a cheesy disability check, because people still want to drive cars and they don't care how much people suffer.
Why should your back pain cut into automobile industry profits? You think those 70,000 people who are injured at the automobile factories every year are faking injuries? If any 60 minutes viewers think industry should still be making a profit after one man is injured on the job, they should receive that injury. That's what Justice says.
Everyone who watches 60 minutes is possessed by the devil. I don't know how your viewers are going to handle judgment day when they actually have to pay the price for the suffering they cause.
When a man is injured on the job he should sue the automobile industry for every penny they own, to guarantee no one is ever injured on the job again, that's what Justice says.
But you can't sue the automobile company, all you can get is a cheesy thousand dollar month disability check.
It's not those who are injured on the job who are cheating the system.
It's the people who drive automobiles, that cost less than $1 million a piece, because they don't want to pay the people who were injured manufacturing those automobiles.
Over 70,000 people a year are injured building automobiles. How can the automobile companies even make a profit when one person is injured? How can they even be making a profit when one person is killed by their product?
Because the news channels like 60 minutes, are so good at brainwashing people into believing everybody's faking an injury, to get the automobile companies money. It's not about getting another job after job injury. It's about making sure no one else is injured by putting that company out of business. No one in their right mind can go back to work at another job knowing people are still being injured at the automobile plant.
Over 1000 workers were killed in Bangladesh manufacturing clothing, and all you people care about is that the people who survived the building collapse go out and get another job so you can wear cheap clothing made by slaves. You don't get it, because you're evil and brainwashed.
Eye for an eye tooth for tooth. When a person loses an eye while building an automobile, if the people who drive automobiles don't want to that injured worker sue the automobile manufacturer for every penny they own, because that person wants to drive an automobile cheep, then every person who drives a car, should have an eye chiseled out of their head. That's God's law. If you don't like it move off of God's earth.
Wake up 60 minutes and do the story of the man who was injured on the job and suffered $450 billion worth of pain and all he got was a cheesy disability check, because people still want to drive cars and they don't care how much people suffer.
Why should your back pain cut into automobile industry profits? You think those 70,000 people who are injured at the automobile factories every year are faking injuries? If any 60 minutes viewers think industry should still be making a profit after one man is injured on the job, they should receive that injury. That's what Justice says.
Everyone who watches 60 minutes is possessed by the devil. I don't know how your viewers are going to handle judgment day when they actually have to pay the price for the suffering they cause.
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-will-intentionally-jam-d-c-beltway-arrest-congressmen-if-cops-wont-organizer-claims/
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2013/10/07/truckers-for-the-constitution-plan-to-slow-dc-beltway-arrest-congressmen
Given the vast number of vengeful attacks from people who claim that they know people -- often multiple people -- who are fraudulently receiving SSDI benefits, the 0.41% factual statistic proves that these complainers are nothing but jealous, vindictive ignoramuses. Just like the producers of this egregious 60 Minutes debacle of a segment, who knew all this (it is very widely known to anyone who investigates SSDI) but went ahead and deliberately kept these essential facts a secret from the audience!
Another falsehood in this scandalous hit piece relates to the bogus assertion by Sarah Carver and Jennifer Griffith that various stores and restaurants are to be avoided on what's implied to be a single day when they're too crowded because "everybody's received their benefits", even though in reality those payments are gradually made over the course of the month. People do NOT all receive their checks on the same day as the segment strongly implied!
If the 60 Minutes hatchet job had instead focused solely on scheming lawyer-doctor claim riggers like Eric Conn's outfit, the segment would have been justified. But the segment as it appeared was quite despicable!
One costs the tax-payer no small amount in billions, the other trillions. If the cost to the tax-payer is the concern here, which you say it is, why then has this crime of the century, systemic Wall Street fraud gone virtually unprosecuted? I'm not going to let this go. Why are we all over Social Security fraud but Wall Street fraud nearly bringing the world's economy to its knees received the proverbial slap on the wrist?
I'll tell you why, because one crime involves the rich and the other involves the poor. The one involving the rich gets glossed over and forgotten, whereas the one involving the poor is investigated to the fullest and prosecuted with vigor. What a sham.