Customer Review

86 of 93 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Triple Down --- A Three-volume encyclopedia of the 2012 election, November 5, 2013
Amazon Verified Purchase(What's this?)
This review is from: Double Down: Game Change 2012 (Kindle Edition)
This is a comprehensive and surprisingly unbiased account of the 2012 campaign and the backstories behind the candidates who took part in it. The book is in three parts, each of which is comprehensive enough to be a stand-alone book in its own right.

The first "book" (Part I) is the backstory of Obama's Presidency from 2008 to 2012. This was my least favorite part because it was clinically written without much emotion or new insights. Authors Mark Halperin and John Heilemann describes Obama as a moderate, pragmatic sort of person who has as little use for the self-serving Black Civil Rights establishment as he does for the Conservative Tea Party activists. According to Halperin and Heilemann, Obama may come across at times as a petulant professor, but he's hardly the extreme Liberal-verging-on-Marxist maniac that has taken root in popular Conservative folklore.

Halperin and Heilemann give a fair account of Obama's political battles with the Republican House of Representatives over healthcare reform, banking bailouts, and federal budgets. But a politically savvy reader will already be familiar with this material. I'd suggest skimming this part or skipping it altogether and getting started with the second part, which makes the book a worthwhile read.

The second part --- describing the Republican primary candidates' machinations to win the nomination --- has all the drama and excitement you'd expect in a political book

It starts out with a fair-minded account of Mitt Romney's career. Nothing new here, because Mitt has been around long enough for most of us to know his story. He's one of those incorruptible personalities whose scandal-free life seems dull by its very absence of misconduct. The only surprise is that the real money brokers in the Republican party seem to have viewed Mitt as a penny-ante operator:

======
Trump was publicly sniffy about Romney as a capitalist, denigrating him as a "small-business guy," and privately disdainful of Bain. "They'd buy a company and fire everyone," he told his associates.
=======

Where my interest was really piqued was in Halperin and Heilemann bringing to life the second-tier challengers like Jeb Bush, Mike Huckabee, Donald Trump, Mitch Daniels, Jon Huntsman, Rick Perry, Tim Pawlenty, Michelle Bachmann, Herman Cain, Newt Gingrich, and Rick Santorum.

Jeb Bush and Mike Huckabee had spent years as low-paid governors of their states. They had belatedly achieved comfortable wealth in the private sector after retiring from public service. Going into 2012 they had to face the agonizing decision of whether to risk every penny of their personal wealth on the time-consuming and expensive campaign to be President. Little wonder that they declined to enter the contest.

I came away disappointed with Donald Trump, whose three billion dollars would have enabled him to campaign. But Trump let his devotion to personal fame and fortune trump his desire to serve the American people by campaigning to be their President. He felt that running for public office would cost him money by taking him away from his business.

I also enjoyed the stories of tension between fellow Minnesotans Tim Pawlenty and Michelle Bachmann who appear to have detested each other. Rick Perry, Herman Cain, and Newt Gingrich also have their interesting personal and professional stories told, usually in good-natured ways. And I LOVED the antics of professional Republican campaign consultants Karl Rove and the delightfully mischievous Ed Rollins. The candidates may have put on a good face in being nicey-nicey to each other in the television debates, but their professional campaign staffs dished the dirt behind the scenes. If the authors' story is true, Jon Huntsman's staff sabotaged Herman Cain's campaign by going public with the womanizing stories.

But the most meaningful insight is about New Jersey Governor Chris Christie. The book should be read for that reason alone. Halperin and Heilemann don't cheerlead for any candidate, but the stories of Governor Christie as told through the eyes of others is a powerful endorsement of him as a candidate for 2016.

The Third Part of the book, about the presidential race between Obama and Romney, is, like the first part, only so-so. That's probably because most of the stories are still fresh on our minds --- the Bain Capital controversies; Obama's dreadful first debate; Romney's "47% moochers and takers" gaffe; and Romney's search for a running mate that culminated the selection of Paul Ryan.

The strength of this book --- its completeness --- is also its weakness. Some may feel that it is TOO complete. For example, I was not at all interested in the pages devoted to minor non-candidate Haley Barbour who never got into the Republican primaries. There is also a "facts, just the facts" tone to the book. There is no opinionating by the author about WHY the nomination process and the election turned out the way it did. The dry facts are presented, and the readers are left to draw their own conclusions.

The book is more like an encyclopedia of pick-and-choose topics. I spent most of my time on Part II, which by itself justified the purchase. The entertaining dramas of the Republicans competing against each other made for some delightful stories, as well as getting to know these second-tier candidates (some of whom will be first-tier in 2016 or 2020) made this a worthwhile read. The best was the part devoted to understanding what makes Governor Chris Christie tick. I came away feeling even more comfortable with him as a Republican candidate for 2016 than I already was.

This book may be over-long and perhaps contains some material that is not of the highest interest. BUT it is THE encyclopedia of the 2012 political campaigns, the candidates who participated in them, and the backstories that went into making the candidates and their campaigns. It's the one "all you need to know" source for the life and times of every political personality of any relevance to the 2012 campaign.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
 

Comments

Tracked by 3 customers

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-7 of 7 posts in this discussion
Initial post: Nov 5, 2013 3:06:41 PM PST
pm444 says:
I enjoyed your review, but I'm curious about why you only referred to Halperin as the author, never once even mentioning his co-author, John Heilemann. Did you have a reason for this omission?

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 5, 2013 3:23:18 PM PST
Thanks, I'll correct that in the review right now.

Nothing against Heilemann, it's just that I was so used to reading Mark Halperin's articles that I assumed he was the author and Heilemann was the editor. I'll add heilemann's name in besides Halperin's.

Posted on Nov 5, 2013 9:05:12 PM PST
Good review. It certainly is a very talked about book right now.

Posted on Nov 6, 2013 3:14:13 PM PST
Nitya says:
You state "I came away disappointed with Donald Trump, whose three billion dollars would have enabled him to campaign."
=============
Donald Trump is way too leveraged to have access to anywhere near $3 billion. If Trump had that kind of money he wouldn't need NBC's annual $16 million stipend to do his "Apprentice" television show.

Timothy L. O'Brien wrote in his 2005 book, "TrumpNation: The Art of Being The Donald," that the developer was probably worth $150 to $250 million, rather than the typical estimates of $2 to $3 billion.

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 7, 2013 6:55:13 AM PST
Zman says:
Trump lost credibility with his birther attacks plus with him on the VP ticket he would have overshadowed Romney. Romney is the button down corporate type whereas Trump is the promoter with a massive ego and a stable of former trophy wives. He would not have played well on the national stage.

Posted on Nov 7, 2013 10:43:56 AM PST
catbyte says:
Interesting review, but do you actually think that Donald Trump would have made a good candidate, much less president? He is a huckster who declared bankruptcy 4 times and left countless people holding the bag, while he skipped merrily away from his debts. That, to me, is a very poor business model. I've read that his alleged $3B "wealth" is also a sham, which is why he decided to cling to his silly TV show and cheesy Trump merchandise. He's also all over the map politically. He's a colossal flip-flopper, but I guess now he's flopped in favor of the TP/Birthers, he's aces. Seriously?

In reply to an earlier post on Nov 7, 2013 11:41:34 AM PST
Last edited by the author on Nov 7, 2013 12:13:17 PM PST
Nitya, thanks for the explanation. I did not realize that Trump's resources were so thin. That would explain why he never became a serious candidate. I also appreciate what "Zman" and "catbyte" said about Mr. Trump being flaky.

BUT......Mr. Trump occupies an important place in the political spectrum --- that of being a Republican Populist.

He understands that if we're ever going to get back on our feet the 99% have to prosper as well as the 1%. The ONLY way the 99% are going to prosper is by giving their jobs some protection from imports produced with peon labor in Mexico and China, raising the minimum wage, and protecting them from gratuitous layoffs by profitable corporations whose managements seek to inflate executive pay beyond reason by taking it out of theIR employees' payrolls and pensions.

I fear that the Republican party is currently too much influenced by an antisocial and even anti-American elite who believes that the 1% should become a tax-exempt charity while the 99% should be subjugated and forced into indentured servitude. The Republican elites yap like magpies: "tax cuts! Tax cuts! Tax cuts!" Then they conspire to put their American workers out of their jobs with ("offshoring, outsourcing, rightsizing, downsizing, reengineering, early retirement, workforce reductions") and every other eumphemism for profiteering the 1% by breaking the backs of the 99% who have labored faithfully for decades to built the nation's industries.

They want to eliminate all taxes on income derived from businesses and investments. At the same time they use the threat of offshoring their employees' jobs to beat down wages. They are now agitating for a repeal of the minimum wage and of environmental and worker safety laws. They are seeking to implement an economy where the labor of the 99% is paid zero wages, while the maximum profits extracted from their labor are taxed at zero percent. This type of labor system that the Republican elites are seeking to impose on the American people was outlawed by the Emancipation Proclamation in 1863.

Donald Trump, along with Pat Buchanan and Ross Perot, are among the very few Republican business leaders who have been true friends of the 99% whose economic fortunes have been in decline for the past 20 years or so.

I vote mostly Republican because I am not satisfied with the Democrats either. Their core belief is to raise taxes and grow government, including massive new money-eating government bureaucracies and taxpayer-subsidized boondoggles like windmills and bullet trains to nowhere. I don't believe that government bureaucracies and boondoggles are any better at growing the economy than the Republican party idea of dividing the country into serfs and lords.

Donald Trump was the one candidate whose economics made sense to me: give the employers their tax cuts but at the same time give the employees a boost in wages and job security. Do something for everybody, not just the 1% who have already been pampered beyond reason with excessive tax exemptions, repeal of necessary regulations, and tariff-free access to overseas peon labor.

IMO whichever party nominates a candidate like Trump (but without all the flakiness) that really "gets" the idea that the economy is suffering because the middle class can't find employment at livable wages, will be the party that rises to dominance. I honestly don't care whether it's Republicans, Democrats, or Independents. I just want somebody who'll do what's necessary to provide reasonable protection of the jobs of middle class people who really want to work but can't find stable jobs that pay enough to support themselves. Mr. Trump, despite his flakiness, at least understood that essential fact of American economic life.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

4.1 out of 5 stars (17 customer reviews)
5 star:
 (6)
4 star:
 (8)
3 star:
 (1)
2 star:
 (2)
1 star:    (0)
 
 
 
$11.93
Add to wishlist
Reviewer


Top Reviewer Ranking: 1,012