A photograph of U.S. Ambassador to Egypt Anne Patterson is burned outside the Ministry of Defense, Cairo, June 28, 2013. Keith Lane/MCT/Getty Images
August 28, 2013
It’s the golden age of
rumors and misconceptions in Egypt these days, especially with the lack of
credible “unbiased” news channels or sources for information. Add that to the
nationalistic wave in the country, misconceptions do not only get viewed as fact,
it actually leads to bad planning, policy and actions. Very few people will
attempt to clear those misconceptions now without risking to antagonize others, but it is a risk I am willing to take, because I cannot take having the
same discussions over and over. Let’s go.
1. The U.S. Is Not against June 30
There is a strong held
belief in Egypt that the US is against the June 30 alliance and government, and
is waging war against it for the sake of Muslim Brotherhood. Egyptians perceive
the U.S. discussion about cutting military aid as an aggressive gesture and are
meeting it with extreme hostility usually reserved to slave owners by their
freed slaves. (It’s that level of intensity). They are complaining daily that
the U.S. is against them and supports the terrorism of the Muslim Brotherhood,
and Egyptian social media has made mocking and insulting President Barack Obama
a national past time. Despite me being in favor of mocking Obama, the reality
is that the U.S. is not against June 30 at all.
Here is what the U.S.
cares about: for Egypt to be run by a ruler that can stabilize it, and will
form a government that makes their relationship look good. The very
contradictory reactions the U.S. regarding Egypt comes from two reasons: first,
the lack of any real foreign policy regarding Egypt (and the Arab Spring for
that matter); and second, the legal conundrum they are facing now because of
us. U.S. law dictates when a military removes a democratically elected leader
that is considered a coup, and any aid going its way must be stopped. In
reflection of the facts, yes, the military did technically remove Morsi and is
now holding him in a location even we, the people who revolted against him, do
not know (you do not have him held captive in your basement, do you?), so the
situation is meeting the legal definition.
The U.S. administration,
which is required to uphold its laws, has no actual choice but to cut the aid,
and in order to avoid doing so, it has done impressive political gymnastics in
order not to call it that. Watching the new and impressive ways they use to
avoid using the “C” word in its statements and press conferences has become my
latest guilty pleasure. My favorite moment was when in a recent press
conference, a State department spokesperson’s reply to the question if the U.S.
has determined whether or not what happened in Egypt is a coup was, “we have
determined we don’t need to make a determination.” Read that sentence again.
Admire its beauty. It’s glorious.
Even after the violent
disbursement of Rabaa El-Adawiya and the clashes that day with Morsi/Muslim
Brotherhood supporters and its death toll, which surpasses the daily death toll
in a country like Syria at its worse day, the U.S. still refuses to use the “C”
word or cut the aid. The only thing they have been doing is push for a
political solution to the problem, which would have to involve a reconciliation
or truce deal with the Brotherhood, because it doesn’t want instability and
would like us to help make the U.S. relationship with our country continue to
make them look good or not embarrass them, which a) we are not doing at all,
and b) doesn’t seem to be one of our priorities, and the worst thing they came
up with as a response was to cancel a joint military exercise. What’s worse is
that they are bending over backward for Egypt, despite facing media and
political scrutiny for it, and they are not getting any leverage or credit for
it. The friction we are seeing are simply the byproduct of a renegotiation of
the terms of the special relationship Egypt has with the U.S. and the Egyptian
government is initiating it. It’s that simple.
2. There Is No Giant Global Conspiracy Against Us
There really isn’t a
global conspiracy against us; Europe is concerned because of the death and the
overthrow and jailing of a “democratically elected” president, but they will
not move beyond being concerned. Even in the United Nations Security Council’s
special session on Egypt, the statement admitted that both sides of the
conflict (i.e. government and Brotherhood) are using violence and called for
mutual de-escalation. This means the UN is not buying the “peaceful warriors
for democracy” narrative that the MB is producing, but also cannot condone the
almost seven hundred dead in one day of conflict either, because it is a
horrifying and indefensible number, so they went the route of balance. They are
not happy with the high death toll and they will not condone it forever, which
is important if you would like their tourists back, and you should: your
economy needs it.
That being said, Turkey
and Qatar are truly against us, so is any and every branch of the MB the world
over, so you are not being completely paranoid here. I also hear that Iran and
the Taliban are not pleased with us either. It is okay though, I think we can
afford that.
3. The International Media Isn’t in the Muslim
Brotherhood’s Pockets
Egyptian social media is
filled with posts, pictures and videos that either a) hate the biased
international coverage, or b) is comprised of videos or images with a message
that we share this in order to “show the international media” the truth. The
reason? The perception that international opinion provides excessive support
for the MB, which develops at times to the belief that the international media
is in the MB’s pocket. The proof? The lack of coverage of the MB’s violent acts
and that they are portrayed as peaceful protesters getting killed by the state.
“Why is no one supporting us?” They protest, in complete denial that this is
primarily their own fault. Oh yes. It’s true.
You see, in order for the
international media to showcase your side of the story, you actually have to
have a side of the story. Your new state needs to have a solid case why it
overthrew the old one, which, for the record, is not being made in anywhere.
One local media outlet, instead of doing pieces that document and explain why
the population revolted against Morsi and his rule, is airing a simplistic
narrative of nationalism versus terrorism, and doing a remarkable job
sensationalizing it. If they have zero intentions of being unbiased, which
seems to be the case, they should try to explain and set in stone why the MB
rule was undemocratic and criminal. It is not hard: An investigative piece on
all the people arrested, killed and maimed by the police or MB during the Morsi
reign; a five-minute video showcasing the attacks on Christians or the disdain
for religion cases; a report on every single journalist or media personality
that got persecuted by the Morsi presidency or their supporters; a short
documentary stating all of the violations and crimes that the Morsi regimes
committed, or maybe explaining the perils of theocracy and why we should never
ever toy with its idea again. Hell, a simple YouTube video explaining how we
got here and what are the lessons learned will do at this point. But no one is
doing that locally. Imagine what effects it could have on the international
level.
To make matters worse, we
are naturally engaging in our favorite national pastime: xenophobia. Therefore
Egyptians are becoming increasingly hostile to foreign journalists, who are
getting harassed, beaten and killed while doing their job. And naturally they
find that the safest place for them to operate is within the marches of the
pro-Morsi protesters, because they actually want them to tell their side of the
story, and are not projecting their own feelings of disappointment or anger
towards them, like the June 30 crowd does. Also, foreign media journalists are
more likely to cover protests in Cairo than cover what’s going on in the
governorates, where Morsi supporters crimes are apparent, so all they see is
clashes with protesters, from the side of the MB, and this is what they report.
Here is how you can remedy
this. First, make your case clear, and it cannot simply be the MB are
terrorists or criminals- detailed concise arguments would be nice. Second,
utilize every chance you get to make the case, and don’t waste an opportunity
to do so. The Mostafa Hegazy presser on August 18 was a perfect example of a
wasted opportunity: he had all the media’s attention, and instead of making the
case against the MB using videos, images, details, names and facts, he opted
for generalized narrative. The man is an excellent speaker and handedly
survived a very hostile press conference, but he should ‘have made the case and
provided proof. Someone has to.
Third and finally, be nice
to foreign journalists. If you keep attacking or insulting them, they have
every incentive to not listen to you. Stop your xenophobia and embrace them as
people who are simply trying to do their job in a very dangerous situation,
instead of being part of the danger against them. If the people won’t do it,
then the state should. Why aren’t foreign journalists being embedded with
security forces during dangerous situation? This way they can finally tell if
a) the police started the attack or the Morsi supporters and b) if the other
side is armed, because it will be shooting in their direction. Simple things,
really, but they will make a difference. It ‘is a war of narrative, and the MB
are helping the narrative writers in every way they can, and you are either
insulting them, demonizing them or attacking them. Not very smart, no?
4. The War on Terror Will Not End This Way
There is a reason why
everyone is wary of the “war on terror” narrative, for a very simple reason:
Wars on concepts cannot be called wars, because wars end. You see, wars on
concepts or ideas definitely do not end with bullets, they end with a counter
idea that exposes or defeats the idea. What is your counter idea to Islamism/MB
ideology? Whoever does not agree with you is a traitor and should be killed?
Yeah, not a very good one, especially against Islamists, who are generally okay
with dying for their beliefs.
So you can go ahead and
think you can kill your way out of this conflict, and you may succeed to end
all major confrontations with a high body count within the month (and become
known as butchers for it). However, sooner rather than later you will start
facing incidents that pop up everywhere, with a few dying here in an explosion,
and a few dying there in a drive-by shooting, and it will not stop and you will
never be safe. It will not always be the MB behind the killings, but rather the
family members/friends of the non-MB Morsi supporter who got killed in one of
the clashes, or jailed for wanting to defend his vote, and sees you stealing it
and persecuting him for it.
The danger of what is
happening is not the MB going underground and starting a terror campaign, but
that those supporters or their family members get radicalized to such a degree
that they will resort to random violence. And in case you haven’t noticed, the
Ministy of Interior, besides being indefensibly ruthless in its actions, is not
in the best to fight this. It can scantly provide the minimum semblance of
security. Exhibit a) the burnt churches. Exhibit b) the burnt museums. Exhibit
c) Their own police stations that they can’t defend. Exhibit d) your
neighborhood where you no longer feel secure.
So please, start demanding
a clear strategy to manage this conflict and the security situation, and don’t
feel ashamed to do so, since this is your life and future we are talking about.
Also, if people tell you the strategy is to eradicate them, please remind them
that if the MB are only 80,000 people. Not only will it take a genocide to kill
them all, you will also have to kill their friends and relatives, which is a
whole lot of killing, and that is if we discount that there is the internet,
where ideas can live forever. So, while it’s prudent to face those who use
violence against you with violence, it is imperative not to help them recruit
or win supporters. While many of the police are engaging in life or death
battles and heroics to protect you, many of them act in a criminal manner and
we should be able to hold them to account. Your best weapon against the Muslim
Brotherhood is to create the state that they could not create, one of
diversity, accountability, human rights, civilian rule and against corruption
and nepotism. Only such an idea can one day end this war.
Mahmoud Salem writes the award-winning Rantings of
a Sandmonkey blog and is a columnist for the Daily News Egypt. This article was
originally published on his blog. On Twitter: @Sandmonkey.