Please upgrade your browser. This site requires a newer version to work correctly. Read more

USGBC Announces Extension of LEED 2009

Published on Written by Posted in Media

Updated November 18, 2014

Extension offers the green building industry additional time to prepare for the newest version of LEED

WASHINGTON, DC (Oct. 29, 2014) – The U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) announced today that it will allow LEED users to register projects under the LEED 2009 rating system until Oct. 31, 2016. The original date for LEED 2009 registration to close was June 27, 2015. Extending to October 2016 gives LEED users and members of the green building industry additional time to prepare for LEED v4, the latest version of LEED, which features increased rigor and multiple updates. While the registration date has been extended, the last day projects can submit for certification, also called the sunset date, remains the same: June 30, 2021. The decision to keep the sunset date in 2021 was voted and approved by the LEED Steering Committee.  

“When USGBC launched LEED v4 last year, we set out with one goal in mind – to raise the bar in a way that challenges the building industry to reach higher than ever before. This is our nature and USGBC and its members’ collective mission,” said Rick Fedrizzi, CEO & founding chair, USGBC. “However, the market has requested additional time to prepare for LEED v4, so we are responding.”

In a survey conducted at last week’s Greenbuild conference, 61 percent of respondents said they are “not ready” or “unsure” if they are ready to pursue LEED v4 and require additional time to prepare. Extending LEED 2009’s availability enables USGBC to work with the broader industry within a longer time frame to drive meaningful and comprehensive change.

“Our international LEED users, which account for some 50 percent of new LEED registrations, have also indicated they would like to have more time to move onto the new rating system,” Fedrizzi noted.  “This extension will be especially helpful to them.”

LEED v4 has been in the market for nearly one year and will remain available for those market leaders who are ready. 

“LEED v4 wasn’t designed to be easy. It is the next generation of green building, and we are confident the market will meet us there as they have in years past,” added Fedrizzi. “When USGBC first pilot tested LEED in 1998, there weren’t many buildings that could qualify for LEED certification at the Platinum level. Now, more than 1,000 buildings have achieved it. With LEED, we have a responsibility to set a high bar and we know that many leaders are capable of reaching it, presently or in the very near future. We want to support our LEED users as they move the market forward with us, and allowing them to utilize the LEED 2009 rating system for a little longer will help facilitate that.”

 “USGBC continues to develop new resources that support the market’s adoption of LEED,” added Fedrizzi. “The LEED Dynamic Plaque provides a vivid, real-time visualization of building performance data spanning water, energy, occupant satisfaction and more, giving building owners critical insight into how their building is performing. Every day, LEED is contributing to scores of new, innovative building technologies in the design, manufacturing and construction process, and has brought new, healthier building materials to market.   

LEED has facilitated spectacular advances in building technologies, integrated design and operating practices. LEED is also largely responsible for the explosive growth of the green building sector, which supports or creates 7.9 million jobs across all 50 states and contributes $554 billion to the U.S. economy annually.

  • 10
    Marisa Long made 10 contributions in the last 6 months

Marisa Long

Public Relations & Communications Director U.S. Green Building Council

18 commentsLeave a comment

I thought it was very interesting reading some of the comments posted particularly from Michael and Jodi. Obviously you have not worked in the manufacturing field. If you have you would know of the immense cost of both time and money to switch from the 2009 version to V4. Manufacturer's even small companies may have dozens if not hundreds of products who in turn have to submit all of these to one of the three or four testing agencies. The cost and time is astronomical, and that is why you are seeing the 61% push back. There are such things as budgets, and unfortunately LEED updates is not always put at the top. That is why more time is truly needed. I truly believe that everyone wants to do there part, but there is no possible way that it could have been completed in the next 8 months. "Lets be realistic" You can talk about lack of support and taking a step back, but the truth of the matter is that this gives manufacturer's the time to digest, budget, and plan for this. As far as the test, I have no idea how someone went off on that tangent, but pushing the deadline was a call that needed to be made to not alienate product manufacturer's both here and abroad. I will not go into changing the 500 mile radius to 100 mile, but this has hurt manufacturer's and Architect's alike and should seriously be looked at to be amended back to its original status.
President & CEO, e4, inc.
Wow. I am frankly baffled at the lack of support for what I believe was a very wise decision on the part of the USGBC. If LEED wants to maintain its relevance to the broad real estate market not just the leaders who have embraced green building, it needed to slow down. I fully support the decision and feel it was critical to ensure that LEED continues to transform the broader marketplace and not just become a leadership recognition tool for the already committed.
Director of Sustainability, 3form
This is a very disappointing decision, from my perspective as Sustainability Director representing a materials manufacturer. When USGBC voted to implement V4 standards by June 2015, those manufacturers that decided to comply quickly scrambled to understand V4's revised credits mechanisms, then invested significant financial resources to be ready to meet client needs. While LEED V4 seemed prematurely released, we nevertheless felt it important to show support, as well as to be ready on schedule. This move to delay by USGBC essentially strips value from those efforts and investments. While it is reasonable to heed perceived market forces, it is also reasonable to expect USGBC to maintain course when they make mandates that have great expense to manufacturers. While it must have been a difficult decision by USGBC's leadership, it certainly seems like a wrong direction to make deadlines so whimsical.
Past (2012) NY Upstate Chapter Chair, Past CSC, and Director of Sustainability Programs, DASNY
Wow, totally frustrated with this decision. We've worked as a Chapter to promote LEEDv4, to make sure our constituents are ready, or at least not panicking. Again, I feel like we've gone down a path knowing where we need to go, then the direction is changed without our input. I do understand that member companies have said they are not ready. Everyone always more time for a change. Birds are not ready to fly without a nudge! And we don't have more time. USGBC used to be one of the large organizations that truly understood that. There will be no money savings in waiting and people won't "do" until they have to.
Senior Vice President, Marketing, Communications & Advocacy, U.S. Green Building Council
Hello, USGBC is not planning to open the old exam. The current exams will prepare test takers for not only LEED v4 projects but also for LEED 2009 projects. The LEED credentials that are available today demonstrate advanced knowledge in green building as well as expertise in LEED.
Director of Sustainable Education, GreenCE, Inc.
In regards to the credentialing exams, I have heard assurances from USGBC that it will remain aligned to LEED v4.
Construction & Installations Director, ThermaCote, Inc.
With the extension of LEED 2009, will the current LEED GA and AP tests still cover version 4 material instead of 2009 material?
Project Manager, Education Platforms, U.S. Green Building Council
Hi Saher, Thanks for checking. This extension will not impact the content of the exams. The information in this article remains correct.
Owner, LEED Consultant, C-Wise Design & Consulting Services
The ambition of the USGBC is to transform the marketplace. LEED has transformed the marketplace, but the marketplace has largely caught up with version 3. It is time to move to v4, to challenge the marketplace, not wait for it. I'm not ready for v4 because I don't need to be. My plan was to study v4 in earnest in spring 2015. Why do today what I can put off till tomorrow? We need to be pushed, to be challenged. The USGBC proclaims it is a consensus based member organization. Today, I find that difficult to believe. This is the wrong call and I know I had no part in making it.
Past (2012) NY Upstate Chapter Chair, Past CSC, and Director of Sustainability Programs, DASNY
Thank you. You nailed it.
  •  
  • of
  • 2

Leave a comment Don't have an account? Create one

You must be signed in to leave a comment.

+2
  • Share on Twitter
  • Share on Facebook
  • Share on LinkedIn
In Media 12.18.2014

International Parking Institute and Green Parking Council Collaborate with GBCI, the...

In Media 12.11.2014

833 Million Square Feet of Building Space in India using LEED

In Media 12.5.2014

USGBC and BCSE Join Global Effort to Further Energy Efficiency

In Media 12.2.2014

USGBC Statistics