This
essay originally appeared in the November 1990 issue of The
Rothbard-Rockwell Report.
The
personal is the political" in today's common leftist chant. It
is also a formula for totalitarianism, for regimenting every aspect
of our daily life. Relations with friends and spouses, whether
or not you open a door for a female or use a deodorant, every
twist and turn of life is scrutinized to root out the "politically
incorrect."
The
only way to combat this nefarious slogan is root-and-branch, total
resistance, war to the knife. And that total opposition is libertarianism.
For the essence of the libertarian creed is the reverse slogan:
"No, dammit, the political is the personal." The personal is the
personal, while for the libertarian the political is systematically
demystified from its lofty and obscurantist collective perch.
"Sovereignty,"
"the State," et al. are broken down into their methodologically
individualist parts, and seen boldly and candidly as people being
permitted to act in a swinish and criminal manner. The State,
the political, is individuals acting badly and criminally in ways
which they could never get away with if the reality of their personal
activity were brought into view. The libertarian, to borrow a
phrase from Karl Hess's single contribution to libertarianism,
his article in Playboy during the 1960s, seeks "the death
of politics," its liquidation into the personal, into society
and the market economy.
Of
all areas of life, sports should be the arena least touched by
politics. For the glory of being a sports fan is precisely that
we are engaging in fun and play, that we are permitted the freedom
to be "irrational"; that is, to be Yankee or Mets fans, to love
our team and to hate the enemy, without having to ground these
passions in a systematic, moral or metaphysical theory. So it
is particularly obnoxious when the gaggle of left Puritans invades
and takes over the field of sports. Which they have done, of course,
with a vengeance.
The
Hate Thought squad has run rampant in sports for years. Veteran
and respected sports figures, such as Al Campanis and Jimmy the
Greek, have seen their careers mercilessly destroyed because they
gave one politically improper answer to an interviewer's question.
No one dares even explore whether or not their answers were correct;
their very expression is a hate-thought-crime; unlike other, seemingly
graver, crimes, from their punishment there is no reprieve.
I
like to think that sports writers are above politics; that sports
and only sports fills their minds. But now, they too have succumbed,
and are, in fact, viciously leftish whenever politics is deemed
to be relevant to sports. The writers for The National,
the cream of the sports writing profession, invariably lead the
vanguard of the Hate Thought Police. The latest flap, of course,
is the Locker Room Controversy. Male pro football players of the
New England Patriots, getting edgy and distracted when a female
reporter invaded their locker room after a game, surrounded her
and made suggestive remarks. Ohh, wow! What a fuss! What a twitter:
The female reporter, asserting her rights as a "professional"
among hundreds of other female sports journalists, insisted that
she was "mind raped." What in blazes is "mind rape?" A new crime
invented for the occasion, a crime apparently only slightly less
odious than rape-rape. When Victor Kiam, owner of the Patriots,
defended his players, organized feminism threatened all sorts
of sanctions, including a boycott of Kiam's Lady Remington razors.
Finally,
to top it off, when Sam Wyche, coach of the Cincinnati Bengals,
insists on barring female reporters from locker rooms in which
male players are naked, the gods of wrath will descend upon him.
The National, the rest of the sports media, and organized
feminism, lament the evil reactionary nature of Wyche as well
as Kiam. "We thought this had all been settled female reporters'
locker room rights had been decided years ago!" There is nothing
that infuriates leftists more than a slipping back, a slackening
of the Tide of Progress. Wyche was duly fined the whopping sum
of $30,000 for disobeying NFL rules, to the general chorus of:
"not strong enough for that heinous offense."
It
turns out, too, that the august U.S. courts had indeed decided
the issue. The egregious federal Judge Constance Baker Motley
had decreed that women have a constitutional right to enter male
locker rooms! Talk about your judicial activism!
But
I thought that the ERA was stopped because of such threats as
compulsory integration of men's and ladies' rooms! Well, to be
fair, Judge Motley did not exactly decree that females have a
constitutional right to enter male locker rooms at will. It's
just that female reporters, being duly certified professionals,
and not simply sluttish thrill-seekers, have the "constitutional
right" to equal access with male reporters to locker rooms. Oh.
It still seems to me like sneaking the ERA in through the back
door. But how about male reporters? Are they entitled to equal
access to female locker rooms? Hey, what's the matter with you,
you evil sexist exploiter of women!
But
why can't Sam Wyche bar all reporters from the locker room, and
make reporters wait until after the players are dressed? Well,
it's true that the action would probably be constitutional, but
it would violate NFL rules, which compel football teams to admit
the press to locker rooms immediately after the game. Those rules,
in turn, were imposed at the behest of the press, along with organized
feminism. Reporters, you see, are professionals, and professionals
have to meet deadlines, and besides they want to interview the
players right after the game, before they have a chance to catch
their breath and collect their thoughts. Catch them off guard,
in short. What? You say players have some sort of right of privacy?
What are you? Some sort of rotten reactionary judicial-activist?
Poor
honest Sam Wyche has a Plan B which he is prepared to fall back
on: To admit all reporters, male and female, to the locker room
right after the game, but to keep the players fully clothed and
out of the showers until the press is kicked out. No, it won't
work, Sam. The football players would not be vulnerable enough
then. Besides, all reporters, male and female, have the God-given,
constitutional right to see football players naked: male players,
that is. Have we got the Constitution all straight by now?