a) It is in the sense of the uniformity and equality of human beings in
relation to God. He is the Master of all people. Human nature is so even that it rescinds
any particularity in his relation with God. No one has any kinship with Him. Hence, all
are same and at parity before God. Also God is not a particular one of a particular nation
or a group or a tribe; and, therefore, the absence of superior avoids the notion of
inferior in the creation while leaves open the scope for elevation of the human values
which is attainable only through righteousness, a platform whereon to perform good deeds
in line with Divine's desire which is the only safe route or promising method for man to
ascend to heights of perfection and prosperity. To quote from the Qur'an:
"And they said, 'God has taken to Him a son'. Glory be to Him!
Nay, to Him belongs all that is in the heavens and the earth; all obey His will. (al-Baqarah,
2:117)
"And whosoever does deeds of righteousness, being a believer, no
unthankfulness shall befall his endeavor; We ourselves write it down for him. "
(al-Ambiya', 21:94)
"0 Mankind! We have created you male and female, and appointed you
races and tribes, that you may know one another. Surely the noblest among you in the sight
of God is the most God-fearing of you. (al-«Hujarat, 49:13)
b) It is also in the sense that man is equal in creation and is
originated from a single source, this equality also runs in the very vitality of human
beings. Those who belong to the various classes in a society are not created by different
gods. Humanity is a single element that has been equally given to all individuals. So
there is no difference in the pulp or in the creation provided to them. As such, there is
no boundary between them that cannot be crossed. In other words, the Creator of the higher
classes of society is not a God superior than that of the poor ones. All are created by
one God and in creation all are at the same level and equally benefited from the element
of humanity. To quote from the Quran:
"0 mankind! Fear your Lord, Who created you of a single
soul. " (an- Nisa', 4:1
c) The equality among the human beings carries the same bearing upon
the possibility of elevation and perfection of individuals too. The obvious reason is that
the human gist is the same in all men while taking its root from one wisdom. This being
so, no one is impuissant in his nature not to be able to pace the path of perfection.
Accordingly, the Divine call is common to all irrespective of nations or classes. To quote
from the Qur'an:
We have sent thee not [to a special group] except to mankind, entire.
" (Saba', 34:29)
"And We have sent thee for the people a messenger. (an-Nisa', 4:79)
"0 men, a clear guide has now come to you from your Lord; We have
sent down to you a manifest light. As for those who believe in God, and hold fast to Him,
He will surely admit them to mercy from Him, and bounty, and will guide them to Him on a
straight path. " (an-Nisa', 4:174,175)
d) It can also be translated to the release of all human beings from
servitude and yielding to anyone but God. This is another interpretation of the essence of
complete yielding to God and worshipping Him. Some people, in some way or other, have
yielded to the obscene yoke of submission to other than God', such as mental, cultural,
economical, and political slavery. Considering the wide stretching sense of worship, we
can well say that they are immured in service to others - like themselves - and, thus,
have taken a rival or an associate to God. Here, Tawhid totally rejects such a way of life
and stands firm and adamant to maintain the man a servant to God alone and emancipates him
from that domination, under whatever pretext it be. Therefore, Tawhid is tantamount to
denial 'of any power concealed under whatever colour or cloak, and an absolute submission
to the absolute authority of God alone. To quote from the Qur'an:
"Authority belongs only to God; He has commanded that you shall
not serve and worship any but Him. That is the right religion".(Yusuf, 12:40)
Thy Lord has decreed you shall not serve and worship any but Him.
" (al-Isra', 17:23)
e) As such Tawhid is to dignify man, the worth of man is so lofty that
to become servile and resigned to others (but to God), and get dominated is in immediate
contrast. an obvious opposition and a crisp contradiction with that worth.
There is no one to countenance this worth so as to be servile to him
except God. He is the only Being, the only perfect Pulchritude in absoluteness that
deserves a man to sit in an enchantment of praise and prayer to Him. The kingdom of God in
the vast human fife is invaded without a right and inroads are made upon the intellect of
man by those idols - the living ones or the made-up ones who are, in fact, a product of
evil while themselves wicked enough to throw the man from the zenith of humanity into the
abyss of vileness discarding the human value and invalidating its worth. It is upon man to
shun from the shame of worshipping servitude to them.
Materialistic humanism has never been able to establish the originality
of man in its due excellence with a delicacy that dashes into the depth and a lofty sense
splashes therefrom, such as:
"And eschew the abomination of idols, and eschew the speaking of
falsehood, being men pure of faith unto God, not associating with Him anything; for
whosoever associates with God anything, it is as though he has fallen from heaven and the
birds snatch him away, or the wit7d sweeps him headlong into a place far away. "
(al-Hajj. 22:30, 31)
"Set not up with God another god, or thou wilt sit condemned and
forsaken. (al- Isra', 17:22)
"Set not up with God another god, or thou wilt sit cast into hell,
reproached and rejected." (al-Isra', 17:39).
f) In this category another meaning of Tawhid is that, a human life is
a compound of mind and reality, thought and action. If one of these two, or partially
both, got dominated by the anti-Divine powers; in other words, if the intellect lenient to
God with an undivine reality, or a Divine desired reality with an intellect ignorant of
God becomes espoused, then in the kingdom of human life duality has occurred and thus an
associate is created in the servitude directed to God. In this case, the example of man
will be like that of a needle, being in a magnetic field, besides the earth's one, if not
deviated totally from the pole direction he would be oscillating. Deviation shall dictate
departure from a straight path of God and shall doom him to a destiny that is not his. To
quoted from the Qur'an:
"What do you believe in part of the Book, and disbelieve in other
part? What shall be the recompense of those of you who do that, but degradation in the
present life, and on the Day of Resurrection to be returned unto the most terrible
chastisement? " (al Baqarah, 2:85)
g) And finally, Tawhid, from this point of view translates the human
coordination coherent with the universal milieu. The stintless vastness of the expanse of
the universe is a ground wherein innumerous laws of creation are in action and reaction
and so constant that any product of the universe, however small and little or trivial and
trifle, cannot escape from the dart of the rays of this law. The law of creation is set on
a keyboard of traditions and the strokes thereon is such a mercy as to bring out into
audience a tune titivated with tucket in full tilt of the gamut of existence and thereby
comes into being the pleasing and the portentous display of the universe that embarces the
man too in its parcel so packed therein as to obey a general law while enjoying a law
particular to himself; and, thus, remain congruous to the consequences as a whole. Indeed,
the salient characteristic in a man (in contradiction to his other fellow creatures who
pace towards their natural destiny with no choice) is his being open to option and his
power to practice his choice - a criterion for his ascendancy to excellence and as well as
a ground to go astray. To quote from the Qur'an:
So let whosoever will believe, and let whosoever will disbelieve.
" (al-Kahf, 1 8:29)
Tawhid solicits the man to pace the way natural to him and congenial
with- the universe. Man as he is the main part of this whole gets attached by his trudge
in his pace and here consequents an absolute parity and a total oneness. To quote from the
Qur'an:
What, do they desire another religion than God's, and to Him has
surrendered whoso is in the heavens and the earth, willingly or unwillingly, and to Him
they shall be returned. " (Ali-Imran 3:83)
"Hast thou not seen how to God bow all who are in the heavens and
all who are in the earth; the sun and the moon, the stars and the mountains, the trees and
the beasts, and many of mankind?" (al-Hajj, 22:18)
a) In the affairs, those of universal and those of human, the
competency is to none besides God. Planning, whatsoever, and an independent direction is
only to the competency of the Creator Who is All-knowing and All-aware of the needs and
the possibilities. The hidden treasures of talents in a human body as well as those
innumerous ones in the vast of the universe together with the relative potentialities in
addition to the places of their display, and, furthermore, the conjugation in between
them; all are in His sight and never apart from His wisdom. Therefore, it is He alone, the
competent one, to fashion the life and plan a schedule of relations for man which is again
at parity with the line of his pace in the system of the galaxy; and accordingly a system
to be sketched for a society, it rests finally on His competency.
This right (as described above) is particularly His and to Him alone,
because of the natural and logical consequence of His being God - the Almighty, the
Creator, the Master. Therefore, any sort of interference from any in determination of a
line to be practiced by a man or a destiny to be headed to, is an encroachment into the
kingdom of Divinity and an inroad into the intrinsic exalted excellence of Divine. Thus,
it is polytheism. To quote from the Quran:
"But no, by thy Lord! They will not believe till they make thee
the judge regarding the disagreement between them, then they shall find in themselves no
impediment touching thy verdict, but shall surrender in full submission. " (an-Nisa, 4:65)
"It is not for any believer, man or woman, when God and His
Messenger have decreed a matter, to have the choice in the affair. Whosoever disobeys God
and His Messenger has gone astray into manifest error. (al-Ahzab 33:36)
b) The right of guardianship and supervision of a society and the
leadership of a human life is rejected but to God. Government or a guardianship of a man
over a man would necessarily carry tyranny as a concomitant; If considered as an
independent right bare of any responsibility unless the leadership and supervision over
the social affairs should be given by a higher power to an individual or vested into a
ruling committee coasted with congenial responsibilities; then alone the recalcitrations,
obstructions obumbrated by intransigence could only be leveled and slaked. According to
the ideology of the religion such a might is Allah, whose knowledge has no bourne. To
quote from the Qur'an:
"Not so much as the weight of (even) an atom in heaven and earth
escapes from Him, (Saba 34:3)
His dudgeon among His qualities (Mighty Punisher, Strong Revenger)
leaves no room for any deviation for His chosen and appointed ones. To quote from the
Quran.
"Had he invented against Us any sayings, We would have
seized him by the right hand, then We would surely have cut his life-vein. (al-Haqqah,
69:44-46)
The government of God is not like one appointed by a nation nor a
majority that could be fooled and run, nor a party that could be abused as a means for
oppressing and pushing the peoples voice down. It is not like the one appointed by
the aristocrats and wealth holders of the society that could be bribed or accepted as
shareholders of their enterprises. To ponder further deep: if human life is indentured to
terminate at a point alongwith all its accessary organizations and the thread of the
things to be held by a most puissant hand - as it is, of course - then such a hand could
never be but that of the Creator's. As such, it is a right especial to God Himself to
govern the man which He does through those whom He appoints, those are best in line
according to the standards established in Divine ideology. So, it is they who carry out
the Divine decrees as they guard. To quote from the Qur'an:
"Say: 'Shall 1 take a guardian and a ruler other than God, the
Originator of the heavens and of the earth, He who feeds and is not fed?' Say: ' I have
been commanded to be the first of them that surrender to the command of God." And you
should not be among those of the idolators. (al-Anam, 6:14)
Your guardian (authority) is only God, and His Messenger and those who
believed, who perform the prayer and pay the alms while they bow down (in their
prayer)." (al-Maidah, 5:55)
"Say: I take refuge with the Lord of men, the ruler of men,
the God of men. ' " (an-Nas, 114:2-4)
c) Absolute possession and provenance of all the bounties and the
stocks existing in the world goes to the belonging of God. Nothing is in an independent
belonging of any in this world although everything in the use of man is a deposit from
Divine so as to be beneficial towards the perfection and elevation of man. This is not in
the sense that a man is at his own convenience to spoil - if he wished - the bounties of
this world which, as a matter of fact, are the result of the toil of innumerous hands. Man
is also not at liberty to enjoy the utilization of these bounties in the errands other
than those of his own elevation.
Whatever is available for man, although for him, is given by God,
therefore, should be utilized for what God (the Donor) has specified and willed, and in
fact, should be used in its main and natural way. It should be benefited from in the same
manner that it is created for. Consuming it in any other way is a deviation from its real
use consequenting in evil.
The role of man in this display of different and colourful bounties of
God, is to utilize them in the right way; of course with first and foremost aim at their
own perfection. To quote from the Qur'an:
"Say: 'Whose is the earth, and whoso is in it; if you have
knowledge?' They will say: 'Gods. Say: 'Will you not then remember? (al-Muminun,
84, 85)
"It is He Who created for you mankind all that is in the
earth. " (al-Baqarah, 2:29)
"Serve God! You have no god other than He. It is He Who produced
you from the earth and has given you to live therein. " (Hud, 11:61)
"And those who break the covenant if God after His compact, and
who snap what God has commanded to be joined, and who work corruption in the earth, theirs
shall be the curse. . . " (ar-Ra'd, 13:25)
d) The right in relation with the bounties of the world is at parity
among men. The opportunities and the possibilities are equally open to all. Every man is
quite free to have his share in congruity with the endeavour that he exerts. In this
stintless expanse there is no precinct prescribed particularly to a person as there are no
divisions such as those of creed, geographical, historical, and even ideological. All are
in an open to toil and take their share. To quoted from the Qur'an:
"It is He Who created for you all [and not for a particular
section of you] in the earth, (al-Baqarah, 2:29)
"And the cattle, He created them for you; in them is warmth, and
uses of various, and of them you eat. And there is beauty in them for you, when you bring
them home to rest and when you drive them forth abroad to pasture. And they carry your
heavy loads... (an-Nahl, 16:5-7)
"it is He Who sends down to you out of heaven water. (an-Nahl,
16:10)
"Thereby He brings forth for you crops.... (an-Nahl, 16:11)
"And what He has created in the earth.... (an-Nahl, 16:13)
"God is He Who made for you the cattle that you may ride on
some of them, and of them you may eat. " (Ghafir, 40:79)
In these verses of the beginning of the chapter, an-Nahl, (The
Bees), the address is to men and not to any particular group. The same can be seen in
other phrase among the same verses:
"If He willed He guides you all. . . " (an-Nahl, 16:9)
" Your God is one God. . . (an-Nahl, 1 6:22)
So far our discourse covers only a little of this uberous dimensions of
the rich and deep concept of Tawhid. This little yet sufficiently ratiocinates that Tawhid
is not a mere philosophical or noetic impracticable theory, that in no way does it care
about the man's way of life, and nor interferes in determination of man's destiny as to
what and how he acts to reach it. It is not just to substitute peoples belief. But
it is a way for comprehension of the universe. It gives a particular understanding of the
universe and the man, of the position of man in cognition to other beings in the world, of
the man's position in history, of his capabilities and needs which are always in him and
with him, and finally of the direction and the high perch of his perfection.
On the other hand, it is a social doctrine. It is a design and sketch
of the environment ideonous to man wherein he can easily progress towards perfection. It
is a mould meant for the society, fixes a basical line and forwards a constructive
principle. Whenever a society sinks into ignorance and tyranny and loses the character
that is the distinction of man, the principle is there to check. It is a relief to ailing
hearts, a frill to a fallen and a typhoon in a stagnant, marsh of the society so that it
could rebuild itself; and it is such a change as to dislodge the foundations and wrench
the stones from stones of the social and economical wrong setups, rescinds the value while
reveals the true worth. In short, it is a protest in every constancy against the existing
conditions contrived by tyranny. Tawhid is not a new answer nor with infinitude of
practice. It is a way ever new and always green for a man. Although it leans to a
theoretical and mental analysis, its main goal is to provide another method for man's
active life.
Therefore, we believe that Tawhid is the radex of religion and a
cornerstone whereon rests the pillars of its mansion. It holds a mammoth ideology, the
backbone of Islam, as a social conduct. It is not just a delicate body to house a thesis
of a moral or a judgment of a metaphysics.
There have always been those who in spite of their belief in God and
Tawhid, have neglected the obvious, practical and specially social aspects of this belief,
either deliberately or otherwise. These easy believers - regardless of circumstances -
have always dwelt a life like that of non-believers; and their belief has ever been at
failure to suscitate any feeling in them that could forbid from inhaling the putridity of
the polytheism.
During the dawn of Islam in Mecca, the capital of the renown idols of
Arabs, there were also the supporters of lbrahim's (Abraham's) upright religion. But
Tawhid was so confined in their minds that its utmost influence was only limited to their
individual conduct. Neither their presence curbed nor their absence gave reins to the
conjectures of their society; such weightless was their existence and so it continued
without ebb and flow. Furthermore, they, the so-called believers, let themselves adrift in
the same current of life wherein the non-believers were at float and were carried away by
the lashes of the waves of the prevailing nefarious traditions. As such, in social sphere
their role was nothing; upon society itself their existence was of no effect; and in the
circumstance their presence was of no influence at all. So, what else could mirror best'
the characteristic of Tawhid, the interpretation of which does not surpass the mind.
It was in such conditions that Islam introduced Tawhid - of course, as
a thought, and the thought as strong as to promise, and the promise as fertile as to
produce a frame that fringes the life and, as for society, give a new vogue and combs its
disturbed hairs into a curled and crisp order.
So, with such a thought and such a promise it set foot on the ground of
practice. Its very first pace revealed an invitation and the invitation disclosed a
revolution which so distant and common that stunned its audience alike those who
entertained, those who spurned - but all concurred in one thing that it was a Message with
a new social, economical, political regulation and with a strange stubbornness to agree
with the existing conditions. It denies a situation and determines another one!
Believers accepted the Message because of its clarity and openness. For
this very reason, its opponents attacked it wildly and anxiously adding their pressure day
by day.
This fact in history is the gage to determine the veracity of those who
claim Tawhid; they are no better than their peers prior to Islam - no matter in what
distance of events or at what spot of the place be they, their belief is no more than a
bedlam. It cannot be but a fiction or a fake of the real Tawhid focused by the apostles,
if it were to see eye to eye with the rivals of God. There never existed Tawhid in such a
sense.
From this vista we can see the expansion of Islam in its earlier stages
and judge the reactionary backwardness in later stages. The Prophet of Islam brought
Tawhid to be the way for the people. Later, it became a matter to be debated. It was a new
reckoning for the world. But it was turned into a topic to beguile the time. It was the
skeleton of the structure of society, and the axel in the centre of all social, economical
and political affairs; but later turned into a means of justifying the existing social
structure, and still remains as an axel but only in some artistic and beautiful painting
of social relations, and nothing in effective existence. How can we expect an active and
constructive role from a just ceremonial idea?
From the preceding discourse it comes to light that Tawhid from a
practical point of view is a mould for society while a method for life, and, as a whole,
an Islamic system for the human life cogent towards the progress - and this forward march
is only possible in the wealth of its shade. Also from a theoretical point of view, it is
an idea which is considered to be the base and philosophical foundation of that system,
and a justification and reasoning for it. With this ground in the fore and in the hind, we
can revert back to the starting point of the essay and analyse the subject from a
particular angle, that this article is viewing at.
We said the prime adversary to the slogan of Tawhid was the wealthy and
the powerful class of the society. This evinces that the first and foremost blow of Tawhid
is directed against the powerful and dominating forces of society - in the Qur'anic term,
the arrogant (mustakbir) class. Also we said that the Divine calls of Tawhid made
clear their stand in relation to the oppressor and dominating forces as soon as they
became audible in society. Therefore, the Divine calls had to face two confrontations, one
opposing the other, from two antipodal wings of society: recalcitration from the
oppressors (mustakbirin) and acceptance from the oppressed (mustad'afin).
At last, we said that such a two sided reaction is, in fact, the
characteristic of Tawhid. It is an irrefragable fact that whenever Tawhid had been or is
proclaimed in its true sense, the reaction had been or will be the same.
Now, let us see which dimension among its several ones hidden in the
concept of Tawhid, is in direct contrast with the interests of the oppressors ?
In other words, the class of oppressors do see a point in Tawhid; what
is that point they are so much perturbed, and therefore, fight with such a determination ?
To recognize the oppressor in the Quran, shall be a great help
toward comprehending this subject: Mustakbir in the Qur'an.
The Qur'an describes, on more than forty occasions, particulars of an
oppressor from different angles such as: psychological, social Position, indulgence in
power, post, and pelf. Studying the Qur'anic view of an oppressor we find him to have such
characteristics as:
a) Although he (the oppressor) accepts God as a mental or ceremonial
reality, or anything with a limited province, he rejects God as is described by the
concept of the slogan, "There is no god but Allah." (The concept of his absolute
and exclusive authority and ownership.) To quote from the Qur'an:
"For when it was said to them, 'There is no god but Allah' they
were ever waxing proud. " (as-Siffat, 37:35)
b) An oppressor considers himself above others and without having a
rightful distinction. He declares such reasons as power and wealth to prove his claim:
"They waxed proud in the earth without right (to justify their
position), and they said, 'Who is stronger than we in might ? " (Fussilat, 41:l5)
c) Insisting in his false claim, he rejects the God's words which
declare a new order and specify true measures:
"And when Our signs are recited to such a man he turns away,
waxing proud, as though he heard them not, and in his ears were heaviness, so give him
good tidings of a painful chastisement. " (Luqman, 31:7)
d) He brings forward excuse that, "Had it been correct we might
have conceived it earlier, or that God should have addressed us directly." This he
does while believing the Call of the Prophet:
"And the non-believers say as regards to the believers, 'If it had
been t7ught good, they had not outstripped us to it. " (al-Ahqaf, 46:11)
"And when a sign came to them, they said, 'We will not believe
until we are given the like of what God's Messengers were given. " (al-An'dm, 6:124) e)
The oppressor introduces the leader of the Call of Tawhid as one who indagates profit and
a superiority and thus, leaning to old and reactionary traditions, tries to discredit him
among the people:
"They said (to Moses), Art thou come to us to turn us from
that we found our fathers practising, and that the domination in the land might belong to
you two? We do not believe you two.' " (Yunus, 10:78)
f) Using force and tricks, and different methods o imposing and fooling
an oppressor, pushing people in his path, which destinates to slavery, and unconditional
servitude to him. Therefore, he forces them to resist and confront to any emancipating
call.
"They [their followers on the Day of Resurrection], shall say,
'Our Lord, we obeyed our chiefs and great ones, and they led us astray from the way. (al-Ahzab,
33:67)
And the weak ones argue with the oppressors[on the Day of
Resurrectionl, 'Why, we were your followers; will you avail us now against any part of the
Fire? (Ghafir, 40:47)
"Said the council of the aids of Pharaoh, 'Surely this man (Moses)
is a cunning sorcerer who desires to expel you from your land; what do you command?
(al-A'raf, 7:109,110)
g) Finally, the oppressor comes into open and confronts the Prophet and
his followers, who have uprised against the dominating order and are dedicated to a
change, in a deliberate atrocious animosity and thought:
"Slain were the Men of the Pit, the fire abounding in fuel, when
they were seated over it, and themselves were witnesses of what (tortures) they did with
the believers. ". (al-Buruj, 85:4 - 7)
"And Pharaoh said (to his advisors),- 'Let me slay Moses,
and let him call to his Lord (as he can). i fear that he may change your religion [which
dominates the mind of the people], or that he may cause corruption (rebellion) to appear
in the land. (Ghafir, 40:26)
This was a small part of particularities and characteristics of the
arrogant (oppressor) in some verses of the Quran.
The Quran goes still beyond and classifies the arrogants
(oppressors) in categories symbolizing each:
"Then We sent forth, after them, Moses and Aaron (Harun) to
Pharaoh and his council with Our signs, but they waxed proud. " (Yunus, 10:75)
"And Korah (Qarun), and Pharaoh, and Haman (Haman); and Moses came
to them with the clear signs, but they waxed proud in the earth. " (al- Ankabut, 29:39)
Pharaoh, all know him. Haman was his special advisor and a prime
personality in the politics o ' f Egypt after Pharaoh. The council of aids of Pharaoh are
the chiefs in Pharaoh's regime who guide the affairs.
Korah was a rich boarder of wealth and the keys of his wealth stores
were in such a bulk that it was a matter of bodily strength to hold or carry them.
In the light of these and several other such verses of the Qur'an the
oppressor is he whose identity is: dominator of society, wields the political and
economical power without reservation, to prolong his tyrannical power and the advantages
therefrom; he even captivates the minds by imposing his ideology so as to keep riveted to
the process that perishes them while provides possibility of persistence in oppression.
Therefore, there is every reason for an oppressor to fight against every call that
enlightens the minds of people and instigates to any revolutionary and changing call; else
he has to give up what he has gained and lose what he loves.
Let us return to our original theme: How the prophets used to introduce
Tawhid? Considering the method they used to bring forth this slogan, while revealing the
most constitutional basics of their ideology, easily reveals what is the unbearable part
in Tawhid for the oppressor. And secondly the reason of being so, and why this wing cannot
bear Tawhid when it is so introduced?
We know that the slogan of Tawhid, had been the first rays of the call
of all prophets.The sentence, "Say, there is no god but Allah, to prosper" is a
well-known declaration of the Prophet of Islam. Also the sentence, "0 people,
worship Allah, there is no god to you beside Him ", is repeated on several
occasions in the Qur'an as the title of the call of the great prophets such as Nuh (Noah),
Hud, Salih, Shu'ayb, etc.
And we see, these slogans are focused to "denial of servitude but
to God", and have introduced Tawhid from this point of view more than any. The
prophets have admonished the people who were in the slumber of ignorance and sunk in a
tyrant society to not worship to any pole of power except God. The call, started, indeed
as a challenge to those who used to claim being deities and masters of the people.
Who does claim as such in a society ? What does it mean to fight them ?
And what scene does this suggest to be the characteristic of a society promised by the
prophets?
To hold a belief of being a deity is repudiated. The tyrants who wield
power, political and social, used to convey to the people that since they were deities
they hold in themselves a part of the spirit of God. On the other hand, the vastness of
the concepts of 'worship'. 'lordship', and 'divinity' in the Qur'an leads us to a
conclusion that the claimers of being deities have even a wider scope in their pose and
purpose.
The term 'worship' ('ibadah) in the Qur'an means to surrender or
yield or obey to a man or any other being unconditionally. When we have resigned ourselves
without any 'why' it is tantamount to say that we have worshipped him.
Accordingly, when an element of a power, whether inside us or from
outside, has made us obedient and dependant and a tool to be used, we have become its
'worshippers and servants'; as it is evident from these Quranic verses, in the
beginning of the call when Moses rebuked and censured Pharaoh:
"That is a Messing thou reproachest me with, having enslaved the
Children of Israel. " (ash-Shuara', 26:22)
The conversation between Pharaoh and the chiefs of his regime:
"Should we believe two human like us while their people are
worshippers to us. " (al-Muminun, 23:47) Prophet lbrahim (Abraham)
addresses his father as:
"Father, serve not Satan; surely Satan is a rebel against
the All-merciful" (Maryam,19:44)
In a general address of God directed to all human beings:
"Made / not covenant with you, children of Adam, that you should
not serve Satan; surely he is a manfest foe to you. (Yasin, 36:60)
Promise of God to all human beings who have a reckoning:
"Those who eschew the serving of idols (taghut) and turn penitent
to God, for them is good tidings! So give thou good tidings to My servants. (az-Zumar,
39:17)
Who criticize the faithfuls and the belief in God and in His
revelations; God says to them:
Whomsoever God has cursed, and with whom is on wrath, and made some of
them apes and swines, and he who worshipped 'taghut, they are worse situated, and have
gone further astray from the right way." (al-Mäidah,5:60)
From these foregoing verses it comes to light that the obedience to
Pharaoh and the members of his regime, and to a tyrant or to a satan is interpreted as 'worship'.
As such, in the sense of the Qur'anic term it means to follow, to resign, and to obey a
power (other than God) in absoluteness; whether be it on a desire or under a pressure, and
be it with or without a praise and sanctity. Anyway, one side turns to a worshipper while
the other the worshipped. This concludes that the term 'divinity' and 'divine' (Allah)
which is another interpretation of 'being worshipped', and 'the worshipped one' correctly
translates to:
In an errenously organized society wherein the people are divided into
two classes, one that of oppressor and the other that of the oppressed. In other words, a
dominator and a beneficiary class while the other a deprived one. This in itself is a
paragon of a worshipper and the worshipped. Such an inconsistency between the two wings of
a society is an indicator that points to the deities whom worship is directed to. To know
the worshipped ones and divines in historical societies, one should not look for a sacred
being either of a man, animal or a thing. The cardinal ones in these societies are those
who with their dependence upon the oppressors have yoked the multitudes of the oppressed
ones.
In such societies, polytheism is the religion. Because there are idols,
worshipped ones, and divines as many as there are poles of power that rule the people, and
push them in their own desired path as if they'(the people) have neither eyes nor ears and
exactly know not where they stand and what they do. Polytheism means accepting the
divinity of others and obeying and worshipping them instead of God or leveling them with
God. It means giving the control of life to others but God. It means surrendering to every
pole of power other than God, seeking needs from them, and paving the path that they
define.
Tawhid is an antipode to such a polytheism. It denies all the deities
and obedience to them. It calls for a campaign against their domination. It asks for
discarding their help. And finally Tawhid is to be dedicated in reminding them as it hails
upon hearts to pursue their provider, God. The prime slogan of all the messengers of God
was that no' to others, and this 'yes' to God. To quote from the Qur'an:
"Indeed, We sent forth among every nation a messenger, say'
: 'Serve your God, and eschew taghuts [idols, anti-God forces]. "
(an-Nahl,16:36)
'And We sent never a messenger before thee except that We revealed to
him, saying, 'There is no god but /;so serve Me. (al-Ambiya', 21 :25)
Therefore, the messengers of God, by this slogan, have denied the
corrupted and perverted system of society, and invited people to get in to a vast struggle
against taghuts (oppressors) namely the guardians of the system, who had rebelled
against the noble human values, those who had imposed some false values upon the people in
order to keep their oppressing position. Denial of polytheism, in fact is the denial of
all social, economical, and political foundations whereon the construction of that society
rests and wherein the polytheism is housed as a rightful tenant and wherefrom keeps
vegilence on the unstable situation. When the deities as such are denied and rejected, so,
also all those who are dedicated to oppress the people and keep them down by imposing and
fooling them, take a full advantage of all their capabilities to saturate their unlimited
desires, are denied too.
Moses, by declaring the same slogan, and in direct talk with the Lord
of the worlds had openly fought Pharaoh, and denied him. It is true that the aids of
Pharaoh brought up many guilts upon Moses, such as his denial of idols. But they
and Pharaoh himself were aware of those lifeless idols that were just a cover and a
justification for their own divinity.
"Then said the council of the regime of Pharaoh [to Pharaoh],
'Wilt thou leave Moses and his people to work corruption in the land, and leave thee and
thy gods?"' (al-A'räf,7:127)
The lifeless idols are just an excuse for imposing the divinity of
live-idols. Therefore, it was quite logical that as a response to Moses' invitation
towards God, the Creator of heavens and earth, the Lord of all, the Possessor of the east
and the west; they treat him and his supporters to torture and death. To quote from the
Qur'an:
"Said he (Pharaoh), 'if thou takest a god other than me, 1 shall
surely make thee one of the imprisoned, (ash-Shu'ara', 26:29)
"Said he, 'We shall slaughter their sons and spare
their women; surely we are triumphant over them. (al-A'raf, 7:1 27)
Pharaoh said to his magicians who had believed in Moses against his
wishes:
I shall assuredly cut off alternately your hands and feet, then 1 shall
crucify you all together. " (al-A'raf, 7:123)
Such atrocities against the name of Allah, and the Messenger of Tawhid
stand only because this emancipating message, means:
Acceptance of God to dominate the life.
Denial of all others who claim such with strife.
Proud declaration of servitude to Him alone.
Dependency to be cut upon all but upon Him sown.
This is the essence of Tawhid, and its most flashing dimension.
THE END
Title - Essence of Tawhid: Denial of Servitude but to God
Author: Hujjatulisiam Sayyid Ali Khamenei
Translator: Hassan Najafi
Publisher: Foundation of Islamic Thought
Circulation: 3,000, First Edition
Printer: Allama Tabatabai
Publishing Date: Shahrivar 1365 (September 1986)