web.archive.org
31 Mar 2017 - 02 Mar 2021
FEBMARNOV
31
201620172020
Blog
All Blogs
Teaching the US Faculty Survey
April 13, 2016
Rachel Fleming-May
The new faculty survey report has arrived! As an LIS faculty member teaching in the areas of Academic Libraries and Sources and Services in the Humanities and Social Sciences, I couldn’t be more excited.
Over the past several iterations, I have found the survey reports invaluable in my work as both an educator of future practitioners and a researcher exploring the role of libraries in the 21st Century Academy. The common thread through much of my teaching and research concerns “things I wish I’d known” when I was an academic librarian; chief among them, how and why faculty behave and work as they do. The reports are a remarkable window on how faculty interact with information, libraries, librarians, and their students in these contexts. They provide fodder for my current teaching and guidance as I develop and revise my course content for future semesters.
I use findings from the reports in at least three of the five courses I teach regularly (I’ve even created my own graphics!) in lectures and to jump-start discussions and activities. I am currently teaching UTK’s Academic Libraries course and will add data from the 2015 report to my upcoming lectures on liaison activities, including strategies for working with faculty and students. This summer and fall I will teach the Sources and Services in the Social Sciences and Sources and Services in the Humanities courses, respectively, and will incorporate report findings into my general overview of disciplinary culture, scholarly communication, and information seeking.
Below, I’ve outlined a few of the questions I’ve used in the past as well as some new ones that have come to mind while reviewing the 2015 report. I hope they might provide a jumping-off point for others’ instructional efforts, or perhaps just serve as a resource for a closer reading of the report.
Academic Culture:
One of the major hallmarks of a culture is its modes of communication. Can you identify any trends or changes in scholarly communication norms and practices as described in the Reports from 2003-15?
Disciplinary Differences:
How do expectations for scholarly output differ among the broad disciplinary divisions as established in the survey?
Support for Teaching and Learning:
  1. What do the findings suggest regarding faculty understanding of undergraduate students’ research skills?
  2. How might you use these findings to inform an outreach strategy for promoting library instructional services?
Ascendant Areas of Interest for Academic Libraries/Librarians:
What “hot spots” can you identify in the most recent reports in terms of new areas of interest or focus for academic librarians?
Research Design and Methods (respondents’ research):
How have norms or approaches to conducting research changed in each of the major disciplinary areas from 2003-15?
Research Design and Methods (the survey itself):
  1. How has the instrument changed over the years? What additions or changes do you think Ithaka S+R should consider for 2018?
  2. Outline the sampling and distribution model used for the survey as described in the “Methodology” section. What strategies might you employ to improve or alter response patterns?
  3. What questions would you like to see added to future iterations of the survey?
This list is certainly not exhaustive, and I’m sure that more will occur to me as I read the 2015 Report a second time. What suggestions do you have? Please share them in the comments!
Email Updates
Sign-up and we’ll send you updates about our news and publications.
SUBSCRIBE
Leave a Reply
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *
Comment
Name *
Email *
Website
Subscribe
TOPICS
Research practices
Student learning and outcomes
TAGS
Library education
US Faculty Survey
Rachel Fleming-May
Associate Professor, School of Information Sciences, The University of Tennessee
Rf-m@utk.edu
@rachelf_m

Libraries & Scholarly Communication
Research Report
Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2015
April 4, 2016
Christine Wolff, Alisa B. Rod, Roger C. Schonfeld
Ithaka S+R
FULL TEXT
PDF
Related Publication
Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Historians
Jennifer Rutner, Roger C. Schonfeld
December 7, 2012
Related Publication
Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Chemists
Matthew P. Long, Roger C. Schonfeld
February 25, 2013
Related Publication
Information Literacy and Research Practices
Nancy Fried Foster
November 13, 2014
Related Publication
Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Art Historians
Roger C. Schonfeld, Matthew P. Long
April 30, 2014
Related Publication
US Faculty Survey 2012
Roger C. Schonfeld, Ross Housewright
April 8, 2013
Related Blog Posts
The Role of a Society Journal in a Changing Environment
Roger C. Schonfeld
March 16, 2015
New Report: Supporting the Changing Research Practices of Art Historians
Matthew P. Long, Roger C. Schonfeld
April 29, 2014
The Ithaka S+R Local Survey at Swarthmore
Roger C. Schonfeld
March 24, 2014
Developing and Improving Scholarly Communication Services
Christine Wolff
September 1, 2016
The Ithaka S+R Local Faculty Survey at SUNY Potsdam
Roger C. Schonfeld
February 12, 2014
Publications
Services
People
Events
Blog
CommunityContactAboutCareers
Email Updates
Sign-up and we’ll send you updates about our news and publications.
SUBSCRIBE
Photo Credits | Privacy policy
©2004-2017 ITHAKA
Ithaka S+R is a not-for-profit service that helps the academic community navigate economic and technological change. We deliver strategic guidance, research, and publications through two program areas: Educational Transformation and Libraries & Scholarly Communication.
2 Rector Street, 18th Floor New York, NY 10006
212.500.2355 info@sr.ithaka.org
Ithaka S+R is part of ITHAKA.
Email UpdatesCommunityContactAboutIthaka S+R HomePublicationsServicesPeopleEventsBlogAboutContactCommunityEmail Updates