Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-94d59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T08:26:52.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

What Does “Explained Variance“ Explain?: Reply

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2017

Abstract

Two quite different statistical specifications lead to conventional regression computations. Under the first, usually called unconditional regression, the independent variables are assigned a distribution, and the sampling distributions of parameters are computed over it, not just over the variation in the disturbance. Then the multiple squared coefficient of correlation, R2, is a substantively meaningful quantity with a population value. In such cases, it is certainly meaningful to estimate R2 and to use the resulting estimate for the usual descriptive and inferential purposes.

The nature of most social scientific work, however, generates data poorly described by the first specification. The second specification, conditional regression, is usually more helpful, and for that reason, it overwhelmingly predominates in econometric textbooks. Under it, sampling distributions are conditioned on the observed values of the independent variables. Then, R2 is a purely descriptive quantity with little substantive content. It is not a parameter, and it will vary meaninglessly across samples even when the underlying statistical law is unchanged. By contrast, the standard error of estimate (SEE) lacks these difficulties, and is a far better statistic for assessing goodness of fit.

Lewis-Beck and Skalaban are persuasive where unconditional regression is concerned. But their argument encounters serious difficulties in the far more common situation in which conditional regression applies. Their blurring of the distinction between the two situations explains why their seemingly persuasive logic leads them astray.

Type
Controversy
Copyright
Copyright © by the University of Michigan 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Maddala, G. S. 1988. Introduction to Econometrics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Sampson, Allan R. 1974. “A Tale of Two Regressions.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 69 (347): 682–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spanos, Aris. 1986. Statistical Foundations of Econometric Modeling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar