SubscribeSign in
Drone Dilemma
The Risks of Washington’s Favorite Counterterrorism Tool Often Outweigh the Rewards
By
Anouk S. Rigterink

June 4, 2021
Sanaa, Yemen, November 2014
Khaled Abdullah / Reuters
The United States’ use of airstrikes carried out by drones, or unmanned aerial vehicles, to kill suspected terrorists abroad began during the George W. Bush administration but picked up speed during the Obama era. These strikes target high-value terrorist leaders as well as rank-and-file terrorists and terrorist infrastructure. Since 2004, the United States has reportedly launched over 14,000 such strikes in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Somalia, and Yemen alone.
On his first day in office, President Joe Biden ordered a review of this practice and announced that until the review is completed, all U.S. drone strikes outside active war zones must be authorized by the White House. The review will likely assess what conditions justify the authorization of a drone strike. How much certainty should the United States have that a drone strike will not cause civilian casualties? Are the military and the CIA obliged to report the number of casualties to the public? What level of threat must the target pose to justify a strike? But the review may not ask the most important question: Do drone strikes further the United States’ military and counterterrorism goals?
Evidence from the record of U.S. drone strikes in Pakistan indicates that such attacks—particularly
Finish reading this article for free.
Enter your email and we'll send a paywall-free link directly to your inbox.
In addition to your unlocked article, you will receive our flagship weekly newsletter Foreign Affairs This Week, as well as occasional updates and offers from Foreign Affairs. You can unsubscribe at any time. For more information, visit our user agreement and privacy policy.
Get unlimited access to all Foreign Affairs. Subscribe now.
Are you already a subscriber? Sign in.
ANOUK S. RIGTERINK is Assistant Professor in Quantitative Comparative Politics at the Durham University School of Government and International Affairs. This essay draws on her article “Wane of Command: Evidence on Drone Strikes and Control Within Terrorist Organizations,” which appeared in the February 2021 issue of American Political Science Review.
MORE BY ANOUK S. RIGTERINK
More:Security Arms Control & DisarmamentStrategy & Conflict U.S. Foreign Policy Biden Administration
Recommended Articles
Drones Are Destabilizing Global Politics
Simple Vehicles Make Conflict Tempting and Cheap
Jason Lyall
China Has Made Drone Warfare Global
The United States Must Join the Market or Be Left Behind
Michael C. Horowitz , Joshua A. Schwartz and Matthew Fuhrmann
GET THE MAGAZINE
Save up to 55%
on Foreign Affairs magazine!
Subscribe
FOREIGN AFFAIRS
Weekly Newsletter
Get in-depth analysis delivered right to your inbox
ABOUT
CONTACT
SUBSCRIPTION
FOLLOW
GRADUATE SCHOOL FORUM
From the
publishers of
Foreign Affairs
The Most:
RecentSharedViewed
Nnamdi Kanu’s Trial Turns Up Pressure on Nigerian Government
Spotlight on Japan Fall 2020
by Author:Sheila A. Smith
Maybe Tunisians Never Wanted Democracy
by Steven A. Cook
Published by the Council on Foreign Relations
Privacy Policy Terms of Use
©2021 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This site uses cookies to improve your user experience. Click here to learn more.
Subscribe for unrestricted access.
Explore Current Issue Archive Books & Reviews Anthologies Newsletters Search Subscribe