An End to Reader Comments
And the introduction of letters to the editor.
Scott Jaschik and Doug Lederman
June 24, 2020
Inside Higher Ed has published reader comments about our articles since we launched the site in January 2005. We did so as part of our core belief that good journalism depends on building a sense of community in which readers are able to share their voices. We wanted to ensure that everyone in higher education, regardless of their position or institution, had an opportunity to contribute their perspectives.
At times, the comments have added significantly to our understanding of our readers and their views on higher education and on the various pieces we publish -- positive and negative. And many readers welcome the perspectives of their peers.
Letters to the Editor
Readers have submitted responses
to this blog post. You can view them
here and here, and find all of our
Letters to the Editor here.
In recent years, however, we have had the same challenges many other online publishers face with regard to comments. The comments sections have come to be dominated by a small number of readers. As is true of so many elements of the digital landscape, our comments reflect the coarsening of interpersonal discourse, especially when people communicate anonymously, as the majority of our commenters do. (We allowed anonymous comments to protect vulnerable adjunct professors and staff members who might legitimately fear for their jobs if they were identified.) The comments have become a deterrent for a significant number of our readers and have lost much of their value.
We have previously done our best to tame the worst elements of our comments while sustaining their original promise. Several years ago, we asked readers for feedback and imposed new rules that we hoped would deter those who mistreat others while continuing to provide an open forum for the exchange of perspectives. Unfortunately, those changes were not effective at improving the relevance and civility of comments.
We remain committed to sharing reader perspectives and are excited to announce that we are replacing comments with letters to the editor effective next week, July 1, 2020. Letters have long been a traditional part of news media, and we admire that tradition. Like comments, letters to the editor can provide our readers with new views on key issues. It is our hope that the significance of letters to the editor will encourage thoughtful and civil submissions; if readers disagree with an opinion expressed in an article, they may submit a letter to the editor to respectfully challenge that point of view.
How will letters be different from comments?
We expect to receive fewer letters to the editor than we have received comments. But we hope they will be more substantive and useful. We also hope they will provide a more civil platform for discussion and debate.
Letters to the editor may be sent to letters@insidehighered.com​. As always, you are welcome to communicate with the editors (without anything being published) at editor@insidehighered.com​.
Inside Higher Ed continues to believe that our talented journalists and thoughtful contributors do not own collectively the knowledge and wisdom about what’s happening in higher education and that our readers need to participate in the conversation.
We depend on you and your perspectives to widen our own and those of your peers and hope that you will embrace this new way of doing so.
Scott Jaschik and Doug Lederman, the editors of Inside Higher Ed, founded the publication in 2005.
Read moreScott Jaschik and Doug Lederman
Be the first to know.
Get our free daily newsletter.

I have read & agree to the terms of Inside Higher Ed’s Privacy Policy.*
-Hide comments  
Inside Higher Ed Careers
Hiring? Post A Job Today!
Browse Faculty Jobs
8 Ways to Improve Your Online Course | Higher Ed Gamma
10 strategies to support students and help them learn during the coronavirus crisis (opinion)
EEOC complaint against Stanford alleges DEI program created hostile environment for Jewish staff
School AAUP
The pandemic has called into question a host of generally accepted teaching practices (opinion)
Featured college pages

We have retired comments and introduced Letters to the Editor. Share your thoughts »
You may also be interested in...
Just When I Thought I Was Out, They Pull Me Back In!
Career strategies for balancing grad school and full-time work (opinion)
A first-generation grad student laments the lack of career opportunities in academe (opinion)
Opinions on Inside Higher Ed

A New Roaring Twenties?

Addressing Substance Use in Online Classes
We Need to Cultivate Student Affairs Practitioner Scholarship
Inside Higher Ed’s Blog U
Just Visiting
Just When I Thought I Was Out, They Pull Me Back In!
Tackling Transfer
What Community College Students Tell Us About Transfer
Confessions of a Community College Dean
No Strings Attached
Learning Innovation
The 3 Talent Markets for Nonfaculty Educators
University of Venus
Cultivating Personal and Professional Flourishing in the Academy
Higher Ed Gamma
What the Pandemic Should Have Taught Us About Effective Teaching
News & Views
Student Voice
Teaching & Learning
The Key Podcast
Find a Job
College Pages
Career Advice
Job Alerts
Post a Job
In-Person Events
Editorial Webcasts
Vendor Webcasts
Reports & Data
Special Reports
AAUP Compensation Data
Quick Takes Views Blog U Letters to the EditorAudio Topics Sponsored Content
Free Newsletters Contact Us About UsHire Faculty & Staff Advertise Work For UsTestimonials Rights and Permissions PrivacyShare our content
Copyright © 2021  •  Inside Higher Ed  •  1150 Connecticut Avenue NW Suite 400  •  Washington, DC 20036  •  Ph: 1-202-659-9208  •  Fax: 1-202-659-9381
Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Join the 180,000+ higher ed professionals who start each day with our must-read newsletter.

* I have read & agree to the terms of Inside Higher Ed’s Privacy Policy.
CoronavirusLive UpdatesCuts at a Community CollegeAn Extra Edge for Wealthy Chinese?Anti-Jewish Bias at Stanford?More Large Gifts From MacKenzie ScottAllegations of ‘Playing’ Indigenous