Have library access? Log in through your library
Ethnohistoric Sources on the Pipil-Nicarao of Central America: A Critical Analysis
William R. Fowler, Jr.
Vol. 32, No. 1 (Winter, 1985), pp. 37-62 (26 pages)
Published By: Duke University Press
Cite this Item
Read and download
Log in through your school or library
Purchase article
$15.00 - Download now and later
A substantial corpus of documentary data exists for the ethnohistoric study of the Pipil-Nicarao, the Precolumbian Nahuat-speaking groups of Central America. Since the middle of last century, scholars have shown a sustained interest in the Pipil-Nicarao. But until recently an explicit historiographic analysis of the sources on the Pipil-Nicarao had yet to be conducted. A detailed critical analysis of the authorship, origin, reliability, relative importance, and interrelationships of the sources is presented here. The kinds of information that the sources provide on the Pipil-Nicarao and their neighbors are outlined. The importance of systematic critical studies in ethnohistoric research is emphasized.
Journal Information
Ethnohistory emphasizes the joint use of documentary materials and ethnographic or archaeological data, as well as the combination of historical and anthropological approaches, in the study of social and cultural processes and history. The journal has established a strong reputation for its studies of the history of native peoples in the Americas and in recent years has expanded its focus to cultures and societies throughout the world. Ethnohistory publishes articles, review essays, and book reviews by scholars in anthropology, history, archaeology, linguistics, literature and art history, geography, and other disciplines and is read by historians and anthropologists alike.
Publisher Information
Duke University Press publishes approximately one hundred books per year and thirty journals, primarily in the humanities and social sciences, though it does also publish two journals of advanced mathematics and a few publications for primarily professional audiences (e.g., in law or medicine). The relative magnitude of the journals program within the Press is unique among American university presses. In recent years, it has developed its strongest reputation in the broad and interdisciplinary area of "theory and history of cultural production," and is known in general as a publisher willing to take chances with nontraditional and interdisciplinary publications, both books and journals.
Rights & Usage
This item is part of a JSTOR Collection.
For terms and use, please refer to our Terms and Conditions
Ethnohistory © 1985 Duke University Press
Request Permissions
Explore JSTOR
For Librarians
For Publishers

JSTOR is part of ITHAKA, a not-for-profit organization helping the academic community use digital technologies to preserve the scholarly record and to advance research and teaching in sustainable ways.
©2000-2021 ITHAKA. All Rights Reserved. JSTOR®, the JSTOR logo, JPASS®, Artstor®, Reveal Digital™ and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA.
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Cookie Policy
ITHAKA websites use cookies for different purposes, such as to ensure web site function, display non-targeted ads, provide social media features, and track usage. You may manage non-essential cookies in “Cookie Settings”. For more information, please see our Cookie Policy.
JSTOR Home Log in RegisterSearchAdvanced SearchImage SearchBrowseby Subjectby Titleby Collectionsby PublisherToolsWorkspaceText AnalyzerThe JSTOR Understanding SeriesData for ResearchAboutSupportLog inRegister