U.S. Military Official Says Afghanistan Could See Military Collapse, Civil War After Troops Leave

U.S. military officials are preparing for every possible scenario as their forces plan to leave Afghanistan.

General Mark Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told reporters traveling with him Thursday that the pullout is "complex and not without risk."

The extent to which the Taliban could continue attacking Afghan government forces during the U.S. withdrawal is a concern for the Pentagon. During a Wednesday appearance at the Sedona Forum, which is hosted by the McCain Institute, Milley said as the troops withdraw, military officials will watch the level of Taliban attacks on the Afghan security forces "very carefully."

"In the worst-case analysis, you have a potential collapse of the government, a potential collapse of the military, you have a civil war, and you have all the humanitarian catastrophe that goes with it," he said.

On the other hand, the Afghan military has a lot of experience in countering the insurgents. "So it's not a foregone conclusion that there will be an automatic fall of Kabul, so to speak," the general added.

The U.S. military ended its ground combat operations against the Taliban in 2014 and transitioned to training, advising and supporting Afghan forces with the hope that Afghan government forces could hold their own against the Taliban and that a political settlement could be reached.

President Joe Biden has decided U.S. forces will exit Afghanistan by September 11. May 1 marks an earlier deadline for all U.S. and other foreign forces to leave Afghanistan, under a February 2020 deal between the Taliban and the Trump administration.

Biden Afghanistan Troops
President Joe Biden walks through Arlington National Cemetery to honor fallen veterans of the Afghan conflict on April 14. Brendan SMIALOWSK/AFP via Getty Images

For more reporting from the Associated Press, see below:

As part of that agreement, the Taliban halted attacks on U.S. troops, and none has been killed since then. But the Taliban said it will consider the United States to be in violation of the agreement for missing the deadline for full withdrawal. Their representatives have been vague about whether they intend to attack starting May 1.

Biden's decision to proceed with a final but delayed withdrawal adds a new element of security risk as the remaining 2,500 to 3,500 American troops, along with about 7,000 coalition troops and thousands of contractors, begin departing. Biden has said all will be gone by the date of the 2001 attacks that prompted the U.S. to invade Afghanistan in the first place.

"We have to assume that this drawdown will be opposed," Pentagon press secretary John Kirby said Tuesday in explaining why Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin decided to keep an aircraft carrier in the Middle East and to move at least four B-52 bombers and portions of an Army Ranger task force to the region as a precaution.

"It would be irresponsible for us not to assume that this drawdown and forces drawing down—both American and from our NATO allies—could be attacked by the Taliban," Kirby added.

The military typically plans for worst-case scenarios to try to avoid being caught by surprise. The withdrawal from Afghanistan involves ground and air movements of troops, supplies and equipment that could be vulnerable to attack. For security reasons, withdrawal details are not being made public, but the White House and several defense officials confirmed Thursday that the drawdown has begun. Defense officials, speaking on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive movements, said that in recent days some troops—described as "dozens"—and military equipment have left the country.

The State Department also is taking precautions. On Tuesday, it instructed all embassy personnel in Kabul to depart unless their jobs require them to be in Afghanistan. The order went well beyond the usual curtailment of staffers for security and safety reasons.

Even the most seasoned American analysts of the Afghan conflict are unsure what to expect of the Taliban. Bruce Riedel, a Middle East analyst at the Brookings Institution and former CIA analyst, wrote this week that it's unclear whether the insurgents will attempt to disrupt the withdrawal, but he says they may escalate the war.

Seth Jones, a counterterrorism and Afghanistan expert as director of the international security program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the Pentagon is wise to prepare for attacks, although he thinks the Taliban is likely to show restraint.

"They just want us to go," he said in an interview. "And anything that starts to complicate that at least runs the risk of backfiring." Among other things, killing Americans could prompt the Biden administration to rethink the withdrawal, which already is highly unpopular among many Republicans.

The possibility of resuming conflict with the Taliban is one of several uncertain aspects of the U.S. withdrawal—beyond the key question of whether the pullout will lead to the collapse of the Afghan government. The U.S. intends to continue counterterrorism operations, as needed, against al-Qaida and potentially other extremist groups in Afghanistan, but it's not yet clear where those forces will be positioned. Also unclear is the extent to which American and coalition forces will continue to provide air and other military support for Afghan security forces during and after the withdrawal.

General Frank McKenzie, who as head of U.S. Central Command is responsible for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, has said little publicly about the likelihood of facing Taliban resistance.

"I would advise the Taliban that we will be well prepared to defend ourselves throughout the withdrawal process," he said at a Pentagon press conference last week.

Gen. Milley Afghanistan
Joint Chiefs Chairman Mark Milley arrives ahead of President Joe Biden's address to a joint session of Congress on April 28. Melina Mara/The Washington Post via AP

Uncommon Knowledge

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

Newsweek is committed to challenging conventional wisdom and finding connections in the search for common ground.

About the writer


Lauren Giella is a Newsweek National reporter based in New York. Her focus is reporting on breaking and trending U.S. ... Read more

To read how Newsweek uses AI as a newsroom tool, Click here.

Newsweek cover
  • Newsweek magazine delivered to your door
  • Newsweek Voices: Diverse audio opinions
  • Enjoy ad-free browsing on Newsweek.com
  • Comment on articles
  • Newsweek app updates on-the-go
Newsweek cover
  • Newsweek Voices: Diverse audio opinions
  • Enjoy ad-free browsing on Newsweek.com
  • Comment on articles
  • Newsweek app updates on-the-go