Skip to search formSkip to main contentSkip to account menu

Review [Publication Type]

Known as: reviewed, reviewing, Review 
An article or book published after examination of published material on a subject. It may be comprehensive to various degrees and the time range of… 
National Institutes of Health

Related topics

Related topics

5 relations

Narrower (4)

Review LiteratureReview, AcademicReview, MulticaseReview, Systematic
literature survey

Papers overview

Semantic Scholar uses AI to extract papers important to this topic.
Review
2018
Review
2018
Review of Particle Physics
This biennial Review summarizes much of particle physics. Using data from previous editions, plus 2658 new measurements from 644… 
Review
2015
Review
2015
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of review methods, act as a guard against… 
Review
2011
Review
2011
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration
abstracts can be used to eliminate clearly irrelevant reports, obviating the need to obtain the full text of those reports or to… 
Review
2010
Review
2010
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official document that describes in detail the process of… 
Review
2009
Review
2009
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement
David Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA, an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta… 
Review
2009
Review
2009
The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.
Review
2005
Review
2005
Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework
This paper focuses on scoping studies, an approach to reviewing the literature which to date has received little attention in the… 
Review
2003
Review
2003
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Cochrane Reviews have recently started including the quantity I 2 to help readers assess the consistency of the results of… 
Review
1996
Review
1996
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?
Review
1986
Review
1986
Meta-analysis in clinical trials.
By clicking accept or continuing to use the site, you agree to the terms outlined in our Privacy Policy (opens in a new tab), Terms of Service (opens in a new tab), and Dataset License (opens in a new tab)