Wikidata:Property proposal/CITES Appendix

CITES Appendix

You have not transcluded your proposal on Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic yet. Please do it.

   Ready ^Create

Description	appendix of a taxon according to CITES convention
Data type	Item
Domain	taxon (Q18609040) rank = species, subspecies
Example 1	Gorilla gorilla (Q737838) → Appendix I
Example 2	polar bear (Q33609) → Appendix II
Example 3	MISSING
Planned use	Adding CITES Appendix to all taxons in wikidata
See also	IUCN taxon ID (P627): identifier for a taxon in the International Union for Conservation of Nature database; source for conservation status (P141) CITES Species+ ID (P2040): identifier for a taxon in the Species+ database (CITES) Appendix I of CITES (Q2851528), Appendix II of CITES (Q2851527), Appendix III of CITES (Q2851523) part of (P361): object of which the subject is a part (if this subject is already part of object A which is a part of object B, then please only make the subject part of object A), inverse property of "has part" (P527, see also "has parts of the class" (P2670))

Motivation

Similar to IUCN conservation status (P141) allow to add CITES Appendix (legal and commercial protection status) to taxons.

Note: identifiers properties are already available for both: UICN identifier (Property:P627) and CITES Species+ ID (P2040).

See also https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Wikidata:Property_proposal/Archive/34#P2040  – The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pzwsk (talk • contribs).

WikiProject Taxonomy has more than 50 participants and couldn't be pinged. Please post on the WikiProject's talk page instead.

Discussion

•  Support Johanricher (talk) 17:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Should this be item?--GZWDer (talk) 10:00, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
    • You need a property to link the species (item) to its CITES Appendix (item)--Pzwsk (talk) 20:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)
      • @Pzwsk: So you will change it to item-datatype? Maybe you could just add part of (P361) as qualifier to CITES Species+ ID (P2040) statements. @GZWDer: FYI --- Jura 14:06, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Support --Benoît (discussion) 11:09, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
•  Oppose current form. --- Jura 11:13, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
  • @Benoît Prieur: à mon avis, le type de données ne devrait pas être "string", mais entité. Peut-être on pourrait aussi rajouter l'information dans les déclarations P2040 déjà existantes. --- Jura 11:54, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
    • @Jura1: Thanks, I changed data type to item. On the other suggestion - adding part of (P361) as a qualifier to CITES Species+ ID (P2040) statements - I oppose as a legal status is not a part of his subject but something that can change over time. Best --Pzwsk (talk) 08:55, 21 November 2019 (UTC)
      • If it changes, one could add additional statements. Given the change of datatype, I withdraw my oppose above. --- Jura 10:24, 21 November 2019 (UTC)