User talk:Delusion23

From Wikidata
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Archive 1 (November 2012 – October 2013)

dmoz[edit]

Thank you. I just imported from here. --Kizar (talk) 21:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 22:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

→ ← Merged. Thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 17:01, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mergers please[edit]

→ ← Merged. Thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 17:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Matóndo míngi[edit]

Matóndo míngi
Thank you very much for your work at Lingála Wikipedia, Etienne

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 20:26, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

→ ← Merged. Thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 20:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 20:29, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I couldn't merge these as they both have Chinese links. Delsion23 (talk) 20:39, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 13:46, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

→ ← Merged Thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 20:29, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Subpages[edit]

If a subtemplate isn't a /doc page, please don't delete the item yet. Please discuss at Wikidata:Requests for comment/Interwiki links for subpages first.--GZWDer (talk) 05:26, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I'll hold off deleting any until consensus is reached. Thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 11:23, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, first of all, I wish you a happy new year. Then, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 17:31, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much :) happy new year to you too! → ← Merged Delsion23 (talk) 18:32, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 23:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→ ← Merged Delsion23 (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 23:19, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And Q4996400 and Q2927952. Thanks Pamputt (talk) 23:23, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q5520798 and Q3095108. Pamputt (talk) 23:24, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q3100032 and Q5529544. Pamputt (talk) 23:25, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
→ ← Merged thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 23:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still another one, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 01:14, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And Q12953636 and Q33726. Pamputt (talk) 10:36, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q8347229 and Q9817999. Pamputt (talk) 10:58, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
→ ← Merged thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 11:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Still another one, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 13:19, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And Q3915506 and Q5613359. Pamputt (talk) 13:33, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q35679 and Q56763 Pamputt (talk) 13:40, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q4261493 and Q6547304 Pamputt (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q56760 and Q6747704 Pamputt (talk) 13:46, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q3285748 and Q4280220 Pamputt (talk) 13:47, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q56767 and Q6959573 Pamputt (talk) 13:48, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q36385 and Q15030335 Pamputt (talk) 13:50, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
And Q36730 and Q13155141 Pamputt (talk) 13:52, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
→ ← Merged thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 14:57, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 22:24, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→ ← Merged thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 19:49, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 12:53, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done I cannot merge them as they both contain Russian links. Delsion23 (talk) 17:00, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... Indeed, I ask to Putnik to look at that point. Pamputt (talk) 23:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Delusion23, could you merge these two items which refer to the same thing? Thanks in advance. Pamputt (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

→ ← Merged thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 20:25, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Please see my reply at User talk:Qbot#January 2014. Thanks. Qbot (talk) 17:19, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm curious why have you created a new item for template instead of restoring one merged by error? --Infovarius (talk) 09:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose that's another way of doing it. Don't think it makes that much of a difference. Delsion23 (talk) 11:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Delusion! Wandering around all Wikimedia projects, I also found /doku used on nds-nlwiki (here for example) and user DixonD explained me that Ukrainian Wikipedia also uses /документація for documentation subpages, /пісочниця for sandboxes and /тести for testcases (here's the full discussion). Would you please be so kind to add them to the filter? Thank you, have a good day. — TintoMeches, 00:00, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Just to give credit where it's due, Matěj Suchánek created the filter, not me :D I've added doku, пісочниця and тести to the filter. документація was already present in the filter. Thanks for making new suggestions to be added. Delsion23 (talk) 00:12, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks about that. I've just another question: how does the filter work? I tried to create this item for a test and I added a couple of wikilinks, but I didn't see any tag or notice telling me I'm doing something wrong... — TintoMeches, 15:43, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have asked Matěj to check. Thanks for testing the filter. Delsion23 (talk) 15:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@TintoMeches: I tested the filter on your edits and article_articleid == 0 was the bad condition. Therefore I removed it from the filter. I appreciate that you made such test. At the moment, the filter is only checking edits which created an item (the first edit of an item). For example, when you click on "add links" in Wikipedia and connect such two pages, the filter catches this. I appreciate that you remarked and tested this. I will probably remove article_articleid == 0 if I don't find any possible issues. One possible issue is that it could also check edits of some relevant templates where an invalid link could be. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Matěj Suchánek: it works! Thanks a lot! Last question/proposal: can you add a tag so that users may notice it and understand not to do add them? — TintoMeches, 17:41, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, it seems it's working well, so tag and later warning can be added. If you see false positive catch, ping me or another admin. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:50, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I will. Thank you both for your help, and sorry for my complaints... :D See you! — TintoMeches, 18:07, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q848570 - Boulevard du Temple[edit]

Hello,
Can you please explain me why shouldn't Q848570 be deleted after being merged with Q1851236, or why (huwiki: Boulevard du Temple (dagerrotípia) ) shouldn't be merged into Q848570? I just couldn't understand it. Thanks in advance, Ldorfman (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

RFD[edit]

I've answered your question, thank you for asking me first to letting you know my reason.AldNonUcallinme? 20:35, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taxa[edit]

Hi Delusion23, sorry but I have to ask: has you any knowledge about them? Brya reverted a lot of your „improvements”. And so did I. --Succu (talk) 22:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your changes to Q217549 and Q12294232, Succu. They were confusing ones. Perhaps you can also help at Q143870? With regards to the ones reverted by Brya, I was changing the "taxon name" so that they would link to the right Wikispecies page. I'm always happy to learn if I'm making mistakes. I'm usually just working through taxon 225 violations at User:Delusion23/Taxon 225 violations. Delsion23 (talk) 22:36, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
wood wasp (Q143870): Cited from enwiki „The term wood wasp is a colloquial name applied to various unrelated families of Symphyta”. So whats your solution? You extendend lots of taxon name (P225) with additions in parentheses to clarify the name (constaint). These are not vailid --Succu (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have now seen that the correct thing to do is to add it to the exemptions at "unique value" Property talk:P225. I'll do this instead in the future. With regards to wood wasp I suppose it should be listed as a colloquial name rather than a taxon. Delsion23 (talk) 22:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please, add such exeptions to this List too. --Succu (talk)
✓ Done. I'll make sure I do so in the future. Cheers. Delsion23 (talk) 23:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A good point about the link to Wikispecies. Obviously this was not the way to repair this, but perhaps there can be a workaround? If need be, a new property could be created. - Brya (talk) 06:44, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose it won't really matter once Wikispecies is fully integrated into Wikidata. Unfortunately the project seems to be low in priority. Delsion23 (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, can you restore the item please? The merge [1] was wrong. There are articles like it:Fabio and clear disambig pages like nl:Fabio. Different items for both groups are needed. Holger1959 (talk) 23:58, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can we please discuss just in one place? My talk for example? — TintoMeches, 00:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welfare / Social help / Wellness (medicine) / Welfare State / Social State / Social Insurance / etc ..[edit]

See Wikidata:Interwiki_conflicts/Unresolved/2014, Feb 14th.

Do you have any suggestions on this? Or could you fix it?

P.S. If I'm not responding, please gimme a nudge at en:User:SzMithrandir. Thank you! -- SzMithrandir (talk) 22:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid my guess is as good as yours. I'm only fluent in English so can't translate them all. These conflicts often arise due to topics overlapping and differences between languages. Delsion23 (talk) 22:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah .. too much uniformity arises Anglo-centrism, while the status quo presents a poor international communication. :/ never perfect. SzMithrandir (talk) 04:52, 21 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q9136462[edit]

Sorry, my merge was wrong. The German Category, although it is also by country, distinguishes between dams (made from earth) and barrages. Therefore the way I wanted to connect them didn't work out. Can you please undelete the item, sorry for bothering you.--Debenben (talk) 13:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done. Thanks. Delsion23 (talk) 13:14, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gender item[edit]

Sorry, this is translate error. In hungarian language setting: Q6581097 = "férfi" and Q8441 = "férfi"! I not see this different. Laszlovszky András (talk) 12:22, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question on filter[edit]

Hi! Now I am the one who asks. Filter 14 catches P107 with bad values and filter 28 catches adding P107. So could we stop the filter 14? It's better to know someone's opinion. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 15:48, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replied at your talk page. Delsion23 (talk) 20:59, 26 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A new filter[edit]

Hi! Just letting you know that I created a new filter which is supposed to catch adding links to userpages. It needs to be expanded and I will expand the filter to also catch creating such item with the links. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 17:46, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: In the notes, I wrote "from start"... is it correct? When I asked my dictionary, it said "ab ovo". Strange.

Hey, good work :) Perhaps you mean "from item creation"? Delsion23 (talk) 18:51, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

I can not speak fluent English, so I will use an interpreter. Please do not pay attention to the possible grammatical errors.

Hello! You left on my talk page that I deleted the language links, leaving no other. The problem is that the site, which is referred to an article in Wikipedia, is no longer valid, so the members of some language sections renamed articles "allrovi" on "allmovie", while leaving the redirection. I, if possible, eliminated this problem, but since I'm not well-versed in Wikidata, I may have missed something out of sight. You know, with these articles so much confusion… --Mattmiller3 (talk) 12:05, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've merged them all to the same item as it appears that they all refer to the same thing but many Wikipedia pages haven't been renamed yet. But that isn't Wikidata's problem, it's a problem with the Wikipedias. Wikidata simply holds the links so that all the different languages are connected. Cheers! Delsion23 (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q644636 vs Q229[edit]

Dear Delusion23,

I did delete taht page since I think its a duplicate entry with Q229. Once I had deleted it, I found out that anyway I could not add the Q229 entry to the "Zypern" entry in de. wikipedia.org.

Since the subject "Cyprus" might be somewhat contentious between greek and turkish positions, this could be a reason for the existence of double entries. However: the Q229 seems for me to be the "real" one for Cyprus, and should be the one controlling the "other languages" list in de.wikipedia.org for this article.

I have to admit that do not fully understand this mechanism, and will refrain from fiddling with it before I do. Sorry and thanks for your help in advance!

prefecture of Japan (Q50337):Wrong interwikilink[edit]

https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q50337&diff=109640818&oldid=103552757
https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q50337&diff=137097862&oldid=137097522. Regards--Oursana (talk) 15:04, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's more of a titling issue. Many articles called "Prefectures of Japan" contain a list of them. Delsion23 (talk) 15:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe the title was wrong and the item was mixed. I linked the lists to the existing item. --Oursana (talk) 17:37, 8 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

تفاوت فصد و فلبوتومی[edit]

با سلام و عصر بخیر مشکل این است که دو واژه فصد و فلبوتومی معادل نیستند اولی در طب سنتی بکار میرود و دومی در طب مدرن. ممتشکرم و موفق باشیدPaiamshadi (talk) 14:13, 12 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Human[edit]

Yes, I know. I started reverting today, but didn't had time to complete. I will look up all my recent edits during weekend, so it should be fixed by Monday. Cheers. --Милан Јелисавчић (talk) 22:59, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Delusion23, you deleted this item because of constraint violation based on (P144). I had this item on my watch list and am curious to know what it was to prevent similarities in the future. Perhaps you could give me some more information. Thank you--Oursana (talk) 18:48, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I answered on my talk page. Cheers --Oursana (talk) 23:18, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This merge mixed a plant genus with a fungus genus. Please undo it. --Succu (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This wasn't merged by me. Seems to have been already restored by another admin. Calak is an admin and should be able to restore their mistakes themselves. Delsion23 (talk) 09:21, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q17283515[edit]

As it was on my watch list.. What was it and why does it not comply with notability? Thanks, GerardM (talk) 06:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Thank you for your trust in me, I'll keep up the good work :) Regards --محمد عصام (talk) 18:21, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, restore items RKDartists (Q17299517) and RKDimages (Q17299580). From my point of view they are notable enough because Wikidata have properties RKDartists ID (P650) and RKDimages ID (P350) that create link between databases described in RKDartists (Q17299517) and RKDimages (Q17299580) and other wikidata items. It is very strange if database is not notable, but Wikidata has properties linked to such database. Those items used by gadget to correctly translate those database labels in different languages. And if we are talking about notability from Wikidata point of view, there are some sources like [2], [3], [4], [5], that describes those items and can be used to proof notability. -- Vlsergey (talk) 10:47, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability[edit]

Hello Delusion23
You deleted Christopher J. Stanley (Q17315527)
Christopher J. Stanley (Department of Mineralogy, British Museum (Natural History), London) is a member of the International Mineralogical Association (Ore Mineralogy Commission).
Ref
You deleted Ruslan I. Kostov (Q17315167)
Ruslan I. Kostov (Faculty of Geology and Prospecting, University of Mining & Geology "St. Ivan Rilski", Sofia) is a member of the International Mineralogical Association (New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification).
You deleted Hans-Peter Bojar (Q17315190)
Hans-Peter Bojar (Department of Mineralogy, Landesmuseum Joanneum, Graz) is a member of the International Mineralogical Association (New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification).
Ref
You deleted Q17315200
Andrzej Manecki (Department of Mineralogy, Petrography and Geochemistry, University of Mining and Metallurgy (AGH), Kraków) is a member of the International Mineralogical Association (New Minerals Nomenclature and Classification).
I'm not amused. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 07:01, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Chris.urs-o: The items did not pass WD:N so they got deleted. Unless it is improved soon the item for Peter Bayliss will also be deleted. So far as I can tell these items are not of notable people. The items here get deleted similar to a BLP speedy deletion on Wikipedia. Delsion23 (talk) 18:30, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I want to use Peter Bayliss, Hans-Peter Bojar and Christopher J. Stanley as authors of articles. There is a structural need here. --Chris.urs-o (talk) 04:54, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored them so that you can use them in items. This will make them pass WD:N. We have an incredibly low threshold for notability here. Delsion23 (talk) 17:08, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you. "We have an incredibly low threshold for notability here": I don't agree. I'm tyding up Wikidata:Database reports/Constraint violations/P484, "Single value" violations and "Unique value" violations, at least I'm trying. It is difficult to know what was done, at least for me. Wikidata needs references, references need author (P50) and property author needs items. 'The IMA List of Minerals', rruff.info, mindat.org and mineralienatlas.de rely on "voluntary" work and have mistakes; original references are needed. People turn chief curators and full professors with 45-50 years. You need a PhD, a post-doc, a assistant professor, to qualify as university lecturer, a full professor and an appoitment as country representative at the International Mineralogical Association. This all is a lot of work, at least a 50 cm high pile of scientific publications. This is notable enough for Wikidata, an item of a person doesn't need a lot of memory space. Regards --Chris.urs-o (talk) 04:19, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Used once now. They are needed as values for the property script directionality (P1406).--Micru (talk) 23:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Since you asked...[edit]

When I find more wrongly linked places, rather than doing them myself, I'll ask you to do them, so you can remove all the bot-created properties that may or may not apply any more. For some reason, some bot or people at the fa wiki have decided to link articles on Fooville, Foostate to Fooville on the en wiki which is a dab page in the en wiki and causes much confusion as someone else on the sr wiki and sh wiki seems to have copied many of the erroneous links. And periodically, I find that Fooville, Foostate on fa wiki links to Fooville, Someotherstate on kk wiki and both are linked to the Fooville dab page in English. While my Serbian is pretty good as is my Farsi, my Kazakh is virtually non-existent (except for Turkish cognates which I can usually get) - God help us for the Thai & Vietnamese links, which are basically only phonetically linkable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:43, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, it does appear to be an issue that is common to fa.wiki links. On Wikidata the correct course of action is to remove the links and then place them into the correct item. I'd be happy to help you do this. If you need any help with translating vi or th, the chrome browser has a built in translator (i use this regularly in my Wikidata work) and Google translate can also translate these languages quite well. Cheers. Delsion23 (talk) 16:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

two more I found:

[[fa:آهنگرمحله (مینودشت)]] = [[en:Ahangar Mahalleh, Minudasht]] [[fa:فارسیان (گالیکش)]] = [[en:Farsian, Galikash]]

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 22:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done Delsion23 (talk) 22:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

another... how do you change the link and add to the right link - I always get errors. [[fa:ذبیح‌آباد]] = [[en:Zabihabad]]

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 17:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I simply went to Q8063502 where the English link is located, then click "add" in the "Wikipedia pages linked to this item" section. Then in the site box I put "fawiki", then I paste the Farsi page name you give me into the page box. Then I click save. This should work for you. Delsion23 (talk) 18:10, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I need to change the wikidata of pufferfish/Tetraodontidae since it is linked to the wrong article in arabic wiki. I am not able to do that is there a cure for that?

  • arwiki ...ينفوخ...must be linked to...Tetraodon (not Tetraodontidae)
  • arwiki ...ينفوخية...must be linked to...Tetraodontidae

best regards, Makki98 (talk) 16:27, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Makki98: Done. --Succu (talk) 16:33, 11 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
@Succu: Thanks a lot Makki98 (talk) 14:46, 12 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Q19194126[edit]

This should not have been merged. It is a French translation of the Euripidean play, not the Greek text. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Admin inactivity[edit]

Hello! Unfortunately your admin rights were removed for inactivity. Thanks for your service as an admin. --Rschen7754 06:21, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]