Wikidata:Property proposal/does not have quality (2)
does not have quality[edit]
Originally proposed at Wikidata:Property proposal/Generic
| Description | expected quality that the item does not possess |
|---|---|
| Represents | quality (Q1207505) |
| Data type | Item |
| Example 1 | post-Panamax (Q60196038)does not have qualityaccess (Q57699905) |
| Example 2 | predatory lending (Q949033) -> morality (Q48324) |
| Example 3 | public statement (Q52947181) -> confidentiality (Q2476929) |
| Example 4 | dark photon (Q19358317) -> rest mass (invariant mass) or rest energy (Q1097654) |
| Example 5 | Open Referral (Q17513556)has part(s) (P527)consultant (Q15978655) |
| Planned use | Migration of statements using existing properties like does not have part (P3113) and excluding (P1011) to approximate this meaning |
| See also | has characteristic (P1552), does not have part (P3113), excluding (P1011) |
Motivation[edit]
It is often important to specify that an item does not have a quality that it might otherwise be expected to have, e.g. a quality that other members of its class have. Analogous to does not have part (P3113), which is sometimes made to fit this purpose.
This property was proposed about four months ago and closed for insufficient support, though no real opposition was apparent. It was noted then that using has characteristic (P1552) with "no value" or an "opposite" value are not generally workable alternatives. Hopefully, new examples will motivate discussion.
@Circeus, Pigsonthewing, Germartin1, TomT0m, ArthurPSmith: --Swpb (talk) 18:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Discussion[edit]
Support Valid property, you have my support again Germartin1 (talk) 13:52, 30 January 2019 (UTC)- Support. Thierry Caro (talk) 04:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Support ChristianKl ❪✉❫ 18:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support Dhx1 (talk) 14:52, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
@ChristianKl, Thierry Caro, Germartin1, Swpb, Dhx1: 
Done: does not have characteristic (P6477). − Pintoch (talk) 14:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)